Growth and Decomposition Analysis of Major Fruits Grown in Punjab

Rohlupuii1,*
1Department of Economics and Sociology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141 004, Punjab, India.
  • Submitted18-07-2024|

  • Accepted25-10-2024|

  • First Online 25-11-2024|

  • doi 10.18805/BKAP760

Background: Punjab has been gifted with the suitable agro climatic conditions and topography for the cultivation of horticultural crops, particularly fruits and vegetables. Due to its easy cultivation on sandy loam soils, increased profitability and good market value in comparison to several other crops in the state, Punjab has gained popularity among fruit growers.

Methods: The study was based on secondary data obtained on the basis of the largest area sown over the period of 13 years i.e., from 2010-11 to 2022-23. Statistical tools like Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), instability index and decomposition analysis were used to analyze the trends in area, production and productivity of major fruits in Punjab.

Result: Results revealed that growth rates of area, production and productivity had shown positive and significant in all the major fruits during the study period. The growth rate of area and production under kinnow was found to be lowest due to decline in area and production during the last three years. Cuddy-Della Valle Index indicates that fluctuations in area and production was found to be tremendously high under lemon and litchi. Decomposition analysis revealed that area under kinnow was the major contributing factor causing the change in production but it was the yield that played a major role in other fruits.

 

India’s total agricultural development has been driven by the expansion of the horticulture sector (Dev, 2012; Mehta, 2009). Due to its varied agro climatic conditions, abundant crop diversity, and rich genetic resources, India is able to produce a wide variety of horticulture crops all year long (jha et al., 2019). India has emerged as world leader in the production of a variety of fruits like mango, banana, guava, papaya, sapota, pomegranate, Lime and aonla and is the second largest producer of fruits and vegetables (GOI, 2023). The challenge for further raising the production and productivity of horticulture crops is the increase in demand for horticultural produce brought on by growing health consciousness, rising income, increased need for exports, and growing population. After the introduction of the green revolution in Punjab, wheat and paddy have become major food grain crops grown in the state. However, in recent decades, crop diversification from wheat-rice monoculture to other alternative crops that require less water has been seen as one of the most pertinent ways to revitalize Punjab’s agrarian economy and promote the sustainable growth of agriculture in the province. One possible strategy to diversify Punjab agriculture is to convert some areas from rice-wheat rotation to high-value crops like fruits and vegetables. It will improve income and employment opportunities while also potentially addressing the negative effects of rice-wheat monoculture (Singh, 2000). In Punjab, the total area under fruit cultivation is 11370 hectares, with a total production of 250736 MT during 2023-24 (GOI, 2023). It gained momentum among the fruit growers as it can be easily cultivated on the sandy loam soils and has higher profitability and good market value relative to some of the other crops in the state (Grover et al., 2012). Major fruits produced in the region include Kinnow, Guava, Mango, Pear, Sweet Orange, Litchi, Peach, and Ber, while smaller fruits include Limes/Lemons, Amla, Grapes, Plum, Banana, Pomegranate, Phalsa, Sapota, Papaya, and others. The purpose of this study is to examine the growth trend in the area, output, and yield of Punjab’s major fruit crops, examine the variation in area, productivity and production and to determine the contribution of sources of output growth in fruit production.
 
 
The study has been conducted in order to understand the growth performance of major fruits in Punjab. The study was based on secondary data for a period of 13 years i.e., from 2010-2011 to 2022-2023, collected from Statistical Abstract of Punjab. The major fruits were selected on the basis of highest area sown. For analysing the data, descriptive statistics such as CAGR (compound annual growth rate), Cuddy-Della Valle Index and decomposition analysis were employed.

Compound annual growth rate (CAGR)
 
The compound annual growth rate in the area, production, and productivity of major fruits were computed by following the exponential equation.
 
                                      Yt = A (1 + r) t                                  …. (1)
 
After taking log on both sides of equation (1)
 
                                 lnYt = ln A + t ln (1 + r)                          …. (2)
 
Where:
Yt = Variable (area/production/productivity) for which growth calculated for the period of 13 years i.e., 2010-11 2022-23.
r =   Compound annual growth rate and ln is the natural logarithm.
CAGR was computed using this formula:
 
                                r = (Antilog of b - 1) × 100
 
Cuddy-Della valle index
 
Variability in area, production and yield of major fruits is measured in relative terms by the Cuddy Della Valle index which is used as a measure of variability in time-series data (e.g. Singh and Byerlee, 1990 and Deb et al., 1999). The simple coefficient of variation over-estimates the level of instability in time-series data characterized by long-term trends whereas the Cuddy-Della Valle index corrects the coefficient of variation by
 
        CDI = (CV*) (1 - R 2) ^0.5
Where:
CDI =  Cuddy-Della Valle index, i.e., corrected coefficient of variation (CV).
CV* = Simple estimate of the coefficient of variation (in per cent).
R2 =   Coefficient of determination from a time-trend regression adjusted by the number of degrees of freedom.
 
Decomposition analysis
 
It is used to compute the relative contribution of factors as area and Ln(Q) = In (a) + t ln (1 + r) productivity in total output of individual fruit crops. Devi et al. (2017); Ruchi, (2017); Kamble and Wali, (2016) and Basitine and Palanisami, (1994) were applied component analysis models to examine the relative contribution of area and productivity in changing level of output. The general outline of decomposition model is expressed as:
 
 
                                           Q = CY                                         …. (i)
 
Where:
Q = Production of major fruits in Punjab.
C = Cultivated area under major fruits.
Y = Yield of major fruits.
 
Then,
                                      Q=C0 and Y0                                …(ii)
 
                                          Qt = CtYt                                  …. (iii)
 
Where:
0 and t =  Time periods such that t >0 by an accounting period (usually single year).
 
Now
                                           (Yt - Y0) = ∆Yt
                                            Ct-C= ∆Ct
                                                                                    (Qt-Q0) = ∆Qt                              …. (iv)
 
Now substituting the terms represented in (iv) equation into (ii) equation.
                                  Qt=(C0 + ∆Ct) (Y0 + ∆Yt)
                     ∆Qt=(Qt-Q0) = {(C0+ ∆Ct) (P0+∆Pt)} -C0P0
Or
                           ∆Qt=(C0∆Pt) +(Po∆Ct) +(∆Ct∆Pt)                …. (v)
 
Change in production =Yield effect + Area effect +Interaction effect.

Thus, the total change in production is attributed due to area and yield that can be decomposed into three effects viz. yield, area and interaction effects.
 
Compound growth rate and Instability index of area, production and productivity of kinnow and sweet orange (Table 1)
 
Kinnow is the chief cultivar of the region occupying more than 90 per cent of the total area under citrus varieties (Government of Punjab, 2020). It is grown in some of the districts like Fazilka, Ferozepur, Bathinda, Muktsar and Faridkot are well known for kinnow cultivation. The growth rate of area, production and productivity has been positive and significant with the rate of 1.06 per cent, 3.18 per cent and 2.10 per cent (Table 1). However, out of all the fruits, it grows the least in terms of area and production since area under cultivation has started declining which has been the main driver of production. The instability index shows that the productivity of kinnow has higher instability as compared to other fruits. This may be because of the rapid expansion in area under kinnow (Yogi et al., 2019) and higher profitability and good market value relative to some of the other fruit crops in the state (Grover et al., 2012). However, Due to its limited harvesting season, which starts from mid-January to mid-February, kinnow fruit is currently causing significant challenges in the market. The limitation of this variety’s harvesting period is causing a glut in the market, which lowers the producer’s price. As a result, to break up the kinnow monoculture, new citrus types with different harvesting times are encouraged to be introduced (Chahal, 2023).

Table 1: Compound growth rate and Instability index of area, production and productivity of kinnow and sweet orange.



Table 1 showed annual growth rate of area, production and productivity under sweet orange found to be 2.40 per cent, 3.31 per cent and 0.88 per cent per annum in the study period respectively. The instability index showed that there was variability in area, production and productivity could be due to Punjab Agricultural University has recommended Early Gold, an early maturing variety of sweet orange (Kumar et al., 2018) for commercial cultivation in the state to meet the demand for pre-winter maturing citrus cultivar. The shifting of some area from kinnow to Early Gold cultivation can play a vital role in enhancing the profitability in citrus cultivation of the region.

The growth rate in area, production and productivity of lemon and mango are presented in Table 2. The compound growth rate of area and production under lemon observed the highest growth among all the fruit crops at the rate of 15.45 per cent and 16.02 per cent respectively due to its wider adapt ability, high yield potential, tolerance to citrus canker, hardy to both hot and cold climatic conditions also have high variability in terms of area and production with the advent of high yielding varieties (Singh, 1992) While, productivity has a low variability.

Table 2: Compound growth rate and Instability index of area, production and productivity of lemon ad mango.



Mango is the third most important fruit crop of Punjab following citrus and guava (Package of Practices PAU, 2019). Area, production and productivity of growth under mango shows positive and significant at the rate of 2.45 per cent, 3.52 per cent and 1.04 per cent during the study period. It has been observed that instability as it is severely damaged by a number of insect pests that, either directly or indirectly, result in significant output losses, which eventually lowers the profitability of mango growers. Singh 2018 and Singh and Sreedevi (2019) reported around 30 species of insect pests inflicting damage to different parts of mango trees in Punjab.

The perusal of theTable 3 reveals the trend of area, production under litchi had a huge growth rate with positive and significant at the rate of 7.86 per cent and 8.98 per cent respectively which is second highest growth next to lemon. The variation in terms of area and production was enormously high because of its increasing demand and profitability and better export potential (Pandey and Sharma, 1989; Cebeco, 2001). Unlike other states in India where litchi is grown, Punjab’s litchi growers are able to reap large profits since fruits are available from mid to end of June (Singh et al., 2022).

Table 3: Compound growth rate and Instability index of area, production and productivity of litchi and guava.



Guava is the second largest major fruit grown in Punjab. The compound growth rate in area, production and productivity was positive and significant for the study period at the rate of 3.70, 4.08 and 0.37 per cent per annum. There was a high instability found in area and production facing numerous horticultural and agronomic issues, including vulnerability to numerous diseases; particularly guava wilt caused by Fusarium (oxysporium pv. psidii). This results in limited fruit development, a short shelf life, a high seed content. and sensitivity to stress (Rai et al., 2010).

Compound growth rate and instability index of area, production and productivity of pear was shown in Table 4. The growth rate of area, production and productivity was positive and significant at the rate of 4.08 per cent, 4.47 per cent and 0.37 per cent per annum during the study period. The instability was found to be high in terms of area and production due to pests and diseases although it provides favorable climatic conditions for growing a wide range of pears. In subtropical regions mainly Punjab pear cultivars like ‘Baggugosha’, ‘Kiefferr’ and Asian pear ‘Patharnakh’ (hard pear) are cultivated commercially both for table and processing purposes and semi-soft cultivars like Punjab Beauty, Punjab Nectar and Punjab Soft are recommended for cultivation (Sawant et al., 2021). The important insect and mite pests of Indian pear orchards are the codling moth, pear psylla, mites and borer (Verma et al., 2010, Husain et al., 2018).

Table 4: Compound growth rate and Instability index of area, production and productivity of pear.


 
Decomposition analysis of major fruits in Punjab
 
Decomposition analysis was carried out to estimate the percentage contribution of area effect, yield effect and interaction effect towards change in production. The perusal of the Table 5 reveals during the study period only area effect was the main contributor in the output growth under kinnow i.e., area effect (51.87%), yield effect (39.75%) and interaction effect (8.38%). On the other hand, the yield effect was playing crucial role by offsetting the area and interaction effect among all the fruit crops except in kinnow.

Table 5: Contribution of area, yield and their interaction in the production of major fruits in Punjab, 2010-11 to 2022-23. (in percentage).

 
Area and production have grown positively overtime in the state except under kinnow. The area under kinnow has declined in the last few years due to introduction of new suitable citrus varieties with varying harvesting span to break the monoculture of kinnow. Production of fruits varied mainly due to changes in area, though productivity gradually remained to increase. As per the decomposition analysis, area under kinnow was the major contributing factor to cause change in production whereas, in other fruit crops it was the yield effect which plays a major role. Therefore, productivity can be increased by creating true-to-type nurseries for high-yielding fruit varieties, managing fruit orchards according to scientific principles, and enhancing farmers’ ability to minimize fruit production losses both before and after harvest. Some major issues regarding the production and marketing of high value crops that inhibit the diversification from wheat-paddy such as inefficient marketing system, high price fluctuations, sensitivity to diseases and bad weather conditions, lack of storage facilities and thereby occurrence of post-harvest losses etc. Hence, better pricing policies and cold storage facilities should be developed in the state.
 
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
 

  1. Basitine, C.L. and Palanisami, K.P. (1994). An analysis of growth trends in principal crops in Kerala. Agricultural Situation in India. 48(12): S85-891.

  2. Cebeco, (2001). Project report for setting up agri export zone for litchi in Ramnagar, Uttaranchal, Cebeco India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

  3. Chahal, T.S. (2023). Effect of rootstock on plant growth, fruit yield and quality of sweet orange cv. early gold under the central zone of Punjab. Agricultural Research Journal. 9(2).

  4. Deb, U.K, Mandal, M.A.S and Dey, M.M. (1999). Impact of new technology on production variability in Bangladesh Agriculture.Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics. 15:27-50. http://dx.doi. org/10.22004/ag.econ.207864.

  5. Dev,  S. M. (2012). Small farmers in India: Challenges and opportunities. Working Paper No. 14. Mumbai, India: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.

  6. Devi, Y.L., Arivelarasan, T and Kapngaihlian, J. (2017). Pulses production in India: Trend and decomposition analysis. Economic affairs. 63(3): 435-438

  7. Government of India. (2023). Horticulture Statistics at Glance. Horticulture Statistics Division, Department of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and farmers Welfare, Government of India.

  8. Government of Punjab. (2020). Statistical Abstract of Punjab. Economic and Statistical Organization of Punjab, Government of Punjab.

  9. Grover, D.K., Singh, J.M., Singh, J. and Kumar, S. (2012). Impact of emerging marketing channels in agriculture-benefit to producer-seller and marketing cost and margins of potato and kinnow in Punjab. AERC Study No.28, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. 1-120.

  10. Husain, M., Rathore, J.P., Sharma, A., Raja, A., Qadri, I., Wani, A.W. (2018). Description and management strategies of important pests of pear: A review. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 6: 677-683.

  11. Jha, G. K., Suresh, A., Punera, B., and Supriya, P. (2019). Growth of horticulture sector in India: Trends and prospects.

  12. Kamble, A.S., and Wali, V.B. (2016). Dynamics of horticultural crops in Karnataka and hazel decomposition analysis. Indian Journal of Applied Research. 6(8): 119-122.

  13. Kumar A, Pathania S and Sharma P K. (2018). Rootstock evaluation for sweet orange cv. Early Gold in arid irrigated regions of Punjab. Indian J. Hort 75(1): 34-38.

  14. Mehta, P.K. (2009). Diversification and horticultural crops: A case of Himachal Pradesh. Institute for Social and Economic Change, University of Mysore, Bangalore. India.

  15. Package of Practices. PAU. (2019). Package of Practices for Cultivation of Fruits. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. 188 pp.

  16. Pandey, R.M. and Sharma, H.C. (1989). The Litchi. Indian Society of Soil Science, New Delhi.

  17. Rai, M.K., Asthana, P., Jaiswal, V.S. and Jaiswal, U. (2010). Biotechnological advances in guava (Psidium guajava L.): Recent developments and prospects for further research. Trees. 24: 1-12.

  18. Ruchi, (2017). Food grains in India: Growth, instability decomposition analysis. international Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development. 4(6): 304-308.

  19. Sawant, S.S., Choi, E.D., Song, J. and Seo, H.J. (2021). Current status and future prospects of white root rot management in pear orchards: A review. Research in Plant Disease. 27(3): 91-98.

  20. Singh, A. J. and Byerlee, D. (1990). Relative variability in Wheat yields across countries and over time. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 41: 21-32. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.14779552.1990.tb00616.

  21. Singh, N.P., Singh, S., Tyagi, M., Singh, J., Singh, B., Mahajan, B.V.C. and Devi, I. (2022). Prospects of litchi cultivation in Punjab. Indian Horticulture. 67(3).

  22. Singh, R. (1992). Fruits. National Book Trust, New Delhi, India.

  23. Singh, S. and Sreedevi, K. (2019). Record of longhorn borer, Aeolesthes Holosericea (Fabricius, 1787) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycidae) on mango in the Indian Punjab. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 89(10): 1714-1718.

  24. Singh, S. (2000). Contract farming for agricultural diversification in the Indian Punjab: A study of performance and problems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 55: 283-94.

  25. Singh, S. (2018). Annual Report. ICAR-All India Coordinated Research Project on Fruits. ICAR- Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru. India. 150 pp.

  26. Verma, M.K., Ahmad, N., Singh, A.K. and Awasthi, O.P. (2010). Temperate tree fruits and nuts in India. Chronica Horti. 50: 43-48.

  27. Yogi, V., Kumar, P., Prakash, P., Kar, A., Singh, D.R., Singh, R. and Awasthi, O.P. (2019). An economic evaluation of kinnow cultivation in north western India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 89(10): 1684-168.

Editorial Board

View all (0)