Banner

Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Full Research Article

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 42 issue 3 (june 2022) : 351-357

​Study of the Zootechnical Performance of Tilapia cabrae and Oreochromis schwebischi in a Controlled Environment: The Case of the Mbolet Fish Farm in Lambaréné, Gabon

A.I. Toure1,*, G.C. Zougou Tovignon1, F.C. Ngansop Nono1, Ngwarh Perpetua Tuncha1, D. Obame Mba1, F.B. Boukila1
1National Higher Institute of Agronomy and Biotechnology (INSAB), University of Science and Techniques Masuku (USTM), P.O. Box 941 Franceville, Gabon.
Cite article:- Toure A.I., Tovignon Zougou G.C., Nono Ngansop F.C., Tuncha Perpetua Ngwarh, Mba Obame D., Boukila F.B. (2022). ​Study of the Zootechnical Performance of Tilapia cabrae and Oreochromis schwebischi in a Controlled Environment: The Case of the Mbolet Fish Farm in Lambaréné, Gabon . Agricultural Science Digest. 42(3): 351-357. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-373.

ABSTRACT

Background: The study of the zootechnical performance of Tilapia cabrae and Oreochromis schwebischi was carried out at the Mbolet fish farm in Lambaréné in Gabon in order to evaluate the growth and reproductive performance of these two species. 

Methods: For this purpose, 226 fish (113 of T. cabrae with an average weight of 30.55±9.5 g and 113 O. schwebischi with an average weight of 20.64±10.5 g), were distributed in four 6 m2 tanks with two replicates per species for the growing phase which lasted 60 days. For the reproductive phase, 42 selected mature fish, including 6 males and 36 females of each species, were placed in six 2 m2 ponds with three replicates per species for 78 days. 

Result: The survival rate, the number of reproductions per species and the absolute, relative and system productivities were determined. It was found that the average weight gain, daily individual growth and specific growth rate were significantly (p<0.05) higher in T. cabrae, 48.1±5.51 g, 0.8±0.092 g/day and 1.57±0.066% g/day respectively, than in O. schwebischi, 27.11±9.23 g, 0.45±0.15 g/day and 1.38±0.051% g/day respectively. At the end of reproduction, the absolute productivity of T. cabrae (234.75±24.71 larvae/female/egg-laying) was significantly higher (p<0.05) than that of O. schwebichi (104.68±46.64 larvae/female/laying). System productivity was significantly higher (p<0.05) in O. schwebichi (11.34±2.29 larvae/m2/day) compared to that of T. cabrae (4.12±1.73 larvae/m2/day). Thus, on a fish farm, the use of these species may be possible.

INTRODUCTION

The increase in the world’s population has led to a correspondingly greater demand for proteins, particularly animal proteins (Caillavet et al., 2019). At the fisheries level, the improvement of fishing techniques and the extension of fishing areas leading to an increase in catches have made it possible to satisfy part of this protein demand (Adeoti et al., 2018). According to FAO (2020), in the period 1961-2017, the average annual growth rate of total food fish consumption increased at 3.1%, outpacing annual population growth rate (1.6%). At the global level, it is estimated that 61% of fish stocks are exploited to their maximum and 29% are overexploited. The stocks directly threatened by exploitation are mainly those of economic interest (Kumar et al., 2020). They are particularly targeted and are subject to strong fishing pressure that is often beyond their level of viability. This situation of overexploitation can also be observed in Africa in general (Lallemand et al., 2016) and in Gabon in particular, in the Moyen Ogooué, fishing is used by the local population as a subsistence mean by providing them with income (DPPAMO, 2019). The Mbolet fish farming station recommends the implementation of a project that consists of producing marketable fish using the most caught species in order to satisfy part of the demand and massively produce fry of species from these fisheries, notably Oreochromis schwebischi and Tilapia cabrae for sequential restocking. Indeed, these species are the most encountered and caught in the fishing areas (DPPAMO, 2019). Moreover, the captive breeding of these two species, which are still poorly understood, considerably limits the implementation of such a project.
       
The general objective of this work is to contribute to the knowledge of the zootechnical performance of the species Tilapia cabrae and Oreochromis schwebischi.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was carried out at the Mbolet fish farm in Lambaréné in the Moyen-Ogooué Province in Central-West Gabon with an average annual temperature of 26.1°C and an average rainfall of 1999 mm (Sonwa et al., 2020) for an altitude of 0° 46' 48" South and a longitude of 10° 14' 2". The climate in this area is of humid tropical savannah type (Aw).        

It is located in the ‘’Petit Paris 3'’ quarter, behind the regional hospital, on the shore of Lake Mbolet at the coordinates -0.698681 and 10.253984. Two species of fish were used in this experimental trial. These were Tilapia cabrae and Oreochromis schwebischi. These fish were caught in the fisheries of Moyen-Ogooué and brought to the station. The experimental samples were taken at the fingerling stage with an average weight of 30.55±9.5 g for T. cabrae and 20.64±10.5 g for O. schwebischi. In order to monitor the growth of these two species in a controlled environment, they were conditioned for one month. Then, 113 fish were used for each species. Four groups were made up, two for each group of each species. The loading of the fish took into account the number of fish, their weight and density in 6 m2 tanks (Table 1). Water was pumped into the ponds from the surrounding lake. This phase lasted 2 months and allowed not only the development of the fish but also the maturation of their gonads. The fish were fed three times a day (9 am, noon and 3 pm) with the feed which characteristics are given in Table 2. The feed was presented to the animals in the form of 4 mm diameter pellets.
 

Table 1: Stocking conditions.


       

Table 2: Incorporation rate of the ingredients and chemical composition of the formulated feed.


 
The sampling of fish carried out every 15 days, allowed the determination of weight gain, the quantity of feed distributed and the number of deaths. At the end of the two months of growth, sexing was carried out in the different groups on the basis of the sexual dimorphism that is marked in these species. Thus, the observation of the genital papilla permitted to identify the male from the female.
       
For breeding, after the selection of fish broodstock, the fish were distributed in six 2 m2 ponds. There were 15 individuals (3 males and 12 females) per tank. The total numbers of 72 fish, of which 36 T. cabrae and 36 O. schwebishi were used. They were weighed and divided into 6 groups (3 groups per species). The loading of the fish took into account the number of fish, their weight and density (Table 3).
 

Table 3: Selected broodstock.


       
Larvae/juveniles were collected every fortnight depending on the species. The monitoring of the reproduction was spread over 78 days during which the data on the number of dead broodstock, number of reproductions carried out in each group, number of larvae produced per female and weight of the females that produced them were collected.
       
The fish were fed trice a day (9 am, noon and 3 pm), except the day before the control fisheries. The feed and the fish were weighed using an electronic scale of the brand Orurudo (capacity: 5 kg and accuracy: 1 g). The pH and temperature were measured daily trice a day (9 am, noon and 3 pm) using a VWR multi-functional pH meter and the transparency using a Secchi disk daily at 12:00 pm. From these data, different zootechnical parameters were calculated (Table 4).
 

Table 4: Zootechnical parameters.


       
The statistical analysis of the results (on growth performance) was done using the 95% confidence interval method (Appendix 8). When the 95% confidence intervals of two compared means are disjoint, then there is a significant difference at 5% level between them. For reproductive performance, the statistical analysis of the results was carried out using the R software commander version 3.4.3. The test used was Student’s mean comparison at the 5% level.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Physicochemical parameters of the water during the growth phase
 
Samples of the physicochemical parameters of the water during grow-out are summarized in Table 5. From this table, no significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between the different times with regard to pH and temperature. The pH varied from 8.43±0.40 to 9.16±0.42 and the temperature from 28.41±0.36°C to 29.9±0.55°C. Transparency averaged 46.66±5.11 cm.
 

Table 5: pH, temperature and transparency of the water used as a function of the sampling time.


 
Evolution of absolute weight gain (AWG)
 
The evolution of the AWG of the two fish species during the two months of grow-out is presented in Fig 1. It shows that, irrespective of the fish species, AWG increased from the beginning of the trial to the end (day 60). Indeed, during this period, the AWG of T. cabrae increased from 832.44 g to 2459.22 g and that of O. schwebischi from 497.93 g to 1504.48 g. The total AWG obtained was 1626.78 g and 1006.55 g for T. cabrae and O. schwebischi respectively. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference (p<0.05) between these total AWG.
 

Fig 1: Evolution of AWG (g) of T. cabrae and O. schwebischi.


 
Daily individual growth (DIG)
 
Fig 2 shows the DIG of the two fish species during the two months of grow-out. Fig 2 shows that, for both fish species, DIG rates decreased from the beginning of the trial to the end (day 60). During this period, the DIG of T. cabrae decreased from 1.475 g to 0.8 g and that of O. schwebischi from 0.7 g to 0.45 g. Thus, at the end of the trial, the average DIG recorded was 0.45 g/day for O. schwebischi and 0.8 g/day for T. cabrae. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference (p<0.05) between these DIG.
 

Fig 2: Evolution of DIG (g/day) according to species.


 
Specific growth rate (SGR)
 
Fig 3 shows the SGR of the two fish species during the two months of grow-out. Fig 3 shows that for both fish species, the SGR rates decreased from the beginning of the trial to the end (day 60). Indeed, during this period, the SGR of T. cabrae decreased from 3.76 to 1.57% g/day and that of O. schwebischi from 2.7 to 1.38% g/day. Thus, at the end of the trial, the average SGR obtained was 1.38% g/day for O. schwebischi and 1.57% g/day for T. cabrae. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference (p<0.05) between these SGR.
 

Fig 3: Evolution of SGR (% g/day) of T. cabrae and O. schwebischi.


 
Consumption index (CI)
 
The CI of the two fish species during the two months of grow-out is presented in Fig 4. From Fig 4, it can be seen that, irrespective of the fish species, the CI increased from the beginning to the end of the trial (day 60). Indeed, during this period, the CI of T. cabrae increased from 3.05 to 3.64 and that of O. schwebischi from 1.86 to 2.93. Thus, at the end of the trial, the recorded CI were 3.64 for O. schwebischi and 2.93 for T. cabrae. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference (p<0.05) between these CI.
 

Fig 4: Evolution of CI according to days.


 
Protein efficiency coefficient (PEC)
 
The PEC of the two fish species during the two months of grow-out is shown in Fig 5. Fig 5 shows that the PECs of all fish species decreased from the beginning of the test to the end (day 60). In fact, during this period, the PEC of T. cabrae increased from 0.015 to 0.00994 and that of O. schwebischi from 0.0095 to 0.0085. Thus, at the end of the trial, the mean PEC recorded were 0.00994 for T. cabrae and 0.0085 for O. schwebischi. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference (p>0.05) between these PEC of each period of the trial. Growth parameters measured in T. Cabrae and O. Schwebischi are recorded in Table 6.
 

Fig 5: Evolution of PEC according to fish species.


 

Table 6: Summary of growth parameters according to T. cabrae and O. schwebischi.


 
Physicochemical parameters during the breeding phase
 
The sampling of physicochemical parameters of the water during the grow-out phase is summarized in Table 7. From this table, it can be observed no significant differences (p>0.05) between the different times with regard to pH and temperature. The pH varied from 8.83±0.44 to 9.64±0.35 and the temperature from 28.61±0.12 to 30.30±0.09°C. Transparency averaged 51±1.25 cm.
 

Table 7: pH, water temperature and transparency in the ponds.


 
Absolute productivity (AP)
 
The AP of O. schwebischi and T. cabrae females is shown in Fig 6. It shows that the AP of O. schwebischi (104.68) was significantly (p<0.001) lower than that of T. cabrae (234.75).
 
Relative productivity (RP)
 
Fig 7 shows the RP of O. schwebischi and T. cabrae. From Fig 7, it can be seen that the RP recorded in O. schwebischi (3.46) was significantly (p<0.001) higher than that of T. cabrae (2.62).
 
System productivity (SP)
 
Fig 8 shows the SP of O. schwebischi and T. cabrae. From Fig 8, it can be seen that the productivity of the system in O. schwebischi (11.34) was significantly (p<0.001) higher than that of T. cabrae (4.12).
 

Fig 8: Productivity of the system according to the females O. schwebischi and T. cabrae.


       
The breeding parameters measured in T. cabrae and O. schwebischi are given in Table 8.
 

Table 8: Summary of reproduction parameters in T. cabrae and O. schwebischi.


 
Physicochemical parameters during the growth phase
 
The average pH values recorded during the present study are higher than those obtained by Koné et al., (2012) (7.86±0.08 and 7.9±0.07) with growing Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings in Côte d’Ivoire. Thus, these values obtained wouldn’t have negatively influenced the growth of the fish.
       
The average temperatures obtained during the present study corroborate those advised by Amoussou et al., (2016) (24 and 32°C).
       
The observed mean turbidity value is included in the standard recommended by Zerbi (2004), 45 to 60 cm.
 
Absolute weight gain (AWG), daily individual growth (DIG), specific growth rate (SGR), consumption index (CI) and protein efficiency coefficient (PEC)
 
The results of the present study showed that AWG, DIG and SGR are more interesting in T. cabrae than in O. schwebischi. CI and PEC are comparable for both species. Generally, T. cabrae seems to be more interesting than O. schwebischi. Moreover, the AWG obtained in T. cabrae and O. schwebischi, are lower than those observed in O. niloticus (65.3, 95.7 and 101.6 g/fish) by Iga (2008). In this study, the DIG of T. cabrae and O. schwebischi are lower than those reported by Dibala et al., (2018) 1.36 g/day in O. niloticus, a fish of the same family. The SGR values are higher than those obtained by Celine et al., (2008) in Benin with Tilapia zillii (0.85% g/day) and 0.74% g/day for T. guineensis.
       
The CI obtained in this study are higher than the 1.5 and 2.5 standards recommended by Iga Iga (2008), which reflects the poor utilization of the feed by these species. Furthermore, the PEC  observed during grow-out monitoring are much lower than those reported by Bahnasawy et al., (2009), which were 2.43 for 17% proteins in the diet and 1.36 for 35% proteins. The differences observed between these results would be related not only to the animal species, stocking density, physiological conditions and origin of the fish but also to the quality of the feed (Mensah et al., 2014).
 
Physicochemical parameters during the breeding phase
 
The pH and temperature values recorded during the present study are within the tolerance limit interval (6.52<pH<10.84) and between 28°C and 35°C given by Ouédraogo (2000), making the environment suitable for the breeding of these species.
       
The average turbidity observed during this study for the breeding was in line with the findings of Zhang et al., (2017) for a transparency between 40 and 60 cm.
 
Absolute productivity
 
The number of larvae produced by a female T. cabrae during an oviposition is higher than that of a female O. schwebischi. These results could be due to the level of intensified parental care. Indeed, in order to ensure the survival of their young, T. cabrae perform passive parental care producing more eggs and therefore more larvae, while O. schwebischi females perform oral incubation (active parental care) (Arizi et al., 2014).
 
Relative productivity
 
In this study, the relative productivities in O. niloticus and in T. cabrae are lower than those reported by Dhraïef et al., (2010) (9.3 larvae/g of female). The difference observed could be justified not only by the stress caused by handling and life in captivity but also by the animal species studied.
 
System productivity
 
In the present study, system productivity was higher in females of O. schwebischi than in females of T. cabrae. The reproductive performance obtained in these broodstock is lower than that reported by Dhraïef et al., (2010) in O. niloticus females, i.e. system productivities of 17.2, 32.5 and 11.9 larvae/m2/day.

CONCLUSION

At the end of this work focused on the contribution to the knowledge on zootechnical performance of Tilapia cabrae and Oreochromis schwebischi in captivity, it was found that T. cabrae showed good growth performance in terms of average weight gain, daily individual growth and specific growth rate compared to O. schwebischi. Regarding breeding, although T. cabrae females showed the highest absolute productivity, the number of breedings, relative and system productivities obtained were better in O. schwebischi females. Based on these results, the use of Tilapia cabrae and Oreochromis schwebischi in captivity can be recommended.

REFERENCES


  1. Adeoti, E.O.B., Yabi, I., Akpo, M.A., Ogouwale, E. (2018). Effects socioéconomiques de la pêche artisanale dans le Doublet Adjohoun-Dandbo au Bénin. JSTOR, Afrique et Développement. 43(2): 173-189.

  2. Amoussou, O.T., Toguyeni, A., Imorou, T.I. (2016). Caractéristiques biologiques et zootechniques des tilapias africains Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) et Sarotherodon melanotheron (Rüppell, 1852). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences. 10(4): 1869-1887.

  3. Arizi, E.K., Obodai, E.A, Aggey-Fynn, J. (2014). Reproductive biology of Sarotherodon melatheron in the Dominli Lagon Ghana. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 40(4): 245-253.

  4. Bahnasawy, M.H., El-ghobashy, A.E., Abbel, H.N.F. (2009). Culture of the Nile recircularing water system using different protein levels. Egyptian Journal Aquatic Biology and Fisheries. 13: 1110-1131.

  5. Caillavet, F., Fadhuile, A., Nichèle, V. (2019). L’évolution de la consommation de produits animaux en France: de multiples enjeux de grands défis et des solutions pour l’élevage. INRA, Productions Animales. 32(2): 132-146.

  6. Céline, S.K.N., Tidiani, K., Issa, N.S., Paul, E.K., Valentin, N., Jos, S. (2008). Etude des performances de croissance de deux tilapias (Tilapia zillii et T. guineensis) et de leurs hybrides en cage flottante. Cybium: Revue internationale d’ichtyologie. 32(2): 131-136.

  7. Dhraïef, M.N., Azaza, M.S., Kraïem, M.M. (2010). Etude de la reproduction du tilapia du Nil Oreochromis niloticus (L.) en captivité dans les eaux géothermales du sud tunisien. Bulletin de l’Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer de Salammbô. 37: 89-96.

  8. Dibala, C.I., Yougbaré, M.C., Kiessoun, K. (2018). Production du tilapia du Nil (Oreochromis niloticus, Linneaus, 1758) avec des aliments à base de protéines végétales. Journal of Applied Biosciences. 128: 12943-12952.

  9. DPPAMO. (2019). Fiches de données de la Direction Provinciale des Pêches et de l’Aquaculture du Moyen-Ogooué. Consultées 01/12/2019.

  10. FAO. (2020). Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics 2018. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1213t.ISBN972-92-5-133371-6.

  11. Iga Iga, R. (2008). Contribution à la mise au point d’aliments pour tilapia Oreochromis niloticus à base d’intrants locaux: cas du Gabon. Mémoire de fin d’études en vue de l’obtention du Master en Sciences Agronomiques et Agroalimentaires, Spécialité: Sciences Halieutiques et Aquacoles, Domaine Aquaculture, Agro campus; 47p.

  12. Kone, M., Cisse, M., Ouattara, M., Fatondji, A. (2012). Biosécurité et productivité du tilapia du Nil, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) élevé en zone rurale ivoirienne. Tropicultura. 30(2): 117-121.

  13. Kumar, R., Kumar, R.R., Stauvermann, P.J., Arora, P. (2020). Effect of fisheries subsidies negotiations on fish production and interest rate. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 13(297). DOI: 10.3390/jrfm 13120297.

  14. Lallemand, P., Bergh, M., Hansen, M., Purves, M. (2016). Estimating the economic benefits of MSC certification for the South African hake trawl fishery. Fisheries Research. DOI: 10.10 16/j.fishres.02.003.

  15. Mensah, E.T.D., Klenam, F., Attipoe, Y., Atsakpo, K. (2014). Comparative growth study of Oreochromis niloticus and Sarotherodon galilaeus under two different culture regimes (hapa-in- pond and cage systems). International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies. 1(5): 53-59. 

  16. Ouédraogo, S. (2000). Biologie de la reproduction de Oreochromis niloticus du lac de barrage de la Comoé. Université Polytechnique de Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. Mémoire de fin de cycle en vue de l’obtention du diplôme d’Ingénieur du développement rural.

  17. Sonwa, D.J., Mfochivé O.F., Gapia, M. and Fiyo, L.F. (2020). Living under a drying Congo Basin. Sustainability. 12: 2936. DOI: 10.3390/su12072936.

  18. Zerbi, A. (2004). Introduction à la gestion de la qualité de l’eau dans l’aquaculture. Montpellier, 50p.

  19. Zhang, X., Mei, X., Gulati, R.D. (2017). Effects of omnivorous tilapia on water turbidity and primary production dynamics in Shallow lakes: Implication for ecosystem management. Springer: Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 27(1): 245-257. DOI: 10.1007/S11160-016-9458-6.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)