The analyzed results of the basic characteristics of soil samples collected from three surveyed positions are presented in Table 1. When considering soil texture, the NFL exhibited an average sand content of 35.2%, clay content of 46.5% and silt content of 18.3%. Similarly, the CCL showed a similar trend with slight variations (34.1%, 46.3% and 19.6%). On the other hand, the BHL displayed higher sand content (38.6%), lower clay content (44.6%) and lower silt content (16.8%). The NFL demonstrated CV values of 3.9%, 4.4% and 3.2% for sand, clay and silt, respectively. In contrast, the CCL exhibited higher CV values (7.4%, 5.7% and 4.3%), indicating greater variability. The BHL had CV values of 6.3%, 5.1% and 4.1% for sand, clay and silt, respectively. The skewness values, which represent the asymmetry of the distribution, were generally close to zero for all land types, indicating a relatively symmetrical distribution of soil texture characteristics.
In terms of soil BD, the average values for NFL, CCL and BHL were 0.88 g/cm³, 1.05 g/cm³ and 1.09 g/cm³, respectively. The NFL exhibited the lowest minimum value of 0.83 g/cm³, while the CCL had the highest maximum value of 1.09 g/cm³. The CV for soil BD ranged from 0.94% to 12.3%, suggesting varying levels of density within each land type. For soil pH, the average values for NFL, CCL and BHL were 4.41, 4.58 and 4.47, respectively. The minimum and maximum values for pH varied slightly across the land types. The CV for soil pH ranged from 2.17% to 2.83%, indicating relatively low variability in pH levels within each land type. Regarding SOC content, the NFL displayed an average value of 18.86 g/kg, while the CCL and BHL showed average values of 26.49 g/kg and 18.45 g/kg, respectively. The CV for SOC content ranged from 3.7% to 5.2%, indicating moderate variability within each land type. For SN levels, the average values for CCL, NFL and BHL were 2.47 g/kg, 2.25 g/kg and 1.87 g/kg, respectively. The CV for SN ranged from 5.9% to 9.7%, indicating moderate variability within each land type.
Overall, the analysis of these fundamental soil characteristics provides valuable insights into the physicochemical properties of soil across the study area. These analyses contribute to a better understanding of soil health, fertility and inform LUPs within the study area.
The analysis of soil characteristics in the three LUPs reveals relationships between soil texture, soil BD, soil pH, SOC and SN (Table 2). For soil texture, it is observed that the average sand content is similar across all land types, ranging from 34.1% to 38.6%. However, there is slight variation in the silt content, with the CCL having the highest average (19.8%) and the BHL having the lowest (16.6%). This suggests that the LUTs have comparable sand content but differ in terms of silt content (Fig 4). Soil BD shows minimal variation among three LUTs, with average values ranging from 0.88 to 1.09 g/cm³.
This implies that the compactness of the soil is relatively consistent across the different land types while soil pH levels are consistent across all land types, with an average of 4.48. This indicates that the acidity of the soil is similar regardless of land use. Examining SOC content, it is evident that the CCL has the highest average (26.49 g/kg), followed by the NFL (18.86 g/kg) and the BHL (18.45 g/kg). As previously analyzed, variations in SOC and SN contents among the LUTs can be attributed to various factors, including LUPs and environmental factors
(Pires et al., 2023; Pouyat and Trammell, 2019). Several studies have demonstrated the influence of LUPs on these soil characteristics
(Benslama et al., 2024; Chemada et al., 2017). The analyzed results align with previous studies, confirming significant variations in SOC and SN contents associated with LUPs (Fig 5). This indicates that CCL has a higher SOC content compared to the other land types while SN content also follows a similar trend as SOC, with the CCL exhibiting the highest average (2.82 g/kg), followed by the NFL (2.25 g/kg) and the BHL (1.87 g/kg).
There is a strong negative correlation between sand content and silt content (-0.872), indicating an inverse relationship between these two soil texture components (Table 3). Similarly, there is a weak negative correlation between sand content and clay content (-0.06), suggesting a slight inverse relationship between these variables. Soil BD shows a moderate positive correlation with sand content (0.618) and a moderate negative correlation with silt content (-0.671). This implies that as sand content increases, soil BD also tends to increase, while a higher silt content is associated with lower soil BD. Soil pH demonstrates a strong positive correlation with BD (0.871) and a weak positive correlation with sand content (0.017). This indicates that higher soil pH values are associated with higher soil BD and a slightly higher proportion of sand in the soil.
Further more, SOC exhibits a strong negative correlation with BD (-0.946) and a strong positive correlation with silt content (0.781). This suggests that as soil BD decreases, the amount of organic carbon in the soil tends to increase and a higher silt content is associated with higher organic carbon levels. Soil nitrogen shows a strong positive correlation with SOC (0.891) and a moderate negative correlation with sand content (-0.636). This implies that as the organic carbon content increases, there is a corresponding increase in soil nitrogen, while a higher proportion of sand is associated with lower nitrogen levels.
In conclusion, the correlation analysis highlights the interrelationships among soil texture, soil BD, soil pH, SOC and SN in the LUTs. These findings provide insights into the complex dynamics of soil properties and their potential implications for soil fertility and nutrient cycling in different LUMs use contexts.