Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 42 issue 6 (december 2022) : 723-728

RAPD Analysis for Genetic Variability of Soybean Mutant Resulting from Gamma Rays Irradiation in M6 Generation

Nilahayati, Rosnina, Jaka Syahputra
1Department of Agroecotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Malikussaleh University, Jl. Cot Tgk. Ni Reuleut Timu, Aceh Utara, 24355, Indonesia.
Cite article:- Nilahayati, Rosnina, Syahputra Jaka (2022). RAPD Analysis for Genetic Variability of Soybean Mutant Resulting from Gamma Rays Irradiation in M6 Generation. Agricultural Science Digest. 42(6): 723-728. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-441.

Background: Soybean is one of the most important commodities around the globe. Increasing  soybean production absolutely continue to be pursued because soybean consumption increased steadily. One way that can be done is assembly technology of new superior varieties that have better and adaptive properties. The aim of this study was to determine molecular diversity of soybean mutants lines resulting from gamma irradiation in M6 generation. 
Methods: Molecular analysis with RAPD markers was carried out in the Tropical Balitbu Laboratory Sumatera Barat, Indonesia in November 2021. The tested genotypes consisted of 8 genotypes, namely Kipas Putih variety (elderly), Anjasmoro variety (comparison), M.1.1.3, M.5.2.1, M.5.2.3 l, M.1.1.8, M.1.1.9 and M.1.1.17 mutant lines. The primers used were RAPD 2 (5´-GTTTCGCTCC-3´), RAPD. 3 (5´-GTAGACCCGT-3´), RAPD 4 (5´-AAGAGCCCGT-3´) and RAPD 5 (5´-AACGCGCAAC-3´). 
Result: The results of the RAPD analysis showed that there were differences in size of amplicon between the mutants and the parents, namely the RAPD 2 primer (1400 bp band) and the RAPD 5 primer (550 bp and 1000 bp band). The parents had a pattern of DNA bands but in the M.5.2.3 and M.1.1.9 mutants the DNA band was absent. The parent RAPD 5 primers (1000 bp, 550 bp) had a DNA banding pattern but in the M.1.1.3 and M.1.1.8 mutants there was no DNA banding pattern. This indicated that the M.1.1.3, M.5.2.3, M.1.1.8 and M.1.1.9 mutants had different genetic diversity from their parent (Kipas Putih variety).


  1. Agam, M.G.S.A.S., Kusmiyati, F., Anwar, S. and Herwibawa, B. (2020). Diversity Analysis in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] Mutant Lines Grown in Saline Soil using Agronomic Traits and RAPD Markers. The 1st International Conference on Genetic Resources and Biotechnology IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 482 012017. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/482/1/012017.

  2. Dhakshanamoorthy, D., Selvaraj, R. and Chidambaramb, A. (2014). Utility of RAPD marker for genetic diversity analysis in gamma rays and ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS)-treated Jatropha curcas plants. Comptes Rendus Biologies. 338: 75-82.

  3. Kumari, N. and Thakur, S.K. (2014). Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-a brief review. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences. 9: 6-13.

  4. Matus, I.A., Hayes, P.M. (2002). Genetic diversity in three groups of barley germplasm assessed by simple sequence repeats. Genome. 45: 1095-1106.

  5. Mullainathan, A., Sridevi, S., Umavathi, E., Gandh, S. (2014). Genetic variation in mutants of chilli (Capsicum annum) revealed by RAPD marker. International Letters of Natural Sciences. 11: 1-8 doi: 10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.11.1.

  6. Mudibu, J., Nkongolo, K.K.C., Kalonji-Mbuyi, A. and Kizungu. (2012). Effect of gamma irradiation on morphoagronomic characteristics of soybeans (Glycine max L.). American Journal of Plant Sciences. 3: 331-337.

  7. Nilahayati, (2018). The improvement of agronomic character of Kipas Putih soybean through gamma-ray irradiation. [Dissertation]. Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan. [Indonesian].

  8. Rajoriya, S.K., Joshi, A., Jain, D., Dadeech, A., Rajamani, G. and Sharma, P. (2020). Characterization of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes through RAPD analysis. int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 9(11): 1366-1372.

  9. Sharma, A., Namdeo, A.G., Mahadik, K.R. (2008). Molecular markers: New prospects in plant genome analysis. Pharmacognosy Reviews. 2(3): 23-31.

  10. Sun, M. and Wong, K.C. (2001). Genetic structure of three orchid species with contrasting breeding systems using RAPD and allozyme markers, American Journal of Botany. 88: 2180-2188. 

  11. Thakur, B., Sharma, S., Sharma, I., Sharma, P., Deepika, Zargar, S.M. (2018). Diversity analysis of pea genotypes using RAPD markers. Legume Research. 41(2): 196-201. DOI: 10.18805/LR-3709.

  12. Van Harten, A.M. (1998). Mutation Breeding, Theory and Practical Application. The United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the Univ. Of Cambridge. 243-353 p.

  13. Wahyudi, D.L., Hapsari and Sundari (2020). RAPD analysis for genetic variability detection of mutant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. Journal of Tropical Biodiversity and Biotechnology. 5(1): 68-77. DOI: 10.22146/jtbb.53653.

  14. Vyas, D., Joshi, A., Rajamani, G., Jain, D and Kaur, G. (2016). Genetic diversity analysis in different genotypes of black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] using RAPD marker. Legume Research. 39: 690-697. DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF. 9430.

  15. Yuwono, T. (2006). Teori dan aplikasi polymerase chain reaction. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Editorial Board

View all (0)