Improvement of ruminant animal’s nutrition with the application of probiotic

Article Id: BKAP58 | Page : 250-255]
Citation :- Improvement of ruminant animal’s nutrition with the application of probiotic .Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika.2017.(32):250-255]

A. S. Meena, A. Sahoo, Pankaj Kumar Kumawat and R. C. Sharma

A. S. Meena, A. Sahoo, Pankaj Kumar Kumawatand R. C. Sharma amarsingh23@gmail.com
Address : ICAR-Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar, Malpura-304501 (Rajasthan) india

Abstract

Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) defined the probiotics as live microorganisms. This, when admixture or add in adequate amounts to the host confer a symbiosis type life and health benefits. An ideal probiotic should be non-toxic, non-pathogenic and ability to do beneficial effect on the host animals. It should be present as viable cells and ability to survive and metabolizing in the host gut environment. It should be viable for periods under storage conditions and remain stable also. Probiotics have been ability to promote growth, improve efficiency of feed utilization, protect host organism from intestinal invader bacteria and stimulate immune response in mammalian species. In ruminants livestocks, probiotics rich feed improved growth rate, increased weight gain and higher efficiency of feed utilization and conversion into body weight. This is happened because probiotic microorganisms promoted the metabolic processes of digestion and nutrient utilization.

Keywords

Probiotics Nutrient utilization Animal health and production

References

  1. Apás, A.L., Dupraz J., Ross. R., González. S.N. and Arena. M.E. (2010). Probiotic administration effect on fecal mutagenicity and microflora in the goat’s gut. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 110(5): 537–540.
  2. Chang, Y., Kim, J., Kim,W., Kim, Y. and Park, Y. (2001). Selection of a potential probiotic Lactobacillus strain and subsequent in-vivo studies. Antonne Van Leeuwenhoek. pp. 193-199.
  3. Collins, F.M. and Carte, P.B. (1978). Growth of salmonellae in orally infected germ free mice. Infect. Immunol., 21: 41-47.
  4. Desnoyers, M., Giger-Reverdin, S., Bertin, G., Duvaux-Ponter, C. and Sauvant, D. (2009). Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(4): 1620–1632.
  5. Ding, G., Chang, Y., Zhao, L., Zhou, Z., Ren, L. and Meng, Q. (2014). Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on alfalfa nutrient degradation characteristics and rumen microbial populations of steers fed diets with different concentrate-to-forage ratios. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 5(1): 24–32.
  6. Ellin, D.M. (2001). Alternatives to antibiotic use of growth promotion in animal husbandry. Food Research Institute Briefings.
  7. Fuller, R. (1989). Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 66:365-378.
  8. Fuller, R. (1992). Probiotics: the sdientific basis. Ed. Fuller R London: Chapman and Hall. 
  9. Koop-Hoolihan, L. (2001). Prophylactic and therapeutic uses of probiotics: A review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 147: 747-748.
  10. Kumar, A., Kamra, D.N., Agarwal, N., Rikhari, K. and Chaudhary, L.C. (2013). Phenotypic and phylogenetic characterization of cellulose degrading bacteria isolated from rumen of buffalo. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 13: 271-279.
  11. Lettat, A., Nozière, P., Silberberg, M., Morgavi, D.P., Berger, C. and Martin, C. (2012). Rumen microbial and fermentation characteristics are affected differently by bacterial probiotic supplementation during induced lactic and subacute acidosis in sheep. BMC Microbiology, 12(1): 142.
  12. Lilly, D.M., and Stillwell, R.H .(1965). Probiotics: Growth promoting factors produced by microorganisms. Science. 147: 747-748.
  13. McNeill, D., Le, O., Schofield, B., Dart, P., Callaghan, M., Lisle, A., Ouwerkerk, D. and Klieve, A. (2016). Production responses of reproducing ewes to a byproduct-based diet inoculated with the probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain H57. Animal Production Science, in press
  14. Meena, A.S., Sahoo, A., Kumawat, P.K. and Kumar, S. (2017). Rumen microbiology and molecular techniques importance in the ruminant nutrition: A Review. Bhartiya Krishi Anushandan Patrika, 32(2): 125-132.
  15. Tannock, G.W. (1983). Effects of dietary and environment stress on the gastrointestinal microbiota, in Human instestinal microflora in health and in disesse, (ed. Hentges DJ) academic press, New York. Pp. 517-39.
  16. Zabala, A., Martin, M.R., Haza, A.I., Fernandez, L., Rodriguez, J.M., Morales, P. (2001). Anti-proliferative effect of two lactic acid bacteria strains of human origin on the growth of a myeloma cell line. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 32:287-292.
     

Global Footprints