Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Detection of Persistence of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in Local and Crossbred Cattle of Assam

Derhasar Brahma1, Krishna Sharma1, Nagendra N. Barman1, Probodh Borah2, Rajeev Kumar Sharma1, Pankaj Deka1, Biswajyoti Borah2, Monuj K. Doley3, Ritam Hazarika4,*
1Department of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati-781 022, Assam, India.
2Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati-781 022, Assam, India.
3Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Assam Agricultural University, Diphu-782 481, Assam, India.
4Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Department, Guwahati-781 003, Assam, India.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the persistence of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) in clinically recovered cattle following an outbreak, focusing on both local indigenous breeds (Lakhimi) and crossbred cattle (Holstein Friesian-cross) in Assam.
Methods: A total of 129 cattle (36 local and 93 crossbred), clinically recovered from FMD, were included in the study. Oropharyngeal fluid (OPF) samples (n=178) were collected at various intervals post-recovery. FMDV detection was carried out using three molecular diagnostic techniques: Multiplex PCR, reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) and SYBR Green real-time PCR, all targeting the FMDV 3D gene.
Result: FMDV was detected in 38 samples (21.35%) by multiplex PCR, 47 samples (26.40%) by RT-LAMP and 49 samples (27.53%) by SYBR Green real-time PCR. While all three methods showed comparable diagnostic accuracy, real-time PCR proved to be the most sensitive, rapid, reliable and cost-effective technique. FMDV persistence was observed in 24.81% (32/129) of cattle up to the 1st month post-recovery, 11.63% (15/129) up to the 3rd month and 1.55% (2/129) up to the 6th month. Local non-vaccinated Lakhimi cattle exhibited higher rates of viral persistence for serotype O, with 33.33% (12/36), 22.22% (8/36) and 5.55% (2/36) showing persistence at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months post-recovery, respectively. In contrast, vaccinated Holstein Friesian-cross cattle, demonstrated lower persistence rates, with 19.23%  for Serotype A and 22.39% for Serotype O at the 1st month and 10.45% for Serotype O at the 3rd month post-recovery. Importantly, no transmission of the virus to healthy in-contact animals was detected during the study period.
Statistical analysis (P=0.23, Chi-square=5.57) revealed no significant difference in viral persistence between local and crossbred cattle, suggesting that factors beyond vaccination status might influence FMDV persistence. However, the findings underscore the critical role of vaccination in reducing viral persistence in recovered cattle.

Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) is a persistent and recurrent disease of significant economic importance in India, with frequent outbreaks occurring despite extensive vaccination programs (Rout et al., 2016; Baro et al., 2018). The geographical distribution of FMD in India varies by region, with prevalence rates reported at 43% in the Eastern region, 31.5% in the Southern region, 11.6% in the North-eastern region, 5% in the Central region, 4.4% in the Western region and 4% in the Northern region (Barman et al., 2020). Among circulating FMDV serotypes, serotype O is predominant (92%), followed by Asia1 (5%) and serotype A (3%) (Subramaniam et al., 2022).
       
FMDV typically resolves systemically within 8-15 days post-infection in cattle (Juleff et al., 2013). However, certain animals may become carriers, harboring the virus in their pharyngeal tissues for extended periods post-infection, particularly if viral persistence extends beyond 28 days (Salt, 1993). FMDV persistence can occur in naive, convalescent, or vaccinated animals, regardless of whether they experienced symptomatic or asymptomatic infections. Both primary and persistent infections are linked to the nasopharyngeal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), where viral capsid proteins and/or genome can be detected in the germinal centers and follicular dendritic cells of this tissue (Cortey et al., 2019).
       
In both domestic and wild ruminants, FMDV persistence can result in intermittent viral shedding in oropharyngeal fluids, which may last for extended periods (Stenfeldt and Arzt, 2020). This phenomenon plays a critical role in FMD epidemiology, particularly at the interface between wildlife and domestic cattle (Jori et al., 2016). Continuous viral replication in specialized cellular sites within carrier animals allows for the possibility of new outbreaks initiated by these carriers (Zhang et al., 2004).
       
Despite its importance, few studies have investigated FMDV persistence in local or crossbred cattle, particularly in India. The carrier state in these animals is difficult to detect due to the absence of overt clinical signs, complicating the accurate assessment of prevalence and epidemiology in field conditions. Thus, labor-intensive sampling and the application of highly sensitive molecular diagnostic tools are required for confirmatory diagnosis. Key aspects of FMDV carriers, including the viral factors influencing persistence, emergence, competition, transmission and spread, remain poorly understood and warrant further study (GFRA Gap Analysis Report, 2022). Understanding the mechanisms and duration of FMDV persistence is crucial for developing effective and sustainable control strategies.
       
This study, therefore, aims to detect and characterize FMDV persistence in local and crossbred cattle (both vaccinated and non-vaccinated) in Assam, India. The findings will provide valuable insights for refining FMD control programs, ultimately contributing to the goal of FMD eradication.
Collection of samples
 
Oropharyngeal fluid (OPF) samples (n=178) were collected using the probang cup method from follow-up cases of FMD-infected (129) and in-contact healthy animals (n=12) during various outbreaks in Assam during 2018-2021. Sampling was conducted 28 days post-outbreak and repeated at 3-month intervals until viral clearance. Samples were collected in equal volumes of 0.08M phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.01% bovine serum albumin with added antibiotics (pH 7.6) (WOAH, 2012). Additionally, whole blood samples (n=24; 12 from healthy in-contact and 12 from FMD-recovered cattle) were collected in EDTA vials and stored at -20°C until processing.
 
Extraction of RNA
 
Genomic RNA extraction from OPF and whole blood samples was performed using the QIAamp RNA mini kit (Hilden, Germany, Cat. No. 52904) according to the recommended protocol.
 
Reverse transcription of extracted RNA for cDNA synthesis
 
For cDNA synthesis, 11 μl of extracted RNA from each sample was subjected to initial incubation at 65°C for 7 minutes after adding Random hexamer (0.2 μg/μl) 1μl. Subsequently, RevertAidTM M-Mulv Reverse Transcriptase (200 units/μl) 1μl, Ribolock RNase Inhibitor (40U/μl) 0.5 μl, 5X RT buffer 4 μl and 10 mM dNTP mix 2 μl were added to a final volume of 20 μl. The reaction mixture underwent thermal cycling at 25°C for 5 minutes, 42°C for 1 hour and 72°C for 10 minutes, followed by storage at 4°C.
 
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR)
 
Multiplex PCR was performed for simultaneous detection and serotyping of FMDV using specific primers for Serotypes O, A and Asia-1 (Giridharan et al., 2005). The mPCR reaction mixture included Master Mix (2X) 12.5 μl, specific primers (10 pmol each) for FMDV serotypes and cDNA 5 μl in a total volume of 25 μl. Thermal cycling conditions involved initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 58°C for 30 seconds and extension at 72°C for 1 minute, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes.
 
Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP)
 
RT-LAMP was used for FMDV detection and serotyping (Madhanmohan et al., 2013) using specific primers for Serotypes O, A and Asia-1, using Loopamp real-time turbidimeter (LA-500; Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan). The RT-LAMP reaction mixture included Reaction Buffer (10x), Bst Polymerase, MgSO4, Betaine, dNTPs and specific primers along with cDNA. The reaction underwent initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by isothermal amplification at 63°C for 60 minutes and inactivation at 83°C for 2 minutes.
 
SYBR green real-time PCR (3D gene)
 
Real-time PCR targeting the FMDV 3D gene was performed using SYBR Green dye (Callahan et al., 2002) on an Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System. The real-time PCR reaction mixture included 2X PCR Master Mix (SYBR Green), specific primers for the 3D gene, cDNA and nuclease-free water. Thermal cycling conditions consisted of initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 seconds and annealing/extension at 60°C for 1 minute. A melt curve analysis was performed at the end of the reaction. All samples were analyzed in duplicate, with appropriate positive and negative controls included in each run to ensure accuracy and reliability of results.
Multiplex PCR (mPCR)
 
In this study, multiplex PCR (mPCR) (Giridharan et al., 2005) was utilized for the confirmatory diagnosis and typing of FMDV using OPF (n=178) and blood (n=24) samples. Among the follow-up cases of clinically FMD-recovered cattle, 38 OPF samples (21.35%) tested positive for FMDV by multiplex PCR (Table 1; Fig 1 and 2), indicating persistence, with 33 samples (18.54%) being Type O and 5 (2.81%) being Type A. However, OPF (n=12) and blood (n=12) samples from all healthy in-contact (control) and blood (n=12) from persistently infected cattle were negative for FMDV. Therefore, this study reveals that investigation of the FMD virus in clinically FMD-recovered animals using OP fluid is suitable for detecting persistently infected animals.

Table 1: Detection of persistence of FMDV from OPF samples (n=178).



Fig 1: Multiplex PCR products for FMDV positive (Serotype O) OPF samples in 1.5% Agarose Gel electrophoresis (M=1 kb Ladder, L1=PC, L2-NC, L3-L7= OPF samples).



Fig 2: Multiplex PCR products for FMDV positive (Serotype A) OPF samples in 1.5% Agarose Gel electrophoresis (M=50 bp Ladder, L1=PC, L2 = NTC, L3-L7=OPF samples).


       
Multiplex PCR (mPCR) is a sensitive, specific and reliable technique that can be used for serotyping ELISA-negative samples. Multiplex assays provide multiple advantage as they are used to detect several pathogens and their serotypes at the same time (Deka et al., 2024). Giridharan et al., (2005) demonstrated that both mPCR and ELISA performed well with 100% efficiency on cell culture samples, with mPCR showing better efficiency than ELISA on clinical samples. The development of one-step mRT-PCR for detection and typing of FMDV serotypes O, A and Asia 1 exhibited high sensitivity and specificity (Le et al., 2011). For the detection of FMDV excreted in cow milk, the detection limit of mPCR was 102.7 TCID50/ml (Ranjan et al., 2016). Therefore, mPCR emerges as a rapid and reliable molecular technique for detecting and typing FMDV, particularly useful for identifying persistence of FMDV from OPF samples in clinically FMD-recovered cattle.
 
Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP)
 
RT-LAMP is a recently developed diagnostic technique that employs a simple isothermal amplification process, allowing rapid and highly sensitive detection of nucleic acids (Notomi et al., 2000). In this study, RT-LAMP (Madhanmohan et al., 2013) was utilized alongside multiplex PCR (mPCR) for confirmatory diagnosis and serotyping of FMDV from oropharyngeal fluid (OPF) samples (n=178) using serotype-specific primers. Among FMD-recovered cattle, 47 OPF samples (26.40%) tested positive for FMDV (Table 1; Fig 3 and 4), with 42 samples (23.60%) belonging to serotype O and 5 (2.81%) to serotype A, indicating viral persistence. Notably, all OPF (n=12) and blood (n=12) samples from healthy in-contact control animals, as well as blood samples (n=12) from clinically recovered but persistently infected cattle, were negative for FMDV.

Fig 3: Results of RT-LAMP for FMDV Serotype O and A in OP fluid (F1-F12) samples (PC=Positive control and NTC=Negative control).



Fig 4: Image of RT-LAMP for FMDV Serotype O and A in OPF sample using a real-time turbidimeter (Included Positive control, Positive sample and Negative control).


       
The one-step RT-LAMP assay used in this study, designed for the rapid detection and serotyping of FMDV, was found to be 10³-105 times more sensitive than conventional RT-PCR, with a detection limit ranging from 10-³ to 10-5  TCID50  of FMDV across all three serotypes. It detected 100% of clinical samples for the three serotypes, comparable to qRT-PCR, whereas RT-PCR detected 69.7%, 58.1% and 60.0% of type O, A and Asia 1 samples, respectively. This demonstrates that RT-LAMP has sensitivity comparable to real-time RT-PCR, with no cross-reactivity among the three FMDV serotypes or negative samples (Madhanmohan et al., 2013).
       
RT-LAMP was able to detect serotype Asia 1 of FMDV within 45 minutes at 61°C (Chen et al., 2011), making it faster than conventional methods. Compared to the real-time TaqMan assay, RT-LAMP was found to be not only sensitive and specific but also more rapid and cost-effective (Dukes et al., 2006). An RT-LAMP assay based on the 3D polymerase gene demonstrated even greater sensitivity than routine mPCR (Ranjan et al., 2016). The assay, enhanced with hydroxynaphthol blue (HNB) dye for colorimetric detection, offers a simple, specific and sensitive tool for rapid diagnosis of FMDV, making it a viable option for field deployment and surveillance in regions like India and other developing countries (Dukes et al., 2006).
       
For FMDV detection in cow milk, the RT-LAMP assay exhibited a detection limit of 101.7 TCID50/ml (Ranjan et al., 2016), further showcasing its versatility. An RT-LAMP assay developed to detect serotype C of FMDV had 10-fold higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR (Ding et al., 2014). A modified FMDV-specific RT-LAMP assay, combined with a lateral flow device (LFD) for dual-labeled product detection, achieved sensitivity equivalent to laboratory-based real-time RT-qPCR and showed 10,000-fold greater analytical sensitivity than the FMDV-specific antigen LFD used in the field (Waters et al., 2014).
       
Lyophilized RT-LAMP and real-time PCR assays are also compatible with fluorescence detection for real-time amplification monitoring and endpoint detection can be achieved using molecular lateral flow devices (Howson et al., 2017). While RT-LAMP assays often target specific local epidemiological settings due to primer design constraints, pan-FMDV assays have also been developed (Lim et al., 2020). Additionally, the need for specialized equipment can be minimized by using indicator chemistries that produce color changes visible to the naked eye, making it an ideal candidate for point-of-care diagnostics under field conditions (Zhang et al., 2022).
       
In conclusion, RT-LAMP offers numerous advantages, including being inexpensive, sensitive, rapid and easy to use, making it a promising tool for the diagnosis and typing of FMDV, particularly in field settings and resource-limited environments.
 
SYBR green real-time PCR (3D gene)
 
Real-time PCR is a highly advanced, rapid and reliable diagnostic technique that allows for real-time monitoring of fluorescence during amplification, eliminating the need for post-PCR processing. In this study, we employed SYBR Green real-time PCR, targeting the FMDV 3D gene across all serotypes (Callahan et al., 2002), for the confirmatory diagnosis of FMDV in oropharyngeal fluid (OPF) samples (n=178). Among the follow-up cases of FMD-recovered cattle, 49 OPF samples (27.53%) tested positive for FMDV (Table 1; Fig 5 and 6), indicating viral persistence. Conversely, OPF (n=12) and blood (n=12) samples from all healthy in-contact controls and blood (n=12) from clinically recovered but persistently infected cattle were negative for FMDV. Real-time PCR proved to be a highly sensitive method, especially for detecting viral persistence in OPF samples.

Fig 5: Amplification Plot of SYBR Green real-time PCR targeting 3D gene of FMDV.



Fig 6: Melt Curve of SYBR Green real-time PCR targeting 3D gene of FMDV.


       
The high sensitivity of real-time RT-PCR enables the detection of FMDV even in non-conventional samples such as OPF, pooled milk (Armson et al., 2020), airborne particles, environmental swabs (Brown et al., 2021) and meat juice (Yeo et al., 2022). A real-time RT-PCR assay, designed to detect all seven FMDV serotypes from various sample types, demonstrated 100% specificity, with the ability to detect viral RNA even before the onset of clinical symptoms in some cases (Callahan et al., 2002). Viral RNA levels typically peak between 30 to 53 hours post-infection (p.i.) and decline thereafter, becoming undetectable between 7 and 18 days p.i. In persistently infected animals, however, viral RNA remained detectable in OPF samples beyond 28 days p.i. (Stenfeldt et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2004). This persistence in OPF samples plays a critical role in understanding the long-term presence of FMDV.
       
Studies using one-step RT-PCR have indicated that FMDV persistence is significantly higher in unvaccinated cattle compared to vaccinated animals (Thwiny, 2016). Real-time PCR assays are widely used in reference laboratories for routine FMD diagnosis and viral quantification, although they cannot distinguish between different FMDV serotypes (Jamal and Belsham, 2013).
       
When comparing multiplex PCR (mPCR), RT-LAMP and SYBR Green real-time PCR for FMDV detection, positive results were found in 21.35%, 26.40% and 27.53% of OPF samples, respectively, highlighting the superior sensitivity of real-time PCR over mPCR and RT-LAMP (Table 1). Real-time PCR was the most rapid and sensitive technique, identifying more cases of persistent FMDV infection compared to the other methods. However, combining these diagnostic techniques can enhance overall diagnostic accuracy, as observed in previous studies (Brahma et al., 2024). A multi-assay approach can significantly improve diagnostic performance and resolution, particularly in challenging epidemiological scenarios (Foglia et al., 2021).
 
Persistence of FMDV in local and crossbred cattle
 
Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) persistence has been observed across various species, including cattle, sheep, goats, Asian buffalo and wildlife species (Weaver et al., 2013). The establishment of a carrier state does not seem to depend on specific viral genome determinants (Arzt et al., 2019). Instead, factors such as species, disease incidence, vaccination coverage and immune status influence the prevalence of carriers within a population (Thwiny, 2016). Viral persistence may be modulated by factors like residual viral RNA replication, RNA degradation/clearance, or the characteristics of infected cells and their ability to induce cell death (Zhang et al., 2004). Additionally, impaired cellular immune responses, inhibition of apoptotic pathways, elevated Th17 activity and upregulated aryl hydrocarbon signaling have been associated with persistence (Zhu et al., 2022). While low levels of FMDV RNA may be detected in pharyngeal epithelial samples during early and persistent infection phases, higher viral levels are often present in pharyngeal secretions (Stenfeldt and Belsham, 2012). Infectious FMDV can be isolated from milk and oropharyngeal fluid (OPF) samples from persistently infected animals (Buckle et al., 2021), including those subclinically infected after vaccination (Navid et al., 2018).
       
FMDV may persist for months or even years post-infection in a subclinical state in a significant proportion of animals (Stenfeldt and Arzt, 2020). In our study, persistence in cattle was mostly detected up to 3-4 months post-infection, with no persistence beyond 4 months in crossbred (vaccinated) cattle. However, 2 local (non-vaccinated) cattle (1.6%) exhibited persistent infection up to 6-7 months post-outbreak. No cases of persistence were detected at the 9-month mark. Overall persistence rates in cattle (n=129) were 24.81%, 11.26% and 1.6% at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months, respectively. Persistence rates in the 1st month varied by serotype and vaccination status: 22.39% in vaccinated serotype O, 19.23% in vaccinated serotype A and 33.33% in non-vaccinated serotype O. At the 3rd month, persistence was 10.45% in vaccinated serotype O and 22.22% in non-vaccinated serotype O. By the 6th month, only 5.55% of non-vaccinated serotype O animals remained persistently infected (Table 2). Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between local (non-vaccinated) and crossbred (vaccinated) cattle, with a p-value of 0.23 (>0.05) and a Chi-square value of 5.57.

Table 2: Month-wise rate of persistence of FMDV in local (non-vaccinated) and crossbred (vaccinated) cattle.


       
Other studies similarly report varying rates of FMDV persistence in both vaccinated and non-vaccinated cattle. In Indian cattle, the average duration of persistence was reported to be 10-13 months based on OPF sampling and FMDV-specific RT-PCR, with no statistical difference in carrier state duration between clinically and subclinically infected animals (Hayer et al., 2017a; Hayer et al., 2017b). In abattoir samples, up to 11.1% of healthy buffalo OPF samples tested positive for FMDV using real-time PCR (Navid et al., 2018). Approximately 50% of FMD-recovered ruminants develop persistent infections, regardless of vaccination status (Parida, 2009). The carrier state in cattle typically does not exceed 6 months, although a small percentage may remain carriers for up to 3 years (WOAH, 2012).
       
In experimental studies, FMDV Asia 1 infection via intradermal-lingual inoculation resulted in 65.2% to 71% of cattle developing persistent infections, with carriers exhibiting significantly higher neutralizing antibody titers than non-carriers (Mohan et al., 2008). Even vaccinated cattle can become carriers (Zhang et al., 2009), although increasing vaccine doses may reduce viral shedding and the frequency of carrier states ( Parida et al., 2006). Persistence rates of 62% and 67% have been reported in vaccinated and non-vaccinated cattle, respectively, with similar levels of viral RNA shedding during persistence (Stenfeldt et al., 2016). One study reported 91% of vaccinated cattle remaining persistently infected up to or beyond 28 days post-challenge (Parida et al., 2006). Unvaccinated cattle tend to shed higher viral loads for longer periods, whether they become carriers or not (Parthiban et al., 2015).
       
The risk of transmission from FMDV carriers appears to be low (Arzt et al., 2021; Bertram et al., 2018; Bronsvoort et al., 2016). In our study, no transmission to in-contact healthy animals (n=12) was detected. However, experimental studies have shown that naive cattle can develop clinical FMD after intranasopharyngeal inoculation with untreated OPF from persistently infected carriers (Stenfeldt and Arzt, 2020). Transmission from carriers is rare, as evidenced by few seropositive animals detected more than 12 months after an outbreak (Bronsvoort et al., 2016). No FMDV infection or seroconversion was detected in three calves born to carrier animals (Bertram et al., 2018). Nonetheless, persistently infected carriers play a crucial role in FMDV ecology and are a significant factor in trade regulations and outbreak responses in disease-free regions (GFRA Gap Analysis Report, 2022).
       
Given the potential role of carriers in FMDV ecology, developing rapid and reliable diagnostic methods for early detection and addressing the carrier state remains critical for effective control and prevention strategies.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that local cattle, particularly those unvaccinated, exhibited a higher prevalence and extended duration of FMDV persistence compared to crossbred cattle. This finding highlights the critical role of vaccination in reducing FMDV persistence in both local and crossbred cattle populations. Implementing comprehensive vaccination programs is essential to minimize viral persistence, thereby enhancing disease control and supporting broader efforts to prevent FMD outbreaks in susceptible cattle breeds.
The authors would like to acknowledge the Regional Research Centre on FMD, Guwahati; Dept. of Microbiology, C.V.Sc., AAU, Khanapara; ADMaC, Dept. of Microbiology, C.V.Sc., AAU, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India; for their support and collaboration in this research.
 
Animal welfare and ethics
 
Prior approval No.770/GO/Re/S/CPCSEA/FVSc/AAU/IAEC/18-19/665 Dated 28.12.2018 was taken under Institutional Animal Ethics Committee.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Armson, B., Gubbins, S., Mioulet, V., Qasim, I.A., King, D.P. and Lyons, N.A. (2020). Foot-and-Mouth Disease Surveillance  Using Pooled Milk on a Large-Scale Dairy Farm in an Endemic Setting. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 7: 264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00264.

  2. Arzt, J., Fish, I., Pauszek, S.J., Johnson, S.L., Chain, P.S., Rai, D.K., Rieder, E., Goldberg, T.L., Rodriguez, L.L. and Stenfeldt, C. (2019). The evolution of a super-swarm of foot-and- mouth disease virus in cattle. PLOS ONE. 14: e021-0847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210847. 

  3. Arzt, J., Fish, I.H., Bertram, M.R., Smoliga, G.R., Hartwig, E.J., Pauszek,  S.J., Holinka-Patterson, L., Diaz- San Segundo, F.C., Sitt, T., Rieder, E. and Stenfeldt, C. (2021). Simultaneous and Staggered Foot- and-Mouth Disease Virus Coinfection of Cattle. Journal of Virology. 95: e01650-21. https://doi. org/10.1128/JVI.01650-21. 

  4. Barman, N.N., Patil, S.S., Kurli, R., Deka, P., Bora, D.P., Deka, G., Ranjitha, K.M., Shivaranjini, C., Roy, P. and Suresh, K.P. (2020). Meta-analysis of the prevalence of livestock diseases in North Eastern Region of India. Veterinary World. 13: 80. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.80-91.

  5. Baro, S., Sharma, K., Borah, B., Tamuly, S., Deka, P., Boro, P. and Das, S.K. (2018). Molecular epidemiology and phylogenetic analysis of foot and mouth disease virus type ‘O’ and evaluation of its carrier state in cattle of Assam by real- time PCR. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(11): 1497-1503. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.B-3670.

  6. Bertram, M.R., Vu, L.T., Pauszek, S.J., Brito, B.P., Hartwig, E.J., Smoliga,  G.R., Hoang, B.H., Phuong, N.T., Stenfeldt, C., Fish, I.H., Hung, V.V., Delgado, A., VanderWaal, K., Rodriguez, L.L.,  Long, N.T., Dung, D.H. and Arzt, J. (2018). Lack of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus from persistently infected cattle to naïve cattle under field conditions in Vietnam. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 5: 174. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00174.

  7. Brahma, D., Sharma, K., Barman, N.N., Deka, P., Borah, B., Buragohain,  B.M., Ahmed, R. and Hazarika, R. (2024). Comparing Typing Methods for Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotypes: Sandwich ELISA, Multiplex PCR, RT-LAMP and SYBR Green Real-time PCR. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5417.

  8. Bronsvoort, M., Handel, I., Nfon, C., Sorensen, K-J., Malirat, V., Bergmann, I., Tanya, V.N. and Morgan, K.L. (2016). ‘Redefining the “carrier” state for foot-and- mouth disease from the dynamics of virus persistence in endemically affected cattle populations. Scientific Reports. 6: e29- 059. doi: 10.1038/srep29059. 

  9. Brown, E., Nelson, N., Gubbins, S. and Colenutt, C. (2021). Environmental and air sampling are efficient methods for the detection and quantification of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Journal of Virological Methods. 287: 113988. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113988. 

  10. Buckle, K., Bueno, R., McFadden, A., van Andel, M., Spence, R., Hamill, C., Roe, W., Vallee, E., Castillo- Alcala, F., Abila, R., Verin, B., Purevsuren, B., Sutar, A., Win, H.H., Thiha, M., Lwin, K.O., Khounsy, S., Phonthasy, S., Souriya, V., Keokhamphet, C., Arzt, J., Ludi, A. and Mioulet, V. (2021). Detection of Foot- and-Mouth Disease Virus in the Absence of Clinical Disease in Cattle and Buffalo in South East Asia. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 8: 691-308. https:/ /doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.691308. 

  11. Callahan, J.D., Brown, F., Osorio, F. A., Sur, J.H., Kramer, E., Long, G.W., Lubroth, J., Ellis, S.J., Shoulars, K.S., Gaffney, K.L., Rock, D.L. and Nelson, W.M. (2002). Use of a portable real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 220: 1636-1642.

  12. Chen, H., Zhang, J., Liu, Y. and Liu, X. (2011). Rapid typing of foot- and-mouth disease serotype Asia 1 by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Virology Journal. 8: 489.

  13. Cortey, M., Ferretti, L., Peìrez-Martiìn, E., Zhang, F., de Klerk-Lorist, L.M., Scott, K., Freimanis, G., Seago, J., Ribeca, P., van Schalkwyk, L., Juleff, N.D., Maree, F.F. and Charleston, B. (2019). Persistent Infection of African Buffalo (Syncerus caffer) with Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus: Limited Viral Evolution and No Evidence of Antibody Neutralization Escape. Journal of Virology. 93: e00563-19. https://doi. org/10.1128/JVI.00563-19.  

  14. Deka, P., Das, S., Hazarika, R., Kayaga, R., Dutta, B., Deka, A., Barman, U., Ahmed, R., Islam, N., Sarma, M., Deka, I., Rout, M., Sharma, K. and Sharma, R. K. (2024). Foot-and-mouth disease-associated myocarditis is age dependent in suckling calves. Scientific Reports. 14: 102-89. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-024-59324-9.

  15. Ding, Y. Z., Zhou, J., Ma, L., Qi, Y., Wei, G., Zhang, J. and Zhang, Y. (2014). A reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay to rapidly diagnose foot-and-mouth disease virus. Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science. 15(3): 423-426.

  16. Dukes, J.P., King, D.P. and Alexandersen, S. (2006). Novel reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Archives of Virology. 151(6): 1093-1106.

  17. Foglia, E.A., Lembo, T., Kazwala, R., Ekwem, D., Shirima, G., Grazioli, S., Brocchi, E. and Pezzoni, G. (2021). Combining Multiple Assays Improves Detection and Serotyping of Foot-and- Mouth Disease Virus. A Practical Example with Field Samples from East Africa. Viruses. 13: 15-83. https:// doi.org/10.3390/v13081583. 

  18. Giridharan, P., Hemadri, D., Tosh, C., Sanyal, A. and Bandyopadhyay,  K. (2005). Development and evaluation of a multiplex PCR for differentiation of foot-and-mouth disease virus strains native to India. Journal of Virological Methods. 126(1-2): 1-11.

  19. Global Foot-and-Mouth Disease Research Alliance (GFRA) Gap Analysis Report. (December 2022). https://go.usa.gov/ xdrKh.

  20. Hayer, S.S., Ranjan, R., Biswal, J.K., Subramaniam, S., Mohapatra, J.K., Sharma, G.K. and Arzt, J. (2017b). Quantitative characteristics of the foot-and-mouth disease carrier state under natural conditions in India. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 65(1): 253-260. doi: 10.1111/ tbed.12627.

  21. Hayer, S.S., VanderWaal, K., Ranjan, R., Biswal, J.K., Subramaniam, S., Mohapatra, J.K. and Arzt, J. (2017a). Foot-and-mouth disease virus transmission dynamics and persistence in a herd of vaccinated dairy cattle in India. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 1-12.

  22. Howson, E.L.A., Armson, B., Madi, M., Kasanga, C. J., Kandusi, S., Sallu, R., Chepkwony, E., Siddle, A., Martin, P., Wood, J., Mioulet, V., King, D. P., Lembo, T., Cleaveland, S. and Fowler, V. L. (2017). Evaluation of Two Lyophilized Molecular Assays to Rapidly Detect Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Directly from Clinical Samples in Field Settings.  Transboundary  and Emerging Diseases. 64(3): 861-871. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/tbed.12451.

  23. Jamal, S.M. and Belsham, G.J. (2013). Foot-and-mouth disease: past, present and future. Veterinary Research. 44(1): 116. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-116.

  24. Jori, F., Caron, A., Thompson, P. N., Dwarka, R., Foggin, C., de Garine- Wichatitsky, M. and Heath, L. (2016). Characteristics of foot-and-mouth disease viral strains circulating at the wildlife/livestock interface of the great Limpopo transfrontier conservation area. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 63(1): e58-e70. doi:10.1111/tbed.12231.

  25. Juleff, N., Valdazo-González, B., Wadsworth, J., Wright, C.F., Charleston, B., Paton, D.J. and Knowles, N.J. (2013). Accumulation of nucleotide substitutions occurring during experimental transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Journal of General Virology. 94(Pt 1): 108-119. doi:10.1099/vir.0.046029-0.

  26. Le, V.P., Lee, K.N., Nguyen, T., Kim, S.M., Cho, I.S., Quyen, D.V., Khang, D.D. and Park, J.H. (2011). Development of one- step multiplex RT-PCR method for simultaneous detection and differentiation of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotypes O, A and Asia 1 circulating in Vietnam Journal of Virological Methods. 175(1): 101-108. 

  27. Lim, D., Kim, H., Chae, H., Ku, B., Nah, J., Ryoo, S., Wee, S., Lee, C., Lyoo, Y.S. and Park, C. (2020). Probe  based real time reverse transcription loop mediated isothermal amplification (RRT LAMP) assay for rapid and specific detection of foot and mouth disease virus. Transboundary Emerging Diseases. 67: 2936-2945. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed. 13669. 

  28. Madhanmohan, M., Nagendrakumar, S.B., Manikumar, K., Yuvaraj, S., Parida, S. and Srinivasan, V.A. (2013). Development and evaluation of a real-time reverse transcription-loop- mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid serotyping of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Journal of Virological Methods. 187(1): 195-202.

  29. Mohan, M.S., Gajendragad, M.R., Kishore, S., Chockalingam, A.K., Suryanarayana, V.V.S., Gopalakrishna, S. and Singh, N. (2008). Enhanced mucosal immune response in cattle persistently infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 125: 337- 343.


  30. Notomi, T., Okayama, H., Masubuchi, H., Yonekawa, T., Watanabe, K., Amino, N. and Hase, T. (2000). Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Research. 28: e63.

  31. Parida, S. (2009). Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus: Strategies and effectiveness. Expert Review of Vaccines. 8: 347-365. doi: 10.1586/14760584.8.3.347.

  32. Parida, S. anderson, J., Cox, S.J., Barnett, P.V. and Paton, D.J. (2006). Secretory IgA as an indicator of oropharyngeal foot-and- mouth disease virus replication and as a tool for post- vaccination surveillance. Vaccine. 24: 1107-1116.

  33. Parthiban, A.R., Mahapatra, M., Gubbins, S., Parida, S. and Bayry, J. (2015). Virus excretion from foot-and-mouth disease virus carrier cattle and their potential role in causing new outbreaks. PLOS ONE. 10(6): e012-8815. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0128815.

  34. Ranjan, R., Biswal, J.K., Sharma, G.K., Sharma, A.K., Singh, K.P., Misri, J. and Pattnaik, B. (2016). Use of nucleic acid recognition methods (m-PCR and RT-LAMP) for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus excreted in cow milk. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 86(8): 865-868. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v86i8.60750.

  35. Rout, M., Subramaniam, S., Das, B., Mohapatra, J. K., Dash, B.B., Sanyal, A. and Pattnaik, B. (2016). Foot-and-mouth disease in wildlife population of India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 51(2): 344–346. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar. 11333.

  36. Salt, J.S. (1993). Foot-and-mouth disease: A review of the pathogenesis and epidemiology. Veterinary Journal. 146(2): 207-220.

  37. Stenfeldt, C. and Arzt, J. (2020). The Carrier Conundrum: A Review of Recent Advances and Persistent Gaps Regarding the Carrier State of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus. Pathogens. 9: 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9030167. 

  38. Stenfeldt, C. and Belsham, G. J. (2012). Detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus RNA in pharyngeal epithelium in the early stages of infection: Implications for diagnosis and control. Veterinary Research. 43(1): 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/ 1297-9716-43-80.

  39. Stenfeldt, C., Eschbaumer, M., Rekant, S.I., Pacheco, J.M., Smoliga, G.R., Hartwig, E.J., Rodriguez, L.L. and Arzt, J. (2016). The Foot-and-Mouth Disease Carrier State Divergence in Cattle. Journal of Virology. 90: 6344-6364. https://doi. org/10.1128/JVI.00388-16. 

  40. Stenfeldt, C., Lohse, L. and Belsham, G.J. (2013). The comparative utility of oral swabs and probang samples for detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus infection in cattle and pigs. Veterinary Microbiology. 162: 330-337. 

  41. Subramaniam, S., Mohapatra, J.K., Sahoo, N.R., Sahoo, A.P., Dahiya, S.S., Rout, M., Biswal, J.K., Ashok, K.S., Mallick, S. and Ranjan, R. (2022). Foot-and-mouth disease status in India during the second decade of the twenty-first century (2011-2020). Veterinary Research Communications. 46: 1011-1022. doi: 10.1007/s11259-022-10010-z. 

  42. Thwiny, H.T. (2016). Diagnosis of carrier state of foot and mouth disease virus in vaccinated and unvaccinated cattle by RT-PCR. Basrah Journal of Veterinary Research. 15(2): 1-12.

  43. Waters, R.A., Fowler, V.L., Armson, B., Nelson, N., Gloster, J., Paton, D.J. and King, D.P. (2014). Preliminary validation of direct detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus within clinical samples using reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification coupled with a simple lateral flow device for detection. PLoS One. 9(8): e105-630.

  44. Weaver, G.V., Domenech, J., Thiermann, A.R. and Karesh, W.B. (2013). Foot and mouth disease: A look from the wild side. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 49: 759-785.

  45. World Organisation for Animal Health. (2012). Foot and mouth disease:  Aetiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and control references. Retrieved from https://www.woah.org/en/ disease/foot-and-mouth-disease/. 

  46. Yeo, S., Yang, M., Nyachoti, M. and Nfon, C. (2022). Detection of antibodies to structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus in swine meat juice. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research- Revue Canadienne de Recherche Veterinaire.  86: 147-152. 

  47. Zhang, J., Hou, Q., Ma, W., Chen, D., Zhang, W., Wubshet, A.K., Ding, Y., Li, M., Li, Q., Chen, J., Dai, J., Wu, G., Zhang, Z., Zaberezhny, A.D., Pejsak, Z., Tarasiuk, K., Zafar Khan, M.U., Wang, Y., He, J. and Liu, Y. (2022). A Naked-Eye Visual Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification with Sharp Color Changes for Potential Pen- Side Test of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus. Viruses. 14: 19-82. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14091982. 

  48. Zhang, Z., Ahmed, R., Paton, D. and Bashiruddin, J.B. (2009). Cytokine mRNA responses in bovine epithelia during foot-and- mouth disease virus infection. Veterinary Journal. 179: 85-91. PMID: 17920964.

  49. Zhang, Z., Murphy, C., Quan, M., Knight, J. and Alexandersen, S. (2004). Extent of reduction of foot-and-mouth disease virus RNA load in oesophageal-pharyngeal fluid after peak levels may be a critical determinant of virus persistence in infected cattle. Journal of General Virology. 85(Pt 2): 415-421.

  50. Zhu, J.J., Stenfeldt, C., Bishop, E.A., Canter, J.A., Eschbaumer, M., Rodriguez, L.L. and Arzt, J. (2022). Inferred Causal Mechanisms of Persistent FMDV Infection in Cattle from Differential Gene Expression in the Nasopharyngeal Mucosa. Pathogens. 11: 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/ pathogens11080822. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)