In the sphere of biomedical research, creating innovative biomaterials is vital for addressing challenging healthcare issues. Hydroxyapatite (HAp) is one such biomaterial that has drawn much attention because of its remarkable properties, particularly in regard to hard tissue implants. The different components of HAp as biomaterials are explained in this introduction, along with the intricacies of oxidative stress and its effects during bone implantation, the importance of antioxidants and HAp limits. In addition to outlining the goals and possible contributions of this research, it highlights a novel metal doping method to increase HAp performance.
A common biomaterial for hard tissue implants is HAp, a calcium phosphate crystal with the chemical formula Ca
10(PO
4)6(OH)
2 (
Gülçin et al., 2010). It is highly biocompatible and biodegradable because of its crystalline structure, which resembles the mineral makeup of bone tissue. Because of these intrinsic properties, HAp is an ideal choice for orthopedic and dental applications, where it can be used as a base for dental restorations, coatings for orthopedic implants and bone transplants.
As an alternative to bone transplantation, HAp has become more significant in orthopedics because of its capacity to promote osseointegration and bone regeneration. HAp enhances the compatibility of orthopedic implants with host bone tissue when used as a covering material, which promotes recovery. HAp is utilized in dentistry for restorative procedures and dental implants since it is both biocompatible and aesthetically similar to human teeth. HAp has also shown promise in drug delivery systems, where it functions as a carrier for pharmaceuticals, guaranteeing regulated release for better therapeutic results. Oxidative stress is a fundamental physiological condition that results from an imbalance between the body’s defense mechanisms and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
(Schieber et al., 2014).
ROS include a variety of species, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radicals (•OH) and superoxide anions (O2•-). Although ROS are necessary for regular physiological functions, excess ROS can result in oxidative stress, which can harm cells and cause a variety of diseases (
Barnes, 2013;
Kramer et al., 2014; Machado et al., 2012).
Because ROS are produced after bone implantation as part of the body’s immune response and wound healing processes (
Mahanty et al., 2023), serve a dual function in tissue repair and can cause oxidative stress and inflammation if their levels are not properly regulated (
Jiang et al., 2002), it is crucial to comprehend how ROS and bone implantation interact in order to improve implant outcomes. Implant-related oxidative stress can result in oxidative damage, which can affect the success of the implant and the healing process (
Krishani et al., 2023).
The body uses antioxidants as a natural defense mechanism against oxidative stress (
Taladrid et al., 2023). By providing electrons to ROS, they neutralize them and stop oxidative damage to biological components. Enzymatic antioxidants such as catalase and superoxide dismutase work in tandem with nonenzymatic antioxidants such as glutathione, polyphenols and vitamins C and E to preserve redox balance
(Poljsak et al., 2013) (Hasanuzzaman et al., 2020).
To combat the oxidative stress caused by the implantation procedure and subsequent tissue healing, antioxidants are essential during bone implantation. The importance of antioxidant techniques in implantology is highlighted by the fact that imbalances in the antioxidant defense system can lead to increased ROS levels and compromised healing. HAp has limitations in regard to hard tissue implants, despite its clear advantages. Its low mechanical strength is a major drawback that restricts its applicability in load-bearing applications. Additionally, over time, HAp brittleness may result in wear or fracture. Additionally, because ROS generation is elevated during implantation procedures, HAp is unable to effectively counteract oxidative stress, which is a significant issue. The antioxidant activity of nHAp can be evaluated
via the DPPH radical scavenging assay, which provides insight into its potential to neutralize free radicals. Building on this concept, we investigated the biocompatibility and osteogenic potential of nHAps using the MG-63 human osteoblast-like cell line
(Kumar et al., 2024).
A popular human osteoblast-like cell model, the MG-63 cell line, is frequently used to study the activity of bone cells and their interactions with biomaterials. Nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp) is commonly used in combination with MG-63 cells to evaluate its osteogenic potential and biocompatibility. By using an
in vitro method, scientists can clarify how nanosized hydroxyapatite interacts with bone cells, offering important new information on its possible use in bone tissue engineering (
Acharya et al., 2022).
In this study, we performed a DPPH radical scavenging assay and an MTT assay for three samples of nano-hydroxyapatite. The first sample was synthesized from Indian hen eggshell (IE1), the second was synthesized from hybrid or broiler hen eggshell (HE1)
via the precipitation method and the third sample was the reference sample nano-Xim HAp 202 (a gift sample from Fliidinova, Portugal).
In this study, we performed a DPPH radical scavenging assay and an MTT assay for three samples of nanohydroxyapatite. The first sample was synthesized from Indian hen eggshell (IE1), the second was synthesized from hybrid or broiler hen eggshell (HE1) via the precipitation method described in the article
(Patil et al., 2025), and the third sample was the reference sample nano-Xim HAp 202 (a gift sample from Fliidinova, Portugal).