Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 44 issue 2 (april 2024) : 340-345

Influence of Spacing and Weed Management Practices on the Growth Characters, Nutrient Removal of Weeds and Nutrient Uptake of Direct Seeded Rice

V. Mullaivendhan1,*, S. Avudaithai1, S. Rathika1, M. Baskar2, M. Sundar3
1Department of Agronomy, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Trichy-620 001, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Soil science and Agricultural Chemistry, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Trichy-620 001, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Kudumiyanmalai-622 104, Tamil Nadu, India.
Cite article:- Mullaivendhan V., Avudaithai S., Rathika S., Baskar M., Sundar M. (2024). Influence of Spacing and Weed Management Practices on the Growth Characters, Nutrient Removal of Weeds and Nutrient Uptake of Direct Seeded Rice . Agricultural Science Digest. 44(2): 340-345. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5847.

Background: The field experiment was conducted at the Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu during rabi, 2022-2023 to study the influence of spacing and weed management practices on growth characters, nutrient removal by weeds and nutrient uptake of direct seeded rice (DSR). 

Methods: The field experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. The main plots were spacing of 20 × 15 cm, 20 × 20 cm and 25 × 25 cm. Sub plots were assigned with weed management practices viz., pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE, Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g  a.i ha-1 on  3 DAS as PE + Cono weeding on 20 DAS + hand weeding (HW) on 40 DAS, Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + Cono weeding on 20 DAS and 40 DAS, Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + Bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + Cono weeding on 40 DAS, Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + Bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + Hand weeding on 40 DAS, Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS and unweeded control. 

Result: The results indicated that the highest growth attributes, higher nutrient uptake of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium under DSR and were significantly improved by spacing 20 × 20 cm along with pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i  ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + Bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + Cono weeding on 40 DAS. This was on par with pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + Bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g  a.i ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + Hand weeding on 40 DAS and hand weeding on 20 and 40 DAS. Similarly lower nutrient removal by weeds were registered under 20 × 15 cm spacing along with pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + Bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + cono weeding on 40 DAS. The interaction of spacing 20 × 20 cm and pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS  as PE + Bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + Cono weeding on 40 DAS significantly increased the growth attributes such as plant height, dry matter production and total numbers of tillers and significantly lowered the nutrient removal by weeds. 

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is important cereal crop, which more than half of the people worldwide consume next to wheat. Rice is grown on 167 million ha worldwide, with Asia accounting for 146 m ha. Above 90 per cent of the globally produced rice is consumed in Asia (FAO, 2019). In India, rice is grown in an area of 45.7 m.ha with a production of 124.3 m.t and an average productivity of 2.7 t ha-1. In Tamil Nadu, rice is cultivated in an area of 2.2 m.ha with a production of 7.9 m.t and a productivity of 3566 kg ha-1 (Indiastat, 2021). DSR is an alternative method of rice cultivation saves the water and reduces labour requirements upto 45% (Chakraborti et al., 2017). Weeds are becoming major biotic problem to sustain the effective crop growth and weed control (Rathika and Ramesh, 2019). However, DSR cultivation depends on various factors, including proper crop geometry and effective weed management strategies (Jannu and Narender, 2023). Different spacing of DSR brings down the seed rate without lowering the productivity and growth and development. Plant density was influenced by crop geometry, which reduces weed pressure based on plant population under DSR condition (Kumar, 2015). Weeds are competing with rice plants for available resources and it’s negatively affecting plant growth characters of DSR. Adoption of hand weeding alone increases the cost of weeding, In this concern effective weed control through use of pre and post emergence herbicides, mechanical and manual weeding are essential for reduces the weed interference and labour cost (Ramesh and Rathika, 2016). Appropriate weed control practices helps to mitigate the available resource competition, thereby promoting plant height, tiller production and overall biomass accumulation in DSR (Rathika et al., 2020). Therefore, plant geometry and integrated weed management were vital tools for increasing growth attributes and nutrient uptake and lowering nutrient removal by weeds (Kokilam et al., 2020). Hence, the present investigation was conducted to study the influence of spacing along with weed management practices on the growth and nutrient uptake of weeds in DSR.
The field experiment was conducted at Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India during rabi 2022-23. The experimental site was sandy clay loam in texture with pH of 9.0 and EC 0.2 dSm-1. The initial soil fertility status showed that low organic carbon (0.47 per cent), low available N (223 kg ha-1), medium available P2O5 (14.2 kg ha-1) and high available K2O (284 kg ha-1).
       
The treatment consisted of three drum seeder spacing (20 × 15 cm (M1), 20 × 20 cm (M2) and 25 × 25 cm (M3)) in main plots and seven weed management practices viz., pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at  20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE (S1), Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g  a.i ha-1 on  3 DAS  as PE + cono weeding on 20 DAS + hand weeding  (HW) on 40 DAS (S2), Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g  a.i ha-1 on  3 DAS as PE + cono weeding on 20 DAS and 40 DAS (S3), Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at  20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS  as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC  at  25 g a.i ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE +  cono weeding on 40 DAS (S4), Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g  a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g  a.i ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE +  HW on 40 DAS (S5), Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (S6) and unweeded control (S7) were assigned in sub plots.
       
The experimental field was laid out in split plot design with three replications. The medium-duration variety TNAU Rice TRY 3 was used for this field experiment. Sprouted seeds were directly sown in puddled soil. Seed rates (25, 21 and 18 Kg ha-1) were varied while using 20 × 15 cm, 20 × 20 cm and 25 × 25 cm spaced drum seeders. The biometric observation on growth characters, such as plant height, dry matter production and total numbers of tillers at harvest; similarly plant and weed samples collected for estimation of nutrient removal by weeds and nutrient uptake of DSR from respective treatments. The samples were dried in oven and finely ground in Wiley mill and used for estimating N, P and K content. The uptake of nutrients are calculated by multiplying the nutrient content and dry matter production and expressed in kg ha-1. The data collected from the experimental field was statistically analyzed using the procedure given by Gomez and Gomez (1984).
Effect of spacing on growth parameters of DSR
 
Spacing exerted a significant influence on growth characteristics of direct seeded rice (Table 1). The highest plant height (112.7 cm), DMP (9674 kg ha-1) and total number of tillers (478 no. m-2) were recorded with a spacing 20 × 20 cm. It was followed by spacing 20 × 15 cm. The lowest growth characters such as plant height, DMP and total number of tillers were registered under 25 × 25 cm. The results showed that efficient weed management under 20 × 20 cm spacing significantly increases plant growth attributes. This might be due to the fact that optimum spacing positively resulted uniform and well distributed plant canopy that shade out weeds, reducing their growth and helps to capture solar radiation efficiently, promoting photosynthetic activity, less intra plant competition of DSR which was significantly increases the growth attributes of DSR. Similar findings were also reported by Sihag et al., (2015); Khan et al., (2017); Rex Immanuel et al., (2019); Ramesh and Rathika (2020) and Palani et al., (2020).
 

Table 1: Influence of spacing and weed management practices on growth attributes of direct seeded rice at harvest.


 
Effect of weed management practices on growth parameters of DSR
 
The plant height, DMP and total numbers of tillers were significantly improved by weed management practices. Among the weed management techniques application of Pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS  as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i. ha-1 on 20 DAS  as PoE + cono weeding on  40 DAS significantly registered the highest plant height (117.5 cm), DMP (10295 kg ha-1) and total number of tillers (490 no. m-2) and this was on par with application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i. ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + hand weeding on 40 DAS and hand weeding on 20 and 40 DAS. This might be due to integrated weed management strategies that lowered crop weed competition by create a barrier that inhibits weed emergence and provides targeted weed control which provides a weed-free situation. Simultaneously, mechanical weeding helps to incorporate the decomposed weeds near the root zone of the crops and provides available nutrients to the crop, which significantly improved the growth and development of direct seeded rice. This result was closely confirmative with Rathika and Ramesh (2018), Manisankar et al., (2019) and Sivakumar et al., (2021).
       
Significant interaction was found between 20 × 20 cm spacing and application pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS  as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i. ha-1 on 20 DAS  as PoE + cono weeding on  40 DAS  for all the growth attributes viz., plant height, DMP and total number of tillers. The lowest growth characters were found under interaction between 25 × 25 cm spacing along with unweeded control. Similar findings were also reported by Nayak et al., (2014) and Sivakumar et al., (2021).
 
Nutrient removal by weeds
 
Effect of spacing on nutrient removal by weeds
 
Direct seeded rice sown using drum seeder with different spacing significantly influenced the nutrient removal by weeds at 45 DAS (Table 2). Higher amount of NPK removed by weeds (27.58, 17.53 and 12.84 kg ha-1, respectively) in 25 × 25 cm spacing than 20 × 15 cm and 20 × 20 cm of drum seeders spacing. Under 20 × 15 cm spacing had the lowest amount of nitrogen (10.98 kg ha-1), phosphorus (6.57 kg ha-1) and potassium (5.90 kg ha-1) removal, which was on par with 20 × 20 cm spacing. The results revealed that wider spacing 25 × 25 cm favoured the growth of weed seeds germination, which in turn created crop weed competition for available resource, such as nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. Simultaneously narrow spacings of 20 × 15 and 20 × 20 reduced the total weed density and weed dry weight; it helps to boost the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium by direct seeded rice. These results were confirmative with Payman and Singh (2008) and Tilahun (2019).
 

Table 2: Influence of spacing and weed management practices on nutrient removal by weeds at 45 DAS.


 
Effect of weed management practices on nutrient removal of weeds
 
Among the weed management strategies followed in direct seeded rice, application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i. ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + cono weeding on  40 DAS significantly lowered the N,P and K removal (8.48, 5.57 and 4.10 kg ha-1) by weeds, which was on par  with application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i. ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + hand weeding on 40 DAS and hand weeding on 20 and 40 DAS. This might be due to application of pre, post emergence herbicides and mechanical weeding were effectively manage the weed population, lower weed dry weight which led to reduce nutrient removal by weeds. The unweeded control exhibited higher weed density, weed dry weight and nutrient content in the weeds, leading to a greater removal of nutrients. These findings align with the research of Rathika and Ramesh (2018), Shanmugapriya et al., (2021) and Manisankar et al., (2021).
 
Nutrient uptake of DSR
 
Effect of spacing on nutrient uptake of DSR
 
Direct seeded rice sown using drum seeder with different spacing significantly influenced the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (Table 3). Drum seeder spacing 20 × 20 cm significantly increases the N, P and K uptake (115.8, 28.4 and 78.0 kg ha-1, respectively) of DSR and it was followed by 20 × 15 cm. The lowest uptake of N, P and K (100.2, 22.6 and 66.7 kg ha-1, respectively) was registered with 25 × 25 cm of spacing. This might be due to the fact that optimum spacing between plants minimises the competition for resources such as essential nutrients, moisture and solar radiation, reduces nutrient stress and promotes healthy root development, which enables plants to efficiently uptake essential elements from the soil. This is in agreement with the findings of Ram et al., (2014) and Rex Immanuel et al., (2019).
 

Table 3: Influence of spacing and weed management practices on nutrient uptake of direct seeded rice at harvest.


 
Effect of weed management practices on nutrient uptake of DSR
 
Application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i. ha-1 on 20 DAS  as PoE + cono weeding on  40 DAS significantly registered higher nutrient uptake of  nitrogen (127.3 kg ha-1), phosphorus (31.3 kg ha-1) and potassium (83.3 kg ha-1) of rice under direct seeded condition, which was comparable with application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i. ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + hand weeding on 40 DAS and hand weeding on 20 and 40 DAS over rest of weed management practices. Unweeded control registered significantly lower nutrient uptake of nitrogen (68.6 kg ha-1), phosphorous (16.1 kg ha-1) and potassium (49.1 kg ha-1), respectively. This was mainly due to lower weed competition, total weed density and total weed dry weight improved the soil aeration led to higher WCE and lower depletion of N, P and K by weeds, which were assisted the increases the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium to the crop for growth and development of direct seeded rice. This corroborated with the findings of Parameswari and Srinivas (2014), Chakraborti et al., (2017) and Sanodiya et al., (2017). 
The direct seeded rice by adopting spacing 20 × 20 cm along with application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 10% WP at 20 g a.i ha-1 on 3 DAS as PE + bispyribac sodium 10% SC at 25 g a.i. ha-1 on 20 DAS as PoE + cono weeding on 40 DAS resulted in maximum growth characters and N, P and K uptake. This treatment combinations paves way for maximizing the growth and development and nutrient uptake of direct seeded rice.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Department of Agronomy, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Thiruchirappalli for providing facilities for carrying out research work.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

  1. Chakraborti, M., Duary, B. and Datta, M. (2017). Effect of weed management practices on nutrient uptake by direct seeded upland rice under Tripura condition. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences.  6(12): 66-72.

  2. FAO. (2019). World Food and Agriculture-Statistical Year book 2019. Rome.

  3. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. International Rice Research Institute. A Wiley-interscience Publication. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

  4. Indiastat, (2021). Indiastat Data Base. Available from: https://www.indiastat.com/

  5. Jannu, N. and Narender, G. (2023). Weed management in direct seeded rice in Indian perspective: A review. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 12(1): 2522-2532.

  6. Khan, M.Z.K., Hasan, A.K., Anwar, M.P. and Islam, M.S. (2017). Weeding regime and plant spacing influence on weed growth and performance of transplant aman rice variety Binadhan-7. Fundamental and Applied Agriculture. 2(3): 331-339. https://doi.org/10.5455/faa.281436.

  7. Kokilam, M.V., Rathika, S., Ramesh, T. and Baskar, M. (2020). Weed dynamics and productivity of direct wet seeded rice under different weed management practices. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 10: 1-5. DOI: 10.18805/ IJARe.A-5586.

  8. Kumar, S. (2015). Effect of crop geometry on growth and yield in dry direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars M. Sc. Thesis. Institute of Agricultural sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

  9. Manisankar, G., Ramesh, T. and Rathika, S. (2021). Effect of different  weed management practices on nutrient removal, nutrient uptake and grain yield of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) under sodic soil ecosystem. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 10(5): 378- 389.

  10. Manisankar, G., Ramesh, T., Rathika, S., Janaki, P. and Balasubramanian, P. (2019). Evaluation of sequential herbicide application on transplanted paddy under sodic soil. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 8(5): 633-638.

  11. Nayak, B., Mujeeb, K.M., Mosha, K. and Prasuna, R.P. (2014). Plant spacing and weed management techniques influence weed competitiveness of drum seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.).  International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical  Technology. 5(3): 13-22.

  12. Palani, R., Ramesh, T., Rathika, S. and Balasubramaniam, P. (2020).  Evaluation of weed management techniques in drip irrigated aerobic rice. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 9(12): 2463-2471.

  13. Parameswari, Y.S. and Srinivas, A. (2014). Influence of weed management practices on nutrient uptake and productivity of rice under different methods of crop establishment.  Journal of Rice Research. 7(1): 77-86.

  14. Payman, G and Singh, S. (2008). Effect of seed rate, spacing and herbicide use on weed management in direct seeded upland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian Journal of Weed Science. 40(1 and 2): 11-15.

  15. Ram, H., Singh, J.P., Bohra, J.S., Singh, R. K. and Sutaliya, J.M.  (2014).  Effect of seedlings age and plant spacing on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economics of rice (Oryza sativa) genotypes under system of rice intensification.  Indian Journal of Agronomy. 59(2): 256-260. 

  16. Ramesh, T. and Rathika, S. (2016). Management of emerged weeds in irrigated blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) through post- emergence herbicides. Legume Research. 39(2): 289- 292. Doi: 10.18805/lr.v0iOF.6771.

  17. Ramesh, T. and Rathika, S. (2020). Effect of weed management techniques on drip irrigated aerobicrice. Plant Archives. 20(2): 4462-4466.

  18. Rathika, S. and Ramesh, T.  (2018). Evaluation of weed management practices in system of rice intensification. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 50(4): 388-390.

  19. Rathika, S. and Ramesh, T. (2019). Weed management in direct wet  seeded rice. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry.  SP2: 978-981.

  20. Rathika, S., Ramesh, T.  and  Shanmugapriya, P. (2020). Weed management in direct seeded rice: A review. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 8(4): 925-933.

  21. Rex, I.R., Thiruppathi, M., Saravanaperumal, M., Murugan, G. and Rao, G.B.S. (2019).  Impact of crop geometry and integrated  nutrient management on NPK uptake and nitrogen use efficiency of rice. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 6: 598-602.

  22. Sanodiya, P. and Singh, M.K. (2017). Integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 49(1): 10-14.

  23. Shanmugapriya, P., Rathika, S., Ramesh, T. and Janaki P. (2021). Influence of weed management practices on nutrient removal and performance of transplanted finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 57(3): 324-329. Doi: 10.18805/A-5589.

  24. Sihag, S.K., Singh, M.K., Meena, R.S., Naga, S., Bahadur, S.R. and Gaurav, Y.R. (2015). Influences of spacing on growth and yield potential of dry direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Ecoscan. 9(1-2): 517-519.

  25. Sivakumar, C., Krishnaveni, A. and Pandiyan, M. (2021). Efficiency of pre and post emergence herbicides with mechanical weeding on direct seeded rice in north western zone of Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 9(1): 1403-1409. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1t.11422.

  26. Tilahun, Z.M (2019). Effect of row spacing and nitrogen fertilizer levels on yield and yield components of rice varieties. World  Scientific News. 116: 180-193.

Editorial Board

View all (0)