Insect fauna associated with basmati rice
Throughout the study, a variety of insect species were identified as pests of rice crops, each exhibiting unique damage characteristics, seasonal abundance patterns and economic significance. A total of thirteen insect species were documented attacking rice at various growth stages in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, as detailed in Table 2. These species-initiated infestations around 20 days after transplanting, marking a critical period for implementing pest management strategies to minimize impacts on crop yield and quality. This knowledge of the timing and nature of infestations enables farmers to apply timely and effective control measures to safeguard their crops.
Efficacy of insecticides on yellow stem borer after first spray
Pre-treatment observations
Before the application of treatments, pre-treatment observations indicated that the percentage of “dead hearts” in the field ranged from 5.79% to 6.49% across the study plots. Statistical analysis showed that this variation in pre-treatment damage was not significant across treatments, suggesting a relatively uniform pest presence and damage level throughout the field. These baseline observations are summarized in Table 3.
Post-treatment observations
Three days after spray application
Three days after spraying, all treatments showed significantly greater efficacy compared to the untreated control, with chemical pesticides demonstrating the highest reduction in damage from
Scirpophaga incertulas. The lowest damage was observed in plots treated with Fipronil 5 SC (5.21%), which was significantly more effective than Imidacloprid 17.8 SC (5.51%) and Cartap hydrochloride 4 G (5.62%). Among the bio-pesticides,
Beauveria bassiana and
Metarhizium anisopliae were the most effective, reducing damage levels to 6.14% and 6.29%, respectively, while the untreated control exhibited the highest damage at 6.53%. These results are consistent with the findings of
Kakde and Patel (2019), who reported that Cartap hydrochloride 4 G was less effective than Fipronil in managing yellow stem borer infestations. This conclusion is further supported by
Singh et al., (2017) and
Lal (2006).
Seven days after spray application
After seven days, Fipronil 5 SC continued to provide the best control, achieving the lowest damage level of 3.29%. Imidacloprid 17.8 SC followed with 3.95% damage and Cartap hydrochloride 4 G recorded 4.69%. Other effective treatments included Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (5.00%) and Thiamethoxam 25 WG (5.25%). Among bio-pesticides, the order of effectiveness was
Beauveria bassiana (5.61%),
Metarhizium anisopliae (5.96%) and
Verticillium lecanii (6.07%), while the untreated control again showed the highest damage at 6.68%.
Ten days after spray application
Ten days after the application, all treatments remained significantly more effective than the untreated control. Chemical pesticides consistently demonstrated strong efficacy, with Cartap hydrochloride 4 G (3.79%), Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (3.94%) and Thiamethoxam 25 WG (4.33%) performing particularly well. Among bio-pesticides,
Verticillium lecanii (5.94%) was the least effective; however,
Beauveria bassiana and
Metarhizium anisopliae continued to show promising results, reducing damage to 4.51% and 4.71%, respectively. These findings align with the observations of
Sulagitti et al., (2017) and
Kumar and Kumar (2017), who identified
B. bassiana and
M. anisopliae as effective bio-pesticides for controlling yellow stem borer infestations.
Efficacy of insecticides on yellow stem borer after second spray
Three days after spray application
After three days following the second spray, observations confirmed a consistent trend: All treatments significantly outperformed the untreated control. The plots treated with Fipronil 5 SC demonstrated the best performance, exhibiting the lowest percentage of dead hearts at 4.86%, which was statistically comparable to Imidacloprid 17.8 SC at 4.99%. Among the bio-pesticides,
Verticillium lecanii was the least effective, showing 5.86% dead hearts.
Seven days after spray application
On the seventh day of the study, various insecticide treatments were ranked for their effectiveness against the Yellow Stem Borer,
S. incertulas. Fipronil 5 SC was the most effective, with a damage level of 3.31%, followed by Imidacloprid 17.8 SC at 3.84%. Cartap Hydrochloride 4 G showed a damage percentage of 4.09%, while Lambda Cyhalothrin 5 EC had 4.30%. Thiamethoxam 25 WG recorded the highest damage at 4.58%. The untreated plot suffered the most damage, underscoring the critical need for pest management. These results highlight Fipronil and Imidacloprid as superior choices for effective pest control.
Ten days after spray application
By the tenth day post-application, Fipronil 5 SC continued to be the most effective treatment, yielding only 2.03% dead hearts, followed closely by Imidacloprid 17.8 SC at 2.40%, which was statistically comparable to other high-performing treatments. These observations align with the findings of
Suri and Makkar (2016), who noted that after seven days, Cartap hydrochloride exhibited minimal damage by the yellow stem borer, comparable to lots treated with Fipronil.
In the final observations taken at ten days after application, Fipronil 5 SC remained the best treatment, followed by Imidacloprid 17.8 SC. The subsequent order of effectiveness included Cartap hydrochloride 4 G (3.03%), Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC (3.47%), Thiamethoxam 25 WG (3.62%),
B. bassiana (3.95%),
M. anisopliae (4.13%) and
V. lecanii (4.42%). The untreated control recorded the highest damage level at 8.14%.
In this investigation, Fipronil 5 SC was established as the most effective treatment against damage caused by the yellow stem borer. This finding is consistent with the results of
Seni and Naik (2017) and
Katel et al., (2023), who also identified Fipronil 5 SC as the most effective, followed by Imidacloprid. Additionally,
V. lecanii demonstrated promising results comparable to those of
M. anisopliae. Current and previous studies corroborate the effectiveness of these treatments. Furthermore, Fipronil 0.3% GR and Cartap hydrochloride were identified as the next most effective insecticides, aligning with the findings of
Panda et al., (2004),
Roshan (2006) and
Singh et al., (2010).
Cost-benefit analysis of treatments
The total expenses incurred during the experiment included costs for insecticides, seeds, labor and irrigation charges. The increase in income resulting from the applied treatments was assessed based on the corresponding rice yields. The highest yield was recorded in plots treated with Fipronil 5 SC, achieving 38.35 q/ha, followed closely by Imidacloprid 17.8 SC at 37.26 q/ha. The cost-benefit ratios calculated for each treatment are presented in Table 4.
All treated plots yielded significantly higher production, ranging from 32.53 q/ha to 38.35 q/ha, compared to the untreated control, which produced only 26.60 q/ha. The cost-benefit ratio for Imidacloprid 17.8 SC was 1:7.83, followed by Thiamethoxam 25 WG at 1:7.59 and Fipronil 5 SC at 1:6.66. While Fipronil 5 SC provided the highest yield in terms of quintals per hectare, its ranking in cost-effectiveness was lower due to its higher associated costs.
Conversely, Cartap hydrochloride 4 G and Lambda cyhalothrin 5 EC exhibited lower yields, which could be attributed to their effectiveness against other insect pests, such as the brown plant hopper (BPH), Gall Midge and white plant hopper (WPH).
From the study, the treatment with Imidacloprid 17.8 SC at 200 ml/ha not only yielded higher grain production but also resulted in greater net profit, corroborating the findings of
Sangamithra et al., (2018) and
Mishra et al., (2009). The best cost-benefit ratio was recorded for Imidacloprid 17.8 SC at 200 ml/ha (1:7.83), closely followed by Thiamethoxam 25 WG at 100 gm/ha (1:7.59). This finding aligns partially with the results reported by
Kumar and Kumar (2017).