Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 94-98

EFFECT OF BYPASSING DIETARY FATS FROM BIO-HYDROGENATION ON GROWTH AND NUTRIENT UTILIZATION IN HEIFERS

Mayank Tandon, P.V. Raman Rao1, D.P. Tiwari!, S.N. Rai
1Dairy Cattle Nutrition Division, National Dairy Research Institute, Kamal- 132001 India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Tandon Mayank, Rao1 Raman P.V., Tiwari! D.P., Rai S.N. (2024). EFFECT OF BYPASSING DIETARY FATS FROM BIO-HYDROGENATION ON GROWTH AND NUTRIENT UTILIZATION IN HEIFERS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(2): 94-98. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The present study was conducted to assess the capability of dietary oils with high degree of
unsaturation to act as "sinks" for absorption of bio-hydrogen of the rumen. Three fat capsules of
different oils [soy (T1), sunflower (T2) and mustard (T3)] were fed to treatment groups along with
control (T4). The total fat concentrations (mg/ml serum) were similar in all the treatment groups
throughout the experiment. Per cent FFAs was higher in T.1 than in T2 while T3 and T4 were similar.
The iodine number was higher in T1 and T groups while 1 3 and T4 tended to similar. DMI (kg/day)
was higher in T4 followed by T3, T; and T2• Digestibility of crude protein differed significantly (P

REFERENCES

  1. AOAC. (1990) Official Methods of Analysis. 13th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C.
  2. Blank, F.C. (1999) Handbook of Food and Nutrition. Agro Botanical Publishers, Bikaner, India.
  3. Bondi, AA (1987) Animal Nutrition. John Wiley and Sons, Toranto, New York. pp. 31.
  4. Cox, H.E. and Pearson, D. (1962) The chemical Analysis of Food. Chemical Publishing Co. Inc., New York, 420 p.
  5. Doney, J.M. and Russel, AJ.F. (1969) J. Agric. Sci., 71 : 343.
  6. Folch, J., et aI. (1951) J. BioI. Chem., 191: 833.
  7. Gagliostro, G.K. and Chilliard, y. (1991) J. Dairy Sci., 74: 499-509.
  8. Goering, H.K and Van Soest, P.J. (1970) Agricultural Handbook No. 379: 1-12. Agriculture Research Services, USDA
  9. Goodman, D.S. (l958) J. Amer. Chern. Soc., 80; 3892.
  10. Kennelly, J.J. and Blair, R. (1996) Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 34: 137-152.
  11. Kewalramani, N., et al. (2003) Anim. Nutr. and Feed Technol., 3: 91-105.
  12. Kronfeld, D.S. (1965) Vet. Rec., 77: 30.
  13. McCracken, BA, etaI. (1993) J. Anim. Sci., 71: 1932-1~39.
  14. Mewara, KK (2006) M.V.Sc. Thesis. GBPUA&T, Pantnagar, India.
  15. NRC. (1989) Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle. 6th Rev. Ed. National Academy Science, Washington, D.C.
  16. Phillis, J.w. (1976) In: Veterinary Physiology (J.w. Philillis, ed.), Bristol, U.K pp. 511.
  17. Purushothaman, S. (2004) M. V.Sc. Thesis, GBPUA&T, Pantnagar, India.
  18. 98 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
  19. Raman Rao and Petit, H.V. (2000) The P.D.F. Research Manuscript, Submitted at the Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Lennoxville (Qc), Canada, pp. 1-50.
  20. Snedecor, G.w. and Cochran, w.G. (1968) Statistical Methods. 6th Oxford and IBH, Pub!. Co., Calcutta.
  21. Van Soest, P. (1982) Nutritional Ecology of Ruminant. Publ 0 and B Books, Inc., 1215 NW Kline Place, Covallis,
  22. Oregano 97330, USA, pp. 173-174,264.
  23. William, H. (1975) Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington (12th Edn.). pp.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)