Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Study of Insect Fauna and Spiders Prevailing in Lovely Professional University Research Farm, Punjab

I Yimjenjang Longkumer1, Yendrembam K. Devi1, Megha N. Parajulee2, Shreya Koundal1, Konthoujam Ambedkar Singh1, Iddi Nangkar1, Abhinash Borah1
1Department of Entomology, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara-144 001, Jalandhar, Punjab, India.
2Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, 1102 East Drew St, Lubbock, Texas 79424 USA.

Background: The diverse insect fauna harboring in every corner of the agroecosystem plays a crucial role in ecological balance. The insect pest feeding on various crops which then it is preyed upon by diverse predators establishing an optimum food chain. With respect to the host plant interaction, it is of paramount importance to survey and identify the species prevailing the region and having the potential of causing a havoc to the host plant so as to initiate an effective pest management tactics. This research focuses on the species diversity of insect pest as well as biological control agents in the various crop ecosystem

Methods: Sampling of the insects and spider fauna were studied for two years, 2022 and 2023. Samplings were conducted in LPU research farm using three sampling techniques such as yellow sticky trap, sweeping net, pheromone lures. Following sampling of the insects and spiders species diversity was assessed using various indices such as shannon weiner indec, pielous index, simpsons index, margalefs index, Brillouins index and berger parker index

Result: 913 insects from 56 species and eight orders-Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Odonata, Orthopteraand Thysanoptera-as well as 9 species of spiders were recorded in the current study. Hemiptera, Lepidopteraand Coleoptera were the orders with the highest species abundance, while Hymenoptera was the least. Margalef’s richness index ranged from 0.26-2.6 and 0.21-2.72 respectively, evenness ranged between 0.06-0.20 and 0.08-0.22 and the diversity index for the first and second year, as indicated by the Shannon-Weiner index, varied from 0.11-0.30 and 0.14-0.34, respectively. In order to develop a strategy framework for monitoring insect biodiversity, which depends on a number of factors, it is necessary to analyze and document insect diversity.

India is one of the most diverse countries in the world in terms of insect fauna and there is a wide range of different species of insects present all over the country with different ecosystems, climatic regions and altitudes. India occupies 7 percent of global faunal population and has 6.13 per cent of total species in the world (Ghosh, 1996). The highest biodiversity of insects in India is at the north-eastern states, western-ghats and Andaman and Nicobar Islands and these places are known to have high endemism (Sankarganesh, 2017). In India, Sikkim has the most diversity of insect fauna withholding 5941 species, followed by West Bengal (5818), Meghalaya (5118) and Uttarakhand (4160) (Chandra, 2011). Punjab have total of 1116 species of insect fauna but there are not many surveys done in this state to explore more diversity of species as about 6000 species are expected from here if adequate surveys are held. In comparison of insect fauna in Punjab region according to different insect orders, the most abundant order is Lepidoptera having total of 340 species, followed by Coleoptera having 296 species, Diptera having 109 species, Hymenoptera having 102 species, Orthoptera with 52 species, Thysanoptera with 45 species, Odonata having 36 species, Trichoptera having 24 species, Neuroptera having 12 species, Isoptera having 9 species, Dermaptera having 3 species, Siphonaptera having 2 species and Plecoptera only having one species (Chandra, 2011). Hymenopterans and dipterans are principal pollinators which are very necessary for pollinating the crops. About 73 per cent of world’s cultivated crop is dependent on pollination out of which most of the pollinators are bees, flies and wasps. Bees pollinate 56.6 per cent of crops followed by flies (19 per cent), wasps (5 per cent), beetles (5 per cent) and butterflies and moths (4 per cent) (Shaheen et al., 2017). Insects play a significant role in our lives and impact humanity’s well-being in various ways. Additionally, ecosystems rely greatly on insect behavior. Insects have important functions in ecosystems, such as recycling nutrients, pollinating plants, dispersing seeds, preserving soil health, regulating other populationsand serving as a significant food source for other species. Some insects have the potential to harm human health, as well as domestic animals, agriculture and horticulture. Some insects like predatory beetles or parasitic wasps play a key role in agroecosystem by controlling pest populations, providing valuable benefits. Approximately 10% of insects are insect predators, while about 15 % are parasitic insects, both playing a crucial role in biological control (Sankarganesh, 2017). Along with insects, spiders are also important group of generalist predators of animal kingdom (Riechert and Lockley 1984) which are abundant in India. Some are polyphagous and carnivorous in nature and studies showed that spiders are good biological control agents demonstrating their potential to be used in IPM and it can reduce the indiscriminate use of pesticides (Benamu 2020; Pitilin et al., 2019). Some of the most common families of spiders which can be found in Punjab are Lyssomanidae, Salticidae, Clubionidae, Thomisidae, Sparassidae, Oxyopidae and Argiopidae (Singh, 2017). Insect biodiversity is highly influenced by climate and environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, rainfall, light, wind, etc. Climate change heavily affects the insect fauna and it is highly responsible for physiological and behavioural changes in insect fauna (Samways, 2005; Parmesan and Yohe, 2003; Merrill et al., 2008). The impact of climate change on insect population is complex and can vary depending on the species, region and type of ecosystem. Some insects may benefit from warmer temperatures or changes in precipitation, while others may struggle to adapt to these new conditions. Increase in temperature may increase the insect population which in terms may increase the insect-transmitted diseases also (Pareek et al., 2017). Hot temperature like heat waves have negative impact on insect fauna and it is known that there is mass extinction of insect fauna with every 6°C increase in temperature (Karthik et al., 2021). It is already found in studies that there shall be 40 percent extinction of insect fauna globally in near future (Iyer, 2019). Maintaining the biodiversity of insect fauna is paramount otherwise it will create an imbalance in the ecosystem in near future (Hallmann et al., 2017; Gaston, 2018; Seibold et al., 2019). The present study was formulated in order to discover the diversity, richness, evennessand dominance of the entomofauna and spiders in LPU, Punjab.
Study area
 
The study was conducted at Lovely Professional University (LPU) research farm was used as the study site to document the diversity of insects based on the abundance of spiders and insects. The study was carried out from January to May, 2022 and 2023. Throughout the study period, weekly field trips were conducted to collect and survey insects. The specimens that were gathered were stored in 70% ethyl alcohol, labeled appropriately with the location and other relevant characteristics. The gathered samples were identified using taxonomic keys up to the species level and preserved in formalin-filled jars. Each daily collection’s specimens were handled differently and placed in vials to be counted for biodiversity. The methods used for collecting insects and bio control agents such as spiders and dragonflies included Light traps, aerial net, sweeping net, Handpick method and pheromone traps. Care was taken to ensure that no harm was caused to the insects. Collected insects were transferred to glass vials (5.2cm x 2.0 cm). The indices for richness was represented by Margalef richness index (1958), for diversity by Brillouin, (Brillouin, 1956), Shannon-Weiner (Shannon, 1948), Simpson’s index (Solow, 1993) and for evenness, Pielou’s evenness index (Pielou, 1966) and other indices such as Berger-Parker dominance (Mateus, 2006).
 
Statistical analysis
 
All of the data obtained were analysed using Microsoft office Excel’s statistical tools. Diversity-based indices were used to measure biodiversity.
A total of 65 faunal species were found in Lovely Professional University research farm with 56 hexapod species and 9 arachnid species. The hexapod species comprised of the insects belonging to orders Coleoptera, Orthoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Odonata, Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, whereas the arachnid species belonged to order Aranea. Of all the orders, maximum species belonged to order Odonata (14), followed by Coleoptera (13), Hemiptera (12), Aranea (9), Lepidoptera (7), Diptera (4), Hymenoptera (4), Orthoptera (2). The species observed are classified under 3 categories viz.  Spiders (Table 1), bio-control agents (Table 2) and insect pests (Table 3). Most of the Bio-control agent species belonged to the order Odonata, followed by Coleoptera and Hymenoptera and least were found from the order Diptera. Hemiptera recorded the maximum pest species, followed by Lepidoptera and Coleoptera while Orthoptera had the least of the pest species. The collected data was further analyzed to study the diversity indices to estimate the species richness and species diversity (Fig 1 and 2). Environmental factors and flora diversity all affect variations in the abundance of individual arthropod species and lower arthropod diversity is caused by a decrease in vegetation cover and/or a shift in vegetation pattern toward tiny, widely distributed vegetation (Zayadi et al., 2013; Meloni et al., 2020; Ikhsan et al., 2022). Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H) is an indicator of diversity of arthropods, our results showed that the Shannon diversity index ranged from 0.11 to 0.30 in the first year and 0.14 to 0.34 in the second year. Shannon’s index interpreted both Lepidoptera and Hemiptera to be the most diverse ordersand Hymenoptera to be the least diverse order with an index of 0.30 and 0.11 in the first year. In the second year, Lepidoptera was the most diverse order and Hymenoptera was the least diverse order with an index of 0.34 and 0.14 respectively. Margalef’s index indicated odonata to be the order with highest species richness in both the first and the second year with an index of 2.66 and 2.72 respectively. Majority of the individuals belonged to family Libelluidae (8 species) followed by Coenagrionidae (5 species) and Gomphidae (1 species). The richness of Libelluidae and Coenagrionidae was reported by many works earlier. Sharma and Joshi (2007) reported 18 species of Libelluidae and 6 species of Coenagrionidae in Hoshiarpur district of Punjab, India. Mishra and Rastogi (2020) and Singh et al., (2020) also reported spiders from different families such as Salticidae, Araneidae and Oxyopidae during a nine year survey in Punjab. The present study also showed significant variations in the population density, species richness and diversity among the different species of spiders which is in accordance with the findings of Jeetikasiddhu et al., (2021). Pielou’s index interpreted Orthoptera to be the most evenly distributed order in the farm with an index of 0.20 and 0.22 respectively in the first and the second year. It included the species belonging to a single family, Acrididae. Due to the abundance of wheat and sugarcane, which are mostly preferred by the observed species, they might have thrived in the region, making Orthoptera the most evenly distributed order constituting a homogenous distribution pattern of the species (Ravi et al., 2022). The wide presence of acridids is confirmed by the similar findings of Das (2023): Kumar and Usmani (2012). Berger-Parker dominance percent interpreted Hemiptera to be the most dominant order, with a percentage of 0.21%, making it the most abundant order in the first year. However, in the second year, Lepidoptera was found to be the most abundant order with a percentage of 0.27%. All the individuals observed were pests of different crops in the farm. The dominance was because of the abundance of crops in vegetative and reproductive phase as similar results matched the findings of Zurbrügg and Frank (2006), with higher bug population in floral regions. Brillouin’s index interpreted Lepidoptera to be the most diverse order in both the years data, with an index of 4.03 and 4.12 respectively. All the species were pests of the field crops. The synchronization of the Lepidopteran pests with the vegetative and reproductive phase of the crops helped in resulting Lepidoptera to be the most diverse order. The synchronized availability of flowers of the spring season might have boosted the Lepidopteran adults (Kumar et al., 2017). Simpson’s index showed that all the collected species from different insect order were highly diverse during the study and the index ranged from 0.97-0.99 and 0.92-0.99 in the first and the second year respectively.
 

Table 1: Fauna of spiders collected in LPU Research Farm, Punjab.


 

Table 2: Fauna of bio-control agent collected in LPU Research Farm, Punjab.


 

Table 3: Fauna of insect pest.


 

Fig 1: Diversity indices of various insect and spider fauna assessed in Punjab during 2022.


 

Fig 2: Diversity indices of various insect and spider fauna assessed in Punjab during 2023.

Based on the survey, the population of spiders and insect faunas were prevalent throughout the research period. Spiders being a generalist feeder were recorded in high abundance with diverse species and habitat. Furthermore, the biodiversity of Insect pest fauna and natural enemies reported also were of significant in the region. The importance of spiders and insect as natural enemies cannot be overlooked, through their utilization as an important IPM tools can help in the minimum usage of hazardous chemicals. Furthermore, this survey also aids in information of insect pest species prevalent in the region which assist in awareness on key pest of the crops and also precautionary steps incase of invasive pest.
The authors are grateful to Lovely Professional University for providing all the necessary resources for the smooth conduct of the field experiment.
All authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Benamu, M.A. (2020). The importance of spider diversity in agro ecosystems and the effect of pesticides. J. Glob. Ecol. 5(1): 60-61. https://doi.org/10.17352/gje.000022

  2. Brillouin, L. (1956). Science and information theory. Academic Press, New York. pp. 320.

  3. Chandra, K. (2011). Insect fauna of states and union territories of India. In book: Arthtopods and their conservation in india (Insects and Spiders): ENVIS bulletin: Wildlife and protected areas. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun: VP Uniyal, Shrivastava Aseem. 14(1): 189-218. http:// wiienvis.nic.in, http://wii.gov.in/envis

  4. Das, J.K. (2023). Diversity and abundance of edible orthopterans insects and their future prospects for fdia. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 6(2): 183-193. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajravs/2023/v6i2245

  5. Gaston, K.J. (2018). Lighting up the nighttime. Sci. 362 (6416): 744-746. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau8226 .

  6. Ghosh, A.K. (1996). Insect biodiversity in India. Orient. Insects. 30(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.1996.10433828

  7. Hallmann, C.A., Sorg, M., Jongejans, E., Siepel, H., Hofland, N., Schwan, H., Stenmans, W., Müller, A., Sumser, H., Hörren, T., Goulson, D. and de Kroon H. (2017). More than 75 per cent decline over 27 years in total flying insect bio mass in protected areas. Plos one. 12(10): e0185809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185809

  8. Ikhsan, Z., Hidrayani., Yaherwandi., Hamid, H. and Ubaidillah, R. (2022). Species diversity and composition of chalcidids wasps (Chalcidoidea: Hymenoptera) on tidal swamp rice Field in Indragiri Hilir District, Indonesia. Agricult. Sci. Digest. 42(2): 165-170. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-332. 

  9. Iyer, G. (2019). Insects are disappearing in Indiaand we don’t even have data. Mongabay-India. https://india.mongabay.com/2019/06/insects-are-disappearing-in-india-and-we-dont-even-have-data/.

  10. Jeetikasiddhu., Lohani, H.P., Pathak, G., Kaushal, B.R. (2021). Spider diversity in different agricultural crops in Mangoli, Nainital district, Uttarakhand, India. J. Mountain Res. 16(1): 151-159. https://doi.org/10.51220/jmr.v16i1.15

  11. Karthik, S., Reddy, M.S.S. and Yashaswini, G. (2021). Climate change and its potential impacts on insect-plant interactions. Intech Open. ISBN: 978-1-83968-612-2, doi: 10.5772/ intechopen.94777.

  12. Kumar, H. and Usmani, M.K. (2012). A check list of acridoidea (Orthoptera) of Punjab, India. J. Entomol. Res. 36(2): 173-175. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2015.312545

  13. Kumar, P., Ramarajan, S. and Murugesan, A.G. (2017). Diversity of butterflies in relation to climatic factors in environmental centre campus of Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tamil Nadu, India. J. Entomol. Zool. 5(2): 1125-1134. 

  14. Margalef, R. (1958). Temporal Succession and Spatial Heterogeneity in Phytoplankton. In: Perspectives in Marine Biology, [Buzzati-Traverso (ed.)], Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, pp. 323-347.

  15. Mateus, R.P., Buschini, M.L.T. and Sene, F.M. (2006). The Drosophila community in xerophytic vegetations of the upper parana- paraguay river basin. Braz. J. Biol. 66 (2): 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-69842006000400016

  16. Meloni, F., Civieta, B.F., Zaragoza, J.A., Moraza, M.L. and Bautista, S. (2020). Vegetation pattern modulates ground arthropod diversity in semi-arid mediterranean steppes. Insec. 11(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11010059

  17. Merrill, R., Gutieyrrez, D., Lewis, O., Gutieyrrez, J., Diez, S. and Wilson, R. (2008). Combined effects of climate and biotic interactions on the elevational range of a phytophagous insect. J. Animal Ecol. 77:145-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2656.2007.01303.x

  18. Mishra, A. and Rastogi, N. (2020). Unraveling the roles of solitary and social web-making spiders in perennial ecosystems: Influence on pests and beneficials. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India, Section B: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-019-01126-5

  19. Pareek, A., Meena, B.M., Sharma, S., Teterwal, M.L., Kalyan, R.K. and Meena, B.L. (2017). Impact of climate change on insect pests and their management strategies. Climate Change and Sustainable Agriculture Publisher: New India Publishing Agency. pp 253-286.

  20. Parmesan, C. and Yohe, G. (2003). A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nat. 421: 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286

  21. Pielou, E.C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13: 131-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0

  22. Pitilin, R.B., Prado, J., Brescovit, A.D. and Buschini, M.L.T. (2019). Climatic conditions drive the abundance and diversity of spider’s community in an atlantic forest fragment. Oecol. Aust. 23(1):  39-55.  https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2019.2301.04

  23. Ravi, G., Mohapatra, L.N., Rahman, S.M., Charati, P.K. and Revanth, T. (2022). Diversity of spider fauna (Arachnida: Araneae) in rice agro ecosystem. Biological Forum-An International Journal 14(2): 940-943.

  24. Riechert, S.E. and Lockley, T. (1984). Spiders as biological control agents. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29: 299-320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.001503

  25. Samways, M. (2005). Insect diversity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 342.

  26. Sankarganesh, E. (2017). Insect Biodiversity: The teeming millions- A review. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 6 (17): 101-105.

  27. Seibold, S., Gossner, M.M., Simons, N.K. and Weisser, W.W. (2019). Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with land scape-level drivers. Nat. 574, 671- 674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3

  28. Shaheen, F.A., Khan, K.A., Husain, M., Mahmood, R. and Muhammad, K.R. (2017). Role of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) foraging activities in increased fruit setting and production of apples (Malus domestica). Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 30(1): 1-6

  29. Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

  30. Sharma, G. and Joshi, P.C. (2007). Diversity of odonata (Insecta) from Dholbaha Dam (Distt. Hoshiarpur) in Punjab shivalik, India. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 10(2): 177-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1226-8615(08)60350-7

  31. Singh, S. (2017). Friends of the fruit growers: Predators, parasitoids and pathogens of insect pests of fruit crops in Punjab. Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India, 80 p.

  32. Singh, S., Sekhar, R. and Jose, K.S. (2020). Predatory spider fauna in fruit crops of Punjab, India along with new records. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 90(9): 1695-1701. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v90i9.106598

  33. Solow, A.R. (1993). A simple test for change in community structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 191-193. https://doi.org/10.2307/5493

  34. Zayadi, H., Hakim, L. and Leksono, A.S. (2013). Composition and diversity of soil arthropods of Rajegwesi Meru Betiri National Park. J. Trop. Life Sci. 3(3): 166-171. https://doi.org/10.11594/jtls.03.03.04

  35. Zurbrügg, C. and Frank, T. (2006). Factors Influencing Bug Diversity (Insecta: Heteroptera) in Semi-Natural Habitats. Biodivers. Conserv. 15(1): 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-8231-7.

Editorial Board

View all (0)