Cultivating edible fungi on substrates supplemented with inorganic selenium is a promising method for developing selenium-rich products. Significant variances were observed in moisture content, protein content, carbohydrate content and antioxidant activity between non-fortified and selenium-fortified mushrooms.
Moisture content
Evaluation of mushroom quality relies heavily on their moisture content, impacting various aspects such as texture, flavor, visual appeal and storage duration (
Khatkar et al., 2017). Additionally, it plays a crucial role in determining the nutritional composition of mushrooms, aiding in the assessment of water-soluble nutrients like vitamins and minerals (
Mattila et al., 2001). A comparison between non-fortified and Se-fortified mushrooms revealed notable differences in moisture content. In non-fortified mushrooms,
P. ulmarius (CO
2) exhibited a moisture content of 69.81g per 100 g edible portion, while
P. eous (APK 1) and
P. florida showed 87.83 and 86.10 g per 100 g edible portion, respectively. Conversely, Se-fortified mushrooms in M
2 displayed higher moisture content across all species (Table 2). Specifically, Se-fortified
P. Ulmaris (CO
2),
P. eous (APK 1) and
P. florida exhibited moisture contents of 75.29, 88.96 and 87.53 g per 100 g edible portion, respectively. It’s worth noting that moisture content also influences the presence of bioactive compounds in mushrooms, including antioxidants, polysaccharides and phenolic compounds (
Wasser, 2002). Notably, among the three species,
Pleurotus eous (APK1) displayed the highest moisture content, while
Pleurotus ulmarius CO
2 exhibited the lowest. These findings align with previous studies using paddy straw as a substrate, where moisture content in
P. ulmarius (CO
2),
P. eous and
P. florida was reported as 66.06%, 88.34% and 87.4%, respectively (
Balasubramanian and Kannan, 2023;
Megu and Rina, 2022;
Khan et al., 2008).
Biological efficiency (BE)
Biological efficiency (BE) assesses the effectiveness of converting substrate mass into mushroom fruiting bodies (
Tikdari and Bolandnazar, 2012) by utilizing the nutrients available in the substrates (
Oseni et al., 2012). In non-biofortified selenium,
P. florida exhibited the highest biological efficiency at 76.8%. Conversely,
P. eous APK1 showed the highest BE at 79.6% (M
1) in selenium-fortified mushrooms. Notably, previous research by (
Murugan and Kannan, 2019) reported high yields of non-biofortified
P. ulmarius CO
2 (296.83 g) with a corresponding high BE of 59.4%, which aligns with our findings. Our results align with those of
(Fasoranti et al., 2018), demonstrating that the increase in selenium biofortification is accompanied by a decrease in yield. Similar findings were observed by
Xu et al., (2021) where, non-fortified
Pleurotus exhibited the highest yield and biological efficiency, while fortified
Pleurotus displayed the lowest yields and biological efficiency. Additionally, it has been noted that the addition of sodium selenite at low concentrations promotes mushroom growth (Table 3a and b).
Carbohydrate
Carbohydrates serve as a source of energy and are present in both digestible and non-digestible forms within mushrooms. In terms of carbohydrate content,
P. ulmarius exhibited the highest level among the three
Pleurotus species at 74.66 mg per 100 g, while
P. florida displayed the lowest at 60.23 mg per 100 g. Among the Se-fortified mushrooms, M
2 exhibited the lowest carbohydrate content, surpassing both non-fortified and M1 Se-fortified mushrooms (Fig 1). Comparatively, the carbohydrate content in cultivated
Pleurotus ostreatus, whether non-fortified or fortified with selenium, did not show significant differences (p<0.05) between them. Their carbohydrate content ranged from 53.84 to 58.10 mg per 100 g, as observed in the study by
(Fasoranti et al., 2019). Alam and his team conducted a nutritional assessment, determining that the carbohydrate content in dried mushrooms measures 42.83 mg per 100 g in
P. florida.
Protein
The protein content in mushrooms varies across species and is influenced by environmental conditions and the maturity stage of the fruiting bodies
(Wang et al., 2014) and are known for their high quality and richness in essential amino acids (
Dunkwal and Singh, 2007). The study observed an increase in total protein content in the fruiting bodies of all M
2 selenium-fortified mushrooms compared to non-fortified ones (Fig 1). Notably, the protein content in non-fortified
P. florida was 24.07 mg/100 g while after 5% se-fortification it was found to increase to 38.21 mg/100 g.
Kaur and his coworkers (2017) utilized selenium-rich wheat straw as a substrate for cultivating
P. florida,
P. ostreatus and
P. sajor-cajju, leading to an increase in total protein content. Additionally, (Fadugba
et al., 2024) found significantly higher crude protein contents in selenium-fortified
Pleurotus ostreatus compared to non-fortified ones.
Selenium
Table 4 displays the Selenium (Se) concentrations in three
Pleurotus species, both non-biofortified and biofortified mushrooms. A notable augmentation in Se levels is evident; however, this increase in Se content correlates with a reduction yield in
Pleurotus eous APK1.
DPPH scavenging activity
The assessment of DPPH scavenging potential in methanolic extracts from both selenium (Se) biofortified and non-biofortified samples of
P. ulmarius (CO
2),
P. eous (APK1) and
P. florida revealed notable differences. Among these species,
P. florida exhibited heightened antioxidant activity compared to the other
Pleurotus species when subjected to M
2 Se-fortification (Fig 2). For non-Se-fortified samples, the DPPH scavenging potential of
P.ulmarius (CO
2),
P. eous (APK1) and
P. florida was found to be 61.96, 65.24 and 64.24 µg/ml respectively. Conversely, in Se-fortified (M
2) samples, the DPPH scavenging potential of
P. ulmarius (CO
2),
P. eous (APK1) and
P. florida increased to 69.37, 66.24 and 70.15 µg/ml respectively, at 50 µg/ml concentration.
Bhattia et al., (2014) documented the DPPH scavenging potential of Se-rich
P. fossulates as 40.60%, while the non-enriched counterpart exhibited a potential of 36.03%. Additionally,
(Fasoranti et al., 2018) indicated that extracts from selenium-fortified
Pleurotus ostreatus displayed the highest DPPH scavenging effects (ranging from 45.09 to 97.92) at concentrations of 50 µg/ml and 250 µg/ml, respectively. Conversely, extracts from non-selenium-fortified
Pleurotus ostreatus exhibited lower scavenging effects on DPPH radicals (ranging from 27.81 to 74.45) at the same concentration.
Vermicomposting using T2 SeSMS
Since M
1 exhibited enhanced mushroom production along with elevated protein and antioxidant activity, its spent mushroom waste was chosen for vermicomposting. The survival count of adult worms, numerous young ones and the quality of cocoons were recorded during the 60
th and 90
th days of the study (Fig 3).
The examination of
E. eugeniae reproduction across various treatments and time points reveals intriguing trends. Across treatments T
2 to T
5, a consistent trend emerged: as the SeSMS concentration decreased and the cow dung proportion increased, there was a noticeable increase in the counts of cocoons, young worms and adult worms. This pattern suggests a positive correlation between the reduction of SeSMS and the augmentation of cow dung with an associated boost in
E. eugeniae reproduction rates. However, when comparing the control group and T
1, where SMS was substituted with SeSMS, a marked improvement was observed with the utilization of SeSMS. This observation underscores the potential benefits of SeSMS over traditional SMS in promoting
E. eugeniae reproduction, indicating a promising avenue for enhancing vermicomposting efficiency and output through substrate optimization.
In the realm of composting, there was a notable range in capacity, alongside a positive trend in reproduction, evidenced by the presence of numerous cocoons, active young worms and adults. This outcome highlights the efficacy of utilizing a blend of eggshell powder and cow dung as the preferred substrate for vermicomposting, as established by (
Annapoorani and Sindhu, 2019).
Suthar et al., (2018) observed notable variations in earthworm populations across different vermicomposting setups, with the highest population of
E. fetida recorded in T
75 (126.0), followed by T
50, T
100, CD
100 and T
25. Their statistical analysis revealed no significant disparity in population growth between T
100 and CD
100, as well as between T
25 and T
50 during the vermicomposting process. Similarly, as seen in (Table 5), the population of Eudrlis eugeniae in different stages of reproduction (cocoons, young ones and adult worms) increased significantly as the proportion of SeSMS decreased and cow dung increased. For instance, in T
5 (SeSMS 100 g and cow dung 1000 g), the highest number of cocoons (34 on the 60
th day and 150 on the 90
th day). Young ones (170 and 189) and adult worms (142 and 308) were observed. This trend underscores the importance of factors such as the success of hatchlings, viability of cocoons and fecundity rate, which directly influence the final population increase in vermicomposting setups. By incorporating these insights, we can better understand the dynamics of earthworm populations and their responses to different vermicomposting conditions, thereby enhancing our ability to optimize composting processes for sustainable waste management.
Vermicomposting ability
Vermicomposting exemplifies an efficient method of utilizing earthworms for organic waste management that promotes the production of organic fertilizers from bioorganic wastes
(Ramesh et al., 2022). Enriched with enzymes, vermicompost aids in breaking down organic matter in the soil, releasing nutrients readily available to plant roots. The rapid reproduction of earthworms, supported by their hermaphroditic nature and optimal conditions of moisture, temperature and feedstock, contributed significantly to their prolific population expansion. With a lifespan of up to two years, earthworms play a vital role in this process.
The control and remaining worm-treated groups underwent assessment on the 60
th and 90
th days of the experiment, with each treatment meticulously scrutinized and analyzed for consistency. Within thirty days, the compost reached its maximum water-holding capacity, transforming into nutrient-rich material and yielding favorable outcomes. Notably, the treatment mixture exhibited a gradual increase in worm-cast granules compared to the control.