Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 47 issue 3 (june 2013) : 244-246

EFFECT OF A COMMERCIAL FEED ADDITIVE (BIACID®) ON PERFORMANCE, CARCASS TRAITS AND BLOOD PARAMETERS OF BROILERS

A. Zarei*, M. Babainia, H. Noroozian
1Department of Animal Science, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Zarei* A., Babainia M., Noroozian H. (2024). EFFECT OF A COMMERCIAL FEED ADDITIVE (BIACID®) ON PERFORMANCE, CARCASS TRAITS AND BLOOD PARAMETERS OF BROILERS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 47(3): 244-246. doi: .
Eighty broilers from Ross 308 strain were divided into 4 drug regimes.On 28th day of age 2 birds were selected randomly from each replicate and SRBC injected to them via wing’s vein (one ml of SRBC for one kg of live body weight). Seven days after injection, blood samples were collected from those birds and send them to the laboratory for determination of blood parameters. At the end of experiment one bird selected from each replicate, then it killed and carcass traits were determined. Data were analyzed by SPSS software.Results revealed no significant difference among different treatments for weight gain and feed intake while feed conversion ratio differed significantly among different treatment groups. Group with 0.1% Biacid® treatment had the highest and the control group had the lowest feed conversion ratio. Production index had no significant difference among treatments., There was no significant difference among treatments for carcass traits,  except gizzard. No significant difference was observed in heterophile, lymphocyte, monocyte, PVC, RBC and SRBC among different treatments except WBC.  Present results reveal Biacid® to be a good alternative to antibiotics in broiler diet.
  1. Abdel-Fattah, S. A., El-Sanhoury M. H., El-Mednay N. M. and Abdel-Azeem. F. (2008). Thyroid activity, some blood constituents, organs morphology and performance of broiler chicks fed supplemental organic acids. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 7:215-222.
  2. Denli, M., Okan F. and Celik, K. (2003). Effect of dietary probiotic, organic acid and antibiotic supplementation to diets on broiler performance and carcass yield. Pak. J. Nutr. 2:89-91.
  3. Didry.N.,Dubreuil and.Pinkas, M. (1994).Activity of thymol,carvacrol,cinnamaldehyde and eugenol on oral bacteria.Pharmaceutica Acta Hevetiae.69:25-28.
  4. Feighner.S.D. and.Dashkevicz,. M.P (1987).Subtherapeutic levels of antibiotics in poultry feeds and their effects on weight gain, feed efficiency and bacterial cholytaurine hydrolase activity.Applied and Environmental Microbiology.53:331-336.
  5. Klein-Hessling, H., Langhout. D. J. and Wijtten. P. (2004). Volatile Fatty Acids and Essential Oils (BIACID) improve technical performance of Broilers. Proc. Aust. Poult. Sci. Sym.
  6. Krogdahl.A.,(1985). Digestion and absorption of lipids in poultry . Journal of Nutrition.115:675-685.
  7. Maron, J. L. (1982). Shell-dropping behavior of Western Gulls. Auk 99: 365-369.
  8. Mondes.Beimont.R.and M.Carvajal.(1998). Control of Aspergillus favous in maize with plant essential oils and their components. J.Food Prote.61:616-619.
  9. Taylor.D.J.(2001).Effects of antimicrobials and their alternatives. Br.Poultry.Science. 29(suppl);67-68.

Editorial Board

View all (0)