Data depicted in Table 1 regarding socio-economic profile of the farmers revealed that 52.50 per cent belongs to the middle-age group (36-50 years), followed by 30 per cent in the young age group (25-35 years) and 17.50 per cent in the elderly category. The majority (90%) of respondents were male, while only 10 per cent were female. Educational qualifications indicated that 41.25 per cent had higher secondary education (10+2), 22.50 per cent were graduates and 8.75 per cent had professional education related to Hi-tech agriculture. Meanwhile, 16.25 per cent had middle school education and 11.25 per cent had primary school education, suggesting that most were non-graduates, which may limit their ability to adopt modern agricultural practices. Regarding farming experience, 22.50 per cent of respondents had over 30 years of experience, while 37.50 per cent had 16 to 30 years, 25 per cent had 6 to 15 years and 15 per cent had less than 5 years. Income data show that 72.50 per cent of farmers earned ₹ 1 to 5 lakhs annually, 12.50 per cent earned ₹ 5 to 10 lakhs and 8.75 per cent earned over ₹ 10 lakhs, while 6.25 per cent had income below ₹ 1 lakh, indicating financial instability. Farm size distribution showed 35 per cent were medium farmers, 25 per cent were large farmers and 40 per cent were small or marginal farmers. A critical finding was that 90 per cent of respondents had not received training on digital marketing, while only 10 per cent attended KVK awareness programs, highlighting the urgent need for capacity-building programs to enhance digital marketing knowledge.
The study further assessed farmers’ availability and accessibility to smartphones with internet connectivity. Results in Table 2 showed that 90 per cent of respondents had constant access, while 6.25 per cent could access the internet only at home and 3.75 per cent used smartphones only on the farm. This suggests that smartphones with internet connectivity were widely available among farmers. Farmers were also found to be active social media users, but the study aimed to identify the most frequently used apps. The finding displayed in Table 3 revealed that 97.50 per cent of respondents used WhatsApp, 92.50 per cent used YouTube and 88.75 per cent used Facebook. However, only 20 per cent used Instagram and Twitter (X) was rarely used (10 per cent). During personal interviews, it was reported that farmers primarily used social media for communication, entertainment and non-agricultural purposes.
Given the study’s focus on digital marketing, it was essential to analyse farmers’ access to marketing platforms. Findings exhibited in Table 4 showed that 91.25 per cent had access to agricultural marketing mobile apps, 82.50 per cent to agricultural marketing websites and 95 per cent to social media marketing platforms. Additionally, 60 per cent of farmers had access to email marketing, 55 per cent to mobile marketing, 45 per cent to video marketing and 60 per cent to content marketing platforms. Although farmers had access to online marketing tools, the extent of their usage for marketing agricultural products remains a critical research question.
To assess farmers’ knowledge of digital marketing for agricultural commodities, 42 statements covering various aspects of digital marketing were framed. The mean per cent score (MPS) for each statement was calculated and ranks were assigned accordingly. The results presented in Table 5 provide a comprehensive overview of farmers’ awareness of digital marketing tools and techniques.
The findings reveal that the average knowledge level of farmers regarding digital marketing was 25.97 MPS, indicating low awareness and limited understanding of digital tools for agricultural marketing. The analysis further highlights critical knowledge gaps, particularly in search engine optimization (SEO), Google Ads and online bidding systems, which ranked at the bottom of the hierarchy. No respondent had awareness about SEO, Google Ads, or bidding systems, which play a vital role in enhancing visibility and market reach. This aligns with
(Raghavendra et al., 2023), who found that farmers exhibited low awareness of various e-marketing processes, including digital advertising methods, which are essential for expanding agricultural markets beyond local boundaries.
Above findings indicate a significant gap in farmers’ awareness regarding online marketing.
Karountzos et al., (2024) also reported that farmers’ lack of knowledge about essential digital marketing techniques, including SEO and content marketing, limits their ability to effectively market agricultural products online. The study further suggests that low awareness of digital advertising methods hinders the potential for expanding agricultural markets beyond local boundaries.
The study also assessed farmers’ familiarity with agricultural e-marketing platforms such as the e-NAM mobile app, which plays a crucial role in digital transactions for agricultural commodities. Findings reveal that knowledge about e-NAM’s operation and working process was extremely low, with an MPS of only 1.25 (Rank XXXIX), indicating that farmers lacked awareness about how to use the platform for marketing their produce. This limited awareness hinders farmers’ ability to participate in digital markets, making it imperative to introduce training programs to educate them about e-NAM and its potential benefits. This finding is in the line of
Raghavendra et al., (2023) who reported that awareness about different e-marketing processes among farmers is relatively lower in certain regions, emphasizing the need for capacity-building programs to enhance knowledge about trading processes.
Similarly, knowledge about methods to increase website traffic ranked XXXVIII with an MPS of 2.25, suggesting limited understanding of website promotion strategies. Generating traffic is a key component of digital marketing and without adequate knowledge, farmers may struggle to attract potential buyers to their online platforms. Advertising and marketing agricultural commodities through blogging websites ranked XXXVI with an MPS of 3.55, indicating minimal knowledge about blogging as a marketing tool. Blogging is highly effective in sharing detailed product information, yet the lack of awareness prevents farmers from leveraging its full potential. Similarly, knowledge about sources for creating digital marketing websites ranked XXXV with an MPS of 4.26, suggesting that many farmers were unaware of how to establish an online presence. Addressing this gap could provide farmers with platforms to showcase their products to a larger audience. These findings are consistent with
Vasumathi and Arun, (2021) who noted that the agricultural sector has not yet capitalized on marketing technology and that the adoption of digital marketing practices would empower agricultural producers by improving their marketing capabilities.
Findings indicate that knowledge about marketing through Amazon and Flipkart ranked XXXIII with an MPS of 6.60, implying that some farmers have a basic understanding of e-commerce platforms. However, comprehensive training is needed to enable them to utilize these platforms effectively. Similarly, awareness of types of digital marketing content ranked XXXII with an MPS of 7.96, suggesting limited knowledge about content diversification, which is essential for engaging customers. The study found that farmers’ knowledge of digital marketing using content creation ranked XXXI with an MPS of 10.45, reflecting that some farmers possess a reasonable understanding of content-based marketing. However, this remains insufficient, as digital content plays an essential role in branding and customer engagement. Additionally, knowledge about WhatsApp Business for farm commodity marketing ranked XXX with an MPS of 10.75, showing that only a few farmers use WhatsApp for business purposes. Given WhatsApp’s widespread usage, increasing awareness of its marketing capabilities is essential.
Kulkarni, (2020) also found that while WhatsApp was the most popular social media platform among farmers, there were challenges in adopting social media due to lack of technical knowledge and understanding of its working.
Marketing agricultural commodities through Facebook pages and groups ranked XXIX with an MPS of 12.50, showing that some farmers are familiar with Facebook’s potential for digital marketing. However, knowledge about Facebook ad types was low (MPS 14.44, Rank XXVIII), indicating limited understanding of Facebook’s advertising features, which could be crucial for reaching targeted customers. The four Cs of digital marketing-consumer, cost, convenience and communication-ranked XXVII with an MPS of 14.66, revealing low awareness of these fundamental marketing principles. Educating farmers about these principles could help them develop more effective marketing strategies. Furthermore, knowledge about essential components of good web content ranked XXVI with an MPS of 16.80, suggesting a basic understanding of content quality, which is crucial for digital marketing success.
Farmers’ awareness of platforms that facilitate digital marketing ranked XXV with an MPS of 17.85, showing some familiarity with online marketing websites but a lack of comprehensive knowledge on their utilization. Similarly, knowledge about mobile apps for agricultural marketing ranked XXIV with an MPS of 18.75, reflecting limited familiarity with agricultural e-commerce applications. Encouragingly, awareness about YouTube marketing and farm video advertising ranked XXIII with an MPS of 18.75, suggesting that many farmers recognized YouTube’s potential for digital marketing. Given that video content is highly effective in engaging audiences, this moderate level of awareness is promising but requires further improvement. Similarly,
Sarje et al., (2024) reported that variables such as education, extension contact and possession of ICT tools were positively related to the utility perception of YouTube among farmers.
Farmers also showed moderate awareness of digital marketing platforms (MPS 18.85, Rank XXII) and e-NAM’s trading/payment systems (MPS 20.54, Rank XXI). Knowledge of email marketing ranked XX with an MPS of 22.75, while understanding of common digital marketing mistakes ranked XIX with an MPS of 24.88, indicating that many farmers were aware of common pitfalls in digital marketing.
The study further found that knowledge about digital marketing through videos ranked XVIII with an MPS of 25, showing that many farmers recognized the effectiveness of video marketing. Awareness of mobile payment gateways was 28.25 MPS (Rank XVI), while understanding of social media marketing strategies ranked XV with an MPS of 32.95, suggesting growing familiarity with social media as a promotional tool. The top-ranked aspects included WhatsApp marketing (MPS 42.8, Rank X), Facebook marketing (MPS 48.90, Rank VII) and YouTube for digital marketing (MPS 50.90, Rank VI), showing that these platforms were relatively well-known among farmers. However, the highest-ranked statement was awareness about the Meri Fasal Mera Byora (MFMB) Haryana portal, with an MPS of 95 (Rank I), indicating strong familiarity among farmers with this state-run platform.
Overall, the findings suggest that while farmers have some knowledge of digital marketing tools, major gaps remain in advanced concepts like SEO, paid advertisements and content marketing strategies. Addressing these deficiencies through structured training programs can significantly enhance farmers’ digital literacy and market reach.
To validate these results, a Shapiro-Wilk test (Table 6) confirmed that the data was not normally distributed (p = 0.005<0.05). Consequently, a Friedman test was conducted, revealing a statistically significant difference between statements (p=0.000<0.05). These findings emphasize the need for structured training programs to bridge the knowledge gap in digital marketing for farmers.