Hatchability parameters and embryonic mortality
The production rates for each egg category are presented in Table 1. Hatchability was significantly higher in nest-laid eggs compared to floor-laid eggs (90.0 vs. 80.4; P = 0.018), representing a 9.6% reduction in FE. Embryonic mortality was also significantly affected by egg type (P = 0.021). In contrast, no significant differences were found between the two categories for peeping mortality or clear egg rates (P>0.05), with clear egg values of 4.9 (NE) and 9.1 (FE).
In this study, eggs laid on the floor exhibited a significantly lower hatchability rate (80.4%) compared to eggs laid in nests (90%) (P = 0.018). These findings align with those of
Ahamed et al., (2019), who reported that eggs laid in nests had a significantly higher hatchability rate than those laid on the floor (90% vs. 83.16%, respectively). Similarly,
Van den Brand et al. (2016) found that eggs laid on the floor had a lower hatchability rate than washed eggs and eggs laid in nests (74.4% 70.6% and 92.6%, respectively).
Our results are also consistent with those of
Heire and Jarp (2001), who concluded in an epidemiological study that incubating eggs laid on the floor led to a 1.07% decrease in overall flock hatchability. This reduction can likely be attributed to the increased embryonic mortality rate in floor-laid eggs, which, in turn, negatively impacted hatchability.
The type of egg significantly influenced (P = 0.021) embryonic mortality in this study. However, no significant differences (P>0.05) were observed between the two egg types regarding culling mortality. Embryonic mortality refers to eggs containing dead embryos that show no signs of culling. The embryonic mortality rate was notably higher in floor-laid eggs (+4%; P = 0.021), which is consistent with the findings of
Van den Brand et al. (2016), who observed significant differences in embryonic mortality between eggs laid on the floor and those laid in nests during various stages of incubation.
The higher embryonic mortality in floor-laid eggs may be partially explained by increased bacterial penetration, which leads to higher mortality during incubation
(Van den Brand et al., 2016). However, floor-laid eggs, which often have more cracks and higher bacterial contamination, are more susceptible to bacterial penetration
(Smeltzer et al., 1979) before and during incubation, potentially leading to lower hatchability
(Heier and Jarp, 2001) compared to clean nest eggs. Furthermore,
Deeming et al., (2002) demonstrated that eggs laid on the floor were more prone to bacterial contamination of the yolk sac (43% versus 11% in clean nest eggs), which resulted in embryonic death around 18 days of incubation, even when the eggshell remained intact. This suggests that bacteria can penetrate the eggshell and negatively impact embryo development by infecting the yolk sac.
Floor-laid eggs are more likely to be dirty
(Berrang et al., 1997), harbor higher levels of bacteria on the eggshell and have a greater incidence of breakage or cracks compared to clean nest eggs
(De Reu, 2006). Additionally, the increased proportion of dirty eggs laid on the floor may elevate the risk of contamination of other eggs if they rupture during incubation, further exacerbating the negative impact of bacterial contamination of eggs on overall hatchability and chick quality. Studies have demonstrated that cracked eggs are associated with lower hatchability, poorer chick quality at hatching and/or higher mortality rates later in life
(Barnett et al., 2004; Khabisi et al., 2012) when compared to intact eggs.
In this study, pipping mortalities were similar between FE and NE eggs (P>0.05). Peeping mortality is primarily related to the mechanical action of peeping, which requires significant effort and energy from the chick, as well as the conditions of gas exchange (CO
2 and O
2) and possibly the shell’s rigidity
(Sauveur, 1988). Peeping mortality may also be attributed to overheating during hatching caused by poor humidity and ventilation conditions, leading to suffocation and embryonic death
(Azeroul, 2011).
Chick quality
The day-old chick quality results for each egg category are shown in Table 2. Day-old chick quality results are shown in Table 2. While average egg weights did not differ significantly between groups (P>0.05), chicks from NE were heavier at hatch (+3.12%; P<0.001), representing 68.4% of egg weight compared to 66.3% for FE. Chick yield was also significantly higher in NE (+2.1%; P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in the Pasgar score between groups (P>0.05).
In contrast to the positive effects observed for NE eggs on chick quality at hatch in this study,
Ahamed et al., (2019) found no significant impact of floor-laid eggs on live weight, yield, or Pasgar score of day-old chicks.
In this study, chick weight at hatch was significantly higher in the NE group (+3.12%; P<0.001). However, some studies have indicated that live weight is the most commonly used parameter for assessing day-old chick quality. The differences observed in hatch weight may be primarily due to the initial egg weight and moisture loss during incubation
(Petek et al., 2010).
It is widely accepted that chick weight is correlated with broiler chicken slaughter performance
(Tona et al., 2004; Van Den Brand et al., 2016;
Boussaada and Ouachem, 2018;
Jabbar, 2017). Some researchers have found a positive relationship between chick length and live weight at 42 days of age. Additionally, chick length is an important indicator of chick quality and can be measured quickly
(Decuypere et al., 2001; Tona et al., 2004; Ípek and Sözcü, 2013).
Ípek and Sözcü, (2013) reported that an increase in chick length in male broilers, derived from the same egg size on the day of hatching, resulted in increased live weight. Chick length is also vital for ensuring greater uniformity and predicting growth performance
(Ould-Ali and Schulte, 2015).
Regarding chick yield, the results of this study show that NE eggs significantly improved chick yield compared to FE eggs (+2.1%; P<0.001). Water loss is crucial for optimal chick yield. The recommended chick yield for high-quality chicks is 69%. Water loss and chick yield are closely linked; if chick yield exceeds 69%, it can lead to dehydration, making it difficult for chicks to hatch and resulting in higher mortality during rearing. On the other hand, when chick yield is below 67%, excess water retention in chicks can occur, leading to lethargy and refusal to feed. Eggs with contaminated shells are unable to retain sufficient water for proper hatching
(Tona et al., 2004; Jabbar, 2017).
In this study, no significant difference in Pasgar scores was observed between the two egg categories (P>0.05). The Pasgar score is a visual scoring system used to assess chick quality based on five morphological criteria: reflexes, navel condition, legs, beak and yolk sac condition. Some studies have reported that high-quality chicks receive a Pasgar score of 10
(Tona et al., 2004; Ould-Ali and Schulte, 2015).
Several morphological criteria are used to evaluate day-old chicks. The chick should appear clean, dry and free from dirt or contamination, with bright and clear eyes. It should be active and responsive to sound. Chicks with deep, clear yellow coloring are considered superior to those with pale or light yellow. The navel should be fully healed and the body and legs should have a normal conformation, with no swelling or lesions on the hock. The skin and toes should be well-formed and the beak should be properly shaped, closed and straight. The abdomen area should be checked for thickness, which is influenced by temperature and humidity
(Tona et al., 2004; Ípek and Sözcü, 2013).