Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) distribution
The T
3 treatment (dragon fruit sole) had the highest mean maximum light intensity (1503.36 μmol m
-2 s
-1), followed by the T
2 treatment (aonla + dragon fruit) at 1181.70 μmol m
-2 s
-1 and the T
1 treatment (multistoried system) at 1128.22 μmol m
-2 s
-1. The PAR received by the T
1 and T
2 was 75 and 78.60%, respectively. Due to variation of the canopy density over storied tree species light variation has occurred on dragon fruit (Fig 2).
Fruit length, diameter and weight
The interaction of the multistoried fruit production model and dragon fruit genotypes significantly affected fruit length, diameter and weight (Fig 3). The longest fruit (8.74 cm) was observed in the T
1V
2 combination (white-fleshed genotype in multistoried), while the smallest (7.92 cm) was in T
3V
1. The multistoried system (T
1V
1) produced the widest fruit (11.66 cm), while the narrowest was in T
3V
1 (7.92 cm). Red-fleshed genotypes produced larger, wider fruit (261.67 g in T
1V
1). The multistoried system yielded larger fruit (154.34 g in T
3V
2) due to fewer fruits per plant, increasing individual fruit weight
(Reza et al., 2022).
Moisture level
The moisture contents of dragon fruit in different treatments and genotypes were given in Table 1. The white fleshed genotype had the maximum moisture content (86.36%) in the T
3V
2 treatment, moderate moisture content was found in T
2V
2 treatment and in T
1V
2 treatment. The lowest moisture content was found in the red fleshed genotype of dragon fruit in T
3V
1 (84.10 %) and in T
2V
1 (84.16 %) treatments, respectively. According to
(Nomura et al., 2005 and
Sonawane, 2017) the moisture percentage of dragon fruit was 83-89%, which was roughly close to the dragon fruit used in the study.
pH
pH is the measurement of acidity or alkalinity of a product. pH of dragon fruit samples was not significantly varied and the value ranged from 4.63 to 4.66 (Table 1). According to
Sonawane, (2017) and
Nomura et al., (2005) dragon fruit pH range was 4 to 6 which supports the present findings.
Brix content
The highest TSS (25.28%) was recorded in the T
3V
1 treatment, followed by T
1V
1 and T
2V
1. The lowest TSS (23.06%) was found in T
3V
2, which was statistically similar to T
1V
2 (23.11%) and T
2V
2 (23.10%). These results suggest that red dragon fruit, with higher TSS content, is sweeter than white-pulped varieties.
Mallik et al. (2018) reported that TSS in dragon fruit ranges from 23.10% to 27.17%, with fruit setting times significantly influencing TSS content.
Energy content
Energy measurement is crucial for dietary balance. T
2V
1 had the highest energy content (62.70 Kcal/100 g), followed by T
3V
1 (62.50 Kcal/100 g), while T
2V
2 had the lowest (40.40 Kcal/100 g) (Table 1). Red-fleshed dragon fruit had higher energy content than the white-fleshed variety.
Patel and Ishnava, (2019),
Nurul and Asmah, (2014) and
Wichienchot et al. (2010) reported 60 Kcal/100 g in fresh dragon fruit.
Sugar content
The highest total and reducing sugar were in T
1V
1, followed by T
2V
1 and T
3V
1, while T
1V
2 had the lowest (Table 1). T
2V
1 had the highest non-reducing sugar and T
1V
2 the lowest. Shaded conditions in multistoried models may enhance sweetness. Red dragon fruit, with higher TSS, had more sugar than the white variety
(Liaotrakoon et al., 2013). Nurul and Asmah, (2014) noted that the growing environment significantly affects dragon fruit’s nutritional and phytochemical composition.
Fat content
Both the dragon fruit genotypes contain 0.395 g/100 g fat in all the three treatments (Table 1). According to
Sonawane, (2017) the fat level of dragon fruit was 0.4 g/100 g which was roughly similar to the dragon fruit that was studied.
Carbohydrate content
Energy measurement is crucial for dietary balance. T
2V
1 had the highest energy content (62.70 Kcal/100 g), followed by T
3V
1 (62.50 Kcal/100 g), while T
2V
2 had the lowest (40.40 Kcal/100 g) (Table 1). Red-fleshed dragon fruit had higher energy content than the white-fleshed variety.
Patel and Ishnava, (2019);
Nurul and Asmah, (2014) and
Wichienchot et al. (2010) reported 60 Kcal/100 g in fresh dragon fruit.
Fiber content
Dragon fruit’s highest fiber content was in T
3V
1 (0.68 g/100 g), moderate in T
2V
1 (0.55 g) and lowest in T
3V
2 (Table 1). Red-fleshed dragon fruit had more fiber, likely due to genetics.
Liaotrakoon et al. (2013) reported fiber content ranging from 0.5-0.7 g/100 g, supporting this study.
Protein content
Protein content of dragon fruit varied from 1.17 to 1.11 g among all the treatment combinations and there was no significant difference found. (Table 1). According
Sonawane, (2017) protein content of dragon fruit was 0.50 to 1.10 g/100 g fresh sample which supports the result.
Ash level
T
3V
1 has noticeably the greatest ash content (1.80 g/100 g) and the lowest ash content was found in T
3V
2 (1.60 g/100 g) treatment combination (Table 1). Red fleshed dragon fruit genotype produced comparatively higher amount of ash than white one irrespective of treatments. This variation in ash content might be due to the genetic make-up of dragon fruit genotypes. According to
Kishore, (2016) ash content of dragon fruit varies from 1.50 g to 2.00 g which was approximately similar to that of the result.
Vitamin C content
Treatment combinations significantly affected vitamin C content in dragon fruit. T
3V
1 had the highest (25.12 mg/100 g), while T
1V
2 had the lowest (22.79 mg) (Table 1). Full sun exposure increased vitamin C levels.
Sumaryani and Dharmadewi, (2018) reported 29.00 mg in red-fleshed and 22.30 mg in white-fleshed dragon fruit.
Sonawane, (2017) found 20.50 mg, while
Kishore, (2016) reported 25.00 mg, aligning with the present study.
Mineral composition
Minerals are essential for health, classified as macro and trace elements. The T
1V
1 treatment yielded the highest mineral content in dragon fruit, with K (5.80 mg) being the highest, followed by Mg and Na, while Ca was lowest (0.76 mg). All treatments showed a similar trend (K > Mg > Na > Ca), likely influenced by genotype and shading (Table 2).
Liaotrakoon et al. (2013) noted that genotype and flowering time affect fruit growth, size and nutritional quality.
Nutritional comparison of dragon fruit genotypes
Two dragon fruit genotypes showed significant nutritional differences under various treatments (Table 3). The red-fleshed genotype had higher moisture, TSS, energy, sugars, fiber and vitamin C than the white-fleshed type. Mineral content also varied significantly (Table 3), with red-fleshed dragon fruit containing more Na (1.58 mg/g), while the white-fleshed type had slightly higher Ca (0.66 mg/g), K (6.31 mg/g) and Mg (3.20 mg/g), likely due to genetic factors.
Liaotrakoon et al. (2013) noted species, origin and harvest time influence nutritional quality, while
Nurul and Asmah, (2014) highlighted environmental effects. The correlation heat map (Fig 4) reveals strong positive and negative relationships, including a significant negative correlation between fiber and sodium (r = -0.96) and a strong positive correlation between total sugar and energy content (r = 0.99).
Biplot principal component analysis
The first two principal components (PC1: 67.1%, PC2: 9.0%) explain 76.1% of the total variance (Fig 5). The PCA biplot reveals six distinct clusters representing dragon fruit genotypes and treatments. Genotypes V
1 and V
2 are clearly separated, indicating significant differences. Treatments 2 and 3 enhance ash content and vitamin C, while treatment 1 boosts total and reducing sugars in V
1. In V
2, treatment 3 improves mineral traits like calcium and magnesium, aiding treatment optimization.