Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 43 issue 5 (october 2023) : 681-687

Factors Influencing White Mango Scale (Aulacaspis tubercularis) Infestation Status at Assosa and Bambasi Districts, in Benishangul Gumuz Region, Western Ethiopia

Merkuz Abera1,*, Bizuayehu Jemaneh2, Adane Tesfay1
1College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
2Benishangul-Gumuz Region Plant Health Clinic, Assosa, Western-Ethiopia.
Cite article:- Abera Merkuz, Jemaneh Bizuayehu, Tesfay Adane (2023). Factors Influencing White Mango Scale (Aulacaspis tubercularis) Infestation Status at Assosa and Bambasi Districts, in Benishangul Gumuz Region, Western Ethiopia . Agricultural Science Digest. 43(5): 681-687. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-412.
Background: This research was conducted to assess factors affecting white mango scale infestation status from August 2018 to April 2019. 

Methods: Survey data was collected from randomly selected of 7 kebele administration and 35 mango orchards as 5 per kebele administrations within 5-10 km interval. Stratified sampling method was used for selecting 3,150 sample leaves from 35 mango trees for counting the clusters of white mango scale. 

Result: The survey result showed that temperature in contrary with rain fall and relative humidity was significantly and positively related with the infestation status. Mango orharchds characterstics of old age, tall size, crowded canopy, other plant availability in the orchards, mango trees planted without appropriate spacing and weed infestation provide favourable condition for the aggravation of infestation status. Therefore it is recommended to develop regular inspection, monitoring and appropriate agronomic practices for providing sustainable management approach.
Mangoes (Mangifera indica Linnaeus) are tropical and subtropical fruits widely grown across the world (Louw et al. 2008; Evans et al. 2017). There are various mango genotypes with various germination and production capacities (Reshma and Simi, 2021). Different mango genotype grown in Ethiopia mainly in the Rift Valley, western and south western Ethiopia with consideration given to its socio-cultural legacy and current scale of production (Anshuman et al. 2015; Tewodros et al. 2019).
 
Mangoes (Mangifera indica  Linnaeus) are affected by a variety of pests, most notably stîne weevil, mealy bugs, fruit flies, scales, thrips and mites and various fungal diseases (Hussen and Yimer, 2013; Kannan and Dhivya, 2021; Bincader et al. 2021 ). Of these, white mango scale (Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead) has been reported to cause severe damage to mangoes around the world (Abo-Shanab, 2012). The white mango scale yellows the leaves of the mango plant, makes pink blemishes on mature and ripe mango fruits and dieback of the plant (El-Metwally et al. (2011); Abo-Shanab, 2012).
 
The pink blemishes on the mango fruit is causing an economic downturn by preventing it from being exported (USDA, 2007). Various studies have shown that white mango scale has spread to various mango growing areas in Ethiopia since its inception in 2010 at Green Focus Ethiopia Ltd. Mango orchard farm (Fita, 2014; Ayalew et al. 2015).
 
In western Ethiopia, the white mango scale had a significant impact on mango production, attracting the concern of various government institutions, civil societies and communities. This is due to the fact that the mango plant is providing significant social and economic benefits for animal shade, public gatherings, sources of income and food. Thus, the problem of this pest is not only economic but also social, environmental and other consequences (Djirata and Getu, 2015).
 
Therefore, the main objective of this study was to identify some factors influencing the spread of white mango scale insect pests in the farm of mango orchards and to provide recommendations for mango producers and to contribute to future research on white mango scale management.
 
Description of survey area
 
The study was conducted in Assosa and Bambasi districts of Asosa Administrative Zone, Benishangul Gumuz Regional State. Benishangul-Gumuz is located in western Ethiopia, 687 kilometers from Addis Ababa (The capital city). The region is located at 9o30'-11o30' latitude and 34o20'-36o30' lîngitude, with an area caverage of 50,380 square kilometers, altitude of 580-2731 meters above sea level, annual àmbient temperature of 17-29oC and annual average rainfall of 860-1600 mm (NMA, 2015). The region produces maize, sorghum, soybeans, mangoes, bananas, lemons, oranges and others. However, the mango among the fruit crops is widely grown, especially in the Assosa administrative zone (BGRS BoA, 2017; CSA, 2017). Bambasi is one of the districts surveyed in Assosa Administrative Zone, 45 km from Asosa, the regional capital. The geographical location of the district is lies between 9o45' latitude and 34o45' longitudes, the area coverage is 2100 square kilometers, the altitude is 1100-1450 meter above sea level, the average annual rainfall is 1350-1450 mm and the annual ambient temperature varies from 21-35°C (NMA, 2015). The district mainly produces maize, sorghum, soybeans, mangoes, bananas, lemons, oranges and others (BGRS BoA, 2017). The other study area was Assosa district, with a geographical location lies between 10°042-10.0670 latitude and 34°312  - 34.5170 longitudes, area coverage 2317 square kilometers, altitude between 1401-1544 meter above sea level, average annual rainfall 900-1200 mm and annual ambient temperature range from 21 to 31°C (NMA, 2015). The main crops grown include sorghum, maize, soybeans, grîund nut, sweet potatoes, bananas, mangoes and more (BGRS BoA, 2017). Fig 1 showed the study location map of both Bambasi and Assosa districts.

Fig 1: Location map of the study site.


 
White mango scale assessment
 
The white mango scale infestation status survey was conducted for nine months from August 2018 to April 2019. Mango orchards for the study were selected using a multi-stage sampling method. Assosa and Bambasi districts were selected on purposive sampling method basis. It is home to the largest mango plantation in the region and the infestation of white mango scale. Next, based on the number of mango plantations in both districts, by proportional sampling method from Assosa district, Amba-14, Amba-5, Amba-8 and Megele-32 and Bambasi district, Villages-47, Village-48 and Sonka in general seven kebele administrations (peasant administrations) were selected (Mulat and Tadele, 2001).  Finally, after a distance of 5-10 km, a mango orchard with at least ten mango trees was selected, with five mango orchards selected in each kebele. In this way, the mango tree is marked by selecting an average representative of the mango orchard. Although the pest attacks parts of the mango tree, such as the leaves, branches and twigs, a leaf sample was taken to make it easier to quantify the scale cluster, according to most studies (Merkuz et al. 2021; Fita, 2014; Djirata et al. 2016). Using the stratified sampling method, the marked mango tree canopy was divided into three parts: three leaves from the top canopy, four leaves from the middle canopy and three leaves from the bottom canopy a total of ten leaves were taken for nine consecutive months. Accordingly, 90 leaves of one tree and 3,150 leaves of 35 trees were sampled. The sample was then placed in a polyethylene bags and immediately taken to the Assosa Plant Health Clinic for a white mango scale cluster count with a hand lenses as illustrated in Fig 2 (Fita, 2014; Djirata et al. 2018). 

Fig 2: Severity status of white mango scale.


 
The infestation and the degree of damage was recorded by using a scoring methîd frîm 0 to 5 scale by relating percentage of panicle destroyed / damaged and cluster formation per leaf with each other as illustrated in Table 1 (Williams et al., 2009; Fita, 2014).
 
Collected survey data
 
Qualitative and quantitative data for the study were taken. Mango orchard characteristics: age, height, canopy size, planting pattern/spacing, Intercropping condition,weed infestation status, average white mango scale cluster number per leaf, severity of infestation: free, minimal, medium, severe and very severe, as well as meteorological data average rainfall, average relative humidity and average Temperature data were collected.
 
Statistical analysis of the survey data

The association of Moterological data such as mean monthly rain fall, temperature and relative humidity with white mango scale cluster abundance per leaf was analysed using Pearson correlation coefficient with corresponding p-value (PROC CORR) (Gomez and Gomez, 1984; SAS, 2009).The effect of explanatory variable of mango orchard characteristic factors which determined the severity status of the responsive variable of white mango scale categorical data were analysed by odds ratio to measure the strength of the association and Chi-Square (X2) test for the significance at 5% error level using cumulative logit model of PROC LOGISTIC PROCEDURE (Gomez and Gomez, 1984; SAS, 2009). Count data of white mango scale was subjected to square root transformation [√(𝑥+5 )] before analysis to stabilize the variance. Homogeneity of variance of the sample was tested using levene’s test before and after data transformation (p>.05) (Gomez and Gomez, 1984; SAS, 2009). The data were reported in the text using the back transformed values. Microsoft Excel was used to summarize survey data.

 
 
Observation in the study districts of mango orchards indicated that different factors were influencing the white mango scale infestation status. White mango scale insect infestation status was significantly correlated with meterological data such as rain fall, temperature and relative humidit. In Assosa orchards mean cluster abundance was significantly and more degree of negative correlation to mean monthly relative humidity (r178 = -0.532, p<.01) than to mean monthly rain fall (r178 = -0.277, p<.01). These finding indicated that mean cluster abundance some how more varied by mean monthly relative humidity than mean monthly rain fall. In orchards of Bambasi also mean cluster abundance was significantly and negatively related to mean monthly rainfall (r133 = -0.380, p<.01). In both Assosa and Bambasi orchards mean cluster was significantly and more strongly positively related to mean monthly temperature (r178 = 0.898, p<0.01) and (r133 = 0.838, p<.01) respectively (Table 2).
 
White mango scale insect pest infestation status was showed a progressive change through out the study periods with the change of mean monthly rain fall, mean monthly temprature and mean monthly relative humidity. Fig 3 illustrates the impact of mean monthly rain fall and mean monthly temperature on mean cluster abundance per leaf at Bambasi district. Maximum cluster abundance 14.1 per leaf was recorded at the maximum temperature records of the study period during April, 2019 at maximum temperature 35.64oC and minimum temperature 20.84oC and mean monthly rain fall 39.2 mm. Mean cluster abundance per leaf was observed decreasing while there was a continued and high rain fall from August a mean monthly rain fall record of 263 mm to December a lower mean monthly rain fall record of 5.2 mm during which a minimum 0.19 mean cluster abundance per leaf was recorded.

Fig 3: Progressive change of mean cluster/leaf with mean monthly rain fall and temperature at Bambasi.


 
Similarly in Assosa district as shown in Fig 4 the abundance of mean cluster per leaf was varied with the change of mean monthly rain fall, mean monthly temperature and mean monthly relative humidity through out the study periods. Mean cluster abundance per leaf was decreased from August to December coincides with lowering of mean monthly relative humidity and mean monthly rain fall. Building up of cluster abundance coincides with a startup of mean monthly relative humidity and mean monthly rain fall increment starting from March. Maximum cluster abundance 15.8 per leaf was recorded during April, 2019 at maximum temperature 32.9oC, minimum temperature 17.8oC, optimum mean monthly rain fall 42 mm and mean monthly relative humidity 32%. Cluster abundance per leaf was observed decreasing while there was a continued and high rain fall starting from August a mean monthly rain fall record of 218.9 mm to December a minimum mean monthly rain fall record 1.5 mm during which minimum mean cluster abundance 0.86 was recorded.

Fig 4: Progressive change of mean cluster/leaf with rain fall, temperature and relative humidity at Assosa.


 
In general these studies indicated that white mango scale insect pest abundance and infestation status was significantly correlated with moterological data such as rain fall, temperature and relative humidity. White mango scale abundance and infestation status were significantly and inversely correlated with rain fall and relative humidity and directly correlated with temperature. The infestation status was decreased with the increased rain fall and relative humidity and increased with the increased temperature. Maximum cluster abundance and infestation status were recorded during maximum temperature records’ while the study month of ‘April’. The build up of white mango scale abundance and infestation status required optimum rain fall and relative humidity. These study result also supported by different literature such as: temperature variation affect the white mango scale populations, peak populations were recorded in the months with maximum monthly temperatures of 35 and 31oC at Arjo and Bako of western Ethiopia, respectively. Extremely low population level below 10 mm average monthly rain fall (highly affected by drought) and in contrary heavy and continued rain fall decreases the population Djirata et al. (2018). Maturation and ripening of mango fruit begin during the first months of rainy season that is, in March to April and continues for few months, vis-a-vis significant infestation of mango fruits by white mango scale, in Western Ethiopia (Djirata and Getu, 2015). However; this result contradicted with the earlier finding that white mango scale had a low tolerance to high temperature and as a result its population declined in temperatures above 30oC (Labuschagne et al. 1995)
 
The severity of mango white scale infestation was also related to the characteristics of the mango orchards as indicated in Table 3. Mango white scale severity of infestation was related to the age, height, canopy size, planting pattern, intercropping and weed infestation status of the mango orchards.
 
White mango scale insect pest infestation status significantly varied for different age category of mango trees (X2.95 (2) = 7.48, p<.05). Mango orchards in age less than 10 years old age group were at 51% lower risk of minimal to moderate severity status compared to greater than 20 years old age mango trees group (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29-0.817). Since the old age mango trees leave without any agronomic management which become suitable for the reproduction of the pest and used for source of infestation. Other study result indicated that according to the oldness of the trees age most farmers did not give attention to mango trees plantation (Hussen and Yimer, 2013).
 
White mango scale insect pest infestation status significantly varied for different height category of mango trees [X2.95 (3) = 11.8, p<.05]. Mango orchards in short height group were at 60% lower risk of minimal to moderate severity status compared to very long height mango trees group (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22-0.739). Very long height mango trees were observed more likely at risk of minimal to medium severity status. Unmanageable sized mango trees were observed difficult for management appilication and since significant contribution for white mango scale infestation. Studies indicated that tall trees present a harvesting problem and create difficulties during spraying and pruning (Griesbach, 2003).
 
White mango scale insect pest infestation status significantly varied for different canopy volume category of mango trees (X2.95 (3) =8.18, p<.05). Mango orchards in crowded canopy group were at 2.08 times more at risk of minimal to moderate severity status compared to uncrowded canopy mango trees group (OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.248-3.465).  The uncrowded canopy volume in which sun light easily penetrate to inner canopy and also free air movement made lower infestation of white mango scale. Studies indicated that well managed orchard trees require regular annual pruning to maintain an open canopy of manageable size which allows air and sunlight to penetrate, which reduces pests and diseases (Bally, 2006). Also other studies suggested that regular canopy management necessary for mango yield improvement (Sharma and Singh, 2006).
 
White mango scale insect pest infestation status significantly varied for different planting pattern or spacing of mango orchards (X2.95 (1) = 5.62, p<.01). Mango orchards in not-recommended planting pattern group were at 75% more likely at  risk of minimal to moderate severity status compared to recommended planting pattern mango trees group (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.102-2.774). It was observed that mango trees planted with recommended planting space which is used regularly 10 m X 10 m as general guide of the study districts were less likely at risk of minimal to moderate severity status. Studies reported that since mango trees grow in to large specimen need appropriate spacing; high-density planting show a progressive decline in crop yield after 14-15 years, due to overcrowding of canopies, which results in the production of fewer fruits which are apt to be poorly colored and infected with pests (Sharma and Singh, 2006; Hussen and Yimer, 2013; Khan et al. 2015). Some fact sheets suggested that adequate plant spacing which allows greater air movement and increases pesticide coverage and also reduces ideal environments for scale insects to develop and increases the ease of detection (Andrew, 2019).
 
White mango scale insect pest infestation status significantly varied by intercropping condition of mango orchards (X2.95 (1) = 7.37, p<.01). Mango orchards in not-intercropped group were at 44% lower risk of minimal to moderate severity status compared to intercropped mango trees group (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.37-0.851). Also white mango scale insect pest infestation status significantly varied for different weed infestation status category of mango orchards (X2.95 (2) = 8.18, p<.01). Mango orchards in low weed infested group were at 52% lower risk of minimal to moderate severity status compared to medium weed mango trees group (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.289-0.802). Mango trees intercropped with other plants and infested by weed were more likely attacked by white mango scale comparatively high infestation status. The intercropped plants and weed might be used as harbor and contributing for overlapping generation of the white mango scale insect pest. Studies suggested that for scale management removing crop debris and disinfest the growing area and free of weeds since scale may survive for weeks on crop debris and in egg masses that have fallen off plants (Andrew, 2019).
 
The infestation of white mango scale insect pest was observed throughout the study periods. However the infestation status varied with temperature, rain fall and relative humidity and also varied with mango orchard characterstics of age, height, canopy volume, intercropping, planting pattern and weed infestation status. Temperature influence the infestation positively and a maximum record during maximum temperature of the study month during April. High and continued rain fall and relative humidity influence infestation negatively. However optimum rain fall and relative humidity starting from March to April enhance infestation. Mango orchard characterstics of old age, tall size, crowded canopy, other plant availability in the orchards, mango trees planted without appropriate spacing and weed infestation provide favourable condition for the aggravation of infestation status. Therefore it is recommended to regular inspection and monitoring of white mango scale insect pest and develops appropriate agronomic practice of mango orchards like pruning, grafting and appropriate spacing, avoid intercropping with plants used as harbor, weeding and other management practice to come with sustainable strategy for management of white mango scale and increase productivity of mango fruits.
 
The authors are grateful to the Bureau of Agriculture and Natural Resource (ANRB), Benshangul Gumuz Regional State for financial aid. They also appreciate Assosa Plant Health Clinic for providing the support, assistance and other facilities during the survey and laboratory work.

 
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Abo-Shanab, A.S.H. (2012). Suppression of white mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) on mango trees in El Beheira Governorate. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences. 5: 43-50.

  2. Andrew, M. (2019). Scale Insects: A Difficult Problem that Can be Managed. Agri-science Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Eco sciences Precinct, Brisbane Queensland, Australia. 1-12. http://era.daf.qld.gov.au/ 2208/6/005-ipm.pdf retrieved on 10 October 2019.

  3. Anshuman Singh, Singh, R.K., Kumar, P. and Singh, A. (2015). Mango biodiversity in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India: Indigenous knowledge and traditional products. Indian J. Tradit Knowl. 14(2): 258-264.

  4. Ayalew, G., Fekadu, A. and Sisay, B. (2015). Appearance and chemical control of white mango scale (Aulacaspis tubercularis) in Central Rift Valley. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal. 4: 59-63.

  5. Bally, I.S.E. (2006). Mangifera indica (mango), ver. 3.1. In: Elevitch, C.R. (Ed.). Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agro-forestry. Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR), Hôlualoa and Hawai‘i. http://www.agroforestry.org/images/pdfs/Mangifera-mango.pdf. Retrieved 5 on September 2018.

  6. BGRS BoA. BoA (2017). Annual report, Assosa. 250, (Unpublished).

  7. Bincader, S., Pongpisutta, R. and Rattanakreetakul, C. (2021). Diversity of colletotrichum species causing anthracnose disease from mango cv. Nam Dork Mai See Tong based on ISSR-PCR. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. DOI: 10.18805/IJARe.AF-691.

  8. CSA (Central Statistical Agency). (2017). Area and Production of Major Crops. Agricultural Sample Survey. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 116.

  9. Djirata, O. and Getu, E. (2015). Infestation of Aulacaspis tubercularis (Homoptera: Diaspididae) on mango fruits at different stages of fruit development, in Western Ethiopia. Journal of Biology. Agriculture and Healthcare. 5(18): 34-38.

  10. Djirata, O., Getu, E. and Kahuthia-Gathu (2016). Trend in mango production and potential threat from emerging white mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis. Journal of Natural Sciences Research. 6(7): 87-94.

  11. Djirata, O., Getu, E. and Kahuthia-Gathu (2018). Population dynamics of white mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in Western Ethiopia, African Journal of Agricultural Research. 13(31): 1598-1605 

  12. El-Metwally, M.M., Moussa, S.F.M. and Ghanim, N.M. (2011). Studies on the population fluctuations and distribution of the white mango scale insect, Aulacaspis tubercularis Newstead within the canopy of the mango trees in eastern of Delta region at the north of Egypt. Acad. J. Biolog. Sci. 4: 123-130.

  13. Evans E. A., Fredy H. Ballen and Muhammad Siddiq. (2017). Mango Production, Global Trade, Consumption Trends and Postharvest Processing and Nutrition. In: Handbook of Mango Fruit: Production, Postharvest Science, Processing Technology and Nutrition. [Muhammad Siddiq, Jeffrey K. Brecht and Jiwan S. Sidhu (eds)]. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Pp 1-16.

  14. Fita, T. (2014). White mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis, distribution and severity status in East and West Wollega Zones, western Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal. 3(3): 01-10

  15. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984).  Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edition, A Wiley Interscience Publications John Wiley and Sons, New York. 680.

  16. Griesbach, J. (2003).  Mango growing in Kenya, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya.

  17. Hussen, S. and Yimer, Z. (2013) Assessment of production potentials and constraints of mango (Mangifera indica) at Bati, Oromia Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research. 11(1): 1-9.

  18. Kannan, R., Dhivya, V. (2021). In-vitro effect of different abiotic stresses on the growth and sporulation of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causing anthracnose of mango. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. DOI: 10.18805/IJARe.A- 5916.

  19. Khan, A.S., Ali, S. and Khan, I.A. (2015). Morphological and molecular characterization and evaluation of mango germplasm: An overview. Sci. Hortic. 194: 353-366.

  20. Labuschagne, T.I., van Hamburg, H. and Froneman, I.J. (1995). Population dynamics of the mango scale, Aulacaspis tubercularis (Newstead) (Coccoidea: Diaspididae), in South Africa. Israel Journal of Entomology. 29: 207-217.

  21. Lal, B. and Mishra, D. (2007). Effect of pruning on growth and bearing behavior of mango cv. Chausa, Indian J. Hortic. 64: 268-270.

  22. Louw, E.C. Labuschagne and Swart, S.H. (2008). Developing a mango programme for optimum mango yield and quality. South African Mango Growers’ Association Research Journal. 28: 1-11.

  23. Merkuz, A., Bizuayehu, J. and Adane, T. (2021). Survey of white mango scale (Aulacaspis tubercularis) distribution on mango (Mangifera indica) production at Assosa and Bambasi districts, in benishangul Gumuz region, western Ethiopia. International Journal of Entomology Research. 6(3): 148-160.

  24. Mulat, D. and Tadele, F. (2001). The Performance of Grain Marketing in Ethiopia: The Case of the Addis Ababa Central Market. Addis Ababa.

  25. NMA (National Meteorological Agency). (2015). Monthly report on temperature and Rainfall distribution for Assosa Zone, Regional Metrological Office, Assosa, Ethiopia. 17-19.

  26. Reshma, U.R. and Simi, S. (2021). Screening of mango landraces for polyembryony and confirmation of seedling origin using mcrosatellite markers. Agricultural Science Digest. DOI: 10.18805/ag.D-5351.

  27. SAS. (2009). What’s New in SAS@ 9.2. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA, 384.

  28. Sharma, R.R. and Singh, R. (2006). Effect of pruning intensity on light penetration and leaf physiology in Amrapali mango trees under highdensity planting. Trop. Sci. 46: 16-19.

  29. Tewodros, B.N., Wanzala, F.K.R., Ali, W.M., Owinoand, W.O., Mwangi, G.S. (2019). Mango (Mangifera indica L.) production practices and constraints in major production regions of Ethiopia. Academic Journals, African Journal of Agricultural Research. 14(4): 185-196.

  30. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). (2007). Importation of Fresh Mango Fruit (Mangifera indica L.) from India into the Continental United States: A Qualitative, Pathway- Initiated Pest Risk Assessment. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A. 90.

  31. Williams, B., Jocelyn, E., Hernani, G., Oscar, S., Ernesto, O., Elda, B., Terry, C. and Les, B. (2009). Integrated Pest Management and Supply Chain Improvement for Mangoes in the Philippines and Australia. 1-139.

Editorial Board

View all (0)