Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, volume 33 issue 4 (december 2018) : 223-229

Analysis of Impact of E-NAM on the stakeholders of Tikamgarh (M.P.)

Anil Mishra
1<p>College of Agriculture, JNKVV, Tikamgarh-472 001, M.P, India.</p>
Cite article:- Mishra Anil (NaN). Analysis of Impact of E-NAM on the stakeholders of Tikamgarh (M.P.) . Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 33(4): 223-229. doi: 10.18805/BKAP124.

The present study attempts to assess the present status of infrastructural facilities, innovative agricultural marketing practices adopted in regulated markets and problems of border markets in Bundelkhand Region of Madhyapradesh. The study is based on both primary and secondary data. Primary data pertaining to the agricultural year 2016-17 were obtained from 120 farmers and 20 traders chosen from the selected markets. Secondary data were collected from the Madhya Pradesh State Agricultural Marketing Board,. Data were processed using descriptive analytical tools and techniques.There was no difference between interior and border regulated markets with respect to facilities like market office, stalls/godown and telephone facilities, but the negative difference was observed in vehicle parking, fire fighting, rest rooms for farmers and conference hall, shed for animals. There was no difference between interior and border markets with respect to services like issuing license, collecting market fee, loading, unloading, weighing and recording of disposal, but the negative difference observed in the case of collection of taxes, computer facility and issuing gate pass service. Major constraint faced by the farmers in using ICT’s was computer illiteracy (74.17%), followed by lack of interest, lack of computer facility, lack of time, costly technology and illiteracy. Maximum number of farmers used Television as the main source of the market information for its accuracy, timeliness and content. Lack of competitive bidding due to poor arrivals was the major problem faced by the farmers followed by poor infrastructure facilities.


  1. Aker, J. C., Klein, M. W., Stephen, A. O., 2010, Are borders barriers? The impact of international and internal ethnic borders on agricultural markets in West Africa. Center for global development, working paper, No. 208, pp. 1-47.

  2. Anonymous, 2001a, Agriculture market infrastructure and prices: A study of Northern and Malanad regions. Agro-climatic regional planning unit (ARPU), Planning commission, Govt of India, pp. 1-4.

  3. Anonymous, 2001b, Conducted study on agriculture market infrastructure and credit services: A study of Tumkur, Bijapur and Shimoga districts. Department of space (DOC), Govt. of India, pp. 4-    8.Anonymous, 2011, ICT in agriculture: Connecting smallholders to knowledge, networks and institutions, World bank report, pp 205-227.

  4. Anonymous, 2012, India and Bangladesh were keen to set up more border markets. Report of Govt of India, p 1.

  5. Anonymous, 2013, India’s North-East diversifying growth opportunities. Report of Indian chamber of commerce, pp. 14-16.

  6. Ashwini, B. C., Bhavya, A. P. and Kiresur, V. R., 2014, Marketing infrastructure in India: Problems and prospects. Indian J. Agril. Mktg (Conf. spl)., 27(3): 47.

  7. Atibudhi, H. N., Dash, S. K., Das, D., Padhy, M. and Pandey, R. K., 2013, Role of technology in improving marketing efficiency of ginger. Paper presented In : 27th Nation. Conf on Agril. Mktg. Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, December 18-20, p 9.

  8. Chadha, R., Pratap, D. and Tandon, A., (2007), Liberalising border trade: Implications for domestic agricultural markets of India. Conf on Global Economic Analysi, pp 1-10.

  9. Chahal, S. S. and Kataria, P., 2008, Impact analysis of infrastructure and incentives on trade in regulated markets of Punjab. Agriculture update, 3(4): 373-378.

  10. Chengappa, P. G., Manjunatha, A. V., Dimble, V. and Shah, K., 2012, Competitive Assessment of Onion Markets in India. Competition Commission of India, Government of India, pp.1-86.

  11. Deshpande, R. S. and Gopalappa, D. V., (2003), Administrative reforms in the field of agricultural marketing in the context of WTO. Indian J. Agril. Mktg., 17(2): 1-13.

  12. Dorosh, P. A., 2004, Trade, food aid and food security: Evolving rice and wheat markets. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(36): 4033-4041.

  13. Epaarachchi, R., Jayanetti, S. and Weliwita, A., 2002, Policies and their implications for the domestic agricultural sector of Sri Lanka: 1995-2000. Research Studies: Agricultural Policy Series No. 5, Institute of Policy Studies, Sri Lanka, pp 1-25.

  14. Franklyn, C., Mohammed, A. and Nkiru, O., 2012, The adoption of information and communication technology (ICT) in agriculture in Adamawa state, Nigeria. African J. Agric. Res and Development, 5(1), pp 75-85.

  15. Gandhi, V. P. and Namboodiri, N. V., 2002, Fruit and vegetable marketing and its efficiency in India: A study of wholesale markets in the Ahmedabad area. Indian Inst., Ahmedabad, India, pp. 1-26. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)