Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore (0.357)

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Multivariate Analysis for Genetic Diversity Estimation in Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera gaertn.) Genotypes

Vijay Kumar1, Manju Rana1,*, Rajesh Kumar1, Anil Kumar Yadav1
1Department of Horticulture, School of Life Sciences, Sikkim University, East Sikkim, Gangtok-737 102, Sikkim, India.

Background: Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) is a perennial rhizomatous aquatic plant naturally growing in India from Kashmir to Kanyakumari with enormous phenotypic diversity in shape, size and colour. It serves as a gene pool for breeding new, improved cultivars; nevertheless, plants’ natural habitat is disappearing daily due to rapid urbanization driven by population growth. Therefore, the current study was formulated to estimate the genetic diversity for upcoming breeding initiatives and further conservation of available germplasm of lotus.

Methods: In the current study, in-situ morphological observations were recorded from thirty-three lotus genotypes between 2022 and 2023, from different locations of Bihar (India). Morphological data on 21 quantitative traits were recorded from selected natural lotus growing site with five replications. 

Result: Based on principal component analysis, six principal components were identified, which accounted for 88.97% of total genetic variation. In D2 analysis, genotypes were categorized into six different clusters. Cluster II consisted of the maximum number of genotypes (23) followed by cluster I (4). The highest intra-cluster distance was recorded for cluster II (184.40), while the inter-cluster distance was highest between cluster VI and III (5098.07). The study highlights the enormous genetic diversity among the genotypes of lotus and generates information about suitable breeding material(s) for future crop improvement programs. The genotypes from distant clusters may serve as potential genetic material for further selection or a superior heterotic combination for lotus breeding.

Lotus belongs to the family Nelumbonaceae. The genus Nelumbo has only two different species in the world viz., Nelumbo nucifera  Gaertn. (Asian lotus) and Nelumbo lutea Willd. (American lotus). In India, lotus is growing naturally from Kashmir to Kanyakumari with enormous phenotypic diversity in shape, size and colour (Goel et al., 2001). It is an aquatic herb with white or red-coloured flowers (Long et al., 2020). The Asian lotus is widely distributed throughout Asia and northern Australia (Li et al., 2010), which used for its ornamental flower, leaves, seed and rhizomes as food and medicine in Asia (Lin et al., 2019; Sharma et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2019). On the basis of the yield potential of flower, seed and rhizome of different genotypes across the globe and their economic uses, Nelumbo cultivars are usually categorized into three types: ornamental lotus, rhizome lotus and seed lotus (Li et al., 2010). Similarly based on nature of acclimatization of Asian lotus to diverse climatic conditions, it is further grouped into temperate and tropical types (Zhang and Wang, 2006). In general, the temperate lotus is mainly distributed in East and Northeast Asia and has a short flowering duration and thicker rhizomes. The tropical lotus distributed in Southeast and South Asia has a longer flowering period and thinner rhizomes (Li et al., 2010). The wild-type lotus is the progenitor of the cultivated type and serves as a source of useful genes for the breeding of new, improved cultivars; nevertheless, the natural habitat of plants is disappearing daily as a result of the ongoing, enormous growth in the human population. Accurate assessment, preservation and recording of genetic diversity are prerequisites for upcoming crop breeding initiatives. Bihar is blessed with enormous diversity among different aquatic crops including lotus. However, a detailed crop improvement program is lacking in the region due to insufficient systematic research on this crop. Meagre information is available regarding the genetic diversity on the crop among different locations of Bihar and genotypes seem to be poorly characterized. During this study, number of genotypes were evaluated, to review the geographical distribution and genetic divergence of the genotypes. The study aimed for the rapid screening of the genotypes to generate the passport information for genetic diversity in lotus, for future breeding program.
The experiment was formulated and carried out at Department of Horticulture, School of life Sciences, Sikkim University, Gangtok, Sikkim. An extensive survey was conducted in different provinces of Bihar (India) from June to November of 2022 and 2023. Bihar is situated geographically in the eastern part of India, between latitudes 24°20'10"N and 27°31'15"N and longitudes 83°19'50"E and 88°17'40"E. Ten districts of Bihar namely Nalanda, Begusarai, Vaishali, Madhepura, Saharsha, Muzaffarpur, Supaul, Gopalganj, Darbhanga and Bhagalpur were taken into account as the lotus growing locations for the investigation (Fig 1). In-situ morphological observation for twenty-one characters viz., leaf width (cm), leaf length (cm), number of leaf venation, length of petiole (cm), diameter of leaf stalk (mm), length of flower stalk (cm), diameter of flower stalk (mm), number of petals per flower, diameter of flower bud (mm), diameter of flower (cm), weight of flower (g), petal length (cm), petal width (cm), number of stamens per flower, receptacle diameter (mm), number of stigma per flower, number of seeds per receptacle, seed weight (g) per receptacle, rhizome length (cm), rhizome diameter (cm), rhizome weight (g) per 50 cm were recorded from 33 naturally lotus growing location and given codes as BRL and numbered from BRL-01 to BRL-33. Data were randomly recorded from each water reservoir with five replications, each replication is a mean of ten plants. Pooled data of both the years (2022 and 2023) was subjected to multivariate analysis viz., principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis was made using INDOSTAT software (Indo Statistical Service, New Delhi, India).  Standardized data, eigen values and associated eigen vectors were calculated from the covariance matrix (S) between the genotypes.

Fig 1: A- Study area of lotus (district wise), B- Study area of lotus (Bihar), C- Study area of lotus (India) as indicated with red colour.

Principal component analysis
 
Principal components and their correlation coefficients (Eigen vectors) for twenty-one traits are presented in Table 1. The principal component analysis (PCA) grouped the traits under six principal components (PCs), which accounted for 88.97% of the total variation. The number of stamens per flower (0.308) and seed weight (g) per receptacle (0.340) were correlated positively with PC1, which accounted for 37.543% of total variation. Number of seeds per receptacle and the number of petals per flower were positively correlated and length of petiole and length of flower stalk was correlated negatively with PC2, which accounted for 19.089% of total variation. Rhizome length, rhizome weight, weight of flower and diameter of flower bud were positively correlated with PC3, which accounted for 14.193% of total variation. Diameter of flower stalk and leaf width were correlated negatively and leaf length was correlated positively with PC4, which accounted for 7.798% of total variation. Number of leaf venation was correlated positively with PC5, accounting for 6.159% of total variation. Diameter of flower and petal length was correlated negatively with PC6, which accounted for 4.189% of the total variation. PCA is a useful technique for evaluating genetic variation among accessions which pinpoint the major variables causing variation and highlight the significant variation in genotypes (Verma et al., 2018). The use of principal component analysis (PCA) has proven useful in identifying the genotypes with the most desirable traits for breeding programs in crop plants (Sarkar et al., 2024). Similarly, Guo et al., (2010) reported four principal components with 77.33% of total variation in sixty-eight rhizome lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn) genotypes from China. Six principal components with 84.75% of total variation based on the different physicochemical parameters of the Garcinia pedunculata Roxb. accessions were reported from Manipur, India (Hazarika et al., 2023). Su et al., (2019) also reported seven principal components with a cumulative contribution of 81.86% of total variation under a comprehensive evaluation of 49 waterlily germplasm. Six principal components with a contribution of 84.75 % of total variation were estimated in the bottle gourd (Kumar et al., 2023) and 94.05% of total variation was estimated in the snake gourd (Fathima et al., 2023).

Table 1: Principal component analysis explained by six principal components on twenty-one quantitative traits of lotus genotypes.


 
Clustering pattern of the genotypes
 
Cluster analysis using D2 statistics is shown in Table 2. On the basis of D2 values, 33 genotypes were categorized into six different clusters. Cluster II was the largest with twenty-three genotypes followed by cluster I with four genotypes. The clusters IV, V and VI possessed only one genotype. The given method of analysis may help to select diverse parents and broaden the local germplasm base for future crop improvement programs. These findings are in close conformity with the results of Guo et al., (2010) and Su et al., (2019), who reported five clusters based on phenological characteristics of rhizome lotus genotypes and six clusters in waterlily, respectively.

Table 2: Clustering of lotus genotypes.


 
Intra- and inter-cluster distance
 
Intra- and inter cluster distances are the indicators of genetic diversity between the clusters. Table 3 shows the average intra and inter-cluster distance based on D2 analysis. Inter-cluster distances were higher in magnitude than intra-cluster distances in the present investigation, indicating a significant genetic variation among the genotypes under investigation. The intra-cluster distance ranged from 0.00 (cluster IV, V and VI) to 184.40 (cluster II). The minimum intra-cluster distance was zero as only one genotype was present in these clusters. It is clear from table 3 that the highest inter-cluster distance was obtained between cluster III and VI (5098.07) followed by cluster I and VI (4971.24). The diversity between the genotypes might be due to the differences in cultivation history, climatic adaptation and cross-breeding among the genotypes, which causes gene flow between the populations (Ghorbani et al., 2020). The result showed crop improvement programs could employ the distant cluster’s genotypes as a viable source to get a broad range of diversity among the segregates and create populations with high yielding transgressive segregates (Singh et al., 2014).

Table 3: Intra and inter cluster distance of 33 genotypes of lotus.


 
Cluster mean for twenty one characters
 
Table 4 (a,b) shows the cluster means of different clusters based on twenty-one morphological characters under the study. In clusters I, cluster mean was highest for most of the economic traits viz., number of petals per flower (115.48) and weight of flower (50.46 g). Whereas in cluster III, cluster mean was highest for length of petiole (223.86 cm) and length of flower stalk (230.11cm). Maximum mean values for rhizome length, rhizome diameter and rhizome weight (g) per 50 cm were recorded in clusters VI [Table 4(b)]. Genotypes with significant mean performance of cluster and inter-cluster distance could be utilized as potential parents for further breeding programs (Sushil et al., 2023).

Table 4 (a): Cluster means for 21 characters of 33 genotypes of lotus (Tocher method).

a

Table 4 (a): Cluster means for 21 characters of 33 genotypes of lotus (Tocher method).

b
Principal component analysis and cluster analysis suggest the significant variation for the traits like number of petals per flower, diameter of flower bud, weight of flower, rhizome length, rhizome diameter, number of stamens per flower and seed weight (g) per receptacles from the first three principal components. The highest inter-cluster distance was recorded between clusters III and VI followed by cluster I and VI. This study highlights the considerable level of genetic diversity among lotus genotypes from different locations in Bihar. These genotypes may be subjected to future breeding programs either through direct selection or hybrid breeding.
Authors are thankful to the Department of Horticulture, School of Life Sciences, Sikkim University, 6th Mile, Tadong, East Sikkim, Gangtok, Sikkim for providing necessary facilities for conducting of present study. Administrative approval for in-service PhD of first author under faculty development programme from Bihar Agricultural University Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India is duly acknowledged. 
All the authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  1. Chen, G., Zhu, M. and Guo, M. (2019). Research advances in traditional and modern use of Nelumbo nucifera: phytochemicals, health promoting activities and beyond. Critical reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 59 (sup1): S189-S209.

  2. Fathima, A.F., Pugalendhi, L., Saraswathi, T., Manivannan, N. and Raveendran, M. (2023). Unraveling the relationship between fruit yield and yield related components in snake gourd genotypes using multivariate analysis. Agricultural Science Digest. 43(5): 661-667. doi:10.18805/ag.D-5753.

  3. Ghorbani, E., Motallebi-Azar, A. and Bolandnazar, S. (2020). Agro- morphological variation in some iranian melon (Cucumis melo L.) genotypes revealed by multivariate analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 54(2): 161-167. doi:10.18805/IJARe.A-424.

  4. Goel, A., Sharma, S.C. and Sharga, A.N. (2001). The conservation of the diversity of Nelumbo (lotus) at the National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India. Botanic Gardens Conservation News. 3(6): 52-54.

  5. Guo, H., Ke, W. and Li, S. (2010). Genetic variability and interrelationships among morphological and agronomical characteristics in rhizome lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. ssp. nucifera) germplasms. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research.  28(2): 126-136.

  6. Hazarika, T.K., Devi, L.S., Ningombam, L., Debbarma, P. and Ngurthankhumi, R. (2023). Unravelling the genetic diversity of Garcinia pedunculata Roxb. with multivariate analysis.  Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. pp.1-23.

  7. Kumar, R., Kumar, R., Prasad, B.D., Kumar, J. and Bamaniya, B.S. (2023). Genetic Diversity of bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.] genotypes of Eastern India through agro- morphological traits and ISSR markers: Implication for future breeding. Genet Resour. Crop Evol. 71(2): 873-891.

  8. Li, Y., Svetlana, P., Yao, J. and Li, C. (2014). A review on the taxonomic, evolutionary and phytogeographic studies of the lotus plant (Nelumbonaceae: Nelumbo). Acta Geologica Sinica English Edition. 88(4): 1252-1261. 

  9. Li, Y., Zhu, F.L., Zheng, X.W., Hu, M.L., Dong, C., Diao,Y., Wang, Y.W., Xie, K.Q. and Hu, Z.L. (2020). Comparative population genomics reveals genetic divergence and selection in lotus, Nelumbo nucifera. BMC Genomics. 21: 1-13.

  10. Li, Z., Liu, X., Gituru, R. W., Juntawong, N., Zhou, M. and Chen, L. (2010). Genetic diversity and classification of Nelumbo germplasm of different origins by RAPD and ISSR analysis.  Scientia Horticulturae. 125(4): 724-732.

  11. Lin, Z., Zhang, C., Cao, D., Damaris, R.N. and Yang, P. (2019). The latest studies on lotus (Nelumbo nucifera)-an emerging horticultural model plant. International Journal of Molecular Sciences.  20(15): 36-80.

  12. Long, D.T., Hong, H.T.K., Tram, L.L.T., Trang, N.T.Q., Tien, N.P.T. and Hanh, N.T.N. (2020). Study of the procedure for bath ultrasound-assisted extraction of total flavonoid from lotus seeds and testing some biological activities. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 54(5): 563-570. doi:10.1880 5/IJARe.A-525.

  13. Sarkar, N.S., Kalaimagal, T., Kavithamani, D., Chandirakala, R., Manonmani, S., Raveendran, M. and Senthil, A. (2024). Assessing genetic relationships, trait associations and diversity patterns in sorghum germplasm through correlation, cluster and principal component analysis. Agricultural Science Digest. 44(3): 445-452. doi:10.18805/ag.D-5896.

  14. Sharma, B.R., Gautam, L.N.S., Adhikari, D. and Karki, R. (2017). A comprehensive review on chemical profiling of Nelumbo nucifera: Potential for drug development. Phytotherapy Research. 31(1): 3-26.

  15. Singh, M.K, Bhardwaj, D.R., Solankey, S.S. and Pandey, A.K. (2014). Morphological analysis define the genetic diversity of Indian bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Vegetos. 27(1): 170-173.

  16. Su, Q., Yang, Y., Tian, M., Zhang, J., Mao, L., Tang, Y. and Lu, J. (2019). Phenotypic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 49 waterlily resources. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 32(11): 2670-2681.

  17. Sushil kumar, S., Sastry, E.D., Sakthivel G, T., Renuka, D.G., Sinha, B. and Singh, N. G. (2023). Multivariate analysis of seedling vigour traits in indigenous rice (Oryza sativa. L) genotypes of Manipur India. Plant Archives. 23(1): 144-148.

  18. Verma, R. K., Kumari, P., Verma, R. B., Rani, N. and Kumar, R. (2018). Principal component analysis in turmeric (Curcuma longa. L). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7(1S): 1097-1101.

  19. Zhang, Q. and Wang, Q. (2006). The discovery of tropical lotus flowers and the classification system of lotus varieties. Chin Landsc Archit. pp. 82-85.

Editorial Board

View all (0)