Respondent¢
s characteristics
Socioeconomic conditions of selected respondents are presented in Table 1. The majority of respondents (48.6%) were in the age group of 30-39 years and 40.8% had no formal education. In the study area, 52 per cent of respondents were male and 48 per cent were female. Farming was the primary occupation for the majority of the respondents. Out of 95 per cent, 34 per cent were also engaged in labour work. About 15.6 per cent of the respondents analyzed had an annual income below 50,000/- and major population (54%) earned upto 50,000 - 1 lakh per annum. The majority of respondents were non-vegetarian and belonged to a nuclear family with medium family size.
Diet diversity score
The mean dietary diversity scores ranged from 0.09±0.17 to 0.91±0.38 over 12 possible range groups with a mean DDS of 4.9±2.99 (Table 2). Fish and other Seafoods, dairy products, meat, legumes, nuts and oil seeds, sweets and fruits were the least consumed food groups by the children, while cereals, vegetables, roots and tubers, spices and condiments were commonly consumed food groups. Table 3 depicts the classification of selected children according to dietary DDS. The majority of children (49.7%) fell under the low DDS group, while 46.4% and 3.9% were in the medium and high DDS group, respectively. Children who fell in the low diversity group in this study were 49.7%, with only 3.6% having high dietary diversity. This indicates that in the previous 24 hours, only about 50.3% met the minimum dietary diversity score (5 to 8 food group) and would most likely meet their adequate nutrient requirement for growth. The prevalence of low DDS observed in this study is similar to previous studies
(Herrador et al., 2015; Ogechi and Chilezie, 2017). The low DDS observed among the majority of the school-age children in this study could be attributed to food insecurity. Previous studies conducted in the Ranchi district of Jharkhand (
Sinha and Lakra, 2006;
Sinha et al., 2007) showed that food insecurity was common in the area, with 52-74% of rural households being food insecure. A study conducted in Ranchi, West Singbhum and Latehar districts of Jharkhand by
Sinha and Lakara, 2006 revealed that 52% of the households had food grain shortage throughout the year during last five years and 66% of them had inadequate grain production in the previous year. Except for cereal, the diet of tribals was inadequate and far below the recommended amount. Another study conducted on the parameters of food security in the Ranchi district of Jharkhand revealed that 74% of the households had food grain shortages throughout the year during the last five years and 48% had food shortages for a period of 5-8 months
(Sinha et al., 2007).
The food frequency questionnaire (Table 4) depicted the consumption patterns of different food groups. It is evident that cereals and fats/oils were consumed on everyday basis. Protein-rich foods like pulses were consumed every day by 23.7% of the respondents whereas fish and meat were consumed by only 7.9% of the respondents. Milk and its products were consumed every day by only 17.3% of the respondents, whereas 53.2% of respondents reported that they had never consumed milk and milk products. The finding of this study is in agreement with earlier work
(Murgugakar et al., 2013), which also reported that protein-rich foods like pulses and flesh foods are consumed maximally only once a week. Similarly, a study conducted on tribal school children in Odisha reported that milk and pulse consumption was meagre in all age groups. Meat and meat products were eaten once a week in the form of dry fish
(Joshi et al., 2021).
Anthropometric profile
The mean weight of girls and boys was 21.8±6.77 and 20.56±6.40, respectively (Table 6). The mean height of the girls was 119.45±15,48cm, whereas that of boys was 115.78 ± 12.86 cm. In the present study, the BMI was found to be 15.31±4.08 and14.65±2.73, respectively in the age groups of 6 -10 years. Although there was no significant sex differences were noted in the mean values of height, weight and BMI. The finding of this study is in agreement with an earlier study
(Sinha and Kumari, 2018) which also reported non-significant sex differences in the mean value of weight, height and BMI of tribal school children. Age-wise anthropometric characteristics of the children are given in Table 5. Mean weight, height and BMI were lower than
WHO 2007 studied in all age groups. No significant difference in weight at ages 6, 7, 8 and 10 years (P >0.05) were observed. However, mean difference was significant at age 9 years. Girls exhibited significantly (P≤0.05) higher height compared to boys at age 9 and 10 years. The study by
Medhi et al., (2007) and
Twara et al., (2015) showed that the mean heights of girls are higher at the age 10,11 and12 than boys which is similar to the results of this study. No significant difference was observed in the mean values of BMI at all age groups.
The extent of malnutrition in children analyzed based on BMI for age percentile cut-offs as per WHO is given in Table 7. The prevalence of overweight was observed more in boys (13.8%) than girls (8.7%). About 37.9% boys and 37% girls were reported as underweight. A higher prevalence of malnutrition (45.2%) was reported in a study
(Prabhakar and Gangadhar, 2009) done on Jenukuruka tribal children in the Mysore district of Karnataka. Similarly, 61.20% of the children were reported underweight in a study conducted on 73 tribal children in the Gajapatidistrict of Odisha
(Joshi et al., 2021). Overall prevalence of underweight of 56.2% among tribal children aged 3-11 years of Paschimanchal area in West Bengal was reported by
Mollah et al.(2021). Another study
(Chandra et al., 2006) in the villages of Dharwad and Haliyet Talukas reported 44.4% of children as underweight. About 51.10% of school-going tribal children of Uttar Pradesh showed evidence of undernutrition in a study conducted by
Twara et al., (2015). Similarly the prevalence of underweight ranging from 34- 62% has been reported in one large-scale study done on rural school children in five countries including India (Partnership for Child Development, 1998). The prevalence of undernutrition among selected school children in the present study was found lower as compared to other studies, but it is still unacceptably high and appropriate intervention is required to improve the nutritional status of school children as it impedes their normal physical and intellectual development.