Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research
Article Metrics

0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
volume 44 issue 1 (march 2010) : 58 - 60
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE NUTRITIVE VALUES OF OATS AND MAIZE SILAGES IN CROSSBRED GROWING CALVES
1Sher-E-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir,
Shuhama, Alusteng-190 006, India
ABSTRACT
Twelve numbers of growing crossbred calves of uniform age and body weight (6-8 months and
72.25±0.53kg) were randomly divided in to two groups of six calves in each and fed individually on
ad libitum quantities of oats silage (T1) vis-à-vis maize silage (T2) for a period of 90 days. The daily
average as well as the percent of body weight of the dry matter intake did not vary significantly;
however, the intake per kg metabolic body weight in group T1 was significantly lower (75.46±2.31g/
day) in comparison to group T2 (101.06±4.31g/day). The DCP and TDN contents of both the silages
were not significant from each other though the values were higher in oats silage (4.25±0.05and
62.55±0.19) in comparison to the maize silage (3.53±0.05 and 55.02±0.47). The ADG of the calves
did not varies significantly between the groups though the efficiency of feeding observed in T1
(9.94±0.83) group was significantly better compare to group T2 (15.25±2.32). Significantly lower
cost of feeding per kg gain was recorded in the calves with oats silage (Rs. 42.68/kg gain) in comparison
to calves fed with maize silage (Rs. 68.85/kg gain) indicating oats silage have better effect on the
growth performances, nutrient digestibility and cost efficiency in comparison to maize silage in
crossbred growing calves.
72.25±0.53kg) were randomly divided in to two groups of six calves in each and fed individually on
ad libitum quantities of oats silage (T1) vis-à-vis maize silage (T2) for a period of 90 days. The daily
average as well as the percent of body weight of the dry matter intake did not vary significantly;
however, the intake per kg metabolic body weight in group T1 was significantly lower (75.46±2.31g/
day) in comparison to group T2 (101.06±4.31g/day). The DCP and TDN contents of both the silages
were not significant from each other though the values were higher in oats silage (4.25±0.05and
62.55±0.19) in comparison to the maize silage (3.53±0.05 and 55.02±0.47). The ADG of the calves
did not varies significantly between the groups though the efficiency of feeding observed in T1
(9.94±0.83) group was significantly better compare to group T2 (15.25±2.32). Significantly lower
cost of feeding per kg gain was recorded in the calves with oats silage (Rs. 42.68/kg gain) in comparison
to calves fed with maize silage (Rs. 68.85/kg gain) indicating oats silage have better effect on the
growth performances, nutrient digestibility and cost efficiency in comparison to maize silage in
crossbred growing calves.
REFERENCES
- AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn., Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem., Virginia, 22201, USA
- Duncan, B. D. (1955) Biometrics, 11:1-42
- Ranjhan, S. K. (2004) In:Animal Nutrition and Feeding Practices, 6th Edn., Bikash Publishing Pvt. Ltd. 351-408
- Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.(1980). Statistical Methods 8th edn., Oxford & IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi.
- Van Soest, P. J. et al. (1983) Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 10:155
Disclaimer :
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Copyright :
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
In this Article
APC
APC cover the cost of turning a manuscript into a published manuscript through peer-review process, editorial work as well as the cost of hosting, distributing, indexing and promoting the manuscript.
Publish With US
Submit your manuscript through user friendly platform and acquire the maximum impact for your research by publishing with ARCC Journals.
Become a Reviewer/Member
Join our esteemed reviewers panel and become an editorial board member with international experts in the domain of numerous specializations.
Open Access
Filling the gap between research and communication ARCC provide Open Access of all journals which empower research community in all the ways which is accessible to all.
Products and Services
We provide prime quality of services to assist you select right product of your requirement.
Support and Policies
Finest policies are designed to ensure world class support to our authors, members and readers. Our efficient team provides best possible support for you.
Follow us
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research