Biochemical Characterization of the Larval Alpha-amylase of Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) from the Field Collected Population of Uttar Dinajpur, West Bengal, India

1Laboratory of Insect Ecology and Pest Management, Department of Zoology, Raiganj University, Raiganj-733 134, West Bengal, India.
2Department of Zoology, Murshidabad University, Berhampore, Murshidabad-742 101, West Bengal, India.
3Department of Zoology, Vivekananda Mahavidyalaya, East Burdwan-713 103, West Bengal, India.

Background: Brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) significantly harms brinjal crops throughout South Asia. The internal feeding habit of larvae renders pesticides ineffective and contributes to resistance against broad-spectrum insecticides, posing severe management challenges. Targeting insect α-amylase to design enzyme inhibitors presents a promising approach for pest suppression. Therefore, biochemical characterization of larval α-amylase of L. orbonalis was carried out.

Methods: Spectrophotometric assays were performed to determine the pH optima and optimal temperature range for α-amylase activity. Effects of various activators and inhibitors on the enzyme were also calculated. Enzyme kinetics study was done to decipher the Km and Vmax of the enzyme-substrate reaction. Enzyme activity was also noted in by zymographic study.

Result: The α-amylase enzyme exhibited a specific activity of 0.294 U/mg of insect protein. It operates optimally at pH 9 and within a temperature range of 45-50oC. Activity of α-amylase was moderately enhanced by Na+ and K+ ions, while Mg²+ and Ca²+ ions significantly increased enzymatic activity. Inhibitory effects were observed with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and gallic acid (GA) at 5 mM concentrations, reducing activity by 54.62%, 29.07% and 74.04%, respectively. Kinetic analysis of α-amylase revealed that its Km was 0.315% and Vmax was 0.099 mM maltose/min. Two clear zones observed through Native PAGE zymography confirmed the identification of two distinct α-amylase isoforms in the gut.

Brinjal or eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) is indigenous to the Indian subcontinent and belongs to the family Solanaceae (Nightshade) (Gnanamani and Vijayalakshmi, 2024; Niranjana, 2017; Tsao and Lo, 2006). It is a major vegetable crop in India, cultivated widely across the country except in high-altitude regions. It is often called the “King of Vegetables” because of its versatile use in a wide range of dishes across Indian cuisine (Choudhary and Gour, 2009). India ranks second globally in brinjal production, following China (Nino-Medina et al., 2017), with West Bengal contributing 23.72% of the national output. The major brinjal-producing districts in West Bengal include Murshidabad, Nadia, Malda, Bankura, Jalpaiguri and Uttar Dinajpur (Mandal et al., 2019; Anonymous, 2018).
       
Brinjal productivity in India is significantly hampered by biotic stresses, particularly insect pests and diseases (Singh, 2019). Among the 26 documented insect pests, the brinjal shoot and fruit borer (BSFB) (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) is the most destructive, causing yield losses of 60% to 80% nationally (Kaur et al., 2010; Niranjana et al., 2017) and 32% to 74% fruit damage in West Bengal across seasons (Ghosh et al., 2003). Managing this pest is challenging because the larvae reside inside the fruit or shoot, preventing the pesticides from directly reaching the pest (Ambethgar et al., 2025). Farmers mainly use pesticides to control the pest population to produce maximum unblemished brinjal fruits. Moreover, brinjal is typically consumed in its unprocessed form. Therefore, application of uncontrolled conventional insecticides makes it very hazardous to human health, contributes to the emergence of insecticide resistance (Dadmal et al., 2004; Kumar et al., 2025) and increases production costs. Hence, it has become mandatory to search for an effective alternative to conventional chemical control by routine insecticide spray. Pest-resistant crop plant production can be one such alternative.
       
Information related to the physiology and biochemistry of the insect midgut can play a crucial role in developing novel insecticidal strategies by the incorporation of inhibitor gene in the host plant to create a transgenic plant (Wang et al., 2023). So, it has become essential to understand the biochemical characteristics of gut enzyme α-amylase, a hydrolytic enzyme found in microorganisms (Agüloğlu et al., 2014; Zaferanloo et al., 2014), plants (Amid et al., 2014) and animals (Horii et al., 1987; Grossman et al., 1942). This particular hydrolytic enzyme plays a crucial role in polysaccharide digestion by catalyzing and hydrolyzing α-D-(1,4)-glucan linkages in starch and related polysaccharides (Gupta et al., 2003; Strobl et al., 1998). The function of α-amylase in starch digestion has been extensively studied in various insect species, including Egyptian cotton leaf worm (Spodoptera littoralis, Lepidoptera) (Darvishzadeh et al., 2014), olive fruit fly (Bactrocera oleae, Diptera) (Delkash-Roudsari et al., 2014), Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata, Coleoptera) (Hamori et al., 2021), wheat bug (Eurygaster maura, Hemiptera) (Ravan et al., 2009) and others.
               
Understanding the functional dynamics of digestive enzymes on their specific substrates is crucial for formulating advanced insect pest management strategies. Among these, assessing enzyme sensitivity to different inhibitors has proven to be an effective approach for developing transgenic plant-based control programs targeting phytophagous insects (Yezdani et al., 2010). Despite the significant role of α-amylase in carbohydrate metabolism, limited information is available on its properties in the brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenée), a major pest of brinjal. This study quantifies and partially characterizes α-amylase activity in L. orbonalis to improve knowledge of its digestive physiology and support innovative pest management approaches.
Larvae collection
 
The larvae of different instars of L. orbonalis were collected by tearing affected brinjal from different fields of Raiganj Block, Uttar Dinajpur district, West Bengal, India (25.9810o N, 88.0510o E) and its surrounding areas during the years 2023 and 2024. The research work was carried out at the Department of Zoology, Raiganj University.
 
Chemicals
 
Bovine serum albumin (BSA), Maltose, Starch, 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS), acrylamide, bis-acrylamide, Tris, Glycine, TEMED (Tetramethylethylenediamine), Ammonium persulphate (APS), Triton X-100 were purchased from SRL, India. Homogenization buffer, solutions of starch (1%) and the staining solutions for gels were prepared fresh before use.
 
Method of larval digestive tract enzyme extraction
 
Enzyme samples from the digestive tract of different larval instars were made by the method of Cohen (1993) with slight modifications. The dissected digestive tracts were isolated and homogenized in ice-cold 0.1 M PBS buffer, pH 7.0 (1/4, w/v) and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4oC. Supernatants were decanted on a separate tube and subsequently centrifuged again in similar conditions (Tierno de Figueroa et al., 2011). The resultant supernatant was collected and stored at -20oC for further use.
 
Amylase assay
 
The α-amylase activity was quantified by the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method, employing 1% starch solution as substrate with slight modification of the protocol as described by Champasri et al., 2021. 100 μl of enzyme extract, 5 mL buffer and 500 μl of 1% starch solution (prepared in 0.05M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) were mixed to prepare the reaction mixture, which was incubated for 30 mins. 1 ml of DNS was added to stop the reaction and subsequently heated in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes. Absorbance of supernatants was measured after cooling to room temperature at 540 nm, using a UV-VIS Spectrophotometer (LABTRONICS, Model No: LT-2201). A blank containing larval extract without the substrate and a control containing the substrate without larval extract were prepared simultaneously. The amount of maltose liberated by the enzyme was measured by using a standard curve of maltose, reacted with DNS. One unit of enzyme activity can be defined as the amount of enzyme needed for the production of 1 mg of maltose in 30 minutes at 35oC. All assays were carried in triplicates.
 
Determination of optimum temperature and pH for the enzyme activity
 
To determine the optimal temperature, the enzyme assay mixture was incubated at temperatures ranging from 15oC to 60oC with 5oC increments for 30 minutes. Following incubation, amylase activity was estimated as described above.
       
To measure the optimum pH required for amylase substrate reaction, the enzyme assays were carried out at different pH values from 4 to 13. The pH values were maintained using buffers like 0.1 M sodium acetate for pH 4-5, 0.1 M sodium phosphate for pH 6-7, 0.1 M Tris-HCl for pH 8-9, 0.1 M glycine-NaOH for pH 10-11 and 0.1 M KCl-NaOH for pH 12-13.
 
Study of enzyme activators and inhibitors
 
To measure the efficacy of various ions as activators, enzyme activity was assayed with 20 mM concentration of chloride salts of Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+. 5 mM of Ethylene- diaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS) and Gallic acid were tested as inhibitors in the reaction mixtures. A reaction mixture containing enzyme, substrate, buffer and none of the above compounds was also used as a control for experimental purpose.
       
The percentage of α-amylase activation or inhibition was estimated by:

 
Total protein concentration (larval gut extract) measurement
 
The Lowry (1951) method was used to determine protein concentration in larval extract and BSA was used as a standard.
 
Kinetic studies
 
The relationship between amylase hydrolytic activity and substrate concentration was estimated. Enzyme assays were conducted across a range of starch concentrations: 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, 1%, 1.25%, 1.5% and 2% (w/v). The same amount of enzyme concentration was used throughout the experiment. In controls, distilled water was used instead of the enzyme at each substrate concentration. Maximum velocity (Vmax) and Michaelis constant (Km) were measured by using a Lineweaver-Burk (double reciprocal) plot.
 
Electrophoresis and zymograms
 
The α-amylase found in the crude gut extract was investigated by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) following the protocols of Lammli (1970) and Andrades et al. (2017) with slight modifications. The electrophoresis was carried out on a separating gel (10%, w/v) and a stacking gel (4.5%), both containing SDS (1%). The running buffer was prepared according to Lammli (1970) but excluded SDS. The sample buffer contains Tris-HCl (0.5 M, pH 6.8), SDS (2%), bromophenol blue (without a-mercaptoethanol) (0.01%, w/v) and glycerol (20%) and was not subjected to heating. At 4oC, electrophoresis was performed with a steady voltage of 50 V. Zymogram analysis was performed using the Mini Dual Vertical Electrophoresis Unit (TARSONS). Thorough washing of the gel was done with water and gently rinsed in Triton X-100 (1%, v/v) in PBS (pH 9) for removal of SDS. Subsequently, the gel was incubated for 4 hours in a development buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 9 and 1 mM CaCl2). Staining of the gel was performed with 0.2% KI and 0.1% iodine solution and active enzyme zones were observed as light spots against a dark brownish background.
 
Statistical analysis
 
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed by Microsoft Excel software and Tukey’s Test was done at P≤0.05 significance level for assessment of differences between sample means (n=3) by using IBM SPSS software (Version 18).
α-Amylase activity
 
Activity of α-amylase was detected in the gut of L. orbonalis larvae using starch as a substrate. The average enzyme activity differed significantly across the larval stages (df = 4, F = 741.855, P<0.05). The α-amylase activity increased with larval growth up to the 2nd instar, followed by a gradual decline in subsequent stages (Fig 1). The 2nd instar exhibited the highest enzyme activity (0.374±0.0037 mg/min/mg protein or U/mg protein), which was not significantly different from the 1st instar but differed significantly from the other stages. The enzyme activities recorded in the 1st and 3rd instars (0.310±0.0046 and 0.294±.0037 U/mg protein) were comparatively higher, but significant difference was not found, though both differed significantly from the 4th and 5th instars. Low range of enzyme activities were observed in the 5th instar (0.123±0.0033 U/mg protein) and the 4th instar (0.177±0.0032 U/mg protein) and the enzyme activity of both significantly differed from the earlier instars.

Fig 1: α-amylase activity at different instars of L. orbonalis.


 
Effect of pH and temperature on enzyme activity
 
The relationship between pH and α-amylase activity on starch in the digestive extract of larval L. orbonalis is illustrated in Fig 2. Enzyme activity started to increase from pH 6 and reached the highest activity at pH 9 and then decreased with increasing pH (Fig 2). Amylase activity at optimal pH (pH 9) was 0.2813±0.0045 U/mg protein. The α-amylase activity increased from 25oC, peaked at 40oC and then declined, indicating broad temperature tolerance (Fig 3). 

Fig 2: Effect of pH on the activity of α-amylase from the digestive tract of L. orbonalis.



Fig 3: Effect of temperature on the activity of α-amylase from the digestive tract of L. orbonalis.


 
Effect of activators and inhibitors on enzyme activity
 
Effects of activator and inhibitor on α-amylase activity have been demonstrated in Table 1. The enzyme activity was observed to be increased by the chloride salts of Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+. Among these, Ca2+ is found to be most effective to increase the activity of the enzyme, while Na+, K+ and Mg+2 ions mildly increase the enzyme activity. Furthermore, EDTA, SDS and Gallic Acid at a concentration of 5 mM were found to inhibit enzyme activity by 51.10%, 31.42% and 73.42%, respectively.

Table 1: Relative activity of α-amylase of L. orbonalis towards different compounds.


 
Kinetic studies
 
Analysis of the Lineweaver-Burk plot derived from reciprocal starch concentration and α-amylase activity revealed a Km  of 0.315% starch and a Vmax  of 0.099 mM maltose/min for the digestive α-amylase enzyme of L. orbonalis (Fig 4 and Fig 5).

Fig 4: Michaelis-Menten plot of enzyme activity (velocity) versus starch concentration (%) to obtain values for the maximum velocity (Vmax) and Michaelis constant (Km) for α-amylase of L. orbonalis.



Fig 5: Double reciprocal plot (Lineweaver-Burk plots) of enzyme activity (velocity) versus starch concentration (%) to obtain values for the maximum velocity (Vmax) and Michaelis constant (Km) for α-amylase of L. orbonalis.


 
Electrophoretic study
 
Native SDS-PAGE was performed to separate amylase isoforms and their molecular weights were analyzed. Electrophoresis using 10% SDS gels revealed two distinct α-amylase bands (isoforms) when starch was used as the substrate (Fig 6). In the zymographic analysis, clear bands appearing against a dark-stained background indicated the presence of active enzymes capable of hydrolyzing starch. Two amylase isoforms were detected in L. orbonalis, with estimated molecular weights of approximately 60 KDa and 180 KDa.

Fig 6: Native gel electrophoresis showing α-amylase bands (P1 and P2) with molecular weights.


       
The alpha-enzyme activity has been detected in the various larval instars of L. orbonalis (Guenee) according to the results of the present study. Active forms of α-amylase have been reported in several other studies with borer pests of Lepidoptera like Chilo suppressalis (Zibaee et al., 2008), Spodoptera littoralis (Darvishzadeh et al., 2014), or Pieris brassicae L. (Sharifloo et al., 2016). Most insect crop pests thrive on a diet rich in complex carbohydrates, such as polysaccharides and therefore their growth and survival depend on the effective utilization of these polysaccharides by α-amylases (Nation, 2008; Chapman, 2012). High content of polysaccharides of brinjal would certainly induce the production of active forms of alpha-amylases in L. orbonalis. In the present study, a significant difference in α-amylase activity was noticed among different instars and peak activity was found in the second instar, which may be due to the differentially expressed amylase gene in various larval instars in the L. orbonalis. The phenomenon of this differential amylase gene expression within various larval instars has been documented already in studies with other Lepidopteran and Coleopteran insects (Kluh et al., 2005).
       
The results of the current study have revealed that alpha-amylase of L. orbonalis remains active over a wide pH range, with the optimum pH being 9. It has been reported in several other studies (Dow, 1984; Abraham et al., 1992; Zibaee et al., 2008; Kaur et al., 2014) that the optimum pH for lepidopteran alpha-amylase is extremely alkaline (9- 11.5), which is in close agreement with our current finding.  According to Chapman (1998), the retention of maximum activity of digestive enzymes at high pH values may be an adaptive response to deal with higher tannin content in the insect diet, as tannin precipitates proteins by binding with them at low pH values. Brinjal, the primary host plant of L. orbonalis, contains high levels of tannins (Sharma et al., 2019), potentially exerting a selective pressure on the pest. The dependence of alpha-amylase can be due to the selection pressure forcing the evolution of alkaline RNQ-type alpha-amylase in the lepidopteran digestive systems (Terra and Ferreira, 2012).
       
In the study, the optimal temperature for L. orbonalis α-amylase activity was found to be 40oC. The rapid decrease of enzyme activity above 40oC suggests sensitivity of the enzyme towards temperature. The functionality of the enzyme was almost absent beyond 65oC. Our current data on optimal temperature study of α-amylasae of L. orbonalis is within the recorded range of 30-60oC (Sharifloo et al., 2016; Kaur et al., 2014; Mendiola-Olaya et al., 2000).
       
It is very well established by several studies that metal ions are crucial for the proper activity, stability of insect α-amylase (Kaur et al., 2014; Terra and Ferreira, 2012), which is very much in line with our findings of α-amylase enzyme activity. Augmentation of α-amylase activity was noted by addition of sodium, magnesium, or calcium ions. Chloride salts of metal ions were used as the potent activators and the increase of amylolytic enzyme activity can also be brought about by these chloride ions that activate hydrolysis of polysaccharides by the change of optimal pH (Terra and Ferreira, 2012). A significant inhibition of 31-51% of amylolytic activity reduction was observed in our results by the metal-chelating agent EDTA and SDS detergent, which is very much comparable to other studies (Cohen and Hendrix, 1994; Zeng and Cohen, 2000; Sharifloo et al., 2016). Ca+2 ion exclusion from the enzyme complex or enzyme denaturation may be the reason behind this inhibition by EDTA or SDS. In the current finding, maximum increase of amylase activity was observed with Ca+2 ion, which is strictly in line with other studies of the role imparted by metallic activators on amylolytic activity (Kazzazi et al., 2005; Zibaee et al., 2008; Delkash-Roudsari et al., 2014; and Sorkhabi-Abdolmaleki et al., 2014). Maximum inhibition of amylolytic enzyme activity was seen with gallic acid in the assay mixture. The inhibitory potential of gallic acid or other polyphenolics has been reported in many other works (Ahmed et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2016; Oboh et al., 2019). The conformation of alpha-amylase is altered by the complexation with gallic acid, which is brought about by non-covalent interactions like hydrogen and hydrophobic bonding. The hydroxyl group of the gallic acid structure is responsible for such a kind of hydrogen bond formation by interacting with the active site’s amino acids of the enzyme (Long, 2023).
       
The Km value of α-amylase against starch for L. orbonalis was 0.31%. Km value corresponds to the dissociation constant (Kd) of the enzyme-substrate reaction; hence low Km indicates a higher affinity of an enzyme towards substrate. Our results of Km of α-amylase are comparable to the Km value obtained in studies with other insects, like 0.42% for click beetle, Pyrearinus termitillumihans (Colepicolo-Neto et al., 1986) and 0.38% in fall army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Ferreira et al., 1994).  A polysaccharide-rich diet may be the reason behind the relatively lower km value observed in the current study.
               
Electrophoretic zymogram study from the gut extracts of L. orbonalis has conspicuously revealed two iso-enzymes of alpha-amylase having distinguishable electrophoretic mobility and molecular weight. A similar isozyme pattern of α-amylase has been identified in other arthropods as well. Two forms of amylolytic enzymes have been recorded in two species of rice weevil, Sitophilus zeamais and S. granarius (Baker, 1983). In larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus) and coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) also similar two isozyme patterns have been noted (Mendiola-Olaya et al., 2000; Valencia et al., 2000). Multiple isoforms of amylase may increase amylolytic efficiencies over a broad range of pH and temperature (Nadaf et al., 2022). Molecular weight of one of the bands with the highest intensity was found to be 60 KDa, which is well within the recorded reference range of 45-67 KDa (Baker, 1991; Terra and Ferreira, 1994). The second band with a molecular weight of more than 180 KDa may be due to the oligomerization of many monomeric subunits of protein to form an oligomer, which gives a greater apparent molecular weight value during gel visualization. 
The development of insect-resistant transgenic crops helps reduce dependence on chemical pesticides, lowering environmental contamination and supporting ecological balance. This approach not only enhances crop protection but also promotes human and environmental safety. Biochemical characterization of digestive enzymes, particularly α-amylase, in pests such as Leucinodes orbonalis, provides crucial insights into their digestive physiology. Such understanding enables the design of specific enzyme inhibitors that form the basis of sustainable pest management strategies. Future research focusing on purification, structural analysis, and molecular modelling of α-amylase of the target insect will help to design novel inhibitors from plants or other sources. 
The present study was self-funded by the authors. The necessary instruments and laboratory facilities were provided by the Department of Zoology, Sericulture and Microbiology, Raiganj University, Raiganj, West Bengal, India. 
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abraham, E.G., Nagaragu, J., Datta, R.K. (1992). Biochemical study of amylase in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.: Comparative analysis in diapausing and non-diapausing strain. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 22: 867-873.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-1748(92)90113-S. 

  2. Agüloğlu, F.S., Enez, B. (2014). Production, purification and characterization of thermostable α-amylase from thermophilic Geobacillus stearothermophilus. Stärke. 66: 182-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/star.201200279.

  3. Ahmed, D., Mughal, Q.M., Younas, S., Ikram, M. (2013). Study of phenolic content and urease and alpha-amylase inhibitory activities of methanolic extract of Rumex acetosella roots and its sub-fractions in different solvents. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 26: 553-559.

  4. Ambethgar S.A., Rameshkumar A., Krishna R.K., Sundaresan S. (2025). Biological control of pests in major tropical vegetable crops: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 46(4): 515-530. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2635.

  5. Amid, M., Manap, M.Y.A. (2014). Purification and characterization of a novel amylase enzyme from red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) peel. Food Chemistry. 165: 412-418. https:/ /doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.133.

  6. Andrades, A., Contreras, L.M. (2017). Amylase zymography. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1626: 301-308. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7111-4_29. 

  7. Anonymous. (2018). Horticulture Statistics Division, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, Horticultural Statistics at a Glance.

  8. Baker, J.E. (1983). Properties of amylase from midguts of larvae of Sitophilus zeamais and Sitophilus granaries. Insect Biochemistry. 13: 421-428.

  9. Baker, J.E. (1991). Purification and partial characterization of α- amylase allozymes from the lesser grain borer Rhyzopertha dominica. Insect Biochemistry. 21: 303-311.

  10. Champasri, C., Phetlum, S., Pornchoo, C. (2021). Diverse activities and biochemical properties of amylase and proteases from six freshwater fish species. Scientific Reports. 11: 5727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85258-7. 

  11. Chapman, R.F. (1998). The Insects: Structure and Function. Cambridge University Press, p. 770.

  12. Chapman, R.F. (2012). The Insects: Structure and Function, Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978 1139035460.

  13. Choudhary, B., Gaur, K. (2009). The development and regulation of brinjal in India (Brinjal /Aubergine), ISAAA, Ithaca, NY.

  14. Cohen, A.C. (1993). Organization of digestion and preliminary characterization of salivary trypsin-like enzymes in a predaceous heteropteran, Zelus renardii. Journal of Insect Physiology. 39: 823-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0022-1910(93)90114-7.

  15. Cohen, A.C., Hendrix, D.L. (1994). Demonstration and preliminary characterization of α-amylase in the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Aleyrodidae: Homoptera). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 109: 593-601.

  16. Colepicolo-Neto, P., Costa, C., Bechara, E.J.H. (1986). Brazilian species of luminescent Elateridae: Luciferin identification and bioluminescence spectra. Insect Biochemistry. 16: 803-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1790(86)90117-4.

  17. Dadmal, S.M., Nemade, S.B., Akhare, M.D. (2004). Field screening of brinjal cultivars for resistance to Leucinodes orbonalis Guen. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystem. 10: 145-150.

  18. Darvishzadeh, A., Hosseininaveh, V., Salimian, S. (2014). Enzymatic activity of α-amylase in alimentary tract of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Characterization  and compartmentalization. Arthropods. 3: 138-146.

  19. Delkash-Roudsari, S., Zibaee, A., Abbaci Mozhdehi, R.M. (2014). Digestive α-amylase of Bacterocera oleae Gmelin (Diptera:  Tephritidae): Biochemical characterization and effect of proteinaceous inhibitor. Journal of King Saudi University Science. 26: 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2013. 05.003.

  20. Delkash-Roudsari, S., Zibaee, A., Abbci-Mozhdehi, M.R. (2014). Digestive proteolytic activity in larvae and adults of Bactrocera oleae Gmelin (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 17: 483-491.

  21. Dow, J.A. (1984). Extremely high pH in biological systems: A model for carbonate transport. The American Journal of Physiology. 246: 633-635. 

  22. Ferreira, C., Capella, A.N., Sitnik, R., Terra, W.R. (1994). Properties of the digestive enzymes and the permeability of the peritrophic membrane of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera)  larvae. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology and Integrative Physiology. 107: 631-640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(94)90362-X.  

  23. Gnanamani, K., Vijayalakshmi A. (2024). Efficient utilization of agro- industrial waste through vermicomposting and its impact on growth and yield of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Agricultural Science Digest. 43(6): 824-828. doi: 10. 18805/ag.D-5775.

  24. Ghosh, S., Senapati, S. (2003). Estimation of loss in yield of brinjal due to pest complex under terai region of West Bengal. Environment and Ecology Research. 21: 764-769.

  25. Grossman, M.I., Greengard, H., Ivy, A.C. (1942). The effect of dietary composition on pancreatic enzymes. The American Journal of Physiology. 138: 676-682.

  26. Gupta, R., Gigras, P., Mohapatra, H., Goswami, V.K., Chauhan, B. (2003). Microbial α-amylases: A biotechnological perspective. Process Biochem. 38(11): 1599-1616.

  27. Hamori, C., Remenyik, J., Kandra, L., Gyemant, G. (2021). Colorado potato beetle alpha-amylase: Purification, action pattern and subsite mapping for exploration of active centre. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 168: 350-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.071.

  28. Horii, A., Emi, M., Tomita, N., Nishide, T., Ogawa, M., Mori, T., Matsubara, K. (1987). Primary structure of human pancreatic α-amylase gene: Its comparison with human salivary α-amylase gene. Gene. 60: 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119 (87)90213-7. 

  29. Kaur, C., Nagal, S., Nishad, J., Kumar, R. (2014). Evaluating eggplant (Solanum melongena L) genotypes for bioactive properties: A chemometric approach. Food Research International. 60: 205-211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.09.049. 

  30. Kaur, R., Kaur, N., Gupta, A.K. (2010). Structural features, substrate specificity, kinetic properties of insect α-amylase and specificity of plant α-amylase inhibitors. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 116: 83-93. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.09.005. 

  31. Kazzazi, M., Bandani, A.R., Ashuri, A., Hosseinkhani, S. (2005). α- amylase activity of nymphal stages of sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae). Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences. 70: 863-867.

  32. Kluh, I., Horn, M., Hýblová, J., Hubert, J., Dolecková-Maresová, L., Voburka, Z., Kudlíková, I., Kocourek, F., Mares, M. (2005). Inhibitory specificity and insecticidal selectivity of alpha- amylase inhibitor from Phaseolus vulgaris. Phytochemistry. 66: 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2004. 11.001. 

  33. Kumar, S., Singh, H., Singh, D.V., Bharti, S.D., Panigrahi, C.K. and Rai, A. (2025). Performance of various pesticides against yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) of basmati rice and effect on yield in Northern India. Agricultural Science Digest. 1-7. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-6252. 

  34. Lammli, U.K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227: 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0.

  35. Long, Y. (2023). Preparation and application of α-amylase inhibitors. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology. 45: 334-339. https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v45i.7486.

  36. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J. (1951). Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 193: 265-275. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6. 

  37. Lu, Q., Chen, C., Zhao, S., Ge, F., Liu, D. (2016). Investigation of the interaction between gallic acid and α-amylase by spectroscopy. International Journal of Food Properties. 19: 2481-2494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2015. 1059345. 

  38. Mandal, R., Maurya, P., Bhattacharjee, T., Banerjee, S., Chattopadhyay, A., Hazra, P. (2019). Breeding potential of brinjal genotypes for fruit and shoot borer resistance using multivariate analysis. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 7: 1340-1347.

  39. Mendiola-Olaya, E., Valencia-Jiménez, A., Valdés-Rodríguez, S., Délano-Frier, J.P., Blanco-Labra, A. (2000). Digestive amylase from the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus Horn. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology  Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 126: 425- 433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0491(00)00216-9. 

  40. Nadaf, H.L., Sirsat, A.K., Hivrale, V.K. (2022). Biochemical characteri- zation of α-amylases from differently feeding pests: Sap-sucking Aphis craccivora and tissue chewing Pectinophora gossypiella. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 42: 3747-3757. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s42690-022-00899-z. 

  41. Nation, J.L. (2008). Insect Physiology and Biochemistry, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton.  https://doi.org/10.1201/97814200 61789. 

  42. Nino-Medina, G., Urías-Orona, V., Muy, D., Heredia, J.B. (2017). Structure and content of phenolics in eggplant (Solanum melongena)- a review. South African Journal of Botany. 111: 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.03.016. 

  43. Niranjana, R.F., Devi, M., Sridhar, R.P. (2017). Comparison of pheromone traps against brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). AGRIEAST Journal of Agricultural Science. 11: 1-7.

  44. Oboh, G., Ogunsuyi, O.B., Adegbola, D.O., Ademiluyi, A.O., Oladun, F.L. (2019). Influence of gallic and tannic acid on therapeutic properties of acarbose in vitro and in vivo in Drosophila melanogaster. Biomed Journal. 42: 317-327. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.01.005. 

  45. Ravan, S., Mehrabadi, M., Bandani, A.R. (2009). Biochemical characterization of digestive amylase of wheat bug, Eurygaster maura (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae). African Journal of Biotechnology. 8: 3640-3648.

  46. Sharifloo, A., Zibaee, A., Sendi, J.J., Jahroumi, K.T. (2016). Characterization of a digestive α-amylase in the midgut of Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Frontiers in Physiology. 7: 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys. 2016.00096.  PMID: 27014094; PMCID: PMC4791400.

  47. Sharma, H., Chawla, N., Dhatt, A.S. (2019). Nutraceutical content and free radical scavenging capacity of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes. Scientia Horticulturae. 244: 294-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.060. 

  48. Singh, S. (2019). Efficacy and economics of pest management modules against Brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis). Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 27(3): 320-323.

  49. Sorkhabi-Abdolmaleki, S., Zibaee, A., Hoda, H., Fazeli-Dinan, M. (2014). Purification and characterization of midgut α- amylase in a predatory bug andralus spinidens. Journal of Insect Science. 14. doi: 10.1673/031.014.65. 

  50. Strobl, S., Maskos, K., Wiegand, G., Huber, R., Gomis-Rüth, F.X., Glockshuber, R. (1998). A novel strategy for inhibition of alpha-amylases: Yellow meal worm alpha-amylase in complex with the Ragi bifunctional inhibitor at 2.5 A resolution. Structure. 6(7): 911-21. doi: 10.1016/s0969- 2126(98)00092-6.

  51. Terra, W. R., Ferreira, C. (2012). Biochemistry and molecular biology of digestion. In L.I. Gilbert (Ed.), Insect molecular biology and biochemistry. Academic Press. pp: 365-418. https:/ /doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384747-8.10011-X. 

  52. Terra, W.R., Ferreira, C. (1994). Insect digestive enzymes: Properties, compartmentalization and function. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry. 109(1): 1-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0491(94)90141-4. 

  53. Tierno de Figueroa, J.M., Trenzado, C.E., M.J. López-Rodríguez, M.J., A. Sanz, A. (2011). Digestive enzyme activity of two stonefly species (Insecta, Plecoptera) and their feeding habits. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology. 160(3): 426-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.07.014. 

  54. Tsao and Lo. (2006). In “Vegetables: Types and Biology”. Handbook of Food Science, Technology and Engineering by Yiu H. Hui. CRC Press. ISBN 1-57444-551-0. Zoological Researches. 19(1): 42-45.

  55. Valencia, R.R., Bernal, E.M. (2000). Guest Editors’ Introduction. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 22(4): 405- 410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986300224002.

  56. Wang, D., He, H., Wei, C. (2023). Cellular and potential molecular mechanisms underlying transovarial transmission of the obligate symbiont sulcia in cicadas. Environ Microbiol. 25(4): 836-852. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.16310.

  57. Yezdani, E., Sendi, J.J., Zibaee, A., Ghadamyari, M. (2010). Enzymatic properties of alpha-amylase in the midgut and the salivary glands of mulberry moth, Glyphodes pyloalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). C R Biol. 333(1): 17-22. doi: 10. 1016/j.crvi.2009.11.004. 

  58. Zaferanloo, B., Bhattacharjee, S., Ghorbani, M.M., Mohan J.P., Palombo A.E. (2014). Amylase production by Preussia minima, a fungus of endophytic origin: Optimization of fermentation conditions and analysis of fungal secretome by LC-MS. BMC Microbiol. 14: 55. https://doi.org/10. 1186/1471-2180-14-55. 

  59. Zeng, F., Cohen, A.C. (2000). Comparison of alpha-amylase and protease activities of a zoophytophagous and two phytozoophagous Heteroptera. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 126(1): 101-6. doi: 10.1016/s1095- 6433(00)00193-8. PMID: 10908857.

  60. Zibaee, A., Bandani, A.R., Kafil, M., Ramzi, S. (2008). Characteri- zation of α-amylase in midgut and salivary glands of Chilo suppressalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), rice striped stem borer. Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology. 11: 201-205.

Biochemical Characterization of the Larval Alpha-amylase of Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) from the Field Collected Population of Uttar Dinajpur, West Bengal, India

1Laboratory of Insect Ecology and Pest Management, Department of Zoology, Raiganj University, Raiganj-733 134, West Bengal, India.
2Department of Zoology, Murshidabad University, Berhampore, Murshidabad-742 101, West Bengal, India.
3Department of Zoology, Vivekananda Mahavidyalaya, East Burdwan-713 103, West Bengal, India.

Background: Brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) significantly harms brinjal crops throughout South Asia. The internal feeding habit of larvae renders pesticides ineffective and contributes to resistance against broad-spectrum insecticides, posing severe management challenges. Targeting insect α-amylase to design enzyme inhibitors presents a promising approach for pest suppression. Therefore, biochemical characterization of larval α-amylase of L. orbonalis was carried out.

Methods: Spectrophotometric assays were performed to determine the pH optima and optimal temperature range for α-amylase activity. Effects of various activators and inhibitors on the enzyme were also calculated. Enzyme kinetics study was done to decipher the Km and Vmax of the enzyme-substrate reaction. Enzyme activity was also noted in by zymographic study.

Result: The α-amylase enzyme exhibited a specific activity of 0.294 U/mg of insect protein. It operates optimally at pH 9 and within a temperature range of 45-50oC. Activity of α-amylase was moderately enhanced by Na+ and K+ ions, while Mg²+ and Ca²+ ions significantly increased enzymatic activity. Inhibitory effects were observed with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and gallic acid (GA) at 5 mM concentrations, reducing activity by 54.62%, 29.07% and 74.04%, respectively. Kinetic analysis of α-amylase revealed that its Km was 0.315% and Vmax was 0.099 mM maltose/min. Two clear zones observed through Native PAGE zymography confirmed the identification of two distinct α-amylase isoforms in the gut.

Brinjal or eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) is indigenous to the Indian subcontinent and belongs to the family Solanaceae (Nightshade) (Gnanamani and Vijayalakshmi, 2024; Niranjana, 2017; Tsao and Lo, 2006). It is a major vegetable crop in India, cultivated widely across the country except in high-altitude regions. It is often called the “King of Vegetables” because of its versatile use in a wide range of dishes across Indian cuisine (Choudhary and Gour, 2009). India ranks second globally in brinjal production, following China (Nino-Medina et al., 2017), with West Bengal contributing 23.72% of the national output. The major brinjal-producing districts in West Bengal include Murshidabad, Nadia, Malda, Bankura, Jalpaiguri and Uttar Dinajpur (Mandal et al., 2019; Anonymous, 2018).
       
Brinjal productivity in India is significantly hampered by biotic stresses, particularly insect pests and diseases (Singh, 2019). Among the 26 documented insect pests, the brinjal shoot and fruit borer (BSFB) (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) is the most destructive, causing yield losses of 60% to 80% nationally (Kaur et al., 2010; Niranjana et al., 2017) and 32% to 74% fruit damage in West Bengal across seasons (Ghosh et al., 2003). Managing this pest is challenging because the larvae reside inside the fruit or shoot, preventing the pesticides from directly reaching the pest (Ambethgar et al., 2025). Farmers mainly use pesticides to control the pest population to produce maximum unblemished brinjal fruits. Moreover, brinjal is typically consumed in its unprocessed form. Therefore, application of uncontrolled conventional insecticides makes it very hazardous to human health, contributes to the emergence of insecticide resistance (Dadmal et al., 2004; Kumar et al., 2025) and increases production costs. Hence, it has become mandatory to search for an effective alternative to conventional chemical control by routine insecticide spray. Pest-resistant crop plant production can be one such alternative.
       
Information related to the physiology and biochemistry of the insect midgut can play a crucial role in developing novel insecticidal strategies by the incorporation of inhibitor gene in the host plant to create a transgenic plant (Wang et al., 2023). So, it has become essential to understand the biochemical characteristics of gut enzyme α-amylase, a hydrolytic enzyme found in microorganisms (Agüloğlu et al., 2014; Zaferanloo et al., 2014), plants (Amid et al., 2014) and animals (Horii et al., 1987; Grossman et al., 1942). This particular hydrolytic enzyme plays a crucial role in polysaccharide digestion by catalyzing and hydrolyzing α-D-(1,4)-glucan linkages in starch and related polysaccharides (Gupta et al., 2003; Strobl et al., 1998). The function of α-amylase in starch digestion has been extensively studied in various insect species, including Egyptian cotton leaf worm (Spodoptera littoralis, Lepidoptera) (Darvishzadeh et al., 2014), olive fruit fly (Bactrocera oleae, Diptera) (Delkash-Roudsari et al., 2014), Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata, Coleoptera) (Hamori et al., 2021), wheat bug (Eurygaster maura, Hemiptera) (Ravan et al., 2009) and others.
               
Understanding the functional dynamics of digestive enzymes on their specific substrates is crucial for formulating advanced insect pest management strategies. Among these, assessing enzyme sensitivity to different inhibitors has proven to be an effective approach for developing transgenic plant-based control programs targeting phytophagous insects (Yezdani et al., 2010). Despite the significant role of α-amylase in carbohydrate metabolism, limited information is available on its properties in the brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenée), a major pest of brinjal. This study quantifies and partially characterizes α-amylase activity in L. orbonalis to improve knowledge of its digestive physiology and support innovative pest management approaches.
Larvae collection
 
The larvae of different instars of L. orbonalis were collected by tearing affected brinjal from different fields of Raiganj Block, Uttar Dinajpur district, West Bengal, India (25.9810o N, 88.0510o E) and its surrounding areas during the years 2023 and 2024. The research work was carried out at the Department of Zoology, Raiganj University.
 
Chemicals
 
Bovine serum albumin (BSA), Maltose, Starch, 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS), acrylamide, bis-acrylamide, Tris, Glycine, TEMED (Tetramethylethylenediamine), Ammonium persulphate (APS), Triton X-100 were purchased from SRL, India. Homogenization buffer, solutions of starch (1%) and the staining solutions for gels were prepared fresh before use.
 
Method of larval digestive tract enzyme extraction
 
Enzyme samples from the digestive tract of different larval instars were made by the method of Cohen (1993) with slight modifications. The dissected digestive tracts were isolated and homogenized in ice-cold 0.1 M PBS buffer, pH 7.0 (1/4, w/v) and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4oC. Supernatants were decanted on a separate tube and subsequently centrifuged again in similar conditions (Tierno de Figueroa et al., 2011). The resultant supernatant was collected and stored at -20oC for further use.
 
Amylase assay
 
The α-amylase activity was quantified by the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method, employing 1% starch solution as substrate with slight modification of the protocol as described by Champasri et al., 2021. 100 μl of enzyme extract, 5 mL buffer and 500 μl of 1% starch solution (prepared in 0.05M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) were mixed to prepare the reaction mixture, which was incubated for 30 mins. 1 ml of DNS was added to stop the reaction and subsequently heated in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes. Absorbance of supernatants was measured after cooling to room temperature at 540 nm, using a UV-VIS Spectrophotometer (LABTRONICS, Model No: LT-2201). A blank containing larval extract without the substrate and a control containing the substrate without larval extract were prepared simultaneously. The amount of maltose liberated by the enzyme was measured by using a standard curve of maltose, reacted with DNS. One unit of enzyme activity can be defined as the amount of enzyme needed for the production of 1 mg of maltose in 30 minutes at 35oC. All assays were carried in triplicates.
 
Determination of optimum temperature and pH for the enzyme activity
 
To determine the optimal temperature, the enzyme assay mixture was incubated at temperatures ranging from 15oC to 60oC with 5oC increments for 30 minutes. Following incubation, amylase activity was estimated as described above.
       
To measure the optimum pH required for amylase substrate reaction, the enzyme assays were carried out at different pH values from 4 to 13. The pH values were maintained using buffers like 0.1 M sodium acetate for pH 4-5, 0.1 M sodium phosphate for pH 6-7, 0.1 M Tris-HCl for pH 8-9, 0.1 M glycine-NaOH for pH 10-11 and 0.1 M KCl-NaOH for pH 12-13.
 
Study of enzyme activators and inhibitors
 
To measure the efficacy of various ions as activators, enzyme activity was assayed with 20 mM concentration of chloride salts of Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+. 5 mM of Ethylene- diaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS) and Gallic acid were tested as inhibitors in the reaction mixtures. A reaction mixture containing enzyme, substrate, buffer and none of the above compounds was also used as a control for experimental purpose.
       
The percentage of α-amylase activation or inhibition was estimated by:

 
Total protein concentration (larval gut extract) measurement
 
The Lowry (1951) method was used to determine protein concentration in larval extract and BSA was used as a standard.
 
Kinetic studies
 
The relationship between amylase hydrolytic activity and substrate concentration was estimated. Enzyme assays were conducted across a range of starch concentrations: 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, 1%, 1.25%, 1.5% and 2% (w/v). The same amount of enzyme concentration was used throughout the experiment. In controls, distilled water was used instead of the enzyme at each substrate concentration. Maximum velocity (Vmax) and Michaelis constant (Km) were measured by using a Lineweaver-Burk (double reciprocal) plot.
 
Electrophoresis and zymograms
 
The α-amylase found in the crude gut extract was investigated by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) following the protocols of Lammli (1970) and Andrades et al. (2017) with slight modifications. The electrophoresis was carried out on a separating gel (10%, w/v) and a stacking gel (4.5%), both containing SDS (1%). The running buffer was prepared according to Lammli (1970) but excluded SDS. The sample buffer contains Tris-HCl (0.5 M, pH 6.8), SDS (2%), bromophenol blue (without a-mercaptoethanol) (0.01%, w/v) and glycerol (20%) and was not subjected to heating. At 4oC, electrophoresis was performed with a steady voltage of 50 V. Zymogram analysis was performed using the Mini Dual Vertical Electrophoresis Unit (TARSONS). Thorough washing of the gel was done with water and gently rinsed in Triton X-100 (1%, v/v) in PBS (pH 9) for removal of SDS. Subsequently, the gel was incubated for 4 hours in a development buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 9 and 1 mM CaCl2). Staining of the gel was performed with 0.2% KI and 0.1% iodine solution and active enzyme zones were observed as light spots against a dark brownish background.
 
Statistical analysis
 
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed by Microsoft Excel software and Tukey’s Test was done at P≤0.05 significance level for assessment of differences between sample means (n=3) by using IBM SPSS software (Version 18).
α-Amylase activity
 
Activity of α-amylase was detected in the gut of L. orbonalis larvae using starch as a substrate. The average enzyme activity differed significantly across the larval stages (df = 4, F = 741.855, P<0.05). The α-amylase activity increased with larval growth up to the 2nd instar, followed by a gradual decline in subsequent stages (Fig 1). The 2nd instar exhibited the highest enzyme activity (0.374±0.0037 mg/min/mg protein or U/mg protein), which was not significantly different from the 1st instar but differed significantly from the other stages. The enzyme activities recorded in the 1st and 3rd instars (0.310±0.0046 and 0.294±.0037 U/mg protein) were comparatively higher, but significant difference was not found, though both differed significantly from the 4th and 5th instars. Low range of enzyme activities were observed in the 5th instar (0.123±0.0033 U/mg protein) and the 4th instar (0.177±0.0032 U/mg protein) and the enzyme activity of both significantly differed from the earlier instars.

Fig 1: α-amylase activity at different instars of L. orbonalis.


 
Effect of pH and temperature on enzyme activity
 
The relationship between pH and α-amylase activity on starch in the digestive extract of larval L. orbonalis is illustrated in Fig 2. Enzyme activity started to increase from pH 6 and reached the highest activity at pH 9 and then decreased with increasing pH (Fig 2). Amylase activity at optimal pH (pH 9) was 0.2813±0.0045 U/mg protein. The α-amylase activity increased from 25oC, peaked at 40oC and then declined, indicating broad temperature tolerance (Fig 3). 

Fig 2: Effect of pH on the activity of α-amylase from the digestive tract of L. orbonalis.



Fig 3: Effect of temperature on the activity of α-amylase from the digestive tract of L. orbonalis.


 
Effect of activators and inhibitors on enzyme activity
 
Effects of activator and inhibitor on α-amylase activity have been demonstrated in Table 1. The enzyme activity was observed to be increased by the chloride salts of Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+. Among these, Ca2+ is found to be most effective to increase the activity of the enzyme, while Na+, K+ and Mg+2 ions mildly increase the enzyme activity. Furthermore, EDTA, SDS and Gallic Acid at a concentration of 5 mM were found to inhibit enzyme activity by 51.10%, 31.42% and 73.42%, respectively.

Table 1: Relative activity of α-amylase of L. orbonalis towards different compounds.


 
Kinetic studies
 
Analysis of the Lineweaver-Burk plot derived from reciprocal starch concentration and α-amylase activity revealed a Km  of 0.315% starch and a Vmax  of 0.099 mM maltose/min for the digestive α-amylase enzyme of L. orbonalis (Fig 4 and Fig 5).

Fig 4: Michaelis-Menten plot of enzyme activity (velocity) versus starch concentration (%) to obtain values for the maximum velocity (Vmax) and Michaelis constant (Km) for α-amylase of L. orbonalis.



Fig 5: Double reciprocal plot (Lineweaver-Burk plots) of enzyme activity (velocity) versus starch concentration (%) to obtain values for the maximum velocity (Vmax) and Michaelis constant (Km) for α-amylase of L. orbonalis.


 
Electrophoretic study
 
Native SDS-PAGE was performed to separate amylase isoforms and their molecular weights were analyzed. Electrophoresis using 10% SDS gels revealed two distinct α-amylase bands (isoforms) when starch was used as the substrate (Fig 6). In the zymographic analysis, clear bands appearing against a dark-stained background indicated the presence of active enzymes capable of hydrolyzing starch. Two amylase isoforms were detected in L. orbonalis, with estimated molecular weights of approximately 60 KDa and 180 KDa.

Fig 6: Native gel electrophoresis showing α-amylase bands (P1 and P2) with molecular weights.


       
The alpha-enzyme activity has been detected in the various larval instars of L. orbonalis (Guenee) according to the results of the present study. Active forms of α-amylase have been reported in several other studies with borer pests of Lepidoptera like Chilo suppressalis (Zibaee et al., 2008), Spodoptera littoralis (Darvishzadeh et al., 2014), or Pieris brassicae L. (Sharifloo et al., 2016). Most insect crop pests thrive on a diet rich in complex carbohydrates, such as polysaccharides and therefore their growth and survival depend on the effective utilization of these polysaccharides by α-amylases (Nation, 2008; Chapman, 2012). High content of polysaccharides of brinjal would certainly induce the production of active forms of alpha-amylases in L. orbonalis. In the present study, a significant difference in α-amylase activity was noticed among different instars and peak activity was found in the second instar, which may be due to the differentially expressed amylase gene in various larval instars in the L. orbonalis. The phenomenon of this differential amylase gene expression within various larval instars has been documented already in studies with other Lepidopteran and Coleopteran insects (Kluh et al., 2005).
       
The results of the current study have revealed that alpha-amylase of L. orbonalis remains active over a wide pH range, with the optimum pH being 9. It has been reported in several other studies (Dow, 1984; Abraham et al., 1992; Zibaee et al., 2008; Kaur et al., 2014) that the optimum pH for lepidopteran alpha-amylase is extremely alkaline (9- 11.5), which is in close agreement with our current finding.  According to Chapman (1998), the retention of maximum activity of digestive enzymes at high pH values may be an adaptive response to deal with higher tannin content in the insect diet, as tannin precipitates proteins by binding with them at low pH values. Brinjal, the primary host plant of L. orbonalis, contains high levels of tannins (Sharma et al., 2019), potentially exerting a selective pressure on the pest. The dependence of alpha-amylase can be due to the selection pressure forcing the evolution of alkaline RNQ-type alpha-amylase in the lepidopteran digestive systems (Terra and Ferreira, 2012).
       
In the study, the optimal temperature for L. orbonalis α-amylase activity was found to be 40oC. The rapid decrease of enzyme activity above 40oC suggests sensitivity of the enzyme towards temperature. The functionality of the enzyme was almost absent beyond 65oC. Our current data on optimal temperature study of α-amylasae of L. orbonalis is within the recorded range of 30-60oC (Sharifloo et al., 2016; Kaur et al., 2014; Mendiola-Olaya et al., 2000).
       
It is very well established by several studies that metal ions are crucial for the proper activity, stability of insect α-amylase (Kaur et al., 2014; Terra and Ferreira, 2012), which is very much in line with our findings of α-amylase enzyme activity. Augmentation of α-amylase activity was noted by addition of sodium, magnesium, or calcium ions. Chloride salts of metal ions were used as the potent activators and the increase of amylolytic enzyme activity can also be brought about by these chloride ions that activate hydrolysis of polysaccharides by the change of optimal pH (Terra and Ferreira, 2012). A significant inhibition of 31-51% of amylolytic activity reduction was observed in our results by the metal-chelating agent EDTA and SDS detergent, which is very much comparable to other studies (Cohen and Hendrix, 1994; Zeng and Cohen, 2000; Sharifloo et al., 2016). Ca+2 ion exclusion from the enzyme complex or enzyme denaturation may be the reason behind this inhibition by EDTA or SDS. In the current finding, maximum increase of amylase activity was observed with Ca+2 ion, which is strictly in line with other studies of the role imparted by metallic activators on amylolytic activity (Kazzazi et al., 2005; Zibaee et al., 2008; Delkash-Roudsari et al., 2014; and Sorkhabi-Abdolmaleki et al., 2014). Maximum inhibition of amylolytic enzyme activity was seen with gallic acid in the assay mixture. The inhibitory potential of gallic acid or other polyphenolics has been reported in many other works (Ahmed et al., 2013; Lu et al., 2016; Oboh et al., 2019). The conformation of alpha-amylase is altered by the complexation with gallic acid, which is brought about by non-covalent interactions like hydrogen and hydrophobic bonding. The hydroxyl group of the gallic acid structure is responsible for such a kind of hydrogen bond formation by interacting with the active site’s amino acids of the enzyme (Long, 2023).
       
The Km value of α-amylase against starch for L. orbonalis was 0.31%. Km value corresponds to the dissociation constant (Kd) of the enzyme-substrate reaction; hence low Km indicates a higher affinity of an enzyme towards substrate. Our results of Km of α-amylase are comparable to the Km value obtained in studies with other insects, like 0.42% for click beetle, Pyrearinus termitillumihans (Colepicolo-Neto et al., 1986) and 0.38% in fall army worm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Ferreira et al., 1994).  A polysaccharide-rich diet may be the reason behind the relatively lower km value observed in the current study.
               
Electrophoretic zymogram study from the gut extracts of L. orbonalis has conspicuously revealed two iso-enzymes of alpha-amylase having distinguishable electrophoretic mobility and molecular weight. A similar isozyme pattern of α-amylase has been identified in other arthropods as well. Two forms of amylolytic enzymes have been recorded in two species of rice weevil, Sitophilus zeamais and S. granarius (Baker, 1983). In larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus) and coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) also similar two isozyme patterns have been noted (Mendiola-Olaya et al., 2000; Valencia et al., 2000). Multiple isoforms of amylase may increase amylolytic efficiencies over a broad range of pH and temperature (Nadaf et al., 2022). Molecular weight of one of the bands with the highest intensity was found to be 60 KDa, which is well within the recorded reference range of 45-67 KDa (Baker, 1991; Terra and Ferreira, 1994). The second band with a molecular weight of more than 180 KDa may be due to the oligomerization of many monomeric subunits of protein to form an oligomer, which gives a greater apparent molecular weight value during gel visualization. 
The development of insect-resistant transgenic crops helps reduce dependence on chemical pesticides, lowering environmental contamination and supporting ecological balance. This approach not only enhances crop protection but also promotes human and environmental safety. Biochemical characterization of digestive enzymes, particularly α-amylase, in pests such as Leucinodes orbonalis, provides crucial insights into their digestive physiology. Such understanding enables the design of specific enzyme inhibitors that form the basis of sustainable pest management strategies. Future research focusing on purification, structural analysis, and molecular modelling of α-amylase of the target insect will help to design novel inhibitors from plants or other sources. 
The present study was self-funded by the authors. The necessary instruments and laboratory facilities were provided by the Department of Zoology, Sericulture and Microbiology, Raiganj University, Raiganj, West Bengal, India. 
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abraham, E.G., Nagaragu, J., Datta, R.K. (1992). Biochemical study of amylase in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.: Comparative analysis in diapausing and non-diapausing strain. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 22: 867-873.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-1748(92)90113-S. 

  2. Agüloğlu, F.S., Enez, B. (2014). Production, purification and characterization of thermostable α-amylase from thermophilic Geobacillus stearothermophilus. Stärke. 66: 182-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/star.201200279.

  3. Ahmed, D., Mughal, Q.M., Younas, S., Ikram, M. (2013). Study of phenolic content and urease and alpha-amylase inhibitory activities of methanolic extract of Rumex acetosella roots and its sub-fractions in different solvents. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 26: 553-559.

  4. Ambethgar S.A., Rameshkumar A., Krishna R.K., Sundaresan S. (2025). Biological control of pests in major tropical vegetable crops: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 46(4): 515-530. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2635.

  5. Amid, M., Manap, M.Y.A. (2014). Purification and characterization of a novel amylase enzyme from red pitaya (Hylocereus polyrhizus) peel. Food Chemistry. 165: 412-418. https:/ /doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.133.

  6. Andrades, A., Contreras, L.M. (2017). Amylase zymography. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1626: 301-308. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7111-4_29. 

  7. Anonymous. (2018). Horticulture Statistics Division, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, Horticultural Statistics at a Glance.

  8. Baker, J.E. (1983). Properties of amylase from midguts of larvae of Sitophilus zeamais and Sitophilus granaries. Insect Biochemistry. 13: 421-428.

  9. Baker, J.E. (1991). Purification and partial characterization of α- amylase allozymes from the lesser grain borer Rhyzopertha dominica. Insect Biochemistry. 21: 303-311.

  10. Champasri, C., Phetlum, S., Pornchoo, C. (2021). Diverse activities and biochemical properties of amylase and proteases from six freshwater fish species. Scientific Reports. 11: 5727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85258-7. 

  11. Chapman, R.F. (1998). The Insects: Structure and Function. Cambridge University Press, p. 770.

  12. Chapman, R.F. (2012). The Insects: Structure and Function, Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978 1139035460.

  13. Choudhary, B., Gaur, K. (2009). The development and regulation of brinjal in India (Brinjal /Aubergine), ISAAA, Ithaca, NY.

  14. Cohen, A.C. (1993). Organization of digestion and preliminary characterization of salivary trypsin-like enzymes in a predaceous heteropteran, Zelus renardii. Journal of Insect Physiology. 39: 823-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0022-1910(93)90114-7.

  15. Cohen, A.C., Hendrix, D.L. (1994). Demonstration and preliminary characterization of α-amylase in the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Aleyrodidae: Homoptera). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 109: 593-601.

  16. Colepicolo-Neto, P., Costa, C., Bechara, E.J.H. (1986). Brazilian species of luminescent Elateridae: Luciferin identification and bioluminescence spectra. Insect Biochemistry. 16: 803-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1790(86)90117-4.

  17. Dadmal, S.M., Nemade, S.B., Akhare, M.D. (2004). Field screening of brinjal cultivars for resistance to Leucinodes orbonalis Guen. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystem. 10: 145-150.

  18. Darvishzadeh, A., Hosseininaveh, V., Salimian, S. (2014). Enzymatic activity of α-amylase in alimentary tract of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Characterization  and compartmentalization. Arthropods. 3: 138-146.

  19. Delkash-Roudsari, S., Zibaee, A., Abbaci Mozhdehi, R.M. (2014). Digestive α-amylase of Bacterocera oleae Gmelin (Diptera:  Tephritidae): Biochemical characterization and effect of proteinaceous inhibitor. Journal of King Saudi University Science. 26: 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2013. 05.003.

  20. Delkash-Roudsari, S., Zibaee, A., Abbci-Mozhdehi, M.R. (2014). Digestive proteolytic activity in larvae and adults of Bactrocera oleae Gmelin (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 17: 483-491.

  21. Dow, J.A. (1984). Extremely high pH in biological systems: A model for carbonate transport. The American Journal of Physiology. 246: 633-635. 

  22. Ferreira, C., Capella, A.N., Sitnik, R., Terra, W.R. (1994). Properties of the digestive enzymes and the permeability of the peritrophic membrane of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera)  larvae. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology and Integrative Physiology. 107: 631-640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(94)90362-X.  

  23. Gnanamani, K., Vijayalakshmi A. (2024). Efficient utilization of agro- industrial waste through vermicomposting and its impact on growth and yield of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Agricultural Science Digest. 43(6): 824-828. doi: 10. 18805/ag.D-5775.

  24. Ghosh, S., Senapati, S. (2003). Estimation of loss in yield of brinjal due to pest complex under terai region of West Bengal. Environment and Ecology Research. 21: 764-769.

  25. Grossman, M.I., Greengard, H., Ivy, A.C. (1942). The effect of dietary composition on pancreatic enzymes. The American Journal of Physiology. 138: 676-682.

  26. Gupta, R., Gigras, P., Mohapatra, H., Goswami, V.K., Chauhan, B. (2003). Microbial α-amylases: A biotechnological perspective. Process Biochem. 38(11): 1599-1616.

  27. Hamori, C., Remenyik, J., Kandra, L., Gyemant, G. (2021). Colorado potato beetle alpha-amylase: Purification, action pattern and subsite mapping for exploration of active centre. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 168: 350-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.071.

  28. Horii, A., Emi, M., Tomita, N., Nishide, T., Ogawa, M., Mori, T., Matsubara, K. (1987). Primary structure of human pancreatic α-amylase gene: Its comparison with human salivary α-amylase gene. Gene. 60: 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119 (87)90213-7. 

  29. Kaur, C., Nagal, S., Nishad, J., Kumar, R. (2014). Evaluating eggplant (Solanum melongena L) genotypes for bioactive properties: A chemometric approach. Food Research International. 60: 205-211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.09.049. 

  30. Kaur, R., Kaur, N., Gupta, A.K. (2010). Structural features, substrate specificity, kinetic properties of insect α-amylase and specificity of plant α-amylase inhibitors. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 116: 83-93. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.09.005. 

  31. Kazzazi, M., Bandani, A.R., Ashuri, A., Hosseinkhani, S. (2005). α- amylase activity of nymphal stages of sunn pest, Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae). Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences. 70: 863-867.

  32. Kluh, I., Horn, M., Hýblová, J., Hubert, J., Dolecková-Maresová, L., Voburka, Z., Kudlíková, I., Kocourek, F., Mares, M. (2005). Inhibitory specificity and insecticidal selectivity of alpha- amylase inhibitor from Phaseolus vulgaris. Phytochemistry. 66: 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2004. 11.001. 

  33. Kumar, S., Singh, H., Singh, D.V., Bharti, S.D., Panigrahi, C.K. and Rai, A. (2025). Performance of various pesticides against yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) of basmati rice and effect on yield in Northern India. Agricultural Science Digest. 1-7. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-6252. 

  34. Lammli, U.K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227: 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0.

  35. Long, Y. (2023). Preparation and application of α-amylase inhibitors. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology. 45: 334-339. https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v45i.7486.

  36. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., Randall, R.J. (1951). Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 193: 265-275. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6. 

  37. Lu, Q., Chen, C., Zhao, S., Ge, F., Liu, D. (2016). Investigation of the interaction between gallic acid and α-amylase by spectroscopy. International Journal of Food Properties. 19: 2481-2494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2015. 1059345. 

  38. Mandal, R., Maurya, P., Bhattacharjee, T., Banerjee, S., Chattopadhyay, A., Hazra, P. (2019). Breeding potential of brinjal genotypes for fruit and shoot borer resistance using multivariate analysis. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 7: 1340-1347.

  39. Mendiola-Olaya, E., Valencia-Jiménez, A., Valdés-Rodríguez, S., Délano-Frier, J.P., Blanco-Labra, A. (2000). Digestive amylase from the larger grain borer, Prostephanus truncatus Horn. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology  Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 126: 425- 433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0491(00)00216-9. 

  40. Nadaf, H.L., Sirsat, A.K., Hivrale, V.K. (2022). Biochemical characteri- zation of α-amylases from differently feeding pests: Sap-sucking Aphis craccivora and tissue chewing Pectinophora gossypiella. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 42: 3747-3757. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s42690-022-00899-z. 

  41. Nation, J.L. (2008). Insect Physiology and Biochemistry, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton.  https://doi.org/10.1201/97814200 61789. 

  42. Nino-Medina, G., Urías-Orona, V., Muy, D., Heredia, J.B. (2017). Structure and content of phenolics in eggplant (Solanum melongena)- a review. South African Journal of Botany. 111: 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.03.016. 

  43. Niranjana, R.F., Devi, M., Sridhar, R.P. (2017). Comparison of pheromone traps against brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). AGRIEAST Journal of Agricultural Science. 11: 1-7.

  44. Oboh, G., Ogunsuyi, O.B., Adegbola, D.O., Ademiluyi, A.O., Oladun, F.L. (2019). Influence of gallic and tannic acid on therapeutic properties of acarbose in vitro and in vivo in Drosophila melanogaster. Biomed Journal. 42: 317-327. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.bj.2019.01.005. 

  45. Ravan, S., Mehrabadi, M., Bandani, A.R. (2009). Biochemical characterization of digestive amylase of wheat bug, Eurygaster maura (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae). African Journal of Biotechnology. 8: 3640-3648.

  46. Sharifloo, A., Zibaee, A., Sendi, J.J., Jahroumi, K.T. (2016). Characterization of a digestive α-amylase in the midgut of Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Frontiers in Physiology. 7: 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys. 2016.00096.  PMID: 27014094; PMCID: PMC4791400.

  47. Sharma, H., Chawla, N., Dhatt, A.S. (2019). Nutraceutical content and free radical scavenging capacity of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes. Scientia Horticulturae. 244: 294-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.09.060. 

  48. Singh, S. (2019). Efficacy and economics of pest management modules against Brinjal shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis). Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 27(3): 320-323.

  49. Sorkhabi-Abdolmaleki, S., Zibaee, A., Hoda, H., Fazeli-Dinan, M. (2014). Purification and characterization of midgut α- amylase in a predatory bug andralus spinidens. Journal of Insect Science. 14. doi: 10.1673/031.014.65. 

  50. Strobl, S., Maskos, K., Wiegand, G., Huber, R., Gomis-Rüth, F.X., Glockshuber, R. (1998). A novel strategy for inhibition of alpha-amylases: Yellow meal worm alpha-amylase in complex with the Ragi bifunctional inhibitor at 2.5 A resolution. Structure. 6(7): 911-21. doi: 10.1016/s0969- 2126(98)00092-6.

  51. Terra, W. R., Ferreira, C. (2012). Biochemistry and molecular biology of digestion. In L.I. Gilbert (Ed.), Insect molecular biology and biochemistry. Academic Press. pp: 365-418. https:/ /doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384747-8.10011-X. 

  52. Terra, W.R., Ferreira, C. (1994). Insect digestive enzymes: Properties, compartmentalization and function. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Comparative Biochemistry. 109(1): 1-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0491(94)90141-4. 

  53. Tierno de Figueroa, J.M., Trenzado, C.E., M.J. López-Rodríguez, M.J., A. Sanz, A. (2011). Digestive enzyme activity of two stonefly species (Insecta, Plecoptera) and their feeding habits. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology. 160(3): 426-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.07.014. 

  54. Tsao and Lo. (2006). In “Vegetables: Types and Biology”. Handbook of Food Science, Technology and Engineering by Yiu H. Hui. CRC Press. ISBN 1-57444-551-0. Zoological Researches. 19(1): 42-45.

  55. Valencia, R.R., Bernal, E.M. (2000). Guest Editors’ Introduction. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 22(4): 405- 410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986300224002.

  56. Wang, D., He, H., Wei, C. (2023). Cellular and potential molecular mechanisms underlying transovarial transmission of the obligate symbiont sulcia in cicadas. Environ Microbiol. 25(4): 836-852. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.16310.

  57. Yezdani, E., Sendi, J.J., Zibaee, A., Ghadamyari, M. (2010). Enzymatic properties of alpha-amylase in the midgut and the salivary glands of mulberry moth, Glyphodes pyloalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). C R Biol. 333(1): 17-22. doi: 10. 1016/j.crvi.2009.11.004. 

  58. Zaferanloo, B., Bhattacharjee, S., Ghorbani, M.M., Mohan J.P., Palombo A.E. (2014). Amylase production by Preussia minima, a fungus of endophytic origin: Optimization of fermentation conditions and analysis of fungal secretome by LC-MS. BMC Microbiol. 14: 55. https://doi.org/10. 1186/1471-2180-14-55. 

  59. Zeng, F., Cohen, A.C. (2000). Comparison of alpha-amylase and protease activities of a zoophytophagous and two phytozoophagous Heteroptera. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 126(1): 101-6. doi: 10.1016/s1095- 6433(00)00193-8. PMID: 10908857.

  60. Zibaee, A., Bandani, A.R., Kafil, M., Ramzi, S. (2008). Characteri- zation of α-amylase in midgut and salivary glands of Chilo suppressalis Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), rice striped stem borer. Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology. 11: 201-205.
In this Article
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest

Editorial Board

View all (0)