Land use pattern of BTAD of 2014-15 and 2022-23
Land is the most important input for agricultural production and its supply is inelastic. Growing population density cause a steady increase in the amount of land used for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes. As a result, there is currently very little space for expanding the net area under cultivation. Therefore, the main strategy for attaining greater agricultural growth must be more intensive use of the land area under cultivation. The land use pattern of BTAD across different land categories is shown in Table 1.
Between 2014-15 and 2022-23, the land use pattern shows a clear transformation, reflecting both development pressures and challenges in agriculture. The area under non-agricultural use increased by 6.88 per cent, indicating conversion of farmland for urban growth and infrastructure, while barren and uncultivable land rose slightly by 1.92 per cent. Permanent pasture and grazing land declined sharply by 13.23 per cent, reducing the traditional base for livestock rearing. In contrast, land under miscellaneous tree crops grew by 5.96 per cent, showing a shift towards plantation-based use, while cultivable waste decreased marginally by 3.25 per cent. Fallow lands expanded significantly, with general fallow rising by 35.19 per cent and current fallow by 21.25 per cent. The net area sown declined by -4.78 per cent and the area sown more than once fell steeply by -27.01 per cent, leading to an overall reduction of -11.97 per cent in total cropped area. This indicates declining crop intensity and shrinking agricultural activity. The findings of the study reveal that there has been negative growth rate in area sown more than once has negative growth rate which may be because of inadequate rainfall during off-monsoon season and scarcity of labour. The finding of the study was similar to the findings of
Sreya and Vedhyavathi (2018). They found that Kerala’s land is gradually moving from agriculture to non-agricultural activities and tree-crop plantations, while more land is becoming fallow or barren. Erratic rainfall and scarcity of labour affect the net sown area for which area under current fallow has increased. To increase the production and enhance farmer’s income, it is necessary to discourage the rising tendency in current fallows or to bring current fallows under cultivation
Ahmad et al., (2018).
Growth trends in area of selected crops in BTAD from 2014-15 to 2022-23
Table 2 shows that there has been a sharp decline in the area or share under food crops. Within this group, autumn rice (-2.32) and summer rice (-2.32) shows a decline, while winter rice (1.08) has grown. Winter rice is the most important food crop in the BTAD. Over the study periods, the area of winter rice showed consistent growth. The decline in rice, especially autumn rice and summer rice, may be due to inadequate rainfall and also inadequate irrigation facility.
Gadad et al., (2017) found that except winter rice, summer rice and autumn rice require irrigation facilities to cultivate.
Gyari (2014) found that only farmers with access to natural waterways or who can afford artificial irrigation (bore wells, pump sets) were able to cultivate summer paddy.
Talukdar and Beka (2005) found that high cost, low product price, land degradation, high cost of irrigation, prevailing market distortion and lack of short duration photo insensitive varieties have been identified as main constraints for summer rice cultivation in the non-traditional areas.
In plantation crops, tea 8.2, areca nut 5.66 and banana 1.85 showed good growth, benefiting from stable market demand and favourable agro-climatic conditions. Farmers shift from rice cultivation to plantation because rice cultivation requires more labour and low profit. The cultivation of modern cash crops has brought short term economic benefits,
Paul (2024).
The annual growth rates of all selected horticulture crops are positive by kharif vegetables 3.7, rabi vegetables 7.6, onion 4.1, garlic 2.5 and chilli 2.43 respectively, this may be because of income earn from horticulture.
Joshi et al., (2006) state that farmers who cultivate fruits and vegetables earn 40-60 per cent more income than cereal growers in India.
Saediman et al. (2020) found from their study that the large difference in the net return was one reason for the crop shifting from rice to horticulture production.
Result of using simpson diversity index
Crop diversification indices of BTAD was estimated for the years of 2014-15 and 2022-23 (Table 3). Table 3 shows how the Simpson Diversity Index has changed between 2014-15 and 2022-23. In 2014-15, the index stood at 0.57, which reflects a moderate level of diversity. This means that land use or crop cultivation was spread across a wider variety of options, with no single type dominating heavily. By 2022-23, however, the index had fallen to 0.32.
De and Bodosa (2014) state that the slow progress of irrigation did not help in crop diversity, particularly in off-monsoon season because crop diversification requires irrigation facility because rainfall is not adequate during off seasons.