Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 44 issue 4 (december 2010) : 254 - 259

IS BIGGER BETTER? PROFIT AND LOSS OF BROILER FARMS IN GOLESTAN PROVINCE OF IRAN

G.A. Ebdal*, A.R. Yazdani, F. Shirani Bidiabadi, A. Shahabadi1
1Department of Animal Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Golestan Province, Gorgan, Iran.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Ebdal* G.A., Yazdani A.R., Bidiabadi Shirani F., Shahabadi1 A. (2024). IS BIGGER BETTER? PROFIT AND LOSS OF BROILER FARMS IN GOLESTAN PROVINCE OF IRAN. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 44(4): 254 - 259. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Like other industries the aim of poultry farmers is to obtain maximum profit from their
resources. Profitable production of broiler is necessary condition for farmer to remain in the
poultry industry. In this study due to importance of poultry farming an attempt has been made to
analyze profit level of small, medium and large scale poultry producers and obtain the most
proper size of poultry farm for the region under the investigation as far as profit is concerned.
Analyzing profit and loss account of different size poultry farms in eastern part of Golestan
province showed that 52% of poultry farms in the area were profit making units, 42% were loss
making units and 6% were active at the breakeven level. The results showed that the most
profitable capacity of poultry farms in the eastern part of Golestan province were units with
production capacity of 20000, analyzing loss making farms revealed that broiler farms with the
capacity of 30000 were making highest level of loss. The result also indicated that the highest level
of resistance against loss was shown by the broiler farms with the production capacity of 10000.

REFERENCES

  1. Amos, T.T (2006). Analysis of Backyard poultry Production in Ondo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry
  2. Science. 5 (3): 247-250.
  3. Bamirol, M.O et al. (2009). Vertical integration and profitability in poultry industry in Ogan and Oyo States, Nigeria. J
  4. Hum EcoI, 27(2): 149-154.
  5. Groen, A. F. Jiang, X. Emerson, D. A. and Verijken, A. (1998). Economic values in broiler breeding. Poultry Sci.
  6. 77:925-933.
  7. Fallah-Khair, A. (2009). Evaluation of Economic values of broiler breeders in partially integrated system. Journal of
  8. Food, Agriculture & Environment .7 (2): 6 2 9 - 6 3 5.
  9. Folorunsho, O. R. and Onibi.G.B. (2005). Assessment of the nutritional quality of eviscerated waste from selected
  10. chicken types. Federal University of Technology. Akure, Nigeria. pp: 300.
  11. Laseinde, E. A. O. (1994). Tropical Agricultural Production Series. Woye and Sons Nig. Ltd. Ilorin, USA, Pp 23-39.
  12. Vol. 44, No. 4, 2010 259
  13. Maqbool, A. (2005).A Case Study of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Department of Environmental and Resource Economics,
  14. Pakistan.
  15. Maqbool, A.A and Bukhsh, K. (2007). A Case Study of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Department of Environmental and
  16. resource economics, Pakistan.
  17. Sheppard, A. (2004). The Structure and Economics of Broiler Production in England. Special studies in Agricultural
  18. University of Exeter centre for rural research lafrowda house. No. 59.
  19. Szentirmay, A. (2007). Analysis of Some Important Cost Factor of Poultry Meat Production. University of West Hungary,
  20. Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences 49 (1).
  21. Unang, Ir. (2003). Profitability and Efficiency of the Broiler Industry in Tasikmalaya. Faculty of Agricultural University of
  22. Siliwangi Tasikmalaya. 27(2): 149-154.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)