The statistical analysis of results showed significant differences between the date palm varieties and also between two antagonistic microorganisms (Table 2). The results showed a high level of effectiveness of the two microorganisms on theincidence of Bayoud disease of date palm compared to the control. The control (direct inoculation with Foa alone), presented a very high mortality rate up to 100% (Table 2), with typical symptoms of bayoud disease by vascular wilt and discoloration (Fig 2). The antagonistic fungus
T. harzianum showed the total absence of bayoud disease symptoms without mortality rate (
rm) observed (0%), (Table 2). The second species, the bacterium
B. subtilus showed an antagonistic behavior less than the fist species (
T. harzianum), withrm value varied according to the date palm variety. In two varieties (Deglet-Nour and H-mira),
B. subtilus showed the total absence also of typical symptoms of bayoud (0%), but in the variety Feggous, the
rm values was 50%. In comparison between these two species, we can say that the fungus
T. harzianum was more efficiency than the bacterium
B. subtilus.
Our findings in this study show that the antagonistic microorganisms tested have significant biocontrol activity against Bayoud disease when tested by an
in vivo biocontrol on bayoud disease incidence. These microorganisms are: one fungus named
Trichoderma harzianum and one bacterium named
Bacillus subtilus (Table 2), using screening test based on inoculation by Foa isolate of three important date palm varieties in Algeria (Deglet-Nour, Feggous and H-mira). The mortality rate varied significantly according to the type of antagonist. The absence of mortality rate was observed using
T. harzianum, while the bacterium
B. subtilus showed the efficiency two varieties (Deglet-Nour and H-mira), while the Feggous variety showed the mortality arrived at 50%. In comparison between these two antagonistic microorganisms, the fungus
T. harzianum is more efficient than the bacterium
B. subtilus.
Many reports from the world has been published about the importance of biological control as the best way to combat Fusarium wilt (
Alabouvette, 2006;
Sajeena et al., 2020; Cheng et al., 2019; Abed et al., 2016; Ou-Zine et al., 2020). This method of control can enhance the plant defense machanisms against Fusarium disease and also other phytopathogenic fungi
(El-Hassni et al., 2007).
The importance of antagonistic fungi like
Trichoderma harzianum as biofungicide against fusarium wilt has been reported by
Kala et al., (2016), against Fusarium wilt of chickpea (
Cicer arietinum L.) caused by
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
ciceris, by
Sahampoor et al., (2020), on Fusarium wilt of cucurbits caused by
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
radicis-cucumerinum and by
Fitrianingsih et al., (2019), on Fusarium wilt oftomato (
Lycopersicum esculentum L.) caused by
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
radicis-lycopersisci.
The antagonistic bacterium
Bacillus subtilus was also reported by many authors against Fusarium wilt diseases. Among these fusarium wilt, we can cite:
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
ciceris of chickpea (
Cicer arietinum L.),
(Zaim et al., 2013; 2018;
Rouag et al., 2019; Suthar et al., 2019), Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
radicis-lycopersisci of tomato (
Lycopersicum esculentum L.), (
Estefania and Ligia, 2018) and
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
abedinis of date palm (
Phoenix dactylifera L.),
(El-Hassni et al., 2007).
In this study, these two antagonistic microorganisms (
T. harzianum and
B. subtilus), can enhance the ability to resist bayoud disease by the three date palm varieties used in the
in vivo biocontrol test (Deglet-Nour, Feggous and H-mira).