Grain yield
The different ESP levels significantly affected the grain yield of rice crop. The mean grain yield of different rice varieties at different sodicity levels ranged from 5434 to 947 kg ha
-1 (Table 2). The highest grain yield was found at ESP 8 (5434 kg ha
-1) which is on par with ESP 16 (5204 kg ha
-1) followed by ESP 24, 32, 40
ie., 4477, 2343, 1659 kg ha
-1, respectively. The lowest grain yield found at the ESP level of 48 (947 kg ha
-1). The grain yield was found to be significantly differ among the rice varieties. The highest grain yield was recorded in TRY 3 (4693 kg ha
-1) followed by CO 43 (3393 kg ha
-1), TRY 1 (3437 kg ha
-1), TRY 2 (3134 kg ha
-1), CSR 27 (3161 kg ha
-1) and the lowest yield was recorded in WP (2246 kg ha
-1). Different rice varieties exhibit the sodicity tolerance differently in terms of grain yield at different ESP levels. The TRY 3 variety gave atleast 50% (as compared to ESP 8) grain yield upto 32 ESP. However, 50% yield was recorded upto 16 ESP only in case of WP. However, 50% yield was recorded upto 24 ESP in case of TRY 1, CO 43, TRY 2 and CSR 27. The grain yield decreases with increasing sodicity levels and the reason for yield reduction is the dominance of sodium ions causes depletion of enzymatic activity in soil. Due to its great sensitivity of WP variety, the yield has substantially reduced at higher sodicity levels. The results are in consistent with
(Gao et al., 2007 and
Singh et al., 2016). The rice is notably sensitive to sodicity at the early seedling stage and significant losses in yield have been recorded as a result of high mortality and poor crop establishment.
Soil enzymes
Urease
The different ESP levels has significant effect on urease content and the mean value ranged from 14.1 to 5.2 µg NH
4+-N g
-1 soil h
-1 (Table 3). The highest urease content was observed at ESP 8 (14.1 µg NH
4+-N g
-1 soil h
-1) which is on par with ESP 16 (14.1 µg NH
4+-N g
-1 soil h
-1) followed by ESP 24 (13.8 µg NH
4+-N g
-1 soil h
-1), ESP 32 (10.7 µg NH
4+-N g
-1 soil h
-1) and ESP 40 (8.57 µg NH
4+-N g
-1 soil h
-1). The lowest urease content was found at ESP 48 (5.24 µg NH
4+-N g
-1 soil h
-1). At ESP 8, 16, 24 and 32 the urease content slowly decreases with increasing sodicity. At highest ESP, the urease activity was drastically reduced. At ESP 40 and 48 only 60.69% and 37.11% urease activity was observed when compared to ESP 8.
Liang et al., (2007), reported that urease encourages the hydrolysis of nitrogen-containing organic carbon into ammonium. At increasing sodicity levels low hydrolysis process may be a reason for decreased urease activity in the soil. There is no significant difference found between the plots of different rice varieties which indicate that the varietal character doesn’t affect the urease activity in soil. The interaction between the different ESP levels and different rice cultivated plots was also found to be non-significant.
Alkaline phosphatase
The data pertaining alkaline phosphatase was presented in Table 3. The alkaline phosphatase activity in soil decreases with increasing sodicity levels. The mean of APH activity at ESP 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 was found to be 156, 143, 94.2, 73.9, 52.7 and 25.9 µg PNP g
-1 soil h
-1, respectively. The results were comparable with the works of
Batra et al., (2010) which confirmed that and the alkaline phosphatase decreased with increase in salt concentration. At ESP 40 and 48 only 33.82% and 16.61% of APH activity found while compared to the activity at ESP 8. The reason for low phosphatase activity may be that increasing salt concentration which affects enzyme activity by influencing the concentration of inhibitors or activators in the soil solution and the effective concentration of the substrate
(Dick et al., 2000). There is no significant differences observed between the plots of various rice varieties. Additionally, no significance difference was also found in the interaction between the various ESP levels and various rice varieties cultivated plots.
Dehydrogenase
The increasing sodicity levels had a significant effect on DHG content of soil. The highest dehydrogenase activity was found at ESP 8 (27.4 µg TPF g
-1 soil 24 h
-1) followed by ESP 16 (25.5 µg TPF g
-1 soil 24 h
-1). From ESP 24, 32 and 40 a low DHG activity was recorded
viz., 16.4, 10.2 and 2.60 µg TPF g
-1 soil 24 h
-1, respectively (Table 4). The lowest activity was observed in ESP 48 (1.12 µg TPF g
-1 soil 24 h
-1).
Srivastava et al., (2014) reported that salt stress-induced soil physical qualities affect plants because DHG activity exhibited lower values in the case of sodic soil compared to normal soil. The reason behind the decreased dehydrogenase activity under increasing sodicity levels may be alterations in the catalytic site of enzymes, ionization-induced conformational changes and salting out effect
(Tejada et al., 2006).
Microbial biomass carbon (MBC)
The results showed that the microbial biomass carbon decreases with increasing ESP levels (Table 4). The different ESP levels have significant effect on soil MBC and the mean value ranged from 235 to 158 µg g
-1. The highest soil MBC was observed at ESP 8 (235 µg g
-1) which is on par with ESP 16 (233 µg g
-1) followed by ESP 24 (193 µg g
-1), ESP 32 (174 µg g
-1) and ESP 40 (167 µg g
-1). The lowest soil MBC was found at ESP 48 (158 µg g
-1).
Tripathi et al., (2006), observed that one of the causes of poor crop development in salt affected soils is likely to be a decline in MBC with increase in salt stress. However, the microbial activity in different rice varieties plots cultivated, interaction between ESP and different plots of rice varieties were found to be non-significant.
Activity of antioxidant enzymes in plants
Catalase activity
The different ESP levels have significant effect on catalase activity. The mean of Catalase (CAT) activity at different sodicity levels
viz., ESP 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 was found to be 54.0, 55.3, 56.7, 58.9, 60.6 and 59.6 µg H
2O
2 g
-1min
-1, respectively (Table 5). The CAT activity increases with increasing sodicity levels. However, at higher ESP levels the activity was slightly reduced. It is in agreement with the studies of
Tripathi et al., (2018). In case of different rice variety, the highest CAT activity was recorded in CO 43 followed by TRY 3, TRY 1, CSR 27, TRY 2 and the lowest activity was found in WP. The results are in accordance with
Geetha et al., (2022), where the tolerant rice varieties recorded higher CAT activity than susceptible varieties. In interaction between the ESP levels and variety, the tolerant varieties CAT increases only upto ESP 40 and slightly decreased at ESP 48. However, in WP, the CAT activity increased upto 32 ESP only and then after it drastically reduced. Tolerable rice varieties at flowering phase of observation produced considerably more CAT activity upto ESP 40 than susceptible varieties which is also reflected in yield. Increase in CAT activity helps to achieve atleast 50% of yield upto ESP 32.
Peroxidase activity
Peroxidase
(POX) activity increases with increasing sodicity levels in tolerant varieties. Different ESP level has a significant effect on POX activity. The different ESP levels
viz., ESP 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 recorded the peroxidase activity of 10.6, 11.5, 11.9, 11.7, 11.5 and 11.1 min
-1g
-1, respectively (Table 5). Among the rice varieties, TRY 3 recorded the highest activity followed by TRY 1, CO 43, TRY 2, CSR 27 and the lowest in WP. Interaction between ESP levels and different rice varieties indicates that in rice variety TRY 3, the POX activity increases upto ESP 40 and decreases at ESP 48. In case of TRY 1, CO 43, TRY 2 and CSR 27 the POX activity increased upto ESP 32 and slowly declines at ESP 40 and 48 which are also reflected in grain yield. At ESP 32, increased POX activity enables us to reach up to 50% of yield. In WP initially at ESP 8 and 16 the POX activity increases and from ESP 24 to 48 the activity was decreasing at increasing sodicity levels. The percentage rise was higher in tolerant cultivars, demonstrating that they are naturally able to survive the stress situation. Comparable results were in accordance with
Upadhay and Kumar (2022) stating that peroxidase activity was one among useful parameter for the identification of tolerant and susceptible genotypes.