Weed flora
The dominated weed species presented in the experimental site are
Cynodon dactylon, Echinochola colona and
Echinochloa crus-galli among the grasses,
Cyperus iria,
Cyperus difformis and
Cyperus rotundus among the sedges and
Eclipta alba and
Ammannia baccifera among the broad leaved weeds. Similar weed flora have been observed in direct seeded rice under sodic soil condition as reported by
Kokilam (2017);
Rathika and Ramesh (2019);
Palani et al., (2020).
Effect of spacing on weed dynamics
Plant spacing had significant effect on total weed density, total weed biomass and weed control efficiency in direct seeded rice (Table 1). Spacing of 20×15 cm recorded significantly the lowest total weed density (40.39 no. m
-2), total weed dry weight (85.52 g m
-2) and higher weed control efficiency (77.5%). This was on par with 20×20 cm of spacing which was registered the lowest total weed density (41.70 no. m
-2), total weed dry weight (87.28 g m
-2) and higher WCE (77.2%) at 45 DAS as compared with spacing of 25 × 25 cm. This might be due to spacing of 25 x 25 cm which allows weed seeds to germinate and to develop vigorous weed population under lower density of crops. However, 20 × 15 cm and 20 × 20 cm of spacing increases the light interception by the plants, which lowers the availability of sunlight for weed growth under the canopy of the crop and stimulate the ability of crop to suppress the weeds. This is in agreement with the findings of
Khan et al., (2017) and
Daba et al., (2022).
Effect of weed management practices on weed dynamics
Total weed density
The application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + cono weeding at 40 DAS registered the lowest weed density (7.67 no. m
-2) at 45 DAS and it was on par with pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium at 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + HW at 40 DAS and hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (7.95 and 8.08 no. m
-2, respectively). The next best treatment was significantly recorded the lower weed density by application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + cono weeding at 20 DAS and 40 DAS which was on par with pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + cono weeding at 20 DAS + hand weeding at 40 DAS (20.69 and 20.96 no. m
-2, respectively). This might be due to the fact that application of pre-emergence herbicides prohibits weed seed germination in the initial stage; similarly, post-emergence controls the weeds efficiently at the later stages and also adoption of cono weeding effectively incorporate the weeds while concurrently improved the soil aeration, which resulted in lower total weed density of grasses, sedges and broad leaved weeds. Unweeded control recorded higher weed density (192 no. m
-2). The corroborated with the findings of
Rathika and Ramesh (2018) and
Kokilam et al., (2020).
Weed dry weight
Application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + cono weeding at 40 DAS registered the lowest weed dry weight of 12.63 g m
-2. It was on par with pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + HW at 40 DAS and hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (12.95 and 13.19 g m
-2, respectively) at 45 DAS. This finding might be due to lower crop-weed competition throughout the crop weed competition period because of broad spectrum herbicides and periodical weed control strategies to DSR. This is in agreement with the findings of
Sangeetha (2006) and
Sivakumar et al., (2021). Unweeded control recorded higher weed dry weight of 405.54 g m
-2.
Weed control efficiency
Application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + cono weeding at 40 DAS recorded higher weed control efficiency (97.0%). This was on par with pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + HW at 40 DAS and hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (96.9 and 96.8%, respectively) at 45 DAS. This finding was similar to that reduction of weed biomass was attained due to pre emergence and post emergence supplemented with mechanical weeding and hand weeding in DSR. The corroborated with the findings of
Kokilam et al., (2020) and
Sivakumar et al., (2021).
Interaction effect on weed dynamics
The interaction effect of spacing and weed management practices were significantly influenced the weed density, dry weight of weeds. The lowest weed density and dry weight of weeds was found direct seeded rice sown at spacing of 20 × 15 or 20 × 20 cm with application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + cono weeding at 40 DAS, which was statistically on par with application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + HW at 40 DAS compared to unweeded control. The finding clearly indicated that density of crop population with appropriate weed management strategy suppress the weed dynamics under DSR situation. The interaction between spacing and weed management was in correlation with result of
Nayak et al., (2014).
Effect on yield attributes
Among spacing, the highest yield attributes were significantly recorded with spacing of 20 × 20 cm (Table 2). This was followed by 20 × 15 cm. The highest number of productive tillers m
-2 (389), panicle length (27.2 cm), number of grains panicle
-1 (192), number filled grains panicle
-1 (187) and test weight (24.7 g) were registered under spacing of 20 × 20 cm, which was followed by spacing of 20 × 15 cm while the lowest yield attributes were recorded in spacing of 25 × 25 cm under sodic soil condition. The finding revealed that spacing of 20 × 20 cm provided significantly higher yield attributes compared to 20 × 15 cm and 25 × 25 cm of spacing. This might be due to lower intra-crop competition helps to avail the essential resources
viz., solar radiation, nutrients, moisture and photosynthetic translocation which leads to higher yield attributes. This is in agreement with the findings of
Chadhar et al., (2020).
Among the weed management practices yield attributes were significantly influenced under sodic soil condition. The highest yield component
viz., number of productive tillers m
-2 (401), panicle length (26.5 cm), number of grains panicle
-1 (202), number filled grains panicle
-1 (191) and test weight (25.1 g) were recorded with application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + cono weeding at 40 DAS which was on par with application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + HW at 40 DAS and hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS. The next best treatment significantly registered on pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + cono weeding at 20 and 40 DAS which was on par with pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + cono weeding at 20 DAS + hand weeding at 40 DAS and lower yield attributes were recorded with unweeded control. This is might be due to lesser crop weed competition resulted weed free condition during critical period of DSR and boosted the nutrient uptake, space and light positively increased yield attributes. This is in agreement with the findings of
Prasanth et al., (2015) and
Manisankar et al., (2019).
Grain and straw yield
The grain and straw yield of DSR drastically influenced by spacing (Table 3). The highest grain and straw yields (4546 and 6714 kg ha
-1) was achieved under 20 × 20 cm of spacing which was followed by 20 × 15 cm of spacing, while least grain and straw yield (3616 and 5975 kg ha
-1) was noted in 25 × 25 cm of spacing. The finding indicated that spacing of 20 × 20 cm substantially higher the grain and straw yield compared to 20 × 15 cm and 25 × 25 cm. The probable cause for the higher grain and straw yield under spacing of 20 × 20 cm could be due to diminished crop-weed competition and lower intra - crop competition is increased the number of productive tillers and other yield components which was led the yield of grain and straw yield of DSR. The similar result in agreement with
Daba et al., (2022).
On the other hand frequency of weed management practices significantly increased the grain and straw yields of DSR. The highest grain and straw yield (4667 and 6898 kg ha
-1) was obtained under application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + cono weeding at 40 DAS which was on par with application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + HW at 40 DAS and hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS. The next greatest treatment significantly found under pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + cono weeding at 20 and 40 DAS which was on par with pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + cono weeding at 20 DAS + hand weeding at 40 DAS. This might be due to application of PE, PoE herbicides, mechanical weeding and hand weeding were lower the total weed density, weed dry weight acquired under weed free situation culminated in decreased the nutrient removal by weeds and improved the nutrient uptake of crop and finally enhanced the grain and straw yields of direct seeded rice. The corroborated with the findings of
Prashanth et al., (2016) and
Manisankar et al., (2021). The lowest grain and straw yields (2995 and 5231 kg ha
-1) was recorded with unweeded control.
Interaction effect on yield parameters and yield
The interaction effect of spacing and weed management practices on yield parameters, grain and straw yields was significant. The highest productive tillers m
-2, panicle length, total grains panicle
-1 and yield of grain and straw was found in the interaction between spacing of 20 × 20 cm and application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + cono weeding at 40 DAS which was on par with application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + HW at 40 DAS. Lowest yield parameters, grain and straw yields were found in the interaction between spacing of 25 × 25 cm and unweeded control. Test weight was did not superiorly influenced by interaction of spacing and weed management practices.
Khan et al., (2017) concluded that spacing and weed management practices influenced the yield component of rice which positively enhanced yield of rice.
Economics of DSR
Economic parameters have been computed using the current market prices of inputs and outputs (Table 4). Notably, employing a spacing of 20 × 20 cm along with the application of pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g ha
-1 at 3 DAS + bispyribac sodium 25 g ha
-1 at 20 DAS + cono weeding at 40 DAS resulted in a higher gross income of ₹ 86,402 ha
-1, accompanied by a net income of ₹ 38,900 ha
-1 with B:C ratio of 1.82. On the contrary, utilizing a spacing of 25 × 25 cm along with unweeded control approach obtained a lower gross income of ₹ 44,631 ha
-1. This was accompanied by a net income of ` 4,242 ha
-1 and a B:C ratio of 1.11. This was in conformity with the result of
Sivakumar et al., (2020).