Impact of Spacings and Different Sources of Organic Nutrients on Growth, Soil Chemical Properties and Economics of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.)

A
Arakanti Chaitanya1,*
K
K. Murali2
N
N. Deva Kumar3
S
S.R. Anand4
N
N. Chiranjeevi5
1Department of Agronomy, College of Horticulture, Pulivendula, Dr. Y.S.R. Horticultural University, West Godavari-534 101, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka, India.
3Retd. Director of Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vigyana Kendra, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka, India.
4AICRP on Potential Crops, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vigyana Kendra, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka, India.
5College of Horticulture Pulivendula, Dr. YSR Horticultural University, West Godavari-534 101, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Background: Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) is a widely used potential crops which has a huge demand in Indian market and is being grow in some parts of India. Since it is a newly introduced crop with higher nutritional value there is need to modify the crop environmental complex with agronomic techniques. So the current study was done on basis of different spacing and organic nutrients at Research Institute on Organic Farming, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore during two Rabi seasons 2020-2021 and 2021-2022.

Methods:The treatments include five different spacing [60 cm x 30 cm (S1), 75 cm x 15 cm (S2), 75 cm x 30 cm (S3), 90 cm x 15 cm (S4) and 90 cm x 30 cm (S5)] and three organic nutrient levels applied based on nitrogen equivalent [60 kg N equivalent ha-1 (N1), 80 kg N equivalent ha-1 (N2) and 100 kg N equivalent ha-1 (N3)] which were evaluated under factorial randomized complete block design.

Result: The results showed that the significantly more number of branches both primary and secondary plant-1) at 30 and 60 Days After Sowing (DAS) and at harvest were 6, 21 and 28 respectively and higher dry matter partitioning to leaf (22.53 g), stem (71.52 g) and spike (76.83 g) were recorded in S5 and was on par with S3. Among nutrient levels N3 recorded more number of branches during 30 and 60 DAS and harvest and higher partitioning of dry matter to different plant parts. S2N3 recorded higher cost of cultivation (₹ 69,663 ha-1), but more gross returns (₹ 2,75,386 ha-1), net returns (₹ 2,06,118 ha-1) and B: C ratio (3.98) was reported with S4N3. It was revealed during the study that neither spacing nor nutrient levels have shown significant influence on soil chemical properties.

With a projected spike in food demand from 59 to102 per cent affordably meeting food and nutritional security is a great challenge. Biased technological development by focusing on few plant species, the Indian food security has become dependent only on fewcrops (Kulczynski et al., 2019). The appropriate counter measure is “greater nutrient source per unit of resource input” by usage of potential crops. Potential crops/underutilized crops/ orphan crops/ neglected crops are the life support species, with promising nutritional utility for the present as well as future needs of human kind, but these crops receive low priority from farming community (Prathyusha et al., 2019).
       
Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) is an annual herb and one amongst the potential crops whose cultivation was suppressed and remained unknown for subsequent centuries. It belongs to lamiaceae family and plays a key role in preventing several long-term diseases and so it is considered as “functional food”. It has wider scope in Indian market, as it is the raw material for many industries like nutraceuticals and pharmaceutical because of its functional component (Patel et al., 2021). In recent years, cultivation of this crop was started in Karnataka due to its easy cultivation under scarce availability of resources and remunerative price with good buy back arrangements. Conventional farming methods deteriorate the health of soil and lower the productivity, quality and also causes environmental pollution. The farming systems like organic farming is sustainable, economically viable and ecologically sounds (Toor et al., 2021). Nutrients are very important in enhancing the yield potential of crop. Both bulky and concentrated manures are sources of essential plant nutrients in organic farming for sustained crop yield by supplying the plant nutrients in easily available form through decomposition. As the crop is newly introduced in India, there is necessity to develop package of practices, with this objective the current study was conducted on organic cultivation of Chia.
The current research trail was conducted during two Rabi seasons 2020-21 and 2021-22 at Research Institute on Organic Farming (RIOF), University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS), Gandhi Krishi Vignan Kendra (GKVK), Bangalore. The soil of the trial site was red sandy loam with slightly acidity (pH 6.0), electric conductivity (0.40 dS m-1) and organic carbon (0.77 per cent). Seed bed was prepared by ploughing twice and after obtaining fine tilth the lay out was made based on factorial randomized complete block design with three replications, two factors and 15 treatment combinations. The two factors i.e.,  Factor A - Five different spacing [60 cm x 30 cm (S1), 75 cm x 15 cm (S2), 75 cm x 30 cm (S3), 90 cm x 15 cm (S4) and 90 cm x 30 cm (S5)] and Factor B- three nutrient levels applied based on nitrogen equivalent [60 kg N equivalent ha-1(N1), 80 kg N equivalent ha-1(N2) and 100 kg N equivalent ha-1 (N3)] applied based on nitrogen (N) equivalent. Farm yard Manure (FYM) @10 t ha-1 was applied 15 days priorly to sowing for all the treatments. Sowing the Chia crop (Local variety) was done with allocation of spacing as per the treatment in each plot. Nutrients were applied after analyzing the concentration of nutrients present in FYM and Vermicompost (VC). 75 per cent of N is supplied through FYM as basal and 25 per cent of N was supplemented through top dressing of VC at 30 DAS. In net plot crop was harvested, threshed and weighed separately after obtaining the maturity and yield was computed in hectare basis.
       
Nondestructive method of sampling was made from five selected and tagged plants. The total number of primary branches plant-1 were counted at 30 DAS, whereas both primary and secondary branches were recorded at 60 DAS and at harvest and their average value was considered. Partitioning of the dry matter of five tagged plants at harvest were uprooted then stem, leaves and spike were separated and oven dried at 60°C. Dry weight of each part plant-1 was recorded and expressed as g plant-1. Soil chemical parameters were obtained by drawing of representative soil samples at depth of 0-15 cm before sowing of crop and after harvest. The pH value was estimated using pH meter as per Jackson, (1973). The electrical conductivity measured with conductivity bridge and expressed as dS m-1 as per Jackson (1973). The organic carbon  of soil was determined as per Jackson (1973). The data collected was statistically analysied by adopting Fishers method of analysis of variance (ANOVA) as outlined by Gomez and Gomez, (1984). Critical difference values were calculated whenever the F-test was significant at 5 per cent level. Economics was calculated with the prevailing costs during the experimentation period. The cost of components such as land preparation, cost incurred on inputs and labour charges at prevailing market price during crop production years of 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 were considered for calculation of cost of cultivation. The other components like Gross returns and Net returns (₹ ha-1)  and B:C ratio were calculated by using the following formulas.
 
Gross returns (₹ ha-1) = Market price (₹ kg-1) x Seed yield (kg ha-1)
 
Net returns (₹ ha-1) = Gross returns (₹ ha-1) - Cost of cultivation ( ha-1)

Growth attributes
 
The data related to growth attributes of Chia (Table 1) shows that significantly higher number of branches plant-1 at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest (6.45, 21.15 and 28.11, respectively) was recorded with S5 which was on par with S3 and the lesser number of branches plant-1 was reported with S1.  N3 recorded significantly higher branches plant-1 at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest (6.32, 20.70 and 27.15, respectively) and was on par with N2, lesser number of branches chia plant-1 was reported with N1. The interaction effect was found  to be non-significant. Mounika et al., (2021) in basil crop reported that more number of primary and secondary branches plant-1 were in wider row spacing than compared narrow spacing which might be because of more availability of resources from the atmosphere, soil rhizosphere and optimum space to grow horizontally in wide spacing. In Occimum basilicum significantly more yield attributes were reported with wider spacing and application of higher dose of FYM by Policepatil  et al. (2020). Higher growth and yield attributes of tomato were observed with combination of FYM and vermicompost, FYM @ 20 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 10 t ha-1 than application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 and control reported  by Bairagya et al., (2022) and Shiny et al., (2022). Manures like vermicompost might have releasenitrogen into soil nutrient pooland causes improvement of growth parameters of chia.

Table 1: Growth attributes of Chia crop as influenced by spacing and organic nutrient levels (Pooled data of 2 years).


       
Spacing S5recorded significantly more dry matter partitioning to leaves, stem and spike (22.53 g, 71.52 g and 76.83 g) which was on par with S3 and the lower with S1. N3 significantly partitioned higher dry matter to chia leaves,stem and spike (21.97 g, 69.93 g and 69.53 g) which was on par with N2 and the lower with N1.Partitioning of dry matter to leaves was not significantly differed due to the interaction of factors at harvest. The results are in close agreement with the findings of Umilsingh, (2020) in chia crop, it was  reported that wider spacing of 60 cm × 30 cm resulted in more growth attributes due to low competition for the available resources between the plant parts, more branching pattern and more inter and intra row spacing compared to closer spacing. Ramesh et al., (2017) reported that quinoa grown under wider spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with higher doses of FYM resulted in higher yield attributes than narrow spacings of 30 cm x 10 cm with low levels of FYM application. FYM and VC improves root proliferation and biomass resulting in higher uptake of nutrients from surrounding root zone and greater assimilation, production and partition of dry matter to all plant parts.
 
Soil chemical properties
 
The pooled data of two years onsoil chemical properties after harvest (Table 2) shows that spacing has not showed significant influence on soil chemical properties, however numerically higher soil pH, EC and OC was reported with S5 (6.27, 0.61 dS m-1 and 0.81 per cent) and lower values was recorded with S2. Nutrient levels had not significantly influence soil chemical parameters. Higher pH, EC and OC was recorded with N3 (6.23,0.55 dS m-1 and 0.80 per cent) and lower pH was recorded with N1.The results are in line with findings of Singh et al., (2021) and Islam et al., (2024) who reported that neither spacing nor application of organic manures had significant influence on soil chemical properties.

Table 2: Chemical properties of soil after harvest of Chia crop as influenced by spacing and organic nutrient levels (Pooled data of 2 years).


 
Economics
 
A new crop or a technology is accepted by the farming community based on the profits realized upon cost involved in production. Data pertaining to effect of spacing and organic nutrient levels on economics (Table 3) shows that more cost of cultivation (₹ 69,663 ha-1) was recorded with S2 N3, whereas lesser cost of cultivation (₹ 51,724 ha-1) was with S5N1. The higher gross and net returns (₹ 2,75,386, ₹ 2,06,118 ha-1, respectively) and B: C ratio (3.98) was recorded with spacing of S4N3. The results are in close conformity with findings of Hebbal et al., (2018) who reported that 30 cm x 10 cm recorded higher cost of cultivation (₹ 33659), gross returns (₹ 110484) and net returns (₹ 76825) than wider spacing of 45 cm x 30 cm and 30 cm x 30 cm. Similarly, higher gross and net returns of ₹ 108242 and  ₹ 78326, respectively were recorded with application of higher dose of FYM 7.5 t ha-1 than lower doses and was in line with findings of Ramamoorthy et al., (2021).

Table 3: Economics of chia crop based on different spacing and organic nutrients during two seasons (Rabi 2020-21 and 2021-22).

Growth attributes of chia differed significantly by the influenceof different crop geometries and nutrient levels. Wider spacing of 90 cm x 30 cm has significantly higher growth attributes and the on-par results were recorded with 75 cm x 30 cm spacing than other spacings. 100 kg N equivalent ha-1 application recorded significantly growth attributes and wason par with 80 kg N equivalent ha-1. Spacing has no significant influence on soil chemical properties. Lesser cost of cultivation (₹ 60,935 ha-1) was recorded with 80 kg N equivalent ha-1 but higher gross returns (₹ 2,75,386 ha-1), net returns (₹ 2,06,118 ha-1) and B: C ratio (3.98) was observed with 90 cm x 15 cm with 100 kg N equivalent ha-1. So it can be conclude that wider spacing along with application 80 kg N equivalent ha-1 can be suggested for profitable chia cultivation.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions in this article are manly those of the authors and do not represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy, completeness of the information and data provided. There is no acceptancy of any liability for  direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare that no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. There is no funding or sponsorship that influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Bairagya, M.D., Kumar, S.D., Maitra, S., Roja, M., Shankar, T. (2022). Effect of FYM and vermicompost on yield and economics of rabi tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 11(7): 8190-8192.

  2. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd edition.).

  3. Hebbal, N., Ramchandrappa, B.K., Mudalgiriyappa., Thimmegowda, M.N. (2018). Yield and economics of finger millet with establishment methods under different planting geometry and nutrient source. Indian Journal of Dryland Agriculture Research and Development. 33(1): 54-58. 

  4. Islam, S.S., Anik, R.B., Hasan, A.K., Karim, K., Khom Phet, T. (2024). Impacts of vermicompost and farmyard manure as organic fertilizer with biochar amendment on soil quality, growth and yield of sunflower. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research58: 595-601. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.AF-848.

  5. Jackson, M.K. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.

  6. Kulczynski, B., Cisowska, J.K., Taczanowski, M., Kmiecik, D., Michałowska, A.G. (2019). The chemical composition and nutritional value of chia seed current state of knowledge. Nutrients. 11(1214): 2-16.

  7. Mounika, Y., Dorajeerao, A.V.D., Reddy, V.K., Suneetha, S., Umakrishna, K. (2021). Effect of spacing and planting season on growth and leaf yield of sacred basil (Ocimum sanctum L.). Journal of Pharmacognisis and Phytochemistry. 10(8): 552-556.

  8. Patel, S.P., Malve, S.H., Chavda, M.V., Vala, Y.B. (2021). Effect of panchagavya and jeevamrut on growth, yield attributes and yield of summer pearl millet. Journal of Pharma Innovation. 10(12): 105-109.

  9. Policepatil, A.S., Ambrish, G., Reddy, S.B., Reddy, B.S. (2020). Importance of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) cultivation in Indian agriculture. Vigyan Varta. 1(6): 17-19

  10. Prathyusha, P., Kumari, B.A., Suneetha, W.J., Srujana, M.N.S. (2019). Chia seeds for nutritional security. Journal of Pharmacognisis and Phytochemistry. 8(3): 2702-2707.

  11. Ramamoorthy, P., Ariraman, R., Suvain, K.K., Selvakumar, S., Karthikeyan, M. (2021). Effect of sulphur levels on growth, yield parameters, yield, nutrient uptake, quality and economics of sunflower: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 44(4): 542-547. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2250.

  12. Ramesh, K., Suneetha, K.B., Devi, Gopinath, K.A., Devi, K.M. (2017). Physiological indices, yield and yield attributes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa L.) as influenced by dates of sowing and varied crop geometry. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 6(7): 1023-1034.

  13. Shiny, A.V.A., Joseph, P.A., Iraiyanban, A.A., Dhivyalakshmi, T. (2022). Effects of organic manure and recommended dosage of fertilizer on nodulation, chlorophyll content of leaves, availability of nutrients and soil properties under green gram Vigna radiata (L.) cultivation. Indian Journal of Agriculture Research. 59(7): 1136-1140. doi: 10.18805/ IJARe.A-6284.

  14. Singh, M.V., Kumar, N., Kumar, V. (2021). Effect of nutrient management practices and planting density on yield and nutrient uptake by hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Annals of Plant Soil Research. 23(4): 411-414.

  15. Toor, M.D., Adnan, M., Rehman, F., Tahir, R., Saeed, M.S., Khan, A.U., Pareek, V. (2021). Nutrients and their importance in agriculture crop production. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience. 9(1): 62582-2845. 

  16. Umilsingh, N. (2020). Optimization of Spacing and Fertilizer Levels on Productivity of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.). (M. Sc. Thesis, University of Agricltural Sciences Bangalore, Karnataka, India).

Impact of Spacings and Different Sources of Organic Nutrients on Growth, Soil Chemical Properties and Economics of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.)

A
Arakanti Chaitanya1,*
K
K. Murali2
N
N. Deva Kumar3
S
S.R. Anand4
N
N. Chiranjeevi5
1Department of Agronomy, College of Horticulture, Pulivendula, Dr. Y.S.R. Horticultural University, West Godavari-534 101, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka, India.
3Retd. Director of Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vigyana Kendra, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka, India.
4AICRP on Potential Crops, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vigyana Kendra, Bengaluru-560 065, Karnataka, India.
5College of Horticulture Pulivendula, Dr. YSR Horticultural University, West Godavari-534 101, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Background: Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) is a widely used potential crops which has a huge demand in Indian market and is being grow in some parts of India. Since it is a newly introduced crop with higher nutritional value there is need to modify the crop environmental complex with agronomic techniques. So the current study was done on basis of different spacing and organic nutrients at Research Institute on Organic Farming, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bangalore during two Rabi seasons 2020-2021 and 2021-2022.

Methods:The treatments include five different spacing [60 cm x 30 cm (S1), 75 cm x 15 cm (S2), 75 cm x 30 cm (S3), 90 cm x 15 cm (S4) and 90 cm x 30 cm (S5)] and three organic nutrient levels applied based on nitrogen equivalent [60 kg N equivalent ha-1 (N1), 80 kg N equivalent ha-1 (N2) and 100 kg N equivalent ha-1 (N3)] which were evaluated under factorial randomized complete block design.

Result: The results showed that the significantly more number of branches both primary and secondary plant-1) at 30 and 60 Days After Sowing (DAS) and at harvest were 6, 21 and 28 respectively and higher dry matter partitioning to leaf (22.53 g), stem (71.52 g) and spike (76.83 g) were recorded in S5 and was on par with S3. Among nutrient levels N3 recorded more number of branches during 30 and 60 DAS and harvest and higher partitioning of dry matter to different plant parts. S2N3 recorded higher cost of cultivation (₹ 69,663 ha-1), but more gross returns (₹ 2,75,386 ha-1), net returns (₹ 2,06,118 ha-1) and B: C ratio (3.98) was reported with S4N3. It was revealed during the study that neither spacing nor nutrient levels have shown significant influence on soil chemical properties.

With a projected spike in food demand from 59 to102 per cent affordably meeting food and nutritional security is a great challenge. Biased technological development by focusing on few plant species, the Indian food security has become dependent only on fewcrops (Kulczynski et al., 2019). The appropriate counter measure is “greater nutrient source per unit of resource input” by usage of potential crops. Potential crops/underutilized crops/ orphan crops/ neglected crops are the life support species, with promising nutritional utility for the present as well as future needs of human kind, but these crops receive low priority from farming community (Prathyusha et al., 2019).
       
Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) is an annual herb and one amongst the potential crops whose cultivation was suppressed and remained unknown for subsequent centuries. It belongs to lamiaceae family and plays a key role in preventing several long-term diseases and so it is considered as “functional food”. It has wider scope in Indian market, as it is the raw material for many industries like nutraceuticals and pharmaceutical because of its functional component (Patel et al., 2021). In recent years, cultivation of this crop was started in Karnataka due to its easy cultivation under scarce availability of resources and remunerative price with good buy back arrangements. Conventional farming methods deteriorate the health of soil and lower the productivity, quality and also causes environmental pollution. The farming systems like organic farming is sustainable, economically viable and ecologically sounds (Toor et al., 2021). Nutrients are very important in enhancing the yield potential of crop. Both bulky and concentrated manures are sources of essential plant nutrients in organic farming for sustained crop yield by supplying the plant nutrients in easily available form through decomposition. As the crop is newly introduced in India, there is necessity to develop package of practices, with this objective the current study was conducted on organic cultivation of Chia.
The current research trail was conducted during two Rabi seasons 2020-21 and 2021-22 at Research Institute on Organic Farming (RIOF), University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS), Gandhi Krishi Vignan Kendra (GKVK), Bangalore. The soil of the trial site was red sandy loam with slightly acidity (pH 6.0), electric conductivity (0.40 dS m-1) and organic carbon (0.77 per cent). Seed bed was prepared by ploughing twice and after obtaining fine tilth the lay out was made based on factorial randomized complete block design with three replications, two factors and 15 treatment combinations. The two factors i.e.,  Factor A - Five different spacing [60 cm x 30 cm (S1), 75 cm x 15 cm (S2), 75 cm x 30 cm (S3), 90 cm x 15 cm (S4) and 90 cm x 30 cm (S5)] and Factor B- three nutrient levels applied based on nitrogen equivalent [60 kg N equivalent ha-1(N1), 80 kg N equivalent ha-1(N2) and 100 kg N equivalent ha-1 (N3)] applied based on nitrogen (N) equivalent. Farm yard Manure (FYM) @10 t ha-1 was applied 15 days priorly to sowing for all the treatments. Sowing the Chia crop (Local variety) was done with allocation of spacing as per the treatment in each plot. Nutrients were applied after analyzing the concentration of nutrients present in FYM and Vermicompost (VC). 75 per cent of N is supplied through FYM as basal and 25 per cent of N was supplemented through top dressing of VC at 30 DAS. In net plot crop was harvested, threshed and weighed separately after obtaining the maturity and yield was computed in hectare basis.
       
Nondestructive method of sampling was made from five selected and tagged plants. The total number of primary branches plant-1 were counted at 30 DAS, whereas both primary and secondary branches were recorded at 60 DAS and at harvest and their average value was considered. Partitioning of the dry matter of five tagged plants at harvest were uprooted then stem, leaves and spike were separated and oven dried at 60°C. Dry weight of each part plant-1 was recorded and expressed as g plant-1. Soil chemical parameters were obtained by drawing of representative soil samples at depth of 0-15 cm before sowing of crop and after harvest. The pH value was estimated using pH meter as per Jackson, (1973). The electrical conductivity measured with conductivity bridge and expressed as dS m-1 as per Jackson (1973). The organic carbon  of soil was determined as per Jackson (1973). The data collected was statistically analysied by adopting Fishers method of analysis of variance (ANOVA) as outlined by Gomez and Gomez, (1984). Critical difference values were calculated whenever the F-test was significant at 5 per cent level. Economics was calculated with the prevailing costs during the experimentation period. The cost of components such as land preparation, cost incurred on inputs and labour charges at prevailing market price during crop production years of 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 were considered for calculation of cost of cultivation. The other components like Gross returns and Net returns (₹ ha-1)  and B:C ratio were calculated by using the following formulas.
 
Gross returns (₹ ha-1) = Market price (₹ kg-1) x Seed yield (kg ha-1)
 
Net returns (₹ ha-1) = Gross returns (₹ ha-1) - Cost of cultivation ( ha-1)

Growth attributes
 
The data related to growth attributes of Chia (Table 1) shows that significantly higher number of branches plant-1 at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest (6.45, 21.15 and 28.11, respectively) was recorded with S5 which was on par with S3 and the lesser number of branches plant-1 was reported with S1.  N3 recorded significantly higher branches plant-1 at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest (6.32, 20.70 and 27.15, respectively) and was on par with N2, lesser number of branches chia plant-1 was reported with N1. The interaction effect was found  to be non-significant. Mounika et al., (2021) in basil crop reported that more number of primary and secondary branches plant-1 were in wider row spacing than compared narrow spacing which might be because of more availability of resources from the atmosphere, soil rhizosphere and optimum space to grow horizontally in wide spacing. In Occimum basilicum significantly more yield attributes were reported with wider spacing and application of higher dose of FYM by Policepatil  et al. (2020). Higher growth and yield attributes of tomato were observed with combination of FYM and vermicompost, FYM @ 20 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 10 t ha-1 than application of FYM @ 10 t ha-1 + vermicompost @ 5 t ha-1 and control reported  by Bairagya et al., (2022) and Shiny et al., (2022). Manures like vermicompost might have releasenitrogen into soil nutrient pooland causes improvement of growth parameters of chia.

Table 1: Growth attributes of Chia crop as influenced by spacing and organic nutrient levels (Pooled data of 2 years).


       
Spacing S5recorded significantly more dry matter partitioning to leaves, stem and spike (22.53 g, 71.52 g and 76.83 g) which was on par with S3 and the lower with S1. N3 significantly partitioned higher dry matter to chia leaves,stem and spike (21.97 g, 69.93 g and 69.53 g) which was on par with N2 and the lower with N1.Partitioning of dry matter to leaves was not significantly differed due to the interaction of factors at harvest. The results are in close agreement with the findings of Umilsingh, (2020) in chia crop, it was  reported that wider spacing of 60 cm × 30 cm resulted in more growth attributes due to low competition for the available resources between the plant parts, more branching pattern and more inter and intra row spacing compared to closer spacing. Ramesh et al., (2017) reported that quinoa grown under wider spacing of 60 cm x 10 cm along with higher doses of FYM resulted in higher yield attributes than narrow spacings of 30 cm x 10 cm with low levels of FYM application. FYM and VC improves root proliferation and biomass resulting in higher uptake of nutrients from surrounding root zone and greater assimilation, production and partition of dry matter to all plant parts.
 
Soil chemical properties
 
The pooled data of two years onsoil chemical properties after harvest (Table 2) shows that spacing has not showed significant influence on soil chemical properties, however numerically higher soil pH, EC and OC was reported with S5 (6.27, 0.61 dS m-1 and 0.81 per cent) and lower values was recorded with S2. Nutrient levels had not significantly influence soil chemical parameters. Higher pH, EC and OC was recorded with N3 (6.23,0.55 dS m-1 and 0.80 per cent) and lower pH was recorded with N1.The results are in line with findings of Singh et al., (2021) and Islam et al., (2024) who reported that neither spacing nor application of organic manures had significant influence on soil chemical properties.

Table 2: Chemical properties of soil after harvest of Chia crop as influenced by spacing and organic nutrient levels (Pooled data of 2 years).


 
Economics
 
A new crop or a technology is accepted by the farming community based on the profits realized upon cost involved in production. Data pertaining to effect of spacing and organic nutrient levels on economics (Table 3) shows that more cost of cultivation (₹ 69,663 ha-1) was recorded with S2 N3, whereas lesser cost of cultivation (₹ 51,724 ha-1) was with S5N1. The higher gross and net returns (₹ 2,75,386, ₹ 2,06,118 ha-1, respectively) and B: C ratio (3.98) was recorded with spacing of S4N3. The results are in close conformity with findings of Hebbal et al., (2018) who reported that 30 cm x 10 cm recorded higher cost of cultivation (₹ 33659), gross returns (₹ 110484) and net returns (₹ 76825) than wider spacing of 45 cm x 30 cm and 30 cm x 30 cm. Similarly, higher gross and net returns of ₹ 108242 and  ₹ 78326, respectively were recorded with application of higher dose of FYM 7.5 t ha-1 than lower doses and was in line with findings of Ramamoorthy et al., (2021).

Table 3: Economics of chia crop based on different spacing and organic nutrients during two seasons (Rabi 2020-21 and 2021-22).

Growth attributes of chia differed significantly by the influenceof different crop geometries and nutrient levels. Wider spacing of 90 cm x 30 cm has significantly higher growth attributes and the on-par results were recorded with 75 cm x 30 cm spacing than other spacings. 100 kg N equivalent ha-1 application recorded significantly growth attributes and wason par with 80 kg N equivalent ha-1. Spacing has no significant influence on soil chemical properties. Lesser cost of cultivation (₹ 60,935 ha-1) was recorded with 80 kg N equivalent ha-1 but higher gross returns (₹ 2,75,386 ha-1), net returns (₹ 2,06,118 ha-1) and B: C ratio (3.98) was observed with 90 cm x 15 cm with 100 kg N equivalent ha-1. So it can be conclude that wider spacing along with application 80 kg N equivalent ha-1 can be suggested for profitable chia cultivation.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions in this article are manly those of the authors and do not represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy, completeness of the information and data provided. There is no acceptancy of any liability for  direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare that no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. There is no funding or sponsorship that influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Bairagya, M.D., Kumar, S.D., Maitra, S., Roja, M., Shankar, T. (2022). Effect of FYM and vermicompost on yield and economics of rabi tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 11(7): 8190-8192.

  2. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd edition.).

  3. Hebbal, N., Ramchandrappa, B.K., Mudalgiriyappa., Thimmegowda, M.N. (2018). Yield and economics of finger millet with establishment methods under different planting geometry and nutrient source. Indian Journal of Dryland Agriculture Research and Development. 33(1): 54-58. 

  4. Islam, S.S., Anik, R.B., Hasan, A.K., Karim, K., Khom Phet, T. (2024). Impacts of vermicompost and farmyard manure as organic fertilizer with biochar amendment on soil quality, growth and yield of sunflower. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research58: 595-601. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.AF-848.

  5. Jackson, M.K. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.

  6. Kulczynski, B., Cisowska, J.K., Taczanowski, M., Kmiecik, D., Michałowska, A.G. (2019). The chemical composition and nutritional value of chia seed current state of knowledge. Nutrients. 11(1214): 2-16.

  7. Mounika, Y., Dorajeerao, A.V.D., Reddy, V.K., Suneetha, S., Umakrishna, K. (2021). Effect of spacing and planting season on growth and leaf yield of sacred basil (Ocimum sanctum L.). Journal of Pharmacognisis and Phytochemistry. 10(8): 552-556.

  8. Patel, S.P., Malve, S.H., Chavda, M.V., Vala, Y.B. (2021). Effect of panchagavya and jeevamrut on growth, yield attributes and yield of summer pearl millet. Journal of Pharma Innovation. 10(12): 105-109.

  9. Policepatil, A.S., Ambrish, G., Reddy, S.B., Reddy, B.S. (2020). Importance of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) cultivation in Indian agriculture. Vigyan Varta. 1(6): 17-19

  10. Prathyusha, P., Kumari, B.A., Suneetha, W.J., Srujana, M.N.S. (2019). Chia seeds for nutritional security. Journal of Pharmacognisis and Phytochemistry. 8(3): 2702-2707.

  11. Ramamoorthy, P., Ariraman, R., Suvain, K.K., Selvakumar, S., Karthikeyan, M. (2021). Effect of sulphur levels on growth, yield parameters, yield, nutrient uptake, quality and economics of sunflower: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 44(4): 542-547. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-2250.

  12. Ramesh, K., Suneetha, K.B., Devi, Gopinath, K.A., Devi, K.M. (2017). Physiological indices, yield and yield attributes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa L.) as influenced by dates of sowing and varied crop geometry. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 6(7): 1023-1034.

  13. Shiny, A.V.A., Joseph, P.A., Iraiyanban, A.A., Dhivyalakshmi, T. (2022). Effects of organic manure and recommended dosage of fertilizer on nodulation, chlorophyll content of leaves, availability of nutrients and soil properties under green gram Vigna radiata (L.) cultivation. Indian Journal of Agriculture Research. 59(7): 1136-1140. doi: 10.18805/ IJARe.A-6284.

  14. Singh, M.V., Kumar, N., Kumar, V. (2021). Effect of nutrient management practices and planting density on yield and nutrient uptake by hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Annals of Plant Soil Research. 23(4): 411-414.

  15. Toor, M.D., Adnan, M., Rehman, F., Tahir, R., Saeed, M.S., Khan, A.U., Pareek, V. (2021). Nutrients and their importance in agriculture crop production. Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Bioscience. 9(1): 62582-2845. 

  16. Umilsingh, N. (2020). Optimization of Spacing and Fertilizer Levels on Productivity of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.). (M. Sc. Thesis, University of Agricltural Sciences Bangalore, Karnataka, India).
In this Article
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest

Editorial Board

View all (0)