Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, volume 38 issue 2 (june 2023) : 157-161

Evaluation of Fabricated Slow Release Nano Encapsulated Herbicide for Bio-Safety Issues

Pradeesh Kumar1,*, Chinnamuthu2
1Department of Agronomy, VIT School of Agricultural Innovations and Advanced Learning (VAIAL), VIT, Vellore- 632 014, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
  • Submitted14-02-2022|

  • Accepted15-09-2022|

  • First Online 24-07-2023|

  • doi 10.18805/BKAP459

Cite article:- Kumar Pradeesh, Chinnamuthu (2023). Evaluation of Fabricated Slow Release Nano Encapsulated Herbicide for Bio-Safety Issues . Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 38(2): 157-161. doi: 10.18805/BKAP459.
Background: Nanotechnology has the great potential to make ensure the valuable impact on season free weed control, eco environment impact analysis and management in these emerging areas especially pulses.  

Methods: A laboratory experiment was carried out at the Department of Nano Science and Technology, TNAU, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu with the objective of fabrication of slow release nanoencapsulated herbicide and its bio-safety issues. 

Result: Our investigation on toxicological research should be aimed to define nanomaterial hazards and levels of exposure along the life cycle of the earthworms and microbes without affecting the environment.
Nanotechnology has the potential to revolutionize the agricultural with new tools for the weed free condition, molecular treatment of diseases, rapid disease detection, enhancing the ability of plants to absorb nutrients etc. Smart delivery systems will help the agricultural industry combat all the aspects. In the near future nano structured catalysts will be available which will increase the efficiency of herbicides and pesticides, allowing lower doses to be used (Biswal et al., 2012). As shown in the past, science and technology have a significant and necessary role to play in these areas (Spielman and Pandya-Lorch, 2009). Whether by increasing productivity of fields, improving food and water quality, or helping to improve market access, new technologies can enable faster advancements in these directions and provide high returns to investments. Although there are debates on the tradeoff between investing in the development and diffusion of well-known past technologies versus that of new and potentially revolutionary technologies, several examples show that both of these strategies may be beneficial and are sometimes complementary. In some cases, technological advances driven by demand, viz., mobile phones can have an enormous impact and even replace previous technologies (such as land-based telephones) before their complete diffusion.
       
 
Platforms for bilayer membranes that can be used for protein analysis can be fabricated by layering of sodium silicate and poly (allyl amine hydrochloride) on gold followed by calcinations in a furnace. Lipid bilayers can fuse to the silicate layer and be used to detect specific proteins (Biswall et al., 2012). 
               
The capsules were prepared by layer-by-layer (LbL) adsorption on decomposable CaCO3 cores using model polyelectrolytes, namely poly-styrene sulfonic acid (PSS) and poly (allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH). Salt-mediated LbL made microcapsule fusion has been reported recently with a different poly-cation resulting in merging of the capsule’s content and formation of anisotropic “Janus-like” capsules indicating no polymer exchange between the capsules (Pechenkin et al., 2012). The question for public authorities is how to approach the prioritization of research and development efforts with biosafety analysis without hampering the environment.
A laboratory experiment was carried out at the Department of Nano Science and Technology, TNAU, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu with the objective of fabrication of slow release nanoencapsulated herbicide and its bio-safety issues.
 
Nanoencapsulation of pendimethalin herbicide
 
Synthesis of MnCO3 core material
 
Equal volume of 0.33 M ammonium bi carbonate (NH4HCO3) was mixed with equal volume of 0.33 M manganese sulphate monohydrate solution (MnSO4). Equal volume of 0.5 per cent ethanol solution was added to the above mixture in the round bottom flask. The resulting solution was vigorously stirred for 10 min. It was then left undisturbed for 10 min and incubated for 1 hour in water bath at 75oC.
       
The solution was centrifuged to settle down the particles completely and the particles were washed thrice with distilled water followed by centrifuging after each wash. Then the particle was isolated by filtering the outcome of final water wash with filter paper Whatman no. 41. The filter paper along with particles settled on it was dried in compact vacuum desiccators. After drying the particles were scrapped and stored in a vial.
 
Loading pendimethalin in the MnCO3 core template
 
Took 20 mg of MnCO3 core particles and added 25 ml of 20 ppm pendimethalin and stirred it for 15 min in magnetic stirrer. Then the suspension was allowed to dry for overnight. This enables pendimethalin to adsorb on the MnCO3 core particles surface. The dried particles were collected and stored in vial.
 
Encapsulation of pendimethalin adsorbed MnCO3 core material
 
MnCO3 microcapsules are prepared by altering layer by layer (LbL) adsorption of opposite charge polyelectrolyte onto the MnCO3 microsphere templates. Prepared polyelectrolyte solution viz., Poly (allylamine hydrochloride), Sodium poly (styrene sulfonate) and Poly vinyl pyrolidone weighing each 20 mg was added to the 20 ml of 0.5 N NaCl solution in separate beakers and dissolved it completely. Then pH was adjusted for the solution to 6.5-7.0 by using hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide.
       
Typically, 20 ml of polyelectrolyte solution was added to 40 mg of dry pendimethalin adsorbed MnCO3 microparticles and the suspension was gently stirred in magnetic stirrer for 15 min. Then the suspension was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 15 min. Later the centrifuged particles rinsed three times with 0.1 N NaCl to remove the unbounded particles. The same procedure was repeated with oppositely charged polyelectrolyte. Then alternate layer was formed using PAH, PSS and PVP. Then the suspension was centrifuged and allowed to dry for overnight. The particles were collected and stored in a vial. The different combination of encapsulation details are given below,
T1-  Single layer coating - Poly (allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH).
T2-  Double layer coating - PAH + Sodium poly (styrene) (PSS).
T3-  Three layer coating I - PAH + PSS + Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP).
T4-  Three layer coating II - PVP + PSS + PAH.
 
Scanning electron microscope (SEM)
 
The SEM is a type of electron microscope that images the sample surface by scanning it with a high-energy beam of electrons in a raster scan pattern. All samples must be of an appropriate size to fit in the specimen chamber and are generally mounted rigidly on a specimen holder called a specimen stub. The SEM (Quanta 250, FEI, Netherlands) can examine any part of a 6-inch (15 cm) semiconductor wafer and some can tilt an object of that size to 45o. For taking images, about 0.5 to 1.0 g of encapsulated herbicide sample was dusted on the carbon conducting tape. Then the stub was mounted on sample stage and the images were taken in 2, 400 to 30, 000 magnification under 15.00 to 30.00 KV.
 
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX)
 
EDAX is an analytical technique used for the elemental analysis or chemical characterization of a sample. It is one of the variants of X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, which relies on the investigation of a sample through interactions between electromagnetic radiation and matter, analyzing-rays emitted by the matter in response to being hit with charged particles. Its characterization capabilities are due in large part to the fundamental principle that each element has a unique atomic structure allowing X-rays that are characteristic of an element’s atomic structure to be identified uniquely from one another. The quantitative analysis of encapsulated herbicide samples was done by FEI QUANTA 250 EDAX. About 1-2 g of encapsulated herbicide sample was dusted on the carbon conducting tape. Then the tap was mounted on sample stage and the images were taken using FEI QUANTA 250 EDAX.
 
Bio safety evaluation
 
Studies on the safety of encapsulated pendimethalin on earthworms
 
The effect of direct and solvent evaporation encapsulated pendimethalin nano herbicide on earthworm E. eugeniae was tested by following the artificial soil test method proposed by Edwards and Bohlen (1992). The culture of E. eugeniae was obtained from a vermicompost unit at Central Farm of TNAU, Coimbatore. 
       
Garden soil and FYM [mixed in the ratio (2:1)] were taken in the tubular plastic tubs  (12 × 4 cm) and treated with different treatments as given above. Twenty earthworms washed cleanly with water were placed on the top of the substrate. After (every 120 hrs.) 5 days, 50 g of FYM was mixed inside the container and water lost by evaporation was replaced daily. The numbers of live earthworms were counted and the weight of the worms was recorded before release and after experimental period of 30 days. Earthworms were considered dead if they did not respond to a gentle mechanical stimulus.
 
Studies on the safety of encapsulated pendimethalin on microbial analysis
 
Population dynamics of different types of microorganisms in soil samples collected from pot culture experiment were studied. Soil samples were serially diluted up to a desired level and unless otherwise mentioned, 100 µ ml suspensions were added to 15-20 ml of the desired medium separately. The plates were incubated at room temperature generally for 3 to 7 days and the number of colonies was counted. Media used for the estimation of population dynamics of different microbial communities furnished in Table 1.
 

Table 1: Methods employed for biological analysis.


               
The data collected from the experiments were analyzed statistically adopting the techniques described by Pansey and Sukhatme (1999). The data were tested at five per cent level of significance.
The nano encapsulated herbicide particles were analysed and tested Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and different bio-safety analysis using standard procedure and the results are discussed here under.
 
SEM and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) studies
 
SEM studies were carried out in every step of the sample preparation to study the surface morphology, shape and size of the fabricated particles. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS or EDX) is an analytical technique used for the elemental analysis or chemical characterization and elemental composition of a sample.
 
Characterization of MnCO3 core
 
MnCO3 microparticles were prepared by mixing MnSO4 and NH4HCO3 solutions. Ethanol was added to decrease the dielectric constant of the system and the solubility of the inorganic salts and results in the formation of modified porous surfaced MnCO3.
       
The SEM image shows (Fig 1) the surface topography of the manganese carbonate (MnCO3) particles. The porous rough surface characteristic of MnCO3 core particles aided in physical adsorption targeted herbicides. The results of the XRD (Fig 2) confirm the MnCO3 core. Further the presence of the MnCO3 core was confirmed with characteristic peak obtained in SEM-EDX.
 

Fig 1: SEM image of MnCO3 core, EDX graph and composition.


 

Fig 2: XRD-diffractrogram of MnCO3 core.


 
Characterization of nanoencapsulated herbicide
 
In the direct encapsulation method the target per-emergence herbicide was implanted directly on the MnCO3 core template synthesized already. Thus formed herbicide embedded core were encapsulated with different layers of polymers viz., poly styrene sulfonate (PSS), Poly allyl amine hydrochloride (PAH) and Poly vinyl pyrolidone (PVP). The surface morphology of bilayers (PAH + PSS) nanoencapsulated herbicide formed by Direct method was observed in SEM (Fig 3). The porous nature of the core materials played an important role for adsorbing the herbicide molecules. Single bilayer of the polyelectrolytes (PAH and PSS) was coated onto the core MnCO3 by Layer-by-Layer (LbL) assembly method. The LbL assembly is a kind of method wherein we can obtain a uniform sized spherical particle. The X-ray diffraction and Raman studies results conforms the unique porous spherical superstructure and also covalent bonding (Kanimozhi and Chinnamuthu, 2012).  The maximum yield and drug loading amount of hollow microspheres were 88.45% and 80±4.0%, respectively (Vandana Singh and Chaudhary, 2011).
 

Fig 3: SEM image of nano encapsulated herbicide, EDX graph and composition.


 
Toxicity analysis of earthworms
 
The toxicity analysis of encapsulated pendimethalin by direct method did not influence the activity of earthworms (Table 2) significantly during the observation period of 30 days. Bilayer of direct encapsulated pendimethalin treatment showed that 92.50 per cent of the earthworms were healthy. The average weight of 20 earthworms in each treatment was increased two times compared to the initial weight (Table 2).
 

Table 2: Effect of direct encapsulated pendimethalin on soil microorganisms.


 
Toxicity analysis of beneficial soil microorganisms
 
The effect of direct encapsulation of pendimethalin by different layers of polymers on the population of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes was studied in post-harvest soils of pot culture experiment. All the treatment noticeably recorded more population of fungi. Different treatments did not influence the soil beneficial microorganisms namely bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes (Table 3) significantly.
 

Table 3: Effect of direct encapsulated pendimethalin on weight of earth worm and survival rate.


               
Microorganisms and earthworms in the environment are the clear indicators of environmental pollution. The change or fluctuation in population after the introduction of any foreign chemical is an indication of toxicity of that compound. Hence, tests were carried out to study the toxicity of nanoencapsulated pendimethalin against natural organisms.
None.

  1. Allen, O.N. (1953). Experiments in Soil Bacteriology. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis, Minn, USA.  

  2. Biswal, S.K., Nayak, A.K., Parida, U.K.  and Nayak, P.L. (2012). Applications of nanotechnology in agriculture and food sciences. International Journal of Science Innovations and Discoveries. 2(1): 21-36.

  3. Edwards, C.A. and Bohlen, P.J. (1992). The Sffects of Toxic Chemicals on Earthworms. In: Review of Environmental Contamination and Toxicity. [Ware, G.W (Eds.)]. Springer- Verlag, New York. pp. 23-99.

  4. Kanimozhi, V. and Chinnamuthu, C.R. (2012). Engineering core/ hallow-shell nanomaterials to load herbicide active ingredient for controlled release. Res. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2(2): 58-69.

  5. Martin, J.P. (1950). Use of acid rose bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Sci. 69: 215-232.

  6. Pansey, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1999). Statistical Methods for Agriculture Works. Indian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi.

  7. Pechenkin, M.A., Mohwald, H. and Volodkin, D.V. (2012). pH and salt mediated response of layer-by-layer assembled PSS/ PAH microcapsules: Fusion and polymer exchange. Soft Matter. 8: 8659-8665.  

  8. Spielman, D.J. and Pandya-Lorch, R. (2009). Millions Fed: Proven Successes in Agricultural Development. Washington. D.C. International Food Policy Research Institute.

  9. Vandana Singh and Chaudhary, A.K.  (2011). Preparation of eudragit E-100 microspheres by modified solvent evaporation method. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica-Drug Research. 68(6): 975-980.

Editorial Board

View all (0)