Demographic description
The demographic profiles of participants are presented in Table 2. The frequencies of male and female participants were significantly different among the different provinces (
Χ= 13.06, p<0.001). Overall, the frequency of male participants across all the provinces was slightly higher at 56 per cent than the female participants (44 per cent). Despite this ratio, cowpea is considered a woman’s in Zambia and other SSA countries
Ouédraogo et al. (2018). However, when the value of a crop becomes lucrative, males suddenly dominate the value chains of crops previously considered to be “women’s crops”
Gondwe et al. (2017). The relatively higher frequency of male farmers could also have resulted from government-led program to promote the production of “underutilised” crops, including cowpea
Malik and Chaudhary (2019). The government’s promotion of cowpea raised awareness of its potential, which most likely increased the number of male participants beyond that previously reported.
The farmers’ ages did not vary significantly (
Χ= 12.06, p<0.60) across the provinces, with the dominant group of cowpea farmers being between 35 and 49 years of age (Table 2). Expectedly, this demographic group was most active in local and household economies. Hence, its dominance in land ownership, household decision-making and management of financial resources, the key determinants of agricultural participation in smallholder farming systems. This generation of farmers possesses experience and confidence to embrace new technologies, which substantiates reports by
Koutsou et al. (2014), who suggested that middle-aged farmers’ involvement could facilitate the adoption of new innovation that improves productivity. Thus, it is likely that such a progressive, dominant group of farmers would adopt new and improved varieties if they conferred production advantages over the currently cultivated varieties.
Importance of cowpea for food security and income generation
The two major uses of cowpea were identified as income generation (48.00 per cent) and food (37.00 per cent) (Table 3). The people living in low rainfall environments, where other crops such as maize often fail to attain reasonable yields, cowpea provides food for subsistence and income for household needs. Marginalized communities that often lack protein-rich diets benefited greatly from cowpea production, which is among the cheapest protein sources for children and pregnant women in SSA
Jimenez-Lopez and Clemente (2019). Thus, cowpea provides food and nutritional security contributing to farmers’ livelihoods
(da Silva 2018). Improving cowpea production and productivity in SSA will have multiple benefits, especially food security. New varieties that can withstand production constraints also minimize production costs, increase yield potential and ultimately contribute to higher profit margins for farmers.
Production constraints of cowpea
The cowpea production constraints identified by the farmers are presented in Table 4. The most important constraints across the provinces were the lack of improved varieties, insect pests and diseases and limited access to inputs, as reported by 45.10 per cent, 18.10 per cent and 14.80 per cent of the respondents, respectively. Cowpea production in SSA and other parts of the world, is still dominated by landraces and traditional varieties. Landraces and traditional varieties became adapted to local conditions during the long period of cultivation in these agro-ecologies, but they tend to have low yield potential. Farmers’ awareness that better varieties might be available opens opportunities for breeders to develop and deploy suitably adapted and high yielding varieties.
Ficiciyan et al. (2018) reported that modern varieties were desirable due to their high yields, tolerance to pests and disease resistance. Pests and diseases of cowpea include aphids (A
phis craccivora Koch) and bruchids (
Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius) and cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus (CABMV).
Mweke et al. (2020) reported that aphids were the most important constraint of cowpea production in southern Africa. Farmers reported that cowpea was susceptible to various pests in the field and in storage. Pests cause severe grain damage and decimate stored grain if it is not treated with agro-chemicals.
Tiroesele et al. (2015) also noted that the cowpea weevil was a serious storage pest, ranked as a major post-harvest pest in the tropics because it caused substantial quantitative and qualitative losses, as well as reductions in weight, market value and germination ability of seeds.
Farmers’ trait preferences in cowpea varieties
Farmers preferred varieties with high yield potential, drought tolerance, pest and disease resistance, as indicated by 46.70, 17.80 and 15.00 per cent of the respondents, respectively (Table 5). High yield was the most important determinant influencing cultivar selection. Similarly,
Abudulai et al. (2016) found that farmers in Ghana preferred high-yielding cowpea varieties. Thus, it would be imperative to develop high-yielding cowpea varieties to increase farmers’ prospects in the target environments. However, it is also imperative to identify complementary traits required by farmers in addition to yield. Traits such as drought tolerance, pests and disease resistance are important because they directly contribute to the attainment of high yields in stressful environments. Other qualitative attributes including taste, cooking time and seed colour have been reported among the farmer-preferred traits in legumes. Farmers in Malawi preferred pigeon pea varieties with good cooking quality and cream-coloured seed
Nyirenda et al. (2020). These findings suggest that these traits need to be integrated into cowpea germplasm with high yield, drought tolerance and pests and disease resistance genetic backgrounds to develop suitable varieties for farmers.
Persley and Anthony (2017) concluded that breeders needed to be aware of the target traits desired by farmers and their markets to develop suitable cultivars for rapid acceptance and adoption by clients within the local value chain.