Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 47 issue 3 (june 2013) : 226-230

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE IN CROSSBRED PIGS

P. Pandu Ranga Reddy1, M Gnana Prakash2, B Punya Kumari, J Suresh3, Alok Bharathi4
1Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding College of Veterinary Science, Tirupati – 507 502, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Reddy1 Ranga Pandu P., Prakash2 Gnana M, Kumari Punya B, Suresh3 J, Bharathi4 Alok (2024). GENETIC ANALYSIS OF REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE IN CROSSBRED PIGS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 47(3): 226-230. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Data pertaining to 1662 Large White Yorkshire (LWY)-Desi crossbred piglets maintained at All India Coordinated Research Project on Pigs, Tirupati were used for the present investigation. Significant influence of period on age at I service (AFS), age at I farrowing (AFF), service period (SP) and farrowing interval (FI) and that of season on AFS, AFF and gestation period (GP) were observed. The overall least squares mean AFS, AFF, SP, GP and FI were 329.05 ± 2.9, 440.42 ± 2.80, 171.15 ± 2.97, 111.28 ± 0.26 and 283.87 ± 3.00 days, respectively. Period of farrowing and parity had a significant effect on all the litter traits studied. Genetic group had a significant effect on litter size at weaning and litter weight at birth while season of farrowing did not affect the litter traits studied. The overall least squares mean litter size was 7.59 ± 0.17 at birth and 6.94 ± 0.16 at weaning while the litter weights were 8.40 ± 0.18 at birth and 66.92 ± 1.42 kg at weaning. The genetic, phenotypic and environmental correlations of GP with litter traits varied from -0.49 to 0.69, -0.24 to 0.88 and -0.22 to 0.95 while the corresponding ranges among the litter traits were from -0.59 to 0.69, 0.62 to 0.88 and 0.09 to 0.95, respectively.

REFERENCES

  1. Andrzej Stasiak, Anna karprzyk and Malgor zata salyga. (2006). The effect of the season of farrowing on selected performance traits in pulawska sows. Anim. Sci. Paper Reports 24 (1): 87-91.
  2. Das D, Deka D, Nath D R and Goswami R N. (2005). Estimates of heritability and effects of some non genetic factors on traits of reproduction in Hampshire pig. Indian. Vet. J. 82: 847-50.
  3. Deka D, Goswami R N, Das D and Nath D R. (2002). Effect of non-genetic factors on preweaning body weight and daily weight gain in Hampshire pigs. Cheiron 51: 44-46.
  4. Harvey W R. (1979). Least squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. U.S. Department of Agriculture Research Science and Education Administration.
  5. Kramer C Y. (1957). Extension of multiple range tests to group correlated adjusted means. Biometrics 13: 13-18.
  6. Kumari B P and Rao D S. (2010). Effect of non-genetic factors on the reproductive traits in crossbred pigs. Tamilnadu J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 6: 1-4.
  7. Kumari B P, Rao D S and Ravi A. (2008). Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting the litter traits in desi and crossbred pigs. Indian. Vet. J. 85: 170-72.
  8. Mellagi A P G, Bernardi M L, Bortolozzo F P and Wentz I. (2006). Influence of litter size, parity and mummified fetuses on swine gestation length. Acta-Scientiae-Veterinariae. 34: 307-11. Cited from CAB Abstracts 2007. Acc.No. 20073063667
  9. Milewska W. (2006). Production traits of polish large white sows kept in breeding herds in the Warmia and Mazury region in the year 1998-2002. Anim. Sci. Paper Reports 29 (1): 103-12.
  10. Nath D R, Deka D and Saikia S. (2002). Certain economically important reproductive traits of Hampshire, Large Black and crossbred pigs of Assam. Indian. Vet. J. 79: 715.
  11. Nguyen N H, McPhee C P and Wade C M. (2003). Genetic parameters for reproduction traits in sows of lines selected for growth rate on restricted feeding. Proc. of XV Conference, Assoc. for Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Melbourne, Australia,7-11 July 2003. 245-48. Cited from CAB Abstracts 2003 .Acc.No.20033215338.
  12. Petrocelli H, Bauza R and Franco J. (1994). Productivity of sows: factors affecting litter size. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Produccion Animal 2:147-159. Cited from CAB Abstracts 1996. Acc. No.19960102296.
  13. Pires A V, Lopes P S, Almeida-Torres R-de, Euclydes R F and Costa A R C-da. (2000). Genetic parameters estimation on swine reproductive traits. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 29: 1698-1705. Cited from CAB Abstracts 2001. Acc. No. 20013040515.
  14. Prakash M G, Ravi A, Kumari B P and Srinivas Rao D. (2008). Reproductive and Productive performance of crossbred pigs. Indian. J. Anim. Sci. 78: 1291-97.
  15. Sai Prasanna J, Gnana Prakash M, Gupta B R and Mahender M. (2009). Genetic study on reproductive traits in crossbred pigs. Livestock Res. Rural Develop..21: Article # 142.
  16. Sharma B D and Singh S K. (1995). A genetic and non-genetic study on reproductive and litter traits in exotic, desi and crossbred pigs. National Acad. Sci. Letters. 18(7/8): 153-56. Acc.No.19980100611.
  17. Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Calcutta
  18. Tomasz Schwarz, Jacek Nowicki and Ryszard Tuz. (2009). Reproductive performance of polish large white sows in intensive production- Effect of parity and season. Ann. Anim. Sci. 9: 269-277.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)