Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 43 issue 4 (december 2009) : 255-258

STUDIES ON DEVELOPMENT OF TENDERIZED CHICKEN GIZZARD AND GOAT HEART PICKLES

A.K. Maiti, S.S. Ahlawat1, N. Khanna
1Deptt. of Animal Products Technology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 004, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Maiti A.K., Ahlawat1 S.S., Khanna N. (2024). STUDIES ON DEVELOPMENT OF TENDERIZED CHICKEN GIZZARD AND GOAT HEART PICKLES. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(4): 255-258. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted to develop vinegar based sweet and sour pickles, separately of
tenderized chicken gizzard and goat heart. Ginger (Zingiber officinale roscoe) + kachri (Cucumis
trigonus Roxb.), (75:25) paste was utilized for preparation of pickles. Chicken gizzard and goat
heart marinated with 10 % (wt. /wt.) paste of natural tenderizers at 4±2 0C for 48 hours. Freshly
processed and stored (27±2 0C) pickles were evaluated for their chemical and physico-chemical
properties. Pickles had 46 to 55% moisture content. The chicken gizzard pickle had significantly
higher protein (25.60 to 24.85%) and low fat (16.71 to 16.85%) content as compared to goat
heart (21.12 to 20.30 and 28.93 to 28.69%, respectively) pickles. Cooking yield of pickles with
gravy ranged between 114.98 and 115.65% indicating significantly (P

REFERENCES

  1. AOAC. (1995). Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists,Washington, D.C.
  2. Buckley, J.D. et al. (1995). J. Animal Sci., 73:3122-3130.
  3. Chen, T.C. and Stinson, R.S. (1983). Poult. Sci., 62:2011-2016.
  4. Greenberg, D.M. and Winnick, T. (1940). J. Biological Chem., 135:761.
  5. Hujjatullah, S. and Baloch, A.K. (1970). J. Food Sci., 35:276-278.
  6. Naveena, B.M. et al. (2004). Meat Science, 68:363-369.
  7. Maiti, A.K. (2006). M.V.Sc. Thesis, CCS HAU, Hisar.
  8. Reema, R. et al. (2005). J. Food Sci. and Technol., 42:289-292.
  9. 258 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH Shukla, P.K. and Srivastava, R.K. (1999). Indian J. Poult. Sci., 34:285-288.
  10. Singh, R.P. and Panda, B. (1984). Livestock Adviser, 9:45.
  11. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1980). Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Calcutta.
  12. Trout, E.S. et al. (1992). J. Food Sci., 57:19.
  13. Witte, V.C. et al. (1970). J. Food Sci., 35:582-585.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)