For adult females, the number of bite counts was in the range of 6 to 43 (average= 26.5±19.8) bite counts in the wet season and 32 to 87 (average= 63.3±23.5) bite counts in the dry season. For young females, the number of bite counts was in the range of 4 to 35 (average= 16.8±12.5) bite counts in the wet season and 12 to 67 (average= 29.7±20.9) bite counts in the dry season.
During the wet season, for adult females, bite weight ranged from 0.7 g recorded for
Salsola longifolia to 3.2 g recorded for
Traganum nudatum, while for young females, bite weight ranged from 0.66 g recorded for
Anabasis articulata to 1.62 g recorded for
Traganum nudatum. During the dry season, the bite weight ranged from 0.72 g recorded for
Anabasis articulata to 2.67 g recorded for
Traganum nudatum and 0.65 g recorded for
Anabasis articulata to 1.55 g recorded for
Limoniastrum guyonianum for adult and young females respectively.
The monitoring individual feeding behavior and direct observation method used has permitted the recording of bite counts, bite weight and the evaluation of the female camels’ intake. The results revealed that the preferred species show a variability in the number of bits (p<0.05), so it is clear that in the dry season,
Anabasis articulata is very grazed as it occupies the second position for adult and young female camels categories with a number of bites (84) and (39) respectively. While in the wet season, the number of bites made on
Anabasis articulata decreases to the half for both categories. The study conducted by
Benseddik (2011), in the Ouargla region confirmed that the palatability of this species is very strong only in winter.
The study exhibited that in wet season,
Traganum nudatum, is the most grazed by adult and young females with a maximum of 57 and 35 bites respectively, also in the dry season it is very appetizing, this result is confirmed by
Benseddik (2011), who reported that the palatability of
Traganum nudatum remains high even if the plant is desiccate.
Limoniastrum guyonianum grazed very little in winter with 6 bites for adult females and 4 bites for young females, but in the dry season, it becomes the most grazed with 87 and 67 bites respectively for adult and young females.
Our results fall within the broad range of the study conducted by
Benguessoum and Bouhamed (2006), on the number of bites per species, reported that the number ranging from 60 to 100 for
Stipagrostis plumosa, from 20 to 29 for
Savignia longistila and from 20 to 30 bites for
Helianthemum lippiias, well our observations concurred with the reports of
Kuria et al. (2012).
Slimani et al. (2013), reported a maximum 2 to 5 bites for each species. Generally, the difference in bite counts may be attributed to forage abundance, where camels concentrated on browsing and the movement was minimal (
Kassily, 2002).
Overall, there is a significant difference (p<0.05) in the average number of bites between seasons, it is higher in the dry season, 63.3±23.47 whereas 26.5±19.78 in the wet season for adult females, while it is 29.7±20.92in the dry season and 16.8±12.47.
The season significantly influences the number of bites, which is a maximum in the dry in the wet season for young females. The season significantly influences the number of bites, which is a maximum in the dry season.
Penning (1986) and
Distel et al. (1995) suggest that the animals try to compensate the small quantity taken by bite by increasing the frequency of bite in order to maintain their intake.
Mebirouk (2014), reports that the average number of bites is changed inversely proportional to the weight of the bite: the number of bite increases when the weight of the bite decreases. The seasonal influence on chemical composition and digestibility of the most selected forage species
Regarding the intake quantity for adult females (Fig 2), in the wet season,
Traganum nudatum recorded the highest amount with 182.4 g/day, followed by
Salsola tetragona and
Anabasis articulata with an estimated intake 63.8 and 53.7 g/day respectively. The lowest intakes were recorded in
Limoniastrum guyonianum,
Moltkiopsis ciliata and
Salsola longifolia 19.3, 14 and 11.9 g/day respectively. In the dry season, the highest intake is estimated in
Traganum nudatum 216.3 g/day followed by
Limoniastrum guyonianum with 106.1 g/day, while the
Moltkiopsis ciliata recorded the lowest ingested amount 35.5 g/day.
For young females (Fig 3), the highest quantity intake in the wet season recorded in
Traganum nudatum 56.7 g/day, the lowest intakes are estimated for
Moltkiopsis ciliata and
Limoniastrum guyonianum 4.5 and 3.1 g/d respectively. In the dry season, the highest intakes were estimated for the species
Moltkiopsis ciliata and
Salsola tetragona 13.3 and 12.3 g/day respectively.
The results obtained for adult females showed that during the wet season the highest daily dry matter intake recorded for
Traganum nudatum 1.9 kg DM followed by
Salsola tetragona with 0.38 kg DM then
Anabasis articulata with 0.32 kg DM (Fig 4).
The lowest quantities were recorded for
Limoniastrum guyonianum and
Salsola longifolia 0.08 and 0.07 kg DM respectively. However, in the dry season,
Traganum nudatum precedes with an estimated quantity of 1.3 kg DM, followed by
Limoniastrum guyonianum with 0.64 kg DM. Very similar quantities were recorded for
Salsola tetragona and
Anabasis articulata 0.38 and 0.36 kg DM respectively, the lowest quantity was recorded for
Moltkiopsis ciliate with 0.21 kg DM. Species
Anabasis articulata and
Salsola tetragona do not showed significant seasonal variability in the amount of dry matter intake.
Concerning young females, in the wet season, the highest daily dry matter intake recorded for
Traganum nudatum 0.34 kg DM, the lowest dry matter intake was recorded for
Limoniastrum guyonianum 0.02 kg DM.0.018 and 0.11 kg DM were recorded for
Salsola tetragona and
Anabasis articulata respectively. In the dry season, the highest daily dry matter intake recorded for
Limoniastrum guyonianum 0.45 kg DM.
Traganum nudatum recorded only 0.26 kg DM followed by
Anabasis articulata and
Salsola longifolia, with 0.15 and 0.11 kg DM respectively, while
Salsola tetragona recorded the lowest quantity with 0.07 kg DM (Fig 5).
Regarding the quantity of dry matter intake (DMI), the study showed a difference in the amount of dry matter intake between seasons (p<0.05). According to
Cross (1977), the dromedary intake at pasture varied from 4.8 to 11.4 kg DM/day, this seasonal variation was also mentioned by
Lechner-Doll et al.(1990);
Migongo-Bake (1992) and
Longo et al., (2007), they reported that the quantity of dry matter intake at the pasture is affected by the season.
AitHamou (1993) reported that the female camels intake decreases from 3.2 kg DM/day/animal in the dry season to 2.06 kg DM/day/animal in the wet season. (
Ben Arfa et al., 2014) reported that the female camels’ intake decreases remarkably in winter, which confirms our results (3.2 kg DMI /d/ animal in the dry season and 2.06 kg DMI/d/animal in the wet season). (
Ben Arfa et al., 2014) reported that mean intake in adult female camels are 6 kg DM /d/animal for all grazed species. In order to adequately cover its needs, the she-camel should consume a large amount of DM
(Laameche et al., 2019).
Our results remain in the intake range of the vegetation at pasture since they represent only the preferred species:
Traganum nudatum, Limoniastrum guyonianum, Anabasis articulata, Moltkiopsis ciliata,
Salsola tetragona and
Salsola longifolia. In the wet season, the decrease in the dry matter intake of the preferred species is linked to the existence of ephemeral species that allow the camels to eat better and to diversify their food rations.
Sagala et al. (2020) reported that that there were species and seasonal differences in forage preferences and that the preferred species were high in crude protein content and in-vitro dry matter digestibility. On the other hand, these ephemeral species disappear during the dry season, which makes the food choice of camels limited. Thus they try to compensate for this lack by increasing the intake of the preferred species available. According to
Salamula et al. (2017) camels could have adequate forage even in the face of climate change.
Dumont (1996) reported that the herbivores food choices are at least partly dictated by the desire to maximize their energy balance.