Weight loss
Observations during storage of tomatoes (Fig 1) revealed that the physiological loss in weight was increased for both coated and uncoated ones as the storage period progressed. The physiological loss in weight was maximum in case of the uncoated samples, whereas aloevera coated samples showed minimum physiological loss in weight followed by corn starch coated samples. However, no significant difference in weight loss was seen between aloevera coated tomatoes and corn starch coated tomatoes. At the end of the storage period the weight loss percentages for uncoated, aloevera coated and corn starch coated samples were recorded as 7.3%, 6.01% and 6.05% respectively. This may be due to the fact that coating material acts as a semi permeable barrier against oxygen, carbon dioxide, moisture and solute movement and thereby reduces rate of respiration, water loss and oxidation reaction
(Ghosh et al., 2015; Mani et al., 2017).
Similar results were found by
Bhowmick et al., (2017) during the storage of plums. 1% corn starch coated plums showed the lowest physiological loss in weight (10.28%) as compared to uncoated fruits with physiological loss in weight of 32.99%.
Moisture content
The rate of water loss depends on the water pressure gradient between the fruit tissue and the surrounding atmosphere, and the storage temperature
(Hernandez-Munoz et al., 2008). The coating material acts as a barrier to water diffusion between the fruit and the environment. This can be observed from Table 1. The moisture content of the uncoated tomatoes decreased at a rapid rate in comparison to aloevera coated and corn starch coated tomatoes for all the storage periods. Loss of moisture results in shrinkage of the product which ultimately affects the quality of the product. As the loss of moisture was more in case of uncoated tomatoes, they started to develop considerable shrinkage after 9th day of storage whereas the coated samples remained fresh and did not develop any shrinkage. After 21 days the moisture content of uncoated tomatoes decreased to about 90% whereas aloevera coated and corn starch coated tomatoes maintained their moisture content close to 94%.
Total soluble solid content
The TSS of coated and uncoated tomatoes were found to increase up to a certain period during storage and thereafter it decreased as the storage period progressed (Fig 2). On the 7
th day TSS was recorded as highest for both the coated and uncoated samples. The increase in total soluble solids may be due to the complete hydrolysis of starch into simple sugars up to the 7
th day of storage. After that they along with other organic acids act as substrate for respiration causing a continuous decrease in TSS for rest of the storage period
(Kanmani et al., 2017). However the rate of change of TSS was more in uncoated tomatoes than the coated ones. This may be due to the fact that the presence of coating slowed down the rate of hydrolysis of carbohydrates which restricted the initial rise of total soluble solid content (
Roy and Karmakar, 2019).
Vitamin C content
Vitamin C acts as an antioxidant and is naturally present in sufficient quantity in most of the fruits and vegetables. The variety, stage of maturity and environmental factor play significant role on the vitamin C content of tomatoes. Vitamin C content of both coated and uncoated tomatoes decreased over the entire storage period (Fig 3). Initially no significant decrease in Vitamin C content was observed for coated samples upto 7
th day whereas a gradual decrease was observed for uncoated samples. At the end of the storage period coated tomatoes retained more vitamin C than uncoated ones. This may be due to the fact that aloevera coating and corn starch coating acted as gas barrier, inhibiting oxygen from entering the fruit, thus reducing the oxidation of Vitamin C. Oxidation of food materials can be prevented by eliminating exposure to oxygen by removing oxygen from the packaging headspace and adding antioxidants to films and coatings to enhance the antioxidant properties of food surfaces
(Sahraee et al., 2019). But at later stage of storage it was lost due to the activities of two enzymes - phenol oxidase and ascorbic acid oxidase
(Ghosh et al., 2015).
Firmness
The firmness is a textural property that is primarily sensed by touch. The firmness of both coated and uncoated tomatoes decreased progressively during the entire storage period (Table 2). At the end of 21 days storage period coated fruits maintain better firmness than uncoated ones. It was observed that corn starch coated tomatoes showed highest value of firmness. Storage at low temperature is a common practice to slow down the softening of fruit tissue. Further the softening process was found to be slowered down by the application of edible coating. This may probably happened because slower respiration rate of coated tomatoes cause lesser degradation of water insoluble calcium pectate or Calcium Bridge that renders the strength to the fruit skin
(Mani et al., 2017).
Colour
Colour change values were calculated using Eq. (1) and are presented in Table 3. Colour change values were lowest for the corn starch coated tomatoes at the end of the 21 days storage period. Colour change values were observed as 11.8, 9.59 and 4.39 for uncoated, aloe vera coated and corn starch coated tomatoes, respectively.
Misir et al., (2014) reported that aloevera gel treatment delayed the green colour loss on the fruit skin of apples stored at 2
oC for 6 months. However
Khodaei et al., (2021) found no change in colour for coated and uncoated strawberries stored at 4
oC and 80% RH for 16 days.
Decay percentage
Table 4 reveals that there was no decay for coated tomatoes upto 14 days of storage. The aloevera coated tomatoes showed minimum decay percentage (5%) followed by corn starch coated tomatoes (10%) and uncoated tomatoes (92%) at the end of 21 days storage period. The decrease in decay percentage was probably due to the fact that coating delayed senescence, which makes the product more resistible to pathogenic infection as a result of cellular or tissue integrity
(Ghosh et al., 2015). Khodaei et al., (2021) reported that uncoated strawberries exhibited the highest level of 59.6% decay at the end of 16 days of storage period while it was the lowest of 32.66% for the strawberries coated with Carboxymethyl Cellulose.