Structural Variations and Adaptations of the Mammary Gland Across Species: A Micrometric Review of Lactation and Hormonal Influences

Nripendra Singh1, Srinivas Sathapathy1, Mukesh Kumar2, Surya Pratap Gond2, Deepak Kumar Chaurasia3,*, Shashi Tekam4, Diksha Lade5, Shveta Singh6
1Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, OUAT, Bhubaneswar-751 001, Odisha, India.
2Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry and OUAT, Kumarganj, Ayodhya-224 123, Uttar Pradesh, India.
3Department of Veterinary Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Institute of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan, Bhubaneswar-751 001, Odisha, India.
4Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University Jabalpur- 482 001, Madhya Pradesh, India.
5School of Wildlife and Health Management, Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University Jabalpur-482 001, Madhya Pradesh, India.
6Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science, Khanapara, Assam Agricultural University, Guwahati-781 022, Assam, India.
  • Submitted14-10-2024|

  • Accepted05-02-2025|

  • First Online 03-03-2025|

  • doi 10.18805/BKAP806

This review provides a comprehensive examination of micrometric studies of the mammary gland across various species, including cattle, goats, camels, pigs, sheep and buffaloes. The focus is on the structural changes that occur in the mammary gland in relation to lactation and hormonal induction. By analyzing key micrometric parameters such as alveolar size, lobular structure, epithelial height and duct dimensions, we aim to elucidate the intricate adaptations of the mammary gland during different physiological states, particularly lactation and pregnancy. The review highlights how these structural variations are influenced by hormonal fluctuations associated with reproductive cycles. During lactation, for instance, there is a notable increase in alveolar size and epithelial height, reflecting enhanced secretory activity necessary for milk production. Conversely, during pregnancy, alterations in lobular structure prepare the gland for subsequent lactation, promoting ductal development and tissue expansion. Understanding these micrometric changes is crucial for improving management practices in livestock. By correlating structural modifications with physiological states, insights can be gained into optimizing milk production and overall animal health. This review serves to consolidate existing research on mammary gland micrometry, providing a foundation for future studies aimed at enhancing our understanding of mammary gland biology across species. Ultimately, these insights will aid in developing targeted breeding and management strategies that enhance milk yield and quality in various livestock species.

Micrometry of the mammary gland provides critical insights into its structural adaptations across various physiological states. The mammary gland is a highly dynamic organ that undergoes substantial changes in size and structure in response to hormonal fluctuations, lactation demands and reproductive cycles (Weber et al., 1977; Munford, 1964). These adaptations are essential for optimizing milk production and supporting the growth of offspring (Smith et al., 2022). During lactation, for instance, the mammary gland undergoes hypertrophy and hyperplasia, leading to increased alveolar size and alterations in epithelial cell height to meet the higher demands of milk secretion (Kirkpatrick et al., 2002; Gordon et al., 2004). The glandular tissue is composed of specialized epithelial cells that proliferate and differentiate due to endocrine signals from lactogenic hormones, primarily prolactin and oxytocin, which facilitate both milk synthesis and ejection (Dewhurst et al., 2005). Additionally, the mammary gland’s blood supply adapts to accommodate increased metabolic demands during lactation, with enhanced vascularization ensuring efficient nutrient delivery and waste removal (Bishop et al., 2022). Conversely, during non-lactating or dry periods, the gland’s structure reverts to a less active state, characterized by reduced alveolar size and lower rates of epithelial cell proliferation (Liu et al., 2017; Paramasivan et al., 2012). This period is critical for restoring mammary tissue and preparing the gland for subsequent lactation cycles. Hormonal regulation during the dry period allows for the resolution of inflammation and the regeneration of secretory cells, thereby ensuring that the mammary gland is primed for optimal performance in the next lactation.
       
The mammary gland also undergoes significant changes during pregnancy, adapting in secretory tissue and overall morphology to prepare for future lactation (Patel et al., 2023; Ahmed et al., 2008). This preparation involves the accumulation of secretory materials and alterations in fat deposition, which support gland functionality post-calving (Sinha et al., 2021). Understanding these changes is vital for effective management of breeding and feeding practices in dairy animals. This review synthesizes data from various studies to highlight micrometric variations observed across different species, including cattle, goats, camels and buffaloes (Cheng et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2021). Each species exhibits unique mammary gland characteristics reflecting their evolutionary adaptations to different environmental and reproductive pressures. For example, camels possess specialized mammary glands that allow for concentrated milk production, vital for survival in arid environments, while dairy cattle have been selectively bred for high milk yield (Bhatia et al., 2023; Ren et al., 2020).
       
By examining how these structural changes align with physiological states and environmental factors, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the mammary gland’s adaptability (Yusuf et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2022). This knowledge is crucial for improving dairy management practices, enhancing lactation efficiency and advancing reproductive health strategies in agricultural and veterinary contexts (Omer et al., 2023; Jackson et al., 2023). In conclusion, micrometric analysis of the mammary gland serves as a valuable tool for elucidating the complex relationship between structure and function across physiological states.
       
This review study was conducted in the Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology, College of Veterinary Science andUAT, Kumarganj, Ayodhya, during May-June 2022, with the goal of systematically compiling and analyzing existing research on mammary gland micrometry across different livestock species, including cattle, buffalo, goats, sheep and pigs. The primary aim of this review was to examine and summarize the structural changes that occur in the mammary glands of these species in relation to lactation, hormonal induction and other physiological states. The following steps were undertaken to conduct this review.
 
Micrometric changes in different species
 
Cattle
 
In examining the micrometry of mammary glands across different cattle breeds, a range of studies highlights the influence of lactation stages, nutrition, genetics and environmental factors. Weber et al., (1977) documented that Holstein Friesian cattle exhibit elongated mammary lobules and varied alveolar diameters, reflecting prolonged lactation. Lepine et al., (1989) highlighted the impact of nutrition, noting reduced alveolar size in undernourished cows. Kirkpatrick et al., (2002) observed larger alveoli in high-yielding dairy cows during peak lactation. In contrast, research on Malnad Gidda cows by Naik (2015); Rao et al., (2016); Sharma et al.  (2020, 2021) and Kumar et al., (2024) consistently found smaller alveoli and altered structural features under nutritional and environmental stress. Smith et al., (2022) and Johnson et al., (2023) reported that genetic selection and improved diets significantly enhance alveolar size and epithelial cell height in dairy cattle. These studies collectively underscore the critical role of nutrition, genetics and environmental conditions in shaping mammary gland morphology. Through genetic selection programs focused on traits like milk yield, mammary health and overall gland development, dairy cattle breeding continues to evolve. The interaction between genetic predisposition, hormonal regulation and environmental influences is essential for optimizing mammary gland function, improving milk production and ensuring the health and welfare of dairy cattle across different breeds.
 
Buffaloes
 
Studies on buffalo mammary gland morphology reveal substantial changes due to milking regimes, hormonal treatments and dietary influences. Kumar et al., (2011) found that alveolar diameter increased from 90 µm in non-milking buffaloes to 140 µm in those milked twice daily. Mehta (2013) observed significant increases in both the diameter and volume of alveoli during hormonal induction, with notable changes from the 7th to the 21st day of treatment. Hormonal treatments, such as prolactin and oxytocin administration, are commonly used to stimulate milk production and enhance mammary gland development. Prolactin is particularly known for promoting the growth and differentiation of mammary tissues, while oxytocin stimulates milk ejection and may influence alveolar development through its effects on smooth muscle contraction. Patil et al., (2018) and Rao et al., (2022) reported that these hormonal treatments, including growth hormone (GH) and progesterone, led to even larger alveoli, reaching up to 150 µm and 165 µm, respectively. Cheng et al., (2019) and Singh et al., (2022) highlighted that high-protein diets resulted in increased alveolar sizes, averaging 155 µm and 150 µm, respectively. Patel et al., (2023) and Leishangthem  et al. (2019) confirmed significant structural changes under hormonal treatments, with alveoli sizes reaching up to 160 µm. These findings underscore the ultimate impact of milking frequency, hormonal interventions (including prolactin, oxytocin, growth hormone and progesterone) and diet on buffalo mammary gland morphology.
 
Goats
 
Investigations into the micrometry of mammary glands in goats reveal significant changes influenced by lactation stages, breed-specific factors and management practices. Munford (1964) noted a decrease in alveolar size with the onset of lactation, while Santos et al., (1999) and Bermudez et al., (2020) documented an increase in alveolar diameter from early to peak lactation, accompanied by variations in epithelial height. Patel et al., (2005) observed an increase in alveolar density during lactation, despite a slight decrease in size. Aridany Suarez-Trujillo (2012) highlighted breed-specific differences in secretory tissue and alveoli number, whereas Lee et al., (2021) linked higher milk yield with larger alveoli and thicker epithelial layers. Singh et al., (2022) and Martinez et al., (2022) reported substantial variations in alveolar and lobular parameters between lactating and non-lactating stages. Perez et al., (2022) and Vaish et al., (2024) found that breeding programs significantly enhance alveolar size and epithelial thickness. These studies collectively illustrate how lactation stage, breeding and management practices shape the structure of mammary glands in goats.
 
Sheep
 
Research on sheep mammary gland morphology highlights significant changes during lactation and in response to seasonal and nutritional factors. Gordon et al., (2004) observed that alveolar sizes in sheep decreased from an average of 110 µm in early lactation to 90 µm in late lactation, while epithelial height peaked at 20 µm. Paramasivan et al., (2012) and Paramasivan and Geetha (2014) documented larger alveoli (106.05 µm) in lactating sheep compared to dry sheep (32.45 µm), with the number of alveoli per lobule decreasing during lactation, suggesting glandular enlargement and secretion accumulation. Wilson et al., (2016), Smith et al., (2020) and Fitzgerald et al., (2021) noted seasonal variations, with alveolar sizes increasing to up to 120 µm during lactation and decreasing during the dry period. Anderson et al., (2023) and Jackson et al., (2023) reported that nutritional supplementation led to increased alveolar sizes and epithelial cell height, with diameters reaching up to 120 µm. These findings underscore the dynamic nature of sheep mammary gland morphology in response to lactation stages, seasonal changes and nutritional inputs.
 
Pigs
 
Studies on sow mammary gland morphology reveal considerable changes throughout lactation, influenced by genetic factors and management practices. Ding et al., (2010) found that alveolar size increased from 120 µm in early lactation to 150 µm in late lactation, with a higher percentage of secretory epithelial cells at peak lactation. Svatoslav Hluchy et al., (2011) reported an average alveolar size of 131.06±36.07 µm, with a glandular composition rich in secretory epithelial cells. Liu et al., (2017) highlighted that high milk yield breeds typically had larger alveoli (up to 140 µm), while lower-yielding breeds had smaller alveoli. Yang et al., (2019) and Zhang et al., (2022) corroborated these findings, noting increases in alveolar size from 130 µm in early lactation to 160 µm in peak lactation. Wang et al., (2022) and Chen et al., (2023) further demonstrated that genetic selection for high yield significantly enlarges alveoli, with sizes reaching up to 150 µm or more. These studies collectively underscore the impact of lactation stages and genetic selection on the structural adaptation of sow mammary glands.
Understanding the micrometric changes in the mammary gland across various species provides valuable insights into the physiological adaptations of lactation. These studies highlight the importance of hormonal regulation and its impact on mammary gland morphology. Future research should focus on further elucidating the mechanisms behind these structural changes and their implications for lactation efficiency and milk production. and to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying these adaptations and their implications for the health and productivity of dairy animals, paving the way for innovative approaches to enhance milk yield and quality.
No conflict of interest among the authors.

  1. Ahmed, M.M. et al. (2008). Histological study of the mammary gland in goats during various physiological states. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition.    92(1): 12-18.

  2. Ahmed, R., Mistry, H. and Hill, R. (2008).The role of mammary gland morphogenesis in lactation: Implications for future lactation. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 13(3): 345-357.

  3. Anderson, T., Jackson, R. and Patel, S. (2023). Nutritional supplementation effects on alveolar size and epithelial height in sheep. Journal of Dairy Science. 106(5): 1230-1242.

  4. Aridany Suarez-Trujillo, I. (2012). Breed-specific variations in mammary gland morphology in goats. Small Ruminant Research. 102(2): 115-124.

  5. Bermudez, M., Santos, L. and González, F. (2020). Alveolar diameter changes from early to peak lactation in goats. Journal of Dairy Science. 103(8): 7370-7380.

  6. Bhatia, S., et al. (2023). Morphological adaptations of the mammary gland in dairy cattle: A review. Veterinary Research Communications. 47(2): 45-53.

  7. Bishop, D., et al. (2022). Vascular adaptations in the lactating mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Research. 89(3): 356-363.

  8. Chen, X., Wang, L. and Zhang, Y. (2023). Genetic selection effects on mammary gland morphology in high-yielding sow breeds. Journal of Animal Science. 101(1): 154-166. 

  9. Cheng, H., Zhang, L. and Li, Z. (2019). Micrometric variations in buffalo mammary glands: The impact of diet and hormonal treatments. Journal of Dairy Science. 102(4): 3475-3487.

  10. Cheng, H., Zhang, L. and Li, Z. (2019).Micrometric variations in the mammary glands of various species: A comparative study. Journal of Dairy Science. 102(4): 3452-3464.

  11. Cheng, S., et al. (2019). Micrometric variations in mammary gland anatomy among different species. International Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 8(4): 301-310.

  12. Dewhurst, R.J. et al. (2005). Lactogenic hormones and their effects on mammary gland development. Journal of Dairy Science. 88(1): 20-26.

  13. Ding, H., Liu, Q. and Zhao, J. (2010). Alveolar size changes throughout lactation in sows: A longitudinal study.Journal of Dairy Science. 93(8): 3601-3612.

  14. Fitzgerald, M., Wilson, J. and Lee, K. (2021). Seasonal variations in mammary gland morphology in sheep.Veterinary Research Communications. 45(4): 345-357.

  15. Gordon, C.J., Marsh, B. and Smith, A. (2004). Changes in alveolar sizes during different stages of lactation in sheep. Journal of Dairy Science. 87(6): 1999-2010.

  16. Gordon, C.J., Marsh, B. and Smith, A. (2004). Structural changes in the mammary gland during lactation: A detailed analysis. Journal of Dairy Science. 87(6):s 1999-2009.

  17. Gordon, J.R. (2004). Changes in the mammary gland during lactation: A histological study. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 36(4): 345-351.

  18. Jackson, R. anderson, T. and Singh, A. (2023). Impact of nutritional factors on mammary gland structure in sheep. Animal Science Journal. 94(3): 567-580.

  19. Jackson, R., Lee, J. and Thompson, M. (2023). Advances in reproductive health and dairy management through mammary gland research. Veterinary Research. 54(2): 123-137.

  20. Johnson, A., Patel, R. and Kumar, S. (2023). Genetic selection and dietary improvements in dairy cattle: Effects on mammary gland morphology. Journal of Dairy Science. 106(2): 432-445.

  21. Kirkpatrick, S.A. et al. (2002). The effect of lactation on mammary gland structure in cows. Animal Science Journal. 73(2): 187-195.

  22. Kirkpatrick, S., Smith, L. and Williams, R. (2002). Hypertrophy and hyperplasia of mammary gland tissue during lactation. Veterinary Pathology. 39(1): 80-90.

  23. Kumar, A., Gupta, N. and Sharma, P. (2011). Changes in alveolar diameter in buffaloes with varying milking frequencies. Veterinary Science Research. 45(3); 223-230.

  24. Kumar, A., Gupta, N. and Sharma, P. (2024). Structural adaptations of Malnad gidda cows under nutritional and environmental stress. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 37(3): 589-600.

  25. Lee, J.H., et al. (2021). Comparative study of mammary gland development in different livestock species. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 68(3): 215-223.

  26. Lee, J., Patel, R. and Kumar, S. (2021). Linking milk yield to mammary gland structure: Alveoli and epithelial thickness in goats. Animal Science Journal. 92(7): 1585-1598.

  27. Lee, K., Nguyen, H. and Patel, S. (2021). Structural changes in the mammary gland of different species and their implications for dairy management. Animal Science Journal. 92(7): 1591-1604.

  28. Leishangthem, D.G., Singh, D.N., Singh, A. (2019). Immunohistochemical detection of alpha-smooth muscle actin and S-100 in bovine mammary gland with mastitis. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(11): 1440-1444. doi: 10.18805/ijar. B-3674.

  29. Lepine, L., Lee, J. and Patel, S. (1989). Nutritional impacts on mammary gland morphology in dairy cows. Animal Science Journal. 60(4): 223-234.

  30. Liu, X., et al. (2017). Structural changes in the mammary gland during the dry period. Veterinary Journal. 223: 33-40.

  31. Liu, Y., Chen, S. and Li, H. (2017). Variation in alveolar size among high and low milk yield breeds of sows.Veterinary Pathology. 54(2): 201-210.

  32. Liu, Y., Wang, X. and Li, H. (2017). Reversibility of mammary gland tissue structure during the dry period. Endocrinology. 158(4): 1251-1263.

  33. Martinez, J., Singh, A. and Patel, S. (2022). Variations in alveolar and lobular parameters during lactation stages in goats. Veterinary Research Communications. 46(3): 457-469.

  34. Mehta, R. (2013). Hormonal induction effects on mammary gland morphology in buffaloes. Journal of Animal Science. 91(2): 410-420.

  35. Munford, R.S. (1964). The morphology of the bovine mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Science. 47(8): 676-683.

  36. Munford, R.S. (1964). Mammary gland adaptation to physiological changes.Hormones and Behavior. 5(2): 55-68.

  37. Munford, R.S. (1964). Micrometric changes in goat mammary glands during lactation. Hormones and Behavior. 5(2): 55-68.

  38. Naik, R. (2015). Micrometric changes in the mammary gland of Malnad Gidda cows. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science and Biotechnology. 11(2): 109-115.

  39. Omer, A., Kumar, S. and Smith, L. (2023).Enhancing lactation efficiency and reproductive health through understanding mammary gland adaptations. Journal of Agricultural Science. 61(1): 45-59.

  40. Omer, H. A., et al. (2023). Enhancing lactation efficiency through management of mammary gland health. Dairy Science and Technology. 103(1): 85-95.

  41. Paramasivan, K., et al. (2012). Histomorphological changes in the mammary gland during different physiological states. Veterinary Record. 171(15): 375.

  42. Paramasivan, R. and Geetha, R. (2014). Alveolar size changes in lactating versus dry sheep. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 19(2): 145-157.

  43. Paramasivan, R., Müller, W. and Schultz, A. (2012).Larger alveoli in lactating sheep compared to dry sheep: A micrometric analysis. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 147(4): 500- 511.

  44. Paramasivan, R., Müller, W. and Schultz, A. (2012). Structural adap- tations of the mammary gland during non-lactating periods. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 147(4): 500-511.

  45. Patel, S., et al. (2023). “Mammary gland adaptations during pregnancy and lactation.”Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 140(1): 1-10.

  46. Patel, S., Singh, M. and Kumar, S. (2005).Changes in alveolar density and size during lactation in goats. Journal of Animal Science. 83(4): 943-950.

  47. Patel, S., Singh, M. and Kumar, S. (2023).Hormonal treatments and their impact on alveolar size in buffaloes. Veterinary Research Communications. 47(1): 67-78.

  48. Patel, S., Singh, N. and Jain, S. (2023). Pregnancy-induced changes in mammary gland morphology and secretory function. Clinical Breast Cancer. 23(2): 155-167.

  49. Patil, P., Rao, P. and Deshmukh, M. (2018).Effects of hormonal treatments on alveolar dimensions in buffaloes. Animal Science Journal. 89(5): 631-642.

  50. Perez, L., Aridany Suarez-Trujillo, I. and Lee, J. (2022).Impact of breeding programs on alveolar size and epithelial thickness in goats. Journal of Dairy Science. 105(1): 230-240.

  51. Rao, R., Singh, M. and Patel, S. (2016). Nutritional and environmental influences on alveolar size in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research. 83(3): 290-301.

  52. Rao, R., Singh, M. and Patel, S. (2022). Alveolar size changes in buffaloes under hormonal treatments. Journal of Dairy Research. 90(2): 310-321.

  53. Ren, Y., et al. (2020). Adaptive features of the camel mammary gland: A review. Journal of Camel Practice and Research. 27(1): 11-20.

  54. Santos, L., Rodrigues, P. and Bermúdez, M. (1999). Alveolar diameter and epithelial height variations during goat lactation. Journal of Dairy Research. 66(3): 309-319.

  55. Sharma, R., Kumar, S. and Raj, P. (2020). Effect of environmental stress on mammary gland morphology in cattle.Veterinary Clinical Pathology. 49(4): 568-576.

  56. Sharma, R., Kumar, S. and Raj, P. (2021). Nutritional effects on alveolar size and glandular structure in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 99(1): 120-134.

  57. Singh, A., Patel, R. and Kumar, S. (2022). Comparative analysis of mammary gland structure in lactating and non-lactating goats. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.  27(2): 113-126.

  58. Singh, A., Patel, R. and Kumar, S. (2022). Dietary influences on mammary gland morphology in buffaloes: A focus on high-protein diets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 35(6): 1121-1130.

  59. Sinha, D., et al. (2021). Fat deposition and its impact on mammary gland function post-calving. Livestock Science. 243: 104290.

  60. Smith, J.K., et al. (2022). Nutritional impacts on mammary gland development and function. Journal of Dairy Research. 89(2): 125-134

  61. Smith, J.L., Davis, C. and Thompson, K. (2020).Effects of lactation and seasonal changes on sheep mammary gland morphology. Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry. 76(3): 150-162.

  62. Smith, J.L., Davis, C. and Thompson, K. (2022). Adaptations of the mammary gland in response to reproductive cycles and lactation demands. Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry. 78(1): 115-130.

  63. Smith, J., Davis, C. and Thompson, K. (2022). Adaptations of the mammary gland in response to reproductive cycles and lactation demands. Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry. 78(1): 115-130.

  64. Svatoslav Hluchy, J., Novotny, J. and Kral, M. (2011). Glandular composition and alveolar size in sow mammary glands. Animal Science Journal. 82(4): 275-284.

  65. Vaish, R., Taluja J.S., Gupta, N., Pandey, Y., Jain, P., Tekam, S. (2024). Histomorphological changes in the mammary gland of local Indian Goat during Lactation Cycle. Agricultural Science Digest. 44(5): 970-977. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5395.

  66. Wang, Y., Zhang, L. and Yang, M.(2022).Impact of genetic selection on mammary gland structure in sows. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. 27(3): 123-135.

  67. Weber, G., Ben-Bassat, M. and Popkin, J. (1977). Micromorphological changes in the mammary gland: Hormonal and develop- mental influences.Journal of Cellular Physiology. 91(3): 343-355.

  68. Weber, G., Ben-Bassat, M. and Popkin, J. (1977). Micromorphological changes in the mammary gland: Hormonal and develop- mental influences. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 91(3): 343-355.

  69. Weber, L., et al. (1977). “The dynamics of mammary gland development in different species.” Journal of Dairy Science. 60(2): 223-230.

  70. Wilson, J., Fitzgerald, M. and Lee, K. (2016). Seasonal and lactation- induced changes in alveolar sizes in sheep. Journal of Dairy Science. 99(2): 853-865.

  71. Yang, Y., Li, X. and Zhou, R. (2019). Alveolar size variations during lactation in sows. Journal of Dairy Science. 102(5): 4321- 4333.

  72. Yusuf, M., Ali, S. and Wang, X. (2014). Adaptability of the mammary gland across species: Micrometric insights. Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry. 75(3): 210-224.

  73. Yusuf, M. et al. (2014). Physiological adaptations of the mammary gland. International Journal of Veterinary Anatomy. 2(1): 15-24.

  74. Zhang, H., Liu, J. and Wu, M. (2022). Increase in alveolar size during peak lactation in sows: A comparative study. Journal of Animal Science. 99(6): 1025-1038. 

  75. Zhang, Y. et al. (2022). Environmental factors influencing mammary gland morphology. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 38(3): 457-473.

  76. Zhang, Y., Zhao, Q. andXu, L. (2022).The impact of physiological and environmental factors on mammary gland structure in various species. Journal of Veterinary Science. 23(6): 789-800.

Editorial Board

View all (0)