Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Molecular Diversity Analysis and Screening of Drought Tolerance Rice (Oryza sativa L.) based on Morpho-physiological and SSR Marker

Mukh Ram1, Shiv Prakash Shrivastav1,*, Deshraj Gurjar1, Durga Prasad1
1Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144 411, Jalandhar, Punjab, India.

Background: Drought prone areas have been increasing day by day because of raising temperature or heat . The assessment of genetic divergence existing in the germplasm collections is very important for success of hybridization programme leading to development of high yielding varieties under drought stress condition.

Methods: The present investigation comprising of 123 rice genotypes was carried out at LPU Phagwara punjab in Kharif 2022 and plants were grown in augmented design under controlled environment. 28 SSR markers were selected for the genetic diversity analysis. The software NTSYS-pc version 2.1 (Exeter Software, Setauket, NY) was used for the statistical analyses of the morphological and SSR marker data.

Result: The analysis of variance for genotypes was reported to be highly significant for all the charcters studied. This indicated sufficient variability available among the genotypes. The leaf rolling was recorded by visual observation in the field condition in the scale 0 to 9 to screen for drought tolerance. The molecular diversity analysis and clustering of diverse rice germplasm into different groups confirm the presence of wide genomic variation among selected genotypes. The range of polymorphic information content (PIC) varied from 0.352 (RM204) to 0.698 (RM480). The markers RM480, RM170, RM316 and RM20 were found most appropriate for discriminating rice genotypes owing to their highest PIC values (0.690 to 0.698). The genotypes were grouped to construct a dendrogram by using the unweighted pair group method based on Arithmetic. In cluster II most of the moderately tolerant genotypes were included, while in cluster III highly tolerant 11 genotypes were grouped. The UPGMA clustering also correlated with drought tolerance characters such as days to maturity, leaf rolling and chlorophyll content, proline content and relative water contents. The genotypes APO, RASI and Nagina-22 were observed to be highly tolerant of drought stress conditions. Among the genotypes, Vandana, Rajendra Bhagwati and RAU-3 were moderately tolerant whereas BPT-5204, MTU-7029 and Sarjoo-52 were susceptible to drought stress. Four genotypes viz. APO, RASI, Nagina-22 and RAU-4 can be used as a source of drought-tolerant genotypes for further breeding programs.

Rice (Oryza sativa L.), a member of the family Poaceae, is the largest widely cultivated major crop in the world. Approximately 90% of the world’s rice is grown in the Asian continent and constitutes a staple food for 2.7 billion people worldwide. About 30% of the 700 million people in absolute poverty (with an income of less than US$ 1 per day) live in rain-fed rice-growing areas in South Asia (IRRI, Philippines, 2012). Rice is grown widely under rainfed conditions in Asia. South Asia alone holds 37% of the world’s rice area, 50% of which is rainfed (Dawe et al., 2010). About 45% of the total area is estimated to have no irrigation input (Crosson, 1995). It threatens sustainable agriculture with its rapid and unpredictable effects, making it particularly difficult for agricultural scientists and farmers to respond to challenges of water stress. Fluctuation in normal period of monsoon either delayed or early withdrawal affects the growing season of crops and causes detrimental effects on yield. Water stress may cause up to 50% yield reduction in rice-growing areas. To overcome this problem, it is important to select those rice genotypes, which have greater genetic diversity and genetic potential for the improvement of desired traits against drought stresses. The genetic diversity is also very important in rice breeding from the standpoint of selection, conservation and proper utilization. Screening tests for drought tolerance are time-consuming, labour intensive and not so effective in identifying the material, which is actually drought tolerant O’Toole, (1979). Molecular marker-based genetic diversity analysis has potential for assessing changes in genetic diversity over time and space. A molecular marker is a DNA sequence that is readily detected and whose inheritance can be easily monitored. Recently, DNA profiles based on various molecular markers have been widely applied across different fields. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are class of repetitive DNA sequences usually 2-6 bp distributed throughout the whole genome and flanked by highly conserved region. Microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are appropriate for assessment of genetic diversity and variety identification because of their ability to detect large numbers of discrete alleles repeatedly, accurately and efficiently (Smith and Helentjaris, 1996; Varshney  et al., 2005). Therefore, the present study was carried out to screen out the available rice genotypes based on phenotyping (various morphological, physiological and seed parameters traits) and genotyping (using various SSR markers at a molecular level) to assess the genetic diversity among the genotypes for the selection of diverse parents that would be used in a cross-breeding programme.
The present work was carried out during Kharif 2022 in Agricultural Research Farm LPU, Phagwara, Punjab. The experimental material comprised of 123 rice genotypes received from the Institute of Agricultural Sciences, B.H.U., Varanasi, U.P., India. (Table 1), were grown in augmented design under controlled environment for Screening purposes. The crop was maintained as per the standard agronomic practices. Observations were recorded on days to 50 per cent flowering (DF), days to maturity (DM). Plant height (cm) (PH), number of effective tillers per plant (ET), panicle length (cm) (PL), panicle weight (g) (PW), number of fertile spikelet per panicle (FSP), total number of spikelet per panicle (TSP), spikelet fertility (SF%), test weight (g) (TW), grain yield per plant (g) (GY), biological yield per plant (g) (BY), harvest Index (HI), leaf rolling (LR), leaf angle (LA), stay green (SG), chlorophyll content (CC), stomatal conductance (SC), proline content (PC) and relative water content (%) (RWC). Fully expanded leaves were be excised at 10.00 AM and relative water content was determined by method of Matin et al.(1989). Chlorophyll content was measured by chlorophyll meter (model CCM-200). Stomatal conductance (mmol/m2/s) was measured by Porometer just before heading. The free proline content (mg g-1) based on fresh weight of leaves was estimated at the anthesis stage according to the method by Bates et al. (1973). The leaf rolling was recorded by visual observation in the field condition in the scale 0 to 9 to screen for drought tolerance, where scale 0 corresponds to no symptom of stress and scale 9 corresponds to fully rolled leaf (Abd Allah, 2009). Analysis of variance for Augmented Design by Federer, 1956. The  DNA was extracted from plant samples using the CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle, 1987). Major contaminations in crude DNA preparation are RNA, protein and polysaccharides. Inclusion of CTAB in extraction buffer helps the elimination of polysaccharides. RNA was removed by RNAse treatment and proteins were removed by phenol-chloroform extraction. In the present study, quantification was done by agarose gel electrophoresis of the isolated DNA samples along with known quantity of uncut lambda DNA marker. 28 SSR markers were selected for the genetic diversity analysis on the basis of published rice microsatellite framework map. These markers cover almost all the 12 chromosomes of rice (Table 2). The original source of markers sequence and the chromosomal positions of these markers can be found from rice genome database (http://www. gramene. org). Statistical analyses for the morphological and SSR marker data were conducted using the software NTSYS-pc version 2.1 (Exeter software, Setauket, NY). The morpho-physiological characters were standardized prior to cluster analysis and visual observation on the basis of leaf rolling under drought stress conditions. The matrix of average taxonomic distance for individuals and morphological traits was then computed using SIMINIT function and EUCLIDIAN distance coefficient. This dissimilarity coefficient is based on interval measure data collected for the morpho-physiological traits. Cluster analysis was then conducted on the taxonomic distance matrix with the Unweighted Pair Group Method based on Arithmetic (UPGMA). The relevant markers were used based on polymorphism extent. The polymorphic information content (PIC) value of each SSR marker was calculated according to the following formula (Weir, 1996).

Table 1: List of 123 rice genotypes.



Table 2: The details of 28 polymorphic SSR markers used for genetic diversity analysis.

 
 PIC = 1- (∑pi)2 
Where,  
i = Total number of alleles detected for SSR marker. 
pi = Frequency of the ith plus allele in a set of 120 genotypes of rice. 
The frequencies of the null alleles were not included in the calculation of PIC values. The genetic similarity between 120 genotypes of rice was determined according to method developed by (Nei, 1973). All the calculations were performed using the software package power marker (Liu and Muse, 2005).
The data pertaining to the analysis of variance are presented in Table 3. All the genotypes showed highly significant variations for all the traits studied, which indicated presence of genetic diversity among the genotypes.

Table 3: Analysis of Variance for 19 traits in rice under drought stress condition.


       
On the basis of visual observation of leaf rolling under drought stress condition in a controlled atmosphere, all the germplasm were categorized in the scale 0 to 9, where scale 0 corresponds to no symptom of stress and scale 9 corresponds to fully rolled leaf (Table 4). The genotypes RASI, APO, ANJALI, NAGINA-22 were highly resistant, while the genotypes BPT-5204, MTU-7029, SARJOO-52 were highly susceptible to drought stress. The days to maturity, chlorophyll content, proline content, relative water content, grain yield and leaf rolling are the most important attributes for screening of rice germplasm under drought stress conditions. On the basis of these traits, nine genotypes performing better with respect to yield and yield contributing traits under water stress condition were selected (Table 5). This finding conforms with the findings of Singh et al. (2014).

Table 4: Grouping of rice germplasm based on leaf rolling under drought stress conditions.



Table 5: Mean Performance of selected nine rice genotypes for drought tolerant traits and grain yield under drought stress condition.


       
Total of 28 SSR primers was used to assess molecular diversity among 123 genotypes. The number of polymorphic bands per primer was observed with an average value of 2.82. The PIC of the 28 SSR primers ranged from 0.352 to 0.698 with an average PIC of 0.53 (Table 6). Thus, the selected primers were highly polymorphic with higher diversity among the genotypes. The largest PIC value was observed for locus RM 480 (0.698), RM 170 (0.696) and RM 316 (0.696) followed by RM 20 (0.690) and lowest for RM 201 (0.352) followed by RM 237 (0.358). The number of alleles ranged from 2 to 4 with an average of 2.82. Seventy-nine microsatellite alleles were amplified, demonstrating considerable variability among the cultivar. Maximum alleles (4) were showed by RM 480, RM 20, RM 316 and RM 170. The amplification of lower number of alleles per locus may be due to poor resolution of agarose gel as compared to polyacrylamide gel. Therefore, most of the primers were selected based on the positions of QTL for drought tolerance on corresponding chromosomes with high and low tolerance bands in most of the genotypes.

Table 6: PIC value of 28 SSR markers.


       
A dendrogram was obtained using Jaccard’s similarity coefficient to cluster diverse rice genotypes. The Jaccard’s similarity coefficients ranged from 0.09 to 0.92. The highest dissimilarity coefficient (0.92) was observed between genotypes RP-5214-18 and NDR-1159, IR-83867-B-250-CRA-1-1 and RAU 1421-1, IR-83867-B and RAU 1428-31-5-4-3-2-2-2 whereas, lowest (0.09) was observed between genotypes BVD-109 and CB-09-516 followed by CB-09-516 and CR-422-63-51-B-2-1(0.11). In cluster analysis, all the genotypes were broadly grouped into seven clusters, proving the presence of wide genetic diversity among selected rice genotypes (Table 7). Cluster II consisted of a total of 38 genotypes, followed by cluster VII consisting of 20 genotypes whereas cluster VI has only 6 genotypes (Table 4). Most of the moderately tolerant genotypes were included in cluster II, while highly tolerant 11 genotypes were grouped in cluster III (Verma et al. 2019 and Shrivastav et al., 2025).

Table 7: Grouping of rice germplasm on the basis of drought related 28 SSR markers.


               
In molecular diversity study, out of 28 SSR markers RM20, RM316, RM170 and RM480 showed higher PIC value. Therefore, these markers could be used further for improvement of drought tolerance/resistance in rice. On the basis of molecular diversity analysis and performance in morphological characteristics, it was concluded that the four genotypes viz. APO, RASI, Nagina-22 and RAU-4 can be used as a source of drought-tolerant genotypes for further breeding programs. This study indicated ample scope for selecting promising genotypes from present set of cultivars for grain yield along with drought tolerance improvement programme. Ravi et al. (2003) in his experiment have also reported that the genetic variation identified by morphological characters and molecular markers may prove useful in breeding programme, for the developing hybrids resistant to abiotic stresses. Chakravarthi and Naravaneni (2006) also reported similar findings; Herrera et al. (2008) and Singh et al. (2014). Liu et al. (2009) showed that the response of different rice lines to drought tolerance was moderately tolerant.
The present study successfully identified significant genetic diversity among 123 rice genotypes under drought stress conditions using morpho-physiological traits and SSR markers. The genotypes APO, RASI, Nagina-22 and RAU-4 were found to exhibit high drought tolerance and can be valuable resources for breeding programs aimed at enhancing drought resistance. High PIC values observed for markers RM480, RM170, RM316 and RM20 indicate their potential applicability in future genetic improvement efforts. The study demonstrates the efficacy of combining phenotypic and molecular diversity analyses for precise selection of drought-tolerant genotypes, which can ultimately contribute to the development of high-yielding rice varieties under water-stressed conditions.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript.
 

  1. Abd Allah, A.A. (2009). Genetic studies on leaf rolling and some root traits under drought conditions in rice (Oryza sativa L.). African J. Biotech. 8(22): 6241-6248.

  2. Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.P. and Teari, D., (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant soil. 39: 205-207.

  3. Chakravarthi, B.K. and R. Naravaneni. (2006). SSR marker based DNA finger printing and diversity study in rice (Oryza sativa L.). African J. Biotech. 5: 684-688.

  4. Crosson, P. (1995). Natural resource and environmental consequences of rice production. Fragile lives in fragile ecosystems, Proceedings of the international rice research conference, IRRI, Los Banos, Manila, Philippines. pp: 83-100. 

  5. Dawe, D., Pandey, S. and Nelson, A. (2010). Emerging trends and spatial patterns of rice production. In: Pandey, S., Byerlee, D., Dawe, D., Dobermann, A., Mohanty, S., Rozelle, S., Hardy, B., editors. Rice in the global economy: strategic research and policy issues for food security. Los Banos (Philippines):  International Rice Research   Institute. pp. 15-35. 

  6. Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 19: 11-15.

  7. Herrera, T.G., D.P. Duque, I.P. Almeida, G.T. Nunez, A.J. Pieters, C.P. Martinez and J.M. Tohme. (2008). Assessment of genetic diversity in Venezuelan rice cultivars using simple sequence repeats markers. Electro. J. Biotech. 5: 10-17.

  8. IRRI (International Rice Research Institute). (2012). Annual report for 2012. Los Baños, Philippines. pp: 145. 

  9. Liu, G., Y. Jia, F.J. Correa-Victoria, G.A. Prado, K.M. Yeater, A. Ma Clung and J.C. Correll. (2009). Mapping quantitative trait loci responsible for resistance to sheath blight in rice. Phytopathol. 99: 1078-1084.

  10. Liu, K. and S.V. Muse. (2005). Power marker: Integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics. 21(9): 2128-2129.

  11. Nei, M. (1973).  Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 70: 3321-3323.

  12. O’Toole, J.C. and Chang, T.T. (1979). Water stress as a constraint to crop production in the tropics. Pages 339-370 in International rice research institute and New York state college of agriculture and life sciences, Cornell University, Los Baños, Philippines.

  13. Ravi, M., Geethanjali, S., Sameeyafarheen, F. and Maheswaran, M. (2003). Molecular marker based genetic diversity analysis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using RAPD and SSR markers. Euphytica. 133: 243-252.

  14. Shrivastav, S.P., Verma, O.P., Lal, K., Singh, V. and Srivastava, K. (2025). Genetic divergence analysis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasms under sodic soil. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 59(2): 206-210. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5976.

  15. Singh, A.K., R. Nandan and P.K. Singh. 2014. Genetic variability and association analysis in rice germplasm under rainfed conditions. Crop Res. 47(1/3): 7-11.

  16. Smith, S., Helentjaris, T. (1996). DNA fingerprinting and plant variety protection. In AH Paterson, ed, Genome Mapping in Plants, Landes Company, Texas. pp: 95-110.

  17. Varshney, R.K., Sigmund, R., Borner, A., Korzun, V., Stein, N., Sorrelles, M.E., Langridge, P., Graner, A. (2005). Interspecific transferability and comparative mapping of barley ESTSSR markers in wheat, rye and rice. Plant Sci. 68: 195202.

  18. Verma, H., Borah, J.L. and Sarma, R.N. (2019). Variability assessment for root and drought tolerance traits and genetic diversity analysis of rice germplasm using SSR markers. Scientific Reports. 9(1): 16513.

  19. Weir, B.S. (1996). Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer  and Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

Editorial Board

View all (0)