In the present investigation, an attempt was made to evaluate the morphometric parameters of 10 different species of genus
Garra viz.,
G.
annandalei,
G.
arunachalensis,
G.
gotyla,
G.
lamta,
G.
lissorhynchus,
G.
parastenorhynchus,
G.
rufa,
G.
rupecula,
G.
stenorhynchus,
G.
quadratirostris found in Arunachal Pradesh. This genus is one of the most diverse and taxonomically confusing groups of the order Cypriniformes that has yet to be examined for proper evidence of morphological and meristic traits
(Zirkunga et al., 2023). In the current study, a total of 11 morphometric parameters were recorded that showed proportionate increase in length with increase in total length (Table 1), among the studied species,
G.
annandalei measured with the maximum length (54.80 - 135.00 mm) and
G.
rufa with minimum length (64.10 - 70.24 mm). Similarly,
Ujjania et al., (2012) reported positive increase in morphometric parameters with increase in total length of cold-water fish from Bari Talab, Udaipur, India. Same report was also observed on the morphometric parameters of genus
Garra in the Himalayan foothills of Himachal Pradesh (
Kanwal and Pathani, 2011;
Brraich and Akhter, 2015). Additionally,
Basudha et al., (2018) and
Zhang et al., (2023) revealed the importance of morphological variation in the identification of freshwater Cyprinidae.
Identification key was developed by examining the external morphological characteristics such as shape of body and head, eye, structure of mouth, rostral cap and lips, presence of lobes and tubercles in the snout, shape of fins and colour pattern (Fig 3 and Table 2). In
Garra, the morphology of snout and distribution pattern of tubercles in the snout bore significant role in taxonomical differentiation among the species
(Sophiya et al., 2020). Considering the morphology of snout, they can be classified as: (i) species with smooth snout (ii) species with transverse lobe (iii) species with proboscis (iv) species with rostral flap and lobe
(Ezung et al., 2021). Different species of
Garra which was described recently from Northeast India includes:
G.
gotyla gotyla,
G.
lamta,
G.
lissorhynchus,
G.
arupi,
G.
nasuta,
G.
rupecula,
G.
elongate,
G.
kempi,
G.
kimini which differs by the presence of short tubercles on proboscis, transverse groove, variation in fin rays and lateral line scales (
Vishwanath, 2021). The current study also confirms the presence of smooth snout with absence of proboscis in
G.
annandalei, transverse lobe with probosis, rostral flap and lobe in
G.
arunachalensis,
G.
gotyla,
G.
lamta,
G.
parastenorhynchus,
G.
rufa,
G.
rupecula,
G.
stenorhynchus and
G.
quadratirostris. Similarly,
Cycek et al., (2016) also reported the importance of morphological traits in identification of
Garra species from Tigris River system of Southeast Turkey.
Fins plays an important role in identification of most of the freshwater fish species (
Kullander and Fang, 2004). Generated fin formula of the species was based on the meristic characters such as numbers of spines and rays in the fins and scales present in lateral line (Table 2).
Arunachalam et al., (2013) reported that single branched pectoral fin ray was the main distinguishing character of
Garra present in the Indian subcontinent. In this study, all the species of
Garra had atleast one branched ray in the pectoral fin, whereas, in case of
G.
annandalei both pectoral and caudal fin was deeply serrated.
G.
lissorhynchus showed the presence of W-shaped band on the caudal-fin and absence of scales near the dorsal fin. This finding was similar with the characters described by
Hora (1921) and
Bhakta et al., (2022). Additionally,
Rath et al., (2019) also reported on the importance of fin ray counts, fin shapes, relative sizes and its positioning as distinguishing characters in differentiating
Garra species. Further, IUCN status (ver. 2024-1) was also assigned for the studied species,
G.
rupecula was identified as near threatened (NT) species,
G.
arunachalensis,
G.
parastenorhynchus,
G.
quadratirostris were under not evaluated category (NE) and
G.
annandalei,
G.
gotyla,
G.
lamta,
G.
lissorhynchus,
G.
rufa,
G.
stenorhynchus, were under least concerned (LC) category (Table 2).
The regression analysis for LLRs was established to assess the symmetrical growth pattern in relation to TL with SL, BD and HL (Table 3). A significant positive relationship (p<0.01 and 0.05) was observed with ‘r’ values > 0.765. The values of coefficient of correlation have been found to be highly significant (p<0.01) for total length (TL) and standard length (SL) in all the species of genus
Garra. Similarly, the value was significantly (p<0.05) higher in all other parameters except for head length (HL) and body depth (BD) in
G.
annandalei,
G.
lissorhynchus,
G.
parastenorhynchus and
G.
rufa (Table 3). The analysis from regression equation clearly revealed that the lengths of the studied morphometric parameters were proportionate to the total length which was similar with the reports of
Hossain (2010) and
Alam et al., (2014). Further,
Brraich and Akhter (2015) observed significant correlation between total length and external body parts in hill stream fish,
Crossocheilus latius latius.
In the present investigation, a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on morphometric parameters through neighborjoining (NJ) clustering method with bootstraps 100 which depicts that
G.
lissorhynchus,
G.
rufa and
G.
rupecula were in the common ancestral group. Species such as
G.
gotyla,
G.
parastenorhynchus and
G.
stenorhynchus were found related to each other. Further, the study also reports that
G.
arunachalensis and
G.
lamta were closely related species, whereas,
G.
annandalei and
G.
quadratirostris were distantly related to
G.
arunachalensis and
G.
lamta (Fig 4). Similar studies were also conducted on Selangat fish from Kelabat Bay and Tukak Strait, Indonesia where 12 morphometric characters confirmed the significance of morphometric variables in construction of phylogenetic tree (
Aisyah and Syarif, 2019). Further, reports on evolution of bony fishes using multi-locus phylogenetic analysis found the remarkable importance of morphological factors
(Broughton et al., 2013). Betancur-R et al., (2013) also used the systematic concepts of construction of phylogenetic tree based on morphology to describe the relationships among fish lineages. Besides,
Muser and Wagner (2015) from their study claimed that the stability and accuracy of phylogenetic trees constructed through molecular data set could be influenced by the morphological data.