Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Genetic Diversity of Trichoderma spp. Isolated from Soils in the Iraqi Environment

Mayada Mahmoud Muteab1, Aqeel N. AL-Abedy1,*
1Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Background: Trichoderma species are biocontrol fungi of great significance in sustainable agriculture soils worldwide. Despite their global importance, little is known about the genetic diversity of local strains, particularly those from extreme habitat Iraqi desert soils. The study utilizes precise molecular techniques (PCR/ ITS analysis), avoiding classical identification constraints, to explore the genetic diversity of Najaf and Karbala Trichoderma isolates. Through comparisons with worldwide records (National center for biotechnology information, NCBI), the research aims at understanding local biodiversity and determining their prospects for sustainable agricultural applications.

Methods: Fungal isolates from desert soils were molecular identified using PCR, amplifying the ITS genetic region with the ITS1-ITS4 primers. Resulting DNA sequences were compared to the NCBI database through BLAST to identify  species. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out using MEGA-X. Distinct isolates were identified and accession numbers were assigned. This molecular approach successfully enabled assessment of genetic diversity within Trichoderma spp. populations.

Result: Genetic analysis revealed two novel, previously unregistered isolates: T. reesei (4) and Trichoderma harzianum (5) , which were then deposited in NCBI under the accession numbers PV112458 and PV114821, respectively. The other identified species, Trichoderma viride (3), Trichoderma longibrachiatum (1) and Trichoderma harzianum (2), were also recorded in NCBI, with the accession numbers PV113441, PV114839 and PV114819, respectively.

Fungi comprise a large diversity of eukaryotic life forms that have major environmental functions as decomposers and  living symbiotically with plants (Hawksworth and Lücking, 2017). They are found in almost all environments, including soil, water and air, as well as on and within living and non-living surfaces. According to estimates, there are millions of fungal species on Earth but a small fraction of them have been formally named until now (Blackwell, 2011; Al-Abedy et al., 2020).
       
Fungi are important to plant health, but can also be beneficial or harmful. Pathogenic fungi are among the main causes of significant of severe economic losses in agriculture, with widely reported damage to agricultural crops in general and food production and food safety in particular (Strange and Scott, 2005). In order to reduce the effect of fungal diseases, the cause requires accurate and rapid identification of the pathogen, which enables the selection of appropriate and effective control strategies, whether chemical, biological, or cultural (Agrios, 2005). Rapid diagnosis also facilitates the implementation of preventive measures to curb disease spreading in other areas or crops. In addition, it helps to maintain crop health and reduce the damage caused by fungal infections, increasing the dividend and improves the quality of the product (Kamaluddin et al., 2021).
       
The morphological characteristics of fungi such as appearance of fungal colonies, the size and shape of spores and reproductive structures are used for traditional fungal identification (Leslie and Summerell, 2006; Al-Salami et al., 2019; Odeh et al., 2021; Mnati et al., 2021). Morphological identification is a simple and low-cost method, requiring no advanced equipment or specialized materials  but it comes with some restrictions. Most fungal species share morphological characteristics, making accurate morphological diagnosis highly dependent on extensive expertise and detailed knowledge of fungal taxonomy. Fungi features are also affected by environmental conditions like temperature, humidity and the growth medium, so identification can be difficult and less accurate. Additionally, morphological identification involves intensive laborious procedures, including the cultivation of fungi in the laboratory, continuous monitoring of growth and development and macroscopic and microscopic examination (Bhunjun et al., 2021).
       
In recent years, molecular diagnostic methods have quickly developed into fast and reliable alternatives to the morphological identification of fungi. DNA analysis forms the basis of these techniques, allowing for discriminatory and speedy identification at the fungal species level (Bahar et al., 2020; Al-Abedy et al., 2020). One of these techniques, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), is especially noteworthy because of its accuracy in differentiating between fungal species and strains. This type of analysis is based on genetic material, a unique genetic fingerprint for each species and strain (Bridge and Spooner, 2001).
       
Molecular diagnosis can be completed within a few hours, allowing for rapid action to control fungal diseases (Schena et al., 2004; Renuka et al., 2025). Additionally, molecular diagnostic techniques are not influenced by surrounding environmental conditions, making them more reliable than morphological diagnosis (Al-Sharmani et al., 2019; Aljuaifari et al., 2019; Dewan et al., 2020).A recent study demonstrated that polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology is highly effective in diagnosing various fungal pathogens, including Fusarium oxysporum, the causative agent of Fusarium wilt in tomatoes. This approach enabled precise and rapid identification of the pathogen, facilitating the implementation of effective measures to control disease spread (Kumar et al., 2024). Another study illustrated how sequencing technology can be used to detect rare and/or unfamiliar fungal species that are challenging to identify by morphology methods (Irinyi et al., 2023). Molecular diagnostic methods are being applied for the early detection of plant-pathogenic fungi and to implement preventive actions before disease symptoms appear (Mahmoudi et al., 2025).
       
Given the importance of accurately identifying both pathogenic and non-pathogenic fungi, this study aims to characterize fungal isolates belonging to the genus Trichoderma collected from different soil types. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology and nucleotide sequence analysis of the amplified DNA products will be utilized to determine the genetic similarities and differences between the isolates in this study and globally documented Trichoderma isolates.
Molecular identification of fungal isolates
 
The genomic DNA of the fungal isolates was extracted using the Favorgen DNA extraction kit (Cat. No: FAPGK100), according to the manufacturer’s procedures (Favorgen, Taiwan-China). The extracted DNA concentration and purity were evaluated using a spectrophotometer at 260 and 280 nm wavelengths (Williams et al., 1997). DNA was extracted and stored at -20oC until PCR analysis.
 
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
 
The partial ITS region of each DNA extracted from each Trichoderma isolate was PCR-amplified using the universal primer pair: ITS1 (TCCGTTGGTGAACCAGCGG) and ITS4 (TCCTCCGC TTATGATATGC) (White et al., 1990). PCR amplification was prepared using Taq DNA polymerase (Roche, Cat. No. 11 146 173 001) in a final volume of 20 μl PCR reaction mixture containing 2 μ1 10X PCR buffer, 1 μl each primer (10 pmol), 3 μl template DNA (30 ng/μ1), 2 μl dNTPs (2 mM) and 1 unit Taq polymerase. Each sample volume was then completed to 20 μl by adding nuclease-free water.
       
The amplification of DNA from fungal isolates was carried out using the following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions: An initial denaturation step at 98oC for 5 minutes, followed by 35 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94oC for 45 seconds, primer annealing at 55oC for 45 seconds and an initial elongation step at 72oC for 1 minute. The PCR process was concluded with a final elongation step at 72oC for 5 minutes.
 
Agarose gel electrophoresis
 
Agarose gel preparation: 1 g of agarose powder was dissolved in 100 mL of 1 × TBE buffer (Tris-Boric acid-EDTA buffer) until the solution became clear. When the solution had cooled to about 45oC, 5 microliters of ethidium bromide dye were added. A gel casting tray with a comb on one side for well formation was prepared. Agarose containing ethidium bromide was poured into the tray and left to solidifyat room temperature. Following polymerization, the comb was gently pulled and the tray returned to the electrophoresis tank. The tank was filled with 1 × TBE buffer, covering the agarose gel with about 70 mm height.
       
Ten microliters of the PCR-amplified DNA product were added to each well of the previously prepared agarose gel. Additionally, five microliters of a molecular-weight size marker were added to the well on the left side of the sample wells to determine the sizes of the amplified DNA fragments. The electrodes of the power supply were connected to the electrophoresis tank and the system was run at 150 milliamps for one hour. After the electrophoresis process was completed, the agarose gel containing the PCR products was examined under ultraviolet (UV) transillumination and images were captured.
 
Analysis of PCR-amplified DNA sequences
 
To identify the fungal isolates, the PCR-amplified DNA products from the fungal isolates, obtained using the ITS1 and ITS4 primers, were sent to Macrogen (South Korea) for bidirectional sequencing of the nucleotide sequences.
       
All nucleotide sequences were analyzed using the BLAST (basic local alignment search tool) program to compare them with available sequences in the National center for biotechnology information (NCBI) database, specifically those of globally identified fungal species. Based on the nucleotide sequences of Trichoderma spp. obtained through PCR, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the MEGA-X software (Kumar et al., 2018).
 
Analysis of DNA sequences with PCR amplification
 
For identification of the fungal isolates, the PCR amplified DNA products of the fungal isolates using the ITS1 and ITS4 primers were sent to Macrogen (South Korea) for bidirectional sequencing of the nucleotide sequences. Nucleotide sequences were compared to globally identified fungal species by BLAST (basic local alignment search tool) program with reference sequences available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. According to the nucleotide sequences of Trichoderma spp. PCR and a phylogenetic tree was constructed with the MEGA-X software (Kumar et al., 2018).
Molecular identification of Trichoderma spp. isolates
 
The results of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) demonstrated the successful amplification of DNA products ranging in size from 600 to 650 base pairs (bp) after extracting the DNA from the fungal isolates and amplifying it using PCR with the ITS1 and ITS4 primer pair (Fig 1).

Fig 1: PCR-amplified DNA products obtained using the ITS1 and ITS4 primers from Trichoderma spp. isolates in this study.


       
Sequence analysis of PCR products, conducted using BLAST, indicated that all isolates fell within the Trichoderma genus, though representing distinct species. Isolates 2 and 5 of Trichoderma were identified as T. harzianum, yet showed genetic dissimilarity despite a 93% sequence similarity. These two isolates shared 91-100% similarity with other T. harzianum isolates already documented in the NCBI database (Fig 2).

Fig 2: Variations in specific nucleotide sequence positions between T. harzianum isolates (2 and 5) identified in this study.


       
Comparison of the ITS1 and ITS4 nucleotide sequences, amplified from T. harzianum isolate 1, revealed a maximum similarity of 100% with a T. harzianum isolate (EOD AEe2 s, OR435192) collected and identified in Russia. The lowest similarity (90%) was observed with isolates from Singapore (OQ789693 and OQ789699), India (PQ277020) and the United States (PP336463). When compared to other isolates registered at the NCBI, isolate 1 showed similarity ranging from 92-99% (Fig 3).

Fig 3: Similarities and differences in specific nucleotide sequence regions (sequence alignments) of PCR-amplified DNA products from T. harzianum isolates (2 and 5) identified in this study, compared to nucleotide sequences of other T. harzianum isolates previously recorded in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).


       
Regarding T. harzianum isolate 2, identified in this study, its closest genetic similarity (98%) was with T. harzianum isolates EOD AEe2 s (OR435192), from Russia and those documented in Saudi Arabia (OK636078) and India (EF552703). Conversely, it showed greater genetic distance from isolates such as those from the United States (PP336463) and Iran (KT351798).  Other isolates registered at the NCBI exhibited similarity ranging from 92-97% with isolate 2. Both T. harzianum isolates 2 and 5 were deposited in the NCBI under accession numbers PV113441 and PV112458, respectively (Fig 4).

Fig 4: Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree showing the genetic relationship between T. harzianum isolates (2 and 5) identified in this study and other T. harzianum isolates previously recorded in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).


       
The results also indicated that fungal isolates 1, 6 and 8 all belonged to T. longibrachaitum, exhibiting 100% similarity (Fig 5 and 6). When the nucleotide sequences of the amplified products from these isolates were compared with sequences of the same gene region from isolates of the same fungus previously registered at the NCBI, 100% similarity was observed with a T. longibrachaitum isolate (KY764813) isolated and identified in China. Other isolates registered at the NCBI, including those identified in China (MF116273, KY750397, MH284177 and KY76481) and Australia (MK870340), showed 99% similarity (Fig 5 and 6).

Fig 5: Similarity in nucleotide sequence alignments of PCR-amplified DNA products from T. longibrachiatum isolates (1, 6 and 8) identified in this study, compared to nucleotide sequences of other T. longibrachiatum isolates previously recorded in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).



Fig 6: Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree showing the genetic relationship between T. longibrachiatum isolates (1, 6 and 8) identified in this study and other T. longibrachiatum isolates previously recorded in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).


       
Analysis of the nucleotide sequences, illustrated in Fig 7 and 8, confirmed that isolates 4 and 7 belong to the fungus Trichoderma reesei. They exhibited 100% similarity to each other and to the T. reesei isolate (MW789354) registered at the NCBI. However, the similarity of isolates 4 and 7 with other isolates registered at the NCBI was lower, reaching a minimum of 96%. These less similar isolates included those identified in China (FJ481035) and Russia (OR435208). Isolates 4 and 7 showed 97-99% similarity with the remaining isolates registered at the NCBI.

Fig 7: Similarities and differences in specific nucleotide sequence regions (sequence alignments) of PCR-amplified DNA products from T. reesei isolates (4 and 7) identified in this study, compared to nucleotide sequences of other T. reesei isolates previously recorded in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).



Fig 8: Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree showing the genetic relationship between T. reesei isolates (4 and 7) identified in this study and other T. reesei isolates previously recorded in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).


       
The results also identified T. viride (isolate 3) among the Trichoderma spp. fungi identified in this study. This isolate showed 100% similarity with the T. viride isolate (HQ259987) identified in India and 99% similarity with other isolates, including those identified in India (OP480797 and HQ259984) and the United States (KJ406563) (Fig 9).

Fig 9: Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree showing the genetic relationship between T. viride isolate (3) identified in this study and other T. viride isolates previously recorded in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).


       
Based on the results of the genetic analysis, it was confirmed that there are two new isolates of T. harzianum (5) and T. reesei (4) that are genetically distinct and not previously registered at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Therefore, they were registered under the accession numbers PV112458 and PV114821, respectively. The remaining Trichoderma fungal species, represented by T. longibrachiatum (1), T. harzianum (2) and T. viride (3), were also registered at the NCBI under the accession numbers PV114839, PV113441 and PV114819, respectively.
       
The sequencing of PCR-amplified products using ITS1 and ITS4 primers has proven highly effective in identifying various fungal species, including T. harzianum, T. longibrachiatum and T. viride. Numerous studies have shown that the ITS region, which includes the ITS1 and ITS2 regions and the 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, exhibits significant diversity among fungal species (Ruppavalli et al., 2025). This diversity has made it a highly effective gene region for molecular identification of various eukaryotic organisms, including fungi (Aljuaifari et al., 2019; Jubair et al., 2020; AL-Abedy et al., 2021a; Al-Shujairi et al., 2022; Alhissnawi et al., 2024).
       
In this study, the ITS region was utilized for the molecular identification of Trichoderma spp. fungi isolated in this study with high efficiency. This was achieved through the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, known for its accuracy and speed in identifying various organisms, including insects and fungi (AL-Abedy et al., 2018; Al-Fadhal et al., 2018; Abdullah et al., 2019; AL-Abedy et al., 2021b; Mahmood and AL-Abedy, 2021).
       
Several factors contribute to the occurrence of variations or genetic diversity among species within the same genus of organisms, including fungal isolates. These factors include genetic mutations, genetic recombination and selective pressure, which lead to varying degrees of genetic diversity among fungal isolates. Such diversity is essential for adaptation, evolution and the ability of fungi to occupy diverse environments and interact with other living organisms (Gladieux et al., 2014). Furthermore, understanding this genetic variation is crucial for studying fungal pathogens and exploiting beneficial fungi for agricultural and industrial purposes (Brunner et al., 2013).
               
The genetic diversity of Trichoderma fungal species, especially the new isolates of T. harzianum (5) and T. reesei identified in this study, is of great importance because this genus includes various species that differ in their ability to control many plant pathogens. 
Exact molecular profiling (PCR/ITS sequencing) of  Trichoderma spp. isolates, identified in Iraqi soil,  confirmed clear genetic difference, testifying to their adaptability to differ in conditions and highlighting the importance of characterization of such resources. The current research positively distinguished T. harzianum, T. longibrachiatum and T. viride. Besides, two new isolates (T. reesei and T. harzianum)  previously  not  registered  on  NCBI  were  characterized, citing unique but uncharacterized strains  occurring in the Iraqi environment and adding to regional  diversity  knowledge.  Similar  findings  also  validated  the precision of ITS region use in Trichoderma species identification, suggesting itsdiagnostic validity. As  Trichoderma  possesses biocontrol potential, this study provides a platform for the further development of the potential of using these local isolates in sustainable agriculture. It immensely contributes to Iraqi Trichoderma genetic diversity, emphasizing the significance of local genetic material in the development of effective agricultural strategies.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Abdullah, A.A., Dewan, M.M. and AL-Abedy, A.N. (2019). Genetic variation of some isolates of Cladosporium sphaerospermum isolated from different environments. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing. 388(1): 012016. 

  2. Abedy, A.A., Musawi, B.A., Isawi, H.A. and Abdalmoohsin, R.G. (2021). Morphological and molecular identification of Cladosporium sphaerospermum isolates collected from tomato plant residues. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 82: e237428.

  3. Agrios, G.N. (2005). Plant Pathology. Elsevier.

  4. Al-Abedy, A.N., Al-Fadhal, F.A., Karem, M.H., Al-Masoudi, Z. and Al-Mamoori, S.A. (2018). Genetic variability of different isolates of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn isolated from Iranian imported potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.). International Journal of Agricultural Statistic Science. 14: 587-598.

  5. Al-Abedy, A.N., Al-Fadhal, F.A., Radi, W.A. and Salim, A.T. (2018). Molecular identification of tomato yellow leaf curl virus and its whitefly vector (Bemisia tabaci). Journal of Global Pharma Technology. 10(11): 924-933.

  6. Al-Abedy, A.N., Al-Janabi, R.G., Al-Tmeme, Z.A., Salim, A.T. and Ashfaq, M. (2020). Molecular characterization of novel isolates of Rhizoctoniasolani, Trichodermaatroviride and Fusarium spp. isolated from different plants and cutting woods in Iraq. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 52(3): 1-10.

  7. Al-Abedy, A.N., Al-Shujairi, K.A., Al-Salami, I., Ashfaq, M. and AL- Musawi, B.H. (2021a). Genetic variation among some isolates of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus and its control using some biological control fungi and nanoparticles. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. 17(1): 229-236.

  8. Al-Abedy, A.N., Kadhim, J.H., Abdalmoohsin, R.G. and Al-Taey, D.K. (2021b). Genetic diversity of Tomato yellow leaf curl virus isolates and the effect of virus on the hormones content of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants.  Research on Crops. 22(2): 347-355.

  9. Al-Fadhal, F.A., Al-Abedy, A.N. and Al-Janabi, M.M. (2018). Molecular identification of novel isolates of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn and Fusarium spp. (Matsushima) isolated from petunia plants (Petunia hybrida L.). Plant Archives. 18(1): 703-711.

  10. Al-Fadhal, F.A., Al-Abedy, A.N. and Alkhafije, D.A. (2019). Isolation and molecular identification of Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium solani isolated from cucumber (Cucumis sativus  L.) and their control feasibility by Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 29: 1-11.

  11. Alhissnawi, M.S., Karrem, A.A. and AL-Abedy, A.N. (2024, July). Molecular identification of dwarf honey bees (Apis florea fabricius) distributed in the eastern region of Iraq. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science IOP Publishing. 1371(3): 032046.

  12. Aljuaifari, W.A., Alshimaysawe, U.A., Mohammed, A.E. and Al-Abedy, A.N. (2019). Evaluate the ability of syntaxin genes to enhance resistance against Fusarium virguliforme and Heterodera glycines. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 388(1): 012014.

  13. Al-Salami, I., Al-Gwaree, R.N. and Al-Abedy, A.N. (2019). Genetic relationship among some isolates of Rhizoctonia solani isolated from some infected tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L). Journal of Global Pharma Technology. 11(7): 379-385.

  14. Al-Sharmani, H.R., Al-Kalabi, H.H. and AL-Abedy, A.N. (2019, November). Efficacy of rice husks compost and Trichoderma harzianum on Rhizoctoniasolani and its effect on seeds germination and seedling health. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing. 388(1): 012002.

  15. Al-Shujairi, K.A., Albehadlli, H.K., Kamaluddin, Z.N., Al-Abedy, A.N.  and Al-Taey, D.K. (2022). Genetic variation among some Sclerotiniasclerotiorum isolates causing white mold disease in eggplants (Solanum melongena). Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. 18(1): 399-407.

  16. Bahar, M., Al-Fadhal, F.A. and AL-Abedy, A.N. (2020). Molecular identification of some phytoplasma isolates collected from some economic crops and weeds in middle Euphrates region of Iraq. Plant Archives. 20(2): 4511-4514.

  17. Benzohra, I.E., Belaidi, H., Megateli, M., Djillali, K., Makhloufi, S., Benouis, S., Boumaaza, B., Mahiout, D. and Bendahmane, B.S. (2024). Evaluation of endophytic microorganisms (Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus subtilis) as bio- fungicides against bayoud disease (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. albedinis) on date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Agricultural Science Digest. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-553.

  18. Bhunjun, C.S., Phillips, A.J., Jayawardena, R.S., Promputtha, I. and Hyde, K.D. (2021). Importance of molecular data to identify fungal plant pathogens and guidelines for pathogenicity testing based on Koch’s postulates. Pathogens. 10(9): 1096.

  19. Blackwell, M. (2011). The Fungi: 1, 2, 3, 5.1 million species?. American Journal of Botany. 98(3). 426-438.

  20. Bridge, P.D., Spooner, B.M. (2001). Molecular taxonomy: Its applicability to routine identification of fungi. Mycopathologia. 153(1): 1-13.

  21. Brunner, P.C., Peter, S., Kohli, Y., Viaud, M., Shimizu, K.K., Sotiropoulos, A.G. (2013). Genetic diversity and population structure of Botrytis cinerea on strawberry in Switzerland. Plant Pathology. 62(3): 612-622.

  22. Dewan, M.M., AL-Asadi, A.H. and AL-Abedy, A.N. (2020). New report of the pathogenic isolate of Fusarium solani isolated from Iraqi potato tubers infected with Fusarium dry rot. Ecology, Environment and Conservation Journal. 26(1): 78-82.

  23. Gladieux P., Condon B., Rieux A., Abadie C., Shabbir A., Halkett F. (2014). Proximate and ultimate drivers of adaptive evolution in fungal pathogens. New Phytologist. 203(2): 358-374.

  24. Hawksworth, D.L. and Lücking, R. (2017). Fungal diversity revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 million species. Microbiology Spectrum. 5(4): 10-1128.

  25. Irinyi L., Serena C., Garcia-Hermoso D., De Hoog S. (2023). Novel sequencing-based methods to study fungal evolution. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2670: 33-47.

  26. Jubair, A.F., Alwan, S.L. and Al-Abedy, A.N. (2020). Genetic variability of different isolates of Fusarium spp. isolated from imported banana fruits Musa spp. Plant Archives. (09725210). 20(2).

  27. Kamaluddin, Z.N., Merjan, A.F. and AL-Abedy, A.N. (2021). Decreased Rhizoctonia solani growth rate in vitro with concentrations of olive and conocarpus leaves extract. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. 17(1): 1943-1948.

  28. Kumar, S., Steenkamp, E.T., Fourie, P.H., Gordon, T.R. (2024). Real- time PCR assays for the detection and quantification of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 in Cavendish banana plants. Plant Pathology. 73(2): 280-291.

  29. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Bnyaz, C. and Tamura, K. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 35(6): 1547-1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096.

  30. Leslie, J.F. and Summerell, B.A. (2006). Fusarium laboratory workshops: A recent history. Mycotoxin Research. 22(2): 73-74.

  31. Mahmood, A.M. and Al-Abedy, A.N. (2021). Effect of some species of Trichoderma spp. and the chemical fungicide Topsin m in control of the disease of seed rot and seedling damping off of okra caused by Fusarium culmorum. Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. 3899: 17-1701.

  32. Mahmoudi, S. et al. (2025). Early detection of fungal pathogens using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) in agricultural crops. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 135(1):  1-12.

  33. Mnati, M.A., Dewan, M.M., AL-Abedy, A.N. and Altaie, A. (2021). Morphological and molecular identification of Fusarium spp. and Macrophominaphaseolina isolated from cowpea plants (Vignaunguiculata). International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. 17(2).

  34. Mnati, M.A., Dewan, M.M., AL-Abedy, A.N. and Altaie, A. (2021). Morphological and molecular identification of Fusarium spp. and Macrophomina phaseolina isolated from cowpea plants (Vignaunguiculata). International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. 17(2). 

  35. Odeh, A., Abdalmoohsin, R.G. and AL-Abedy, A.N. (2021). Molecular  identification of Fusarium brachygibbosum and some isolates of Trichoderma spp. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 13(1): 1390-1396.

  36. Renuka, R., Prabakar, K., Pugalendhi, L., Rajendran, L., Anandham, R., Raguchander, T. and Karthikeyan, G. (2025). Understanding    the etiology of chilli fruit rot disease in Tamil Nadu. Agricultural Science Digest. 45(1): 110-116. doi: 10.18805/ ag.D-5684.

  37. Ruppavalli, M.V., Johnson, I., Karthikeyan, M., Parthiban, V.K. and Arul, L. (2025). Virulence assay and morpho-molecular characterization of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum-the cabbage head rot pathogen. Agricultural Science Digest. 45(1). doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5681 

  38. Schena, L., Ippolito, A., Pennycook, S.R. (2004). Development of a specific PCR-based assay for the detection of Phytophthora cactorum. Journal of Plant Pathology. 86(2): 131-139.

  39. Strange, R.N. and Scott, P.R. (2005). Plant disease: A threat to global food security. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 43(1): 83-116.

  40. White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S.J. W.T. and Taylor, J. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. 18(1): 315-322.

Editorial Board

View all (0)