Multivariate Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Yield Attributing Traits in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss.]

A
Adya Ponniyath1
S
Sayooj Manoj1
R
Rahul Singh1,*
P
Priyanka Upadhyay2
S
Shiv Prakash Shrivastav1
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144 401, Punjab, India.
2Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur-848 125, Bihar, India.

Background:  The present study aimed to evaluate genetic diversity and identify key traits contributing to yield improvement in 53 accessions of Brassica juncea using multivariate analyses.

Methods: Thirteen agro-morphological traits were assessed under an augmented randomized block design. Significant variation among genotypes was observed for most traits through ANOVA, highlighting the scope for genetic enhancement.

Result: Principal component analysis revealed that the first three principal components explained 75.5% of the total variance, primarily influenced by shoot length, plant height, siliquae traits and yield attributes. The PCA biplot showed clear trait associations and grouped similar genotypes such as Pusa Bold, RH 119 and 53-14-24D. Mahalanobis D² clustering organized the genotypes into seven distinct clusters, with maximum inter-cluster distance indicating high divergence between clusters VI and VII. The study provides useful insights for breeders to select diverse parents and prioritize traits for the development of high-yielding cultivars.

Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss, commonly referred to as Indian Mustard, is a vital oilseed crop from the Brassicaceae family. This amphidiploid species emerged as a result of interspecific hybridization between Brassica rapa (2n=2×=20, AA) and Brassica nigra (2n=2×=16, BB) with a chromosome number 2n=4×=36, AABB). Vavilov identified Afghanistan and adjacent regions in Central Asia as the primary origin of B. juncea, while secondary centres of genetic diversity were suggested to be Asia Minor, parts of China and eastern India (Zhang et al., 2023). Rajasthan dominates Indian mustard cultivation, among other states accounting for approximately 45% of the nation’s total output (Ola et al., 2024). India’s share in the global oilseed sector includes 7.4% of total oilseed production, 5.8% of edible oil output and 6.1% of oil meal (Jat et al., 2019; Samal et al., 2021). Oilseed crops are vital to global agriculture, playing a key role in the Indian economy, reflected in the significant outcomes of the Yellow Revolution (Kumar et al., 2020; Saha et al., 2024). However, the rising population has led to a gradual drop in the per capita oil availability due to environmental stresses and limited resources (Anushree et al., 2025), making it vital to boost production to secure future needs (Ponniyath et al., 2025).
       
Assessing genetic variation is the fundamental step for a successful breeding program (Lakra et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2021). Agro-morphological traits have been widely used to explore the extent of genetic variation and to understand the evolutionary linkages among different Brassica juncea accessions (Vinu et al., 2013; Akhatar et al., 2020; Saroj et al., 2021). Multivariate analyses like Principal component analysis and D2 analysis have been employed to assess the variability among the studied  traits. By summarizing complex trait data, PCA provides insights into genetic diversity and population structure (Upadhyay et al., 2022). Mahalanobis (1936) D2 analysis has proven to be an effective method for evaluating genetic divergence among genotypes and allows for a comprehensive assessment of variability in quantitative traits (Rout et al., 2019). Considering the present scenario, the study was undertaken to assess the genetic diversity and interrelationships of different traits among various genotypes of Indian mustard with the aim to identify useful traits that can help in selecting better genotypes for future yield improvement.
53 accessions of Brassica juncea were procured from released sources (Table 1). The experiment was conducted in Rabi 2024-2025 at the Agriculture Research Farm, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab under an Augmented randomized block design with the experimental layout consisting of paired rows, each 2 meters in length and spaced 45 cm apart with a total plot size of 176m2. The experimental site is located at an altitude of 230 meters above mean sea level, at 31o14'31''N latitude and 75o41'47''E longitude. The region experiences a humid subtropical climate, marked by cool winters and extended periods of hot summers. Observations were recorded on five competitive randomly selected plants for 13 traits viz., germination percentage, days to 50% flowering, plant height (cm), main shoot length (cm), primary branches per plant,  secondary  branches  per  plant,  number  of  siliquae per plant, number seeds per siliqua, length of siliqua (cm), thousand seed weight (g), biological  yield per plant (g), economic yield per plant (g) and harvest index (%). Cluster and principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the recorded data for quantitative traits. Prior to cluster and PCA, mean of each parameter was standardized to avoid the effects of scaling differences. For all the pairs of accessions, Euclidean distance co-efficient were calculated. The resulting Euclidean dissimilarity co-efficient matrices were utilized to estimate the association among the B. juncea germplasm through cluster analysis using the complete linkage method (Statistical version 7.0 and NTSYS-pc v 2.1).

Table 1: List of genotypes.

Principal component analysis (PCA)
 
PCA was first introduced by Karl Pearson (1901) to reduce data dimensionality and identify patterns in multivariate data. In the current study, the dataset was divided into 13 components (Table 2 and Fig 2a), corresponding to various parameters. Out of the 13 principal components, the first three PCs (PC1, PC2 and PC3) occupied most of the variability (75.5%,).  According to Kaiser’s rule for PCA, PC’s with eigenvalues ≥  are considered significant and account for most of the variability. Similar results were reported by Chakraborty et al., (2021), where the first three PCs accounted for the maximum variability indicating genetic consistency. PC1 had the highest eigenvalue of 6.946, contributing 53.4% of the total variance, having major contribution from  the traits, main shoot length, plant height, number of siliquae per plant, siliquae length, test weight, number of seeds per siliqua, number of secondary branches, biological yield and number of primary branches. PC2 with an eigenvalue of 1.867, contributing 14.4% of the variance, for which harvest index, economic yield per plant, germination percentage and days to 50% flowering were the major contributors. Similar traits were studied to contribute more to PC2 in the studies by Chakraborty et al., (2021) and Saikrishna et al. (2021). PC3 with an eigenvalue of 1.001, accounting for 7.7% of the variance, primarily represented by germination percentage, days to 50% flowering, biological yield, economic yield per plant and number of primary branches. PC4 to PC13 had eigenvalues less than 1 and accounted for the remaining 24.5% of the total variability. The scree plot in principal component analysis displays the percentage of total variance explained by each principal component (Fig 2c). Among the thirteen PC’s, PC1 had the highest contribution (53.4%)  to the total variance (Fig 2e) followed by PC2 contributing 14.4% to the variance, PC3 accounting for 7.7% of the variance and increasing the cumulative variance to 75.5% (Fig 2c).

Table 2: Eigenvalues and coordinates of the eigenvectors of the 13 principal components in (Brassica juncea)


 
PCA-biplot analysis
 
The PCA biplot (Fig 1a and b) displayed the relationships among 13 traits and the distribution of 53 genotypes defined by PC1 and PC2 (Fig 2,b,d, e and f). The traits, days to 50% flowering strongly influenced PC1 in the negative direction, while economic yield and biological yield contributed positively along PC1 and PC2 and were strongly correlated. Harvest index and germination percentage indicated negative strong correlation. The genotypes Pusa Bold, RH 119, 53-14-24D were closely located on the biplot indicating similar traits. The genotypes, 53-14-24D, Durga Mani, 55-14-101 were located close to the economic yield per plant indicating high yield.

Fig 1: (a). Contribution of traits to PC (b). PCA biplot.



Fig 2: Graphical representation of principle component analysis (PCA).


 
D2 analysis
 
Danalysis was carried out according to methods given by Mahalanobis (1936), which was later revised by Rao (1952). All the 53 genotypes were  clustered into seven different clusters by using Tocher method (Table 3 and Fig 3). Maximum number of genotypes were present in Cluster-I,  which contained 17 genotypes followed by Cluster-III (16), Cluster-IV (12). Least number of genotypes were present in Cluster-II (5), Cluster-III (1), Cluster-V, Cluster-VI (1), Cluster-VII (1) and Cluster-IV (1). The clustering pattern revealed the presence of enough divergence to enable formation of individual clusters.

Table 3: Distribution of 53 genotypes of Indian mustard into different clusters.



Fig 3: Clustering by tocher method.


 
Contribution of various traits towards total genetic divergence
 
The contribution of various traits towards total genetic divergence (Table 4a) revealed that  the trait germination percentage (85.85%) contributed the highest for divergence, followed by biological yield (2.47%) followed by harvest index (1.96%), economical yield (1.67%), number of siliquae per plant (1.89%), siliqua length (1.52%), number of seeds per siliqua (1.09%), thousand seed weight (1.02%), main shoot length (0.94%), number of primary branches (0.65%), plant height (0.51%), days to 50% flowering (0.29%) and number of secondary branches (0.15%). Kumari and Kumari (2018) reported similar values for number of primary branches.

Table 4: Contribution of various traits towards total genetic divergence.


 
Cluster means
 
The range of mean values among different clusters was recorded for different characters in (Table 5). Cluster-I had the highest mean value for the trait days to 50% flowering (68.16). Cluster-II had the highest mean values for main shoot length (179.98), thousand seed weight (3.84) and biological yield (272.81). Cluster-III exhibited the lowest mean value for economic yield (45.65). Cluster-IV showed lowest mean for number of siliquae per plant (8.82).

Table 5: Cluster means for 13 traits in 53 genotypes of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea).


       
Cluster-V had the highest plant height (189.04), number of primary branches (6.53) and economic yield per plant (50.89). Cluster-VI had the highest mean value for siliqua length (4.67). Cluster VII exhibited the highest value for germination percentage (34.61), number of secondary branches (7.07), number of seeds per siliqua (256.6), harvest index (19.45). Similarly, Reddy et al. (2025) reported the highest cluster mean for plant height in Cluster VI, while Cluster I exhibited the highest mean value for the number of siliqua length. In contrast, Cluster II recorded the maximum mean for the number of seeds per siliqua. For 1000-seed weight, the highest mean was noted in Cluster VI. It’s indicating that the genetic potential for that trait is higher in the genotypes of this cluster compared to others.
 
Inter and intra-cluster distances
 
The inter and intra-cluster distances revealed the extent of degree of genetic diversity among clusters (Table 6 and Fig 4). The maximum inter-cluster distance was found between clusters VI and VII (36.09) (Priyanka et al. 2021) followed by that between II and VI (31.93),  III and IV (29.44), II and III (25.29) and IV and VII (23.17) Rout et al. 2019). whereas, minimum inter-cluster distance was found between clusters II and VII (4.98), followed by I and V (5.22), I and IV (6.66), III and IV (7.33) and III and VI (7.47). The intra-cluster distance observed were 3.28 (cluster I), 2.81 (cluster II),  4.14 (cluster III ), 3.5 (cluster IV). The clusters V, VI and VII contained single genotypes and therefore, their intra-cluster distances were zero. The inter- and intra-cluster distances revealed considerable genetic diversity among the genotypes, with the highest inter-cluster distance observed between Clusters VI and VII (36.09), indicating their suitability as potential parents for hybridization to exploit heterosis. The highest intra-cluster distance was recorded in Cluster III (4.14), suggesting greater genetic variability within this cluster. Current findings are in line with Reddy et al. (2025).

Table 6: Cluster distance in 53 genotypes of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea).



Fig 4: Intra and inter-cluster distance diagram.

The present investigation demonstrates considerable genetic diversity among 53 Brassica juncea accessions, with the first three principal components accounting for the majority of trait variation. Key traits influencing variability included main shoot length, plant height, siliquae per plant, siliqua length, test weight and yield-related characters. Genotypes Pusa Bold, RH 119 and 53-14-24D exhibited similar trait combinations, while 53-14-24D, Durga Mani and 55-14-101 were associated with higher economic yield. the trait germination percentage (85.85%) contributed the highest for divergence, followed by biological yield (2.47%) and minimum was from number of secondary branches (0.15%). The inter-cluster distances suggest ample scope for selecting genetically diverse parents. These findings can guide breeders in designing crossing programs to develop improved, high-yielding mustard varieties adapted to diverse conditions.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Akhatar, J., Singh, M.P., Sharma, A., Kaur, H., Kaur, N., Sharma, S. and Banga, S.S. (2020).  Association mapping of seed quality traits under varying conditions of nitrogen application in [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss]. Frontiers in Genetics. 11: 744.

  2. Anushree, K.V., Nagarjun P. (2025). Unlocking the genetic potential of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.): A review on advances in breeding approaches. Agricultural Science Digest. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-6254.

  3. Chakraborty, S., Kumar, A., Kishore, C., Singh, R. S., Kumar, A., Kumar, A. and Kumar, M. (2021). Multivariate based diversity analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Genotypes by principle component analysis. Biological Forum-An International Journal. 13(3): 680-685.

  4. Gupta, S., Kumar, A., Janeja, H. S., Prakash, A. and Anand, R. (2024). Genetic engineering in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.): Current progress and future directions for enhanced crop improvement. J. Adv Biol Biotechnol. 27(5): 739-751.

  5. Jat, R.S., Singh, V.V., Sharma, P. and Rai, P.K. (2019). Oilseed brassica in India: Demand, supply, policy perspective and future potential. OCL. 26(8). doi: 10.1051/ocl/2019005.

  6. Kumar, S. and Meena, R.S. (2020). Impact of various sowing environ- ment and nutrient sources on growth performance of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agronomy 65(4): 465-470.

  7. Kumari, A. and Kumari, V. (2018). Studies on genetic diversity in Indian mustard (Brassica Juncea Czern and Coss) for morphological characters under changed climate in the mid-hills of Himalayas. Pharma Innov. J. 7: 290-296.

  8. Lakra, A., Tantuway, G., Tirkey, A. E. and Srivastava, K. (2020). Genetic variability and trait association studies in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(1): 2556-2563.

  9. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936). A note on the statistical and biometric writings of Karl Pearson. Sankhyβ: The Indian Journal of Statistics. 2(4): 411-422.

  10. Ola, M. P. (2024). Comparative study of nano urea and nitrogen levels on growth and productivity of indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.).

  11. Pearson, K. (1901). Principal components analysis. The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 6(2): 559.

  12. Ponniyath, A., Singh, S.K., Upadhyay, P., Yadav, P.K. and Krishna, B. (2025). Genetic characterization for economic yield and its related characters in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss]. Biopesticides International. 21(1).

  13. Priyanka, N. and Pandey, M.K. (2021). Genetic variability and genetic diversity study in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal. 10(10): 1133-1135.

  14. Rao, C.R. (1952). Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. Ola, M.P. Comparative Study of Nano Urea and Nitrogen Levels on Growth and Productivity of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.).

  15. Reddy, B.V.P., Chakraborty, M., Roy, S.K., Kundu, A., Mandal, R. and Debnath, M.K. (2025). Genetic diversity in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern and Coss.) genotypes for yield and its attributing traits under Terai agro-climatic zone of West Bengal, India. Journal of Advances in Biology and Biotechnology. 28(1): 641-647. https://doi.org/10. 9734/jabb/2025/v28i11918.

  16. Rout, S., Das, A., Sur, B., Umamaheswar, N., Sadhu, S., Ghimiray, T.S. and Roy, S.K. (2019). Genetic divergence in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss] under sub-Himalayan region. Journal of Crop and Weed. 15(2): 18-24.

  17. Saha, S., Dasgupta, T., Sawarkar, A., Maity, S.N. and Roy, A. (2024). Genetic diversity and yield component analysis in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss.]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 58: 995-1002. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6165.

  18. Saikrishna, A., Arunkumar, B., Khan, H., Kuchanur, P.H. and Patil, A. (2021). Genetic diversity studies in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) CzernandCoss.] For yield and its component traits. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 10(10): 534-538.

  19. Samal, I., Dhillon, M. K. and Singh, N. (2021). Biological performance and biochemical interactions of mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi) in Brassica juncea. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences.  91(9): 1347-1352.

  20. Saroj, R., Soumya, S.L., Singh, S., Sankar, S.M., Chaudhary, R., Yashpal. and Yadava, D.K. (2021). Unraveling the relationship between seed yield and yield-related traits in a diversity panel of Brassica juncea using multi-traits mixed model. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12: 651936.

  21. Singh, V.K., Mahavir, A.R., Kumari, M.N. and Kumar, R. (2021). Assessment of genetic diversity among indian and exotic genotypes of Brassica juncea using phenotypic evaluation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(4): 434-439.  doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5502.

  22. Upadhyay, P., Gupta, M., Sra, S.K., Sharda, R., Sharma, S., Sardana, V.K. and Kaur, G. (2022). Genome wide association studies for acid phosphatase activity at varying phosphorous levels in Brassica juncea L. Front. Plant Sci. 13: 1056 028. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1056028.

  23. Vinu, V., Singh, N., Vasudev, S., Kumar, S., Naresh, S., Bhat, S.R. and Prabhu, K.V. (2013). Evaluación de la diversidad gené tica en genotipos de Brassica juncea (Brassicaceae) utilizando diferencias fenotÃpicas y marcadores SSR. Revista de Biología Tropical. 61(4): 1919-1935.

  24. Zhang, D., Yu, H., Gao, L., Wang, J., Dong, H., Guo, Y. and Hu, S. (2023). Genetic diversity in oilseed and vegetable mustard (Brassica juncea L.) accessions revealed by nuclear and mitochondrial molecular Markers. Agronomy. 13(3): 919.

Multivariate Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Yield Attributing Traits in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss.]

A
Adya Ponniyath1
S
Sayooj Manoj1
R
Rahul Singh1,*
P
Priyanka Upadhyay2
S
Shiv Prakash Shrivastav1
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144 401, Punjab, India.
2Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Samastipur-848 125, Bihar, India.

Background:  The present study aimed to evaluate genetic diversity and identify key traits contributing to yield improvement in 53 accessions of Brassica juncea using multivariate analyses.

Methods: Thirteen agro-morphological traits were assessed under an augmented randomized block design. Significant variation among genotypes was observed for most traits through ANOVA, highlighting the scope for genetic enhancement.

Result: Principal component analysis revealed that the first three principal components explained 75.5% of the total variance, primarily influenced by shoot length, plant height, siliquae traits and yield attributes. The PCA biplot showed clear trait associations and grouped similar genotypes such as Pusa Bold, RH 119 and 53-14-24D. Mahalanobis D² clustering organized the genotypes into seven distinct clusters, with maximum inter-cluster distance indicating high divergence between clusters VI and VII. The study provides useful insights for breeders to select diverse parents and prioritize traits for the development of high-yielding cultivars.

Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss, commonly referred to as Indian Mustard, is a vital oilseed crop from the Brassicaceae family. This amphidiploid species emerged as a result of interspecific hybridization between Brassica rapa (2n=2×=20, AA) and Brassica nigra (2n=2×=16, BB) with a chromosome number 2n=4×=36, AABB). Vavilov identified Afghanistan and adjacent regions in Central Asia as the primary origin of B. juncea, while secondary centres of genetic diversity were suggested to be Asia Minor, parts of China and eastern India (Zhang et al., 2023). Rajasthan dominates Indian mustard cultivation, among other states accounting for approximately 45% of the nation’s total output (Ola et al., 2024). India’s share in the global oilseed sector includes 7.4% of total oilseed production, 5.8% of edible oil output and 6.1% of oil meal (Jat et al., 2019; Samal et al., 2021). Oilseed crops are vital to global agriculture, playing a key role in the Indian economy, reflected in the significant outcomes of the Yellow Revolution (Kumar et al., 2020; Saha et al., 2024). However, the rising population has led to a gradual drop in the per capita oil availability due to environmental stresses and limited resources (Anushree et al., 2025), making it vital to boost production to secure future needs (Ponniyath et al., 2025).
       
Assessing genetic variation is the fundamental step for a successful breeding program (Lakra et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2021). Agro-morphological traits have been widely used to explore the extent of genetic variation and to understand the evolutionary linkages among different Brassica juncea accessions (Vinu et al., 2013; Akhatar et al., 2020; Saroj et al., 2021). Multivariate analyses like Principal component analysis and D2 analysis have been employed to assess the variability among the studied  traits. By summarizing complex trait data, PCA provides insights into genetic diversity and population structure (Upadhyay et al., 2022). Mahalanobis (1936) D2 analysis has proven to be an effective method for evaluating genetic divergence among genotypes and allows for a comprehensive assessment of variability in quantitative traits (Rout et al., 2019). Considering the present scenario, the study was undertaken to assess the genetic diversity and interrelationships of different traits among various genotypes of Indian mustard with the aim to identify useful traits that can help in selecting better genotypes for future yield improvement.
53 accessions of Brassica juncea were procured from released sources (Table 1). The experiment was conducted in Rabi 2024-2025 at the Agriculture Research Farm, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab under an Augmented randomized block design with the experimental layout consisting of paired rows, each 2 meters in length and spaced 45 cm apart with a total plot size of 176m2. The experimental site is located at an altitude of 230 meters above mean sea level, at 31o14'31''N latitude and 75o41'47''E longitude. The region experiences a humid subtropical climate, marked by cool winters and extended periods of hot summers. Observations were recorded on five competitive randomly selected plants for 13 traits viz., germination percentage, days to 50% flowering, plant height (cm), main shoot length (cm), primary branches per plant,  secondary  branches  per  plant,  number  of  siliquae per plant, number seeds per siliqua, length of siliqua (cm), thousand seed weight (g), biological  yield per plant (g), economic yield per plant (g) and harvest index (%). Cluster and principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the recorded data for quantitative traits. Prior to cluster and PCA, mean of each parameter was standardized to avoid the effects of scaling differences. For all the pairs of accessions, Euclidean distance co-efficient were calculated. The resulting Euclidean dissimilarity co-efficient matrices were utilized to estimate the association among the B. juncea germplasm through cluster analysis using the complete linkage method (Statistical version 7.0 and NTSYS-pc v 2.1).

Table 1: List of genotypes.

Principal component analysis (PCA)
 
PCA was first introduced by Karl Pearson (1901) to reduce data dimensionality and identify patterns in multivariate data. In the current study, the dataset was divided into 13 components (Table 2 and Fig 2a), corresponding to various parameters. Out of the 13 principal components, the first three PCs (PC1, PC2 and PC3) occupied most of the variability (75.5%,).  According to Kaiser’s rule for PCA, PC’s with eigenvalues ≥  are considered significant and account for most of the variability. Similar results were reported by Chakraborty et al., (2021), where the first three PCs accounted for the maximum variability indicating genetic consistency. PC1 had the highest eigenvalue of 6.946, contributing 53.4% of the total variance, having major contribution from  the traits, main shoot length, plant height, number of siliquae per plant, siliquae length, test weight, number of seeds per siliqua, number of secondary branches, biological yield and number of primary branches. PC2 with an eigenvalue of 1.867, contributing 14.4% of the variance, for which harvest index, economic yield per plant, germination percentage and days to 50% flowering were the major contributors. Similar traits were studied to contribute more to PC2 in the studies by Chakraborty et al., (2021) and Saikrishna et al. (2021). PC3 with an eigenvalue of 1.001, accounting for 7.7% of the variance, primarily represented by germination percentage, days to 50% flowering, biological yield, economic yield per plant and number of primary branches. PC4 to PC13 had eigenvalues less than 1 and accounted for the remaining 24.5% of the total variability. The scree plot in principal component analysis displays the percentage of total variance explained by each principal component (Fig 2c). Among the thirteen PC’s, PC1 had the highest contribution (53.4%)  to the total variance (Fig 2e) followed by PC2 contributing 14.4% to the variance, PC3 accounting for 7.7% of the variance and increasing the cumulative variance to 75.5% (Fig 2c).

Table 2: Eigenvalues and coordinates of the eigenvectors of the 13 principal components in (Brassica juncea)


 
PCA-biplot analysis
 
The PCA biplot (Fig 1a and b) displayed the relationships among 13 traits and the distribution of 53 genotypes defined by PC1 and PC2 (Fig 2,b,d, e and f). The traits, days to 50% flowering strongly influenced PC1 in the negative direction, while economic yield and biological yield contributed positively along PC1 and PC2 and were strongly correlated. Harvest index and germination percentage indicated negative strong correlation. The genotypes Pusa Bold, RH 119, 53-14-24D were closely located on the biplot indicating similar traits. The genotypes, 53-14-24D, Durga Mani, 55-14-101 were located close to the economic yield per plant indicating high yield.

Fig 1: (a). Contribution of traits to PC (b). PCA biplot.



Fig 2: Graphical representation of principle component analysis (PCA).


 
D2 analysis
 
Danalysis was carried out according to methods given by Mahalanobis (1936), which was later revised by Rao (1952). All the 53 genotypes were  clustered into seven different clusters by using Tocher method (Table 3 and Fig 3). Maximum number of genotypes were present in Cluster-I,  which contained 17 genotypes followed by Cluster-III (16), Cluster-IV (12). Least number of genotypes were present in Cluster-II (5), Cluster-III (1), Cluster-V, Cluster-VI (1), Cluster-VII (1) and Cluster-IV (1). The clustering pattern revealed the presence of enough divergence to enable formation of individual clusters.

Table 3: Distribution of 53 genotypes of Indian mustard into different clusters.



Fig 3: Clustering by tocher method.


 
Contribution of various traits towards total genetic divergence
 
The contribution of various traits towards total genetic divergence (Table 4a) revealed that  the trait germination percentage (85.85%) contributed the highest for divergence, followed by biological yield (2.47%) followed by harvest index (1.96%), economical yield (1.67%), number of siliquae per plant (1.89%), siliqua length (1.52%), number of seeds per siliqua (1.09%), thousand seed weight (1.02%), main shoot length (0.94%), number of primary branches (0.65%), plant height (0.51%), days to 50% flowering (0.29%) and number of secondary branches (0.15%). Kumari and Kumari (2018) reported similar values for number of primary branches.

Table 4: Contribution of various traits towards total genetic divergence.


 
Cluster means
 
The range of mean values among different clusters was recorded for different characters in (Table 5). Cluster-I had the highest mean value for the trait days to 50% flowering (68.16). Cluster-II had the highest mean values for main shoot length (179.98), thousand seed weight (3.84) and biological yield (272.81). Cluster-III exhibited the lowest mean value for economic yield (45.65). Cluster-IV showed lowest mean for number of siliquae per plant (8.82).

Table 5: Cluster means for 13 traits in 53 genotypes of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea).


       
Cluster-V had the highest plant height (189.04), number of primary branches (6.53) and economic yield per plant (50.89). Cluster-VI had the highest mean value for siliqua length (4.67). Cluster VII exhibited the highest value for germination percentage (34.61), number of secondary branches (7.07), number of seeds per siliqua (256.6), harvest index (19.45). Similarly, Reddy et al. (2025) reported the highest cluster mean for plant height in Cluster VI, while Cluster I exhibited the highest mean value for the number of siliqua length. In contrast, Cluster II recorded the maximum mean for the number of seeds per siliqua. For 1000-seed weight, the highest mean was noted in Cluster VI. It’s indicating that the genetic potential for that trait is higher in the genotypes of this cluster compared to others.
 
Inter and intra-cluster distances
 
The inter and intra-cluster distances revealed the extent of degree of genetic diversity among clusters (Table 6 and Fig 4). The maximum inter-cluster distance was found between clusters VI and VII (36.09) (Priyanka et al. 2021) followed by that between II and VI (31.93),  III and IV (29.44), II and III (25.29) and IV and VII (23.17) Rout et al. 2019). whereas, minimum inter-cluster distance was found between clusters II and VII (4.98), followed by I and V (5.22), I and IV (6.66), III and IV (7.33) and III and VI (7.47). The intra-cluster distance observed were 3.28 (cluster I), 2.81 (cluster II),  4.14 (cluster III ), 3.5 (cluster IV). The clusters V, VI and VII contained single genotypes and therefore, their intra-cluster distances were zero. The inter- and intra-cluster distances revealed considerable genetic diversity among the genotypes, with the highest inter-cluster distance observed between Clusters VI and VII (36.09), indicating their suitability as potential parents for hybridization to exploit heterosis. The highest intra-cluster distance was recorded in Cluster III (4.14), suggesting greater genetic variability within this cluster. Current findings are in line with Reddy et al. (2025).

Table 6: Cluster distance in 53 genotypes of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea).



Fig 4: Intra and inter-cluster distance diagram.

The present investigation demonstrates considerable genetic diversity among 53 Brassica juncea accessions, with the first three principal components accounting for the majority of trait variation. Key traits influencing variability included main shoot length, plant height, siliquae per plant, siliqua length, test weight and yield-related characters. Genotypes Pusa Bold, RH 119 and 53-14-24D exhibited similar trait combinations, while 53-14-24D, Durga Mani and 55-14-101 were associated with higher economic yield. the trait germination percentage (85.85%) contributed the highest for divergence, followed by biological yield (2.47%) and minimum was from number of secondary branches (0.15%). The inter-cluster distances suggest ample scope for selecting genetically diverse parents. These findings can guide breeders in designing crossing programs to develop improved, high-yielding mustard varieties adapted to diverse conditions.
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Akhatar, J., Singh, M.P., Sharma, A., Kaur, H., Kaur, N., Sharma, S. and Banga, S.S. (2020).  Association mapping of seed quality traits under varying conditions of nitrogen application in [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss]. Frontiers in Genetics. 11: 744.

  2. Anushree, K.V., Nagarjun P. (2025). Unlocking the genetic potential of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.): A review on advances in breeding approaches. Agricultural Science Digest. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-6254.

  3. Chakraborty, S., Kumar, A., Kishore, C., Singh, R. S., Kumar, A., Kumar, A. and Kumar, M. (2021). Multivariate based diversity analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Genotypes by principle component analysis. Biological Forum-An International Journal. 13(3): 680-685.

  4. Gupta, S., Kumar, A., Janeja, H. S., Prakash, A. and Anand, R. (2024). Genetic engineering in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.): Current progress and future directions for enhanced crop improvement. J. Adv Biol Biotechnol. 27(5): 739-751.

  5. Jat, R.S., Singh, V.V., Sharma, P. and Rai, P.K. (2019). Oilseed brassica in India: Demand, supply, policy perspective and future potential. OCL. 26(8). doi: 10.1051/ocl/2019005.

  6. Kumar, S. and Meena, R.S. (2020). Impact of various sowing environ- ment and nutrient sources on growth performance of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agronomy 65(4): 465-470.

  7. Kumari, A. and Kumari, V. (2018). Studies on genetic diversity in Indian mustard (Brassica Juncea Czern and Coss) for morphological characters under changed climate in the mid-hills of Himalayas. Pharma Innov. J. 7: 290-296.

  8. Lakra, A., Tantuway, G., Tirkey, A. E. and Srivastava, K. (2020). Genetic variability and trait association studies in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(1): 2556-2563.

  9. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936). A note on the statistical and biometric writings of Karl Pearson. Sankhyβ: The Indian Journal of Statistics. 2(4): 411-422.

  10. Ola, M. P. (2024). Comparative study of nano urea and nitrogen levels on growth and productivity of indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.).

  11. Pearson, K. (1901). Principal components analysis. The London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 6(2): 559.

  12. Ponniyath, A., Singh, S.K., Upadhyay, P., Yadav, P.K. and Krishna, B. (2025). Genetic characterization for economic yield and its related characters in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss]. Biopesticides International. 21(1).

  13. Priyanka, N. and Pandey, M.K. (2021). Genetic variability and genetic diversity study in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). The Pharma Innovation Journal. 10(10): 1133-1135.

  14. Rao, C.R. (1952). Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. Ola, M.P. Comparative Study of Nano Urea and Nitrogen Levels on Growth and Productivity of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.).

  15. Reddy, B.V.P., Chakraborty, M., Roy, S.K., Kundu, A., Mandal, R. and Debnath, M.K. (2025). Genetic diversity in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern and Coss.) genotypes for yield and its attributing traits under Terai agro-climatic zone of West Bengal, India. Journal of Advances in Biology and Biotechnology. 28(1): 641-647. https://doi.org/10. 9734/jabb/2025/v28i11918.

  16. Rout, S., Das, A., Sur, B., Umamaheswar, N., Sadhu, S., Ghimiray, T.S. and Roy, S.K. (2019). Genetic divergence in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss] under sub-Himalayan region. Journal of Crop and Weed. 15(2): 18-24.

  17. Saha, S., Dasgupta, T., Sawarkar, A., Maity, S.N. and Roy, A. (2024). Genetic diversity and yield component analysis in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. and Coss.]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 58: 995-1002. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-6165.

  18. Saikrishna, A., Arunkumar, B., Khan, H., Kuchanur, P.H. and Patil, A. (2021). Genetic diversity studies in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) CzernandCoss.] For yield and its component traits. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 10(10): 534-538.

  19. Samal, I., Dhillon, M. K. and Singh, N. (2021). Biological performance and biochemical interactions of mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi) in Brassica juncea. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences.  91(9): 1347-1352.

  20. Saroj, R., Soumya, S.L., Singh, S., Sankar, S.M., Chaudhary, R., Yashpal. and Yadava, D.K. (2021). Unraveling the relationship between seed yield and yield-related traits in a diversity panel of Brassica juncea using multi-traits mixed model. Frontiers in Plant Science. 12: 651936.

  21. Singh, V.K., Mahavir, A.R., Kumari, M.N. and Kumar, R. (2021). Assessment of genetic diversity among indian and exotic genotypes of Brassica juncea using phenotypic evaluation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(4): 434-439.  doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5502.

  22. Upadhyay, P., Gupta, M., Sra, S.K., Sharda, R., Sharma, S., Sardana, V.K. and Kaur, G. (2022). Genome wide association studies for acid phosphatase activity at varying phosphorous levels in Brassica juncea L. Front. Plant Sci. 13: 1056 028. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1056028.

  23. Vinu, V., Singh, N., Vasudev, S., Kumar, S., Naresh, S., Bhat, S.R. and Prabhu, K.V. (2013). Evaluación de la diversidad gené tica en genotipos de Brassica juncea (Brassicaceae) utilizando diferencias fenotÃpicas y marcadores SSR. Revista de Biología Tropical. 61(4): 1919-1935.

  24. Zhang, D., Yu, H., Gao, L., Wang, J., Dong, H., Guo, Y. and Hu, S. (2023). Genetic diversity in oilseed and vegetable mustard (Brassica juncea L.) accessions revealed by nuclear and mitochondrial molecular Markers. Agronomy. 13(3): 919.
In this Article
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest

Editorial Board

View all (0)