A total eleven different bacterial strains were isolated from chilli, brinjal and tomato growing soil samples (Table 1) by using MRS media. Four
Acinetobacter species were isolated from chilli, brinjal growing soil. Three
Bacillus species were isolated,
Microbacterium was isolated from chilli,
Enterobacterium was isolated from the tomato
L. lactis and
L. fermentum isolated from tomato and brinjal growing soil.
The morphological characteristics of the selected isolate were noted majority of the isolates showed white and rough colonies on MRS Agar.
Acinetobacter spp. is gram-negative and cocci in shape. The
Bacillus spp.,
L. lactis and
L. fermentum are gram-positive.
Microbacterium and
Enterobacterium spp. are spherical and are gram-negative in nature. Similarly,
Maany et al. (2019) isolated a total of 41 LAB from the soil of healthy and diseased tomato and Phaseolus plants using MRS agar.
The production of lactic acid in the isolated bacterial strains were determined by spectrophotometric method. Concentration of lactic acid ranged from 51.148 mg/L to 5311.11 mg/L. The lowest concentration was reported in S1
Acinetobacter schindleri and highest concentration was reported in S11
L. lactis (Fig 2).
A similar work was carried out by
Tolieng et al. (2017) observed that lactic acid producing bacteria isolated from soil and tree barks in Thailand and showed
Lactococcus produced the L-lactic acid (72.32-77.47 g/L) with 100% optical purity.
Enterococcus hirae produced (31.56-34.86 g/L),
Bacillus coagulans produced 48.48 and 93.51 g/L of L-lactic acid with high optical purity (99.56%).
Sporoacto bacillus produced D-lactic acid (87.64 g/L).
The potential probiotic isolates were identified through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. All eleven isolates produced an amplicon of approximately 1500 bp. 16S rRNA analysis revealed that identified strains S8, S1, S6 and S9 showed homology to (94.95%)
Acinetobacter spp. JNG7 (99.37%) and its different strains. Similarly, S4, S7 and S5 showed homology to the (84.07%)
Bacillus cereus strain F3-50, (99.58%)
Bacillus velezensis strain 8-4 and (97.48%)
Bacillus subtilis strain IP18. S3 and S2 showed homology to (99.29%)
Enterobacter spp. strain LJ68, (98.15%)
Microbacterium spp. HBUM178923. Strains S10 and S11 showed homology to (99%)
Limosilactobacillus fermentum and (99%)
Lactobacillus lactis. Similarly, 16S rRNA sequencing identified LAB isolates from winter salad pickle, a total 8 species showed
Pediococcus pentosaceus (51.1%) and
Lactobacillus plantarum (20%),
W. cibaria (11.1%),
L. fermentum (6.7%),
E. faecium (4.4%),
E. faecalis (2.2%),
Leuconostoc citreum (2.2%) and
Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp.
mesenteroides (2.2%) homology
(Saeedi et al., 2015).
The biochemical tests results revealed that
B. cereus, B. subtilis, B. velezensis showed positive and
L. fermentum, L. lactis showed negative to catalase test. For oxidase test,
B. subtilis showed negative, the remaining isolates showed positive. For indole,
L. fermentum, L. lactis showed positive and
B. cereus, B. subtilis, B. velezensis showed negative. For phosphate solubilization,
B. cereus, B. subtilis showed positive and
B. velezensis, L. fermentum, L. lactis showed negative. Similarly, all isolates showed positive in lactose fermentation test and negative to the H
2S production. For lysine decarboxylase test
B. velezensis showed negative and the remaining isolates showed positive results.
B. cereus, B. subtilis showed positive and
B. velezensis, L. fermentum, L. lactis showed negative results (Table 2).
Madushanka et al. (2025) observed that none of the isolates showed hydrogen sulphide production and gas production from glucose fermentation.
Mete et al. (2017) determined Lysine carboxylase activity of isolates and observed seven isolates showed negative results.
Phyto-pathogenic fungi such as
Fusarium oxysporum (F2),
Alternaria alternata (G2),
Rhizopus oryzae (TPS1
), Rhizopus arrhizus (TPS2) and
Fusarium spp. (YECA) were isolated from infected plants. Pure cultures were examined for colony and microscopic characteristics. Morphological characterization confirmed that the infected plant tissues were associated with selected isolates.
Genotypic identification was performed using 18S rDNA sequencing, sequencing data were compared with the reference sequence published on the NCBI database using the BLAST algorithm. The analysed strain G2 showed 88.35% similarity to
A. alternata, F2 strain showed 94.82% similarity to
F. oxysporum. TPFS1 and TPFS2 strains showed 99.55% and 99.11% similar to
R. oryzae and
R. arrhizus. The YECA strain showed 99.91% similarity to
Fusarium spp. Thilagam et al. (2018) reported
A. alternate. F. oxysporum, F. solani, A. flavus, Colletotricum spp. in infected plant parts such as roots, stems, leaves, flowers and fruits from Tamil Nadu region.
Selected bacterial supernatants were examined for antibacterial activity against
X. campetris, E. coli and Pseudomonas spp. B. cereus supernatant showed no zone against
X. campetris and E. coli completely inhibited against
Pseudomonas. B. subtilis and
B. velezensis exhibit weak inhibitions, producing small zones (1-7 mm) against test organisms.
L. fermentum supernatant completely inhibited against
Xanthomonas and also higher concentrations of
Pseudomonas, but it showed strong antibacterial potential (15-31 mm) against
E. coli. L. lactis spp. supernatant also showed strong antibacterial activity against all tested organisms by producing large (18-33 mm) zone of inhibition, but at higher concentrations showed complete inhibition against
Pseudomonas spp. (Table 3)
.
Four species of lactic acid bacteria were subjected to antimicrobial activity, among four
L. lactis subsp.
lactis showed the strongest inhibition 14 mm zone against
E. coli. Weakest activity was observed with neutralized supernatants of
L. saki and
L. plantarum (8.33 mm) against
Shigella dysenteriae and
S. aureus (
Chakoosari et al., 2015).
Antifungal assay showed variations in zone of inhibition of bacterial supernatant against
Penicillium spp. F. oxysporum, Botrytis spp., Verticillium and A. niger. B. cereus supernatant moderate inhibition against
Penicillium (4-7 mm),
F. oxysporum (4-13 mm) and
Botrytis spp. (4-9 mm), but no activity against
Verticillium and A. niger. Whereas,
B. subtilis supernatant showed activity against
Verticillium (8-12 mm) and
A. niger (3-5 mm), but no activity against remaining test organisms.
B. velezensis supernatant showed zone of inhibition against
Penicillium (3-6 mm) and
Botrytis spp. (8-9 mm) and no zone of inhibition against
F. oxysporum, Verticillium and A. niger. L. fermentum exhibits antifungal activity by showing zones 6-15 mm to
Penicillium, 5-18 mm to
F. oxysporum, 6-21 mm to
Verticillium, 11-19 mm to
A. niger and no activity to
Botrytis spp. L. lactis showed strong antifungal activity with zone of inhibition 10-26 mm against
F. oxysporum, 8-20 mm against
Penicillium, 9-18 mm against
A. niger and also showed complete inhibition against
Verticillium and no activity against
Botrytis spp. (Table 4).
Magnusson et al. (2003) reported four LAB isolates showed significant antifungal activity against five
Candida species, with inhibition zones ranging from 10.0 to 17.2 mm. The strongest effect (22.0 mm) was observed for isolate HH (
L. curvatus) against
C. glabrata ATCC2001.
L. curvatus (HH) also inhibited
C. parapsilosis (15.6 mm) and
C. tropicalis (14.7 mm), while
P. pentosaceus (HM) showed strong inhibition against
C. krusei (17.2 mm),
C. glabrata (16.0 mm) and
C. albicans (13.3 mm).
L. plantarum (HS) effectively suppressed
C. albicans (15.3 mm) and
C. krusei (13.1 mm).
Antibiotic assay revealed that
L. lactis exhibited highest sensitivity with large inhibition zones (19-44 mm) against all tested antibiotics.
B. cereus also showed strong activity to ciprofloxacin (30 mm), levofloxacin (29 mm), cefixime (29 mm) and gentamicin (27 mm).
L. fermentum showed good susceptibility to multiple antibiotics, with clear zones of inhibition for ampicillin (25 mm), cefixime (15 mm), ciprofloxacin (19 mm), gentamicin (15 mm) and levofloxacin (16 mm) and no inhibition to tetracycline.
B. subtilis and
B. velezensis showed moderate susceptibility; both showed no inhibition to ampicillin and cefixime and showed 16 mm zones to gentamicin and tetracycline for ciprofloxacin 24 mm, 18 mm and 20 mm, 21 mm zone of inhibition for levofloxacin, respectively (Fig 3). A study by
Onuoha et al. (2016) evaluated antibiotic sensitivity of
E. coli,
Klebsiella spp.,
S. aureus and
Shigella spp. against eight antibiotics, including ceftazidime, ampicillin, amoxicillin- clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, cefuroxime, meropenem, ofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole. Their findings showed that meropenem was most effective antibiotic against all tested organisms, followed by the fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin), which also exhibited strong inhibitory activity. Cefuroxime inhibited all isolates except
Shigella spp., while the remaining antibiotics displayed sensitivity only against two of the tested organisms.