The study showed significant improvements in the cows’ pain and swelling as early as the second day of using PHS (p<0.001). On days 3 and 4, the majority of cows experienced complete relief from pain and swelling, respectively (Table 2). Further more, their activity levels significantly improved (p< 0.001) starting from day 2 of the PHS application (Table 2). The average recovery time was 3.4 days and client satisfaction scores with the product were very high (4.00 ± 0.00) (Table 3). No adverse effects were observed on the application of spray in any of the animals, suggesting the PHS is safer to use.
These results suggest that PHS may be effective in alleviating pain, inflammation and swelling in dairy cows with wounds or arthritis. The topical application of PHS on cows at veterinary clinics appeared to completely resolve these issues, indicating its potential analgesic, anti-inflammatory, immune-modulating and antibacterial properties (although further research is needed to confirm these mechanisms). Improvement in activity levels suggests that PHS may also help restore the normal activity of cows suffering from these conditions. Client satisfaction with PHS for treating pain and inflammation associated with hard tissue swelling was high, potentially due to the presence of ingredients such as
Citrus deodara,
Curcuma longa (turmeric),
Mentha arvensis (mint),
Cinnamomum camphora and
Cinnamomum zeylanicum (cinnamon) in the spray.
The positive effects in this study may be due to the combined properties of herbal ingredients in PHS. The potential contributions of some key ingredients are described as follows
Curcuma longa (turmeric)
Chattopadhyay et al., 2004 suggest that extracts and volatile oil fractions from
C. longa possess anti-inflammatory properties.
ElHage and Mathew, 2005 further demonstrated curcumin, the main active component of turmeric, has anti-inflammatory effects comparable to the common drug phenylbutazone, which is potentially beneficial for both acute and chronic inflammation. Further more, curcumin may regulate cytokine secretion from immune cells, exerting both anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects
(Kang et al., 1999). In vitro studies have reported curcumin’s ability to inhibit pro-inflammatory Th1 cytokines, potentially regulating Th1-controlled immune disorders
(Kang et al., 1999). Overall, the established anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of
C. longa in these studies indicate their contribution to PHS’s ability to alleviate pain and inflammation associated with hard tissue swelling in dairy cows.
Mentha arvensis (mint)
The menthol in PHS, derived from
M. arvensis, provides a cooling sensation upon topical application. This effect is caused by menthol-stimulating cold receptors by inhibiting calcium currents in neuronal membranes
(Peier et al., 2002). Furthermore, menthol possesses anti-inflammatory properties by inhibiting the release of inflammatory mediators such as leukotrienes, prostaglandins and interleukins from monocytes, as well as serotonin and neuropeptides
(Peier et al., 2002).
Citrus deodara
Published reports indicated that
C. deodara wood has been used traditionally in Ayurvedic medicine for treating severe inflammations and joint disorders
(Al-Hindawi et al., 1989). Studies have shown its effectiveness in inhibiting polyarthritis and suppressing paw edema in rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis (
Uma Chandur et al., 2011 and
Shinde et al., 1999). The volatile oil extract of
C. deodara wood also significantly inhibited rat paw edema caused by carrageenan at specific doses
(Winter et al., 1962). Furthermore, this extract displayed both anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities in pain models using mice (
Newbould, 1963 and
Shinde et al., 1999). These findings suggest that the anti-inflammatory, analgesic and anti-arthritic properties of
C. deodara might have helped reduce pain and inflammation associated with wounds and arthritis-induced hard tissue swelling in cows treated with PHS.
The observed improvement in hard tissue swelling associated with wound healing in our study could be partly attributed to the potential antibacterial properties of
Cinnamomum camphora and
Cinnamomum zeylanicum. Infections and prolonged inflammation are known to hinder wound healing
(Jorge et al., 2010). Cinnamaldehyde, a key bioactive component found in both
Cinnamomum species, has demonstrated a significant antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in laboratory experiments (
Lee and Ahn, 1998), suggesting that PHS may help reduce bacterial burden in wounds, potentially promoting faster healing. Further more, studies have shown cinnamaldehyde’s ability to inhibit the growth of various fungi, including yeasts, molds and dermatophytes
(Ooi et al., 2006). Furthermore, it may even be effective against human head lice eggs and adult females
(Ooi et al., 2006). As further research is needed to confirm these effects in the context of wound healing with PHS, these findings indicate a potential benefit of cinnamaldehyde for wound health.
Compared with traditional routes such as oral medications or injections, topical applications offer several advantages for treating cows. Topical applications generally have a better safety profile because they bypass the digestive system, avoiding potential gastric upset associated with oral medications
(Jorge et al., 2010). Furthermore, they minimize the risk of complications such as inconsistent drug levels in the bloodstream or first-pass metabolism by the liver, which can occur with oral medications. Topical treatments deliver the medication directly to the inflammation source, allowing for a higher concentration of active ingredients at the site of pain, maximizing their effectiveness while minimizing systemic effects throughout the body (
de Paula et al., 2010). Unlike injections, topical applications are noninvasive and painless for the cows, which eliminates the stress associated with injections and the potential for needle-related injuries or disease transmission (
Miller and Pisani 1999). Topical treatments are commonly easier and less expensive to administer compared with other methods. Farmers can readily apply them without requiring veterinary assistance, improving treatment accessibility and reducing overall costs.