Water extractable iodine
In relation to the allocation of iodine in various forms, it is observed that the water extractable and exchangeable fractions exhibit higher accessibility for crop absorption in comparison to other fractions. The water-soluble iodine concentration exhibited a decline from the 40
th day of incubation to the 120
th day of incubation across all treatments, with the exception of the treatment including the application of potassium iodate alone by soil drenching at 60 and 90 days after incubation (DAI) (Table 2). The application of KIO
3 alone by soil drenching resulted in a rise in the observed parameter from the 40th day after incubation (DAI) to the 80
th DAI, followed by a subsequent drop from the 80
th DAI to the 120
th DAI, as presented in Table 2. The application of iodate by soil drenching may have resulted in an enhancement in the iodine content that can be extracted from water samples at the 80
th day after incubation (DAI). Furthermore, a more pronounced drop in water extractable iodine was observed throughout the later phases of the experiment, namely between the 80
th and 120
th days after incubation (DAI). In contrast, the use of Cs-KIO
3 in isolation, as well as the combined application of Cs-KIO
3 and SD-KIO
3, resulted in a reduction in the depletion of iodine that is extractable in water for the whole duration of the incubation period, as compared to other treatments. The observed phenomenon can be attributed to a decrease in the rate of volatilization of iodate fertiliser when it is co-applied with chitosan, as opposed to its application in isolation. (
Rakoczy-Lelek et al., 2021).
Exchangeable Iodine
The combined treatments of CsKIO
3 and SD-KIO
3 exhibited the greatest levels of exchangeable iodine content during all phases of incubation. Regardless of the treatments used in the incubation research, the levels of exchangeable iodine generally exhibit a decline during the course of incubation period, with the exception of the treatment including sole soil drenching of potassium iodate. In all phases of incubation, the rate of decline in exchangeable iodine was seen to be lower for the treatments including Chitosan alone, as well as the combined treatments of Cs-KIO
3 and SD-KIO
3, when compared to the rate of decrease in water extractable iodine. In contrast, the treatments using SA-KIO
3 alone and the combination of SA-KIO
3 and SD-KIO
3 resulted in the greatest reduction in exchangeable iodine compared to water extractable iodine, as seen in Fig 1. The preservation of exchangeable iodine in chitosan applied treatments may be attributed to the robust interaction between chitosan and iodate, as shown by
Andreica et al., (2020). Among the various treatments, the application of Chitosan-KIO
3 complex at a rate of 10 kg ha
-1 combined with SD-KIO
3 at a concentration of 0.3% at 60 and 90 days after incubation (DAI) treatment resulted in a smaller reduction in exchangeable iodine levels compared to other treatments. Specifically, there was an 11.4% decrease in exchangeable iodine levels from the 40
th to the 80
th DAI and a 9.6% decrease from the 80
th DAI to the 120
th DAI. Following this, the application of Chitosan-KIO
3 complex at a rate of 5 kg ha
-1 combined with SD-KIO
3 at a concentration of 0.3% at 60
th and 90
th DAI showed a 20.9% decrease in exchangeable iodine levels from the 40
th to the 80
th DAI and a 14.7% decrease from the 80
th DAI to the 120
th DAI.
Iodine bound to oxides
Following the extraction of water-extractable and exchangeable iodine, the soil underwent an additional step in which hydroxylamine hydrochloride was introduced to extract oxide-bound iodine from the existing pool of soil iodine. In the current investigation, the largest proportion of oxide bound iodine was seen in the treatment involving the application of SA-KIO
3- 5 kg ha
-1 + SD-KIO
3- 0.3% at 60 and 90 days after incubation(DAI) treatment. This was followed by the treatment involving SA-KIO
3- 5 kg ha
-1 + SD-KIO
3- 0.2% at 60
th and 90
th DAI. Conversely, the lowest value was observed in the control treatments without any additional substances applied (Table 3). The amount of oxide bound iodine was found to be higher at the 40
th day after incubation (DAI) compared to the 80
th and 120
th DAI for all treatment groups. A contrasting pattern in the rate of decline was seen in the concentration of iodine bound to oxides, as compared to the other fractions. The rate at which oxide bound iodine decreased was found to be higher in the chitosan treatment alone, as well as in the combined Cs-KIO
3 and SD-KIO
3 treatments, with reductions ranging from 18% to 33% between the 40
th and 80
th days after incubation (DAI) and from 22% to 36% between the 80
th and 120
th DAI. In contrast, the rate of decrease in oxide bound iodine was relatively similar for the SA-KIO
3 and SD-KIO
3 treatments alone, with reductions of approximately 15% to 16% between the 40th and 80th DAI and 17% to 18% between the 80
th and 120
th DAI. According to
Kohler et al., (2019), the presence of oxides in soil leads to a greater likelihood of iodine binding when iodine is added to the soil.
Iodine bound to organic matter
The presence of organic matter iodine in soil is indicative of its unavailability and it has been seen to exhibit significant variation across different sources of chitosan and potassium iodate during the incubation process. The use of chitosan resulted in an elevation of the organic bound iodine in both Cs-KIO
3 and SD-KIO
3 treatments, hence reducing the adsorption of iodine by oxides. The rate of decline in organic bound iodine was higher in treatments where KIO
3 was applied to the soil alone, as well as in treatments where KIO
3 was applied in combination with soil application (SA-KIO
3) and soil drenching (SD-KIO
3) treatments (Fig 2). The lack of chitosan in the soil leads to a faster rate of decline in soil and soil drenching of potassium iodate. This is attributed to the reduction in soil binding affinity to organic bound iodine, as discussed by Dávila
Rangel et al., (2020). Additionally, it was observed that the magnitude of loss was greater between the 40
th and 80
th days after initiation (DAI), whereas it was comparatively lower between the 80
th and 120
th DAI for the Cs-KIO
3 and SD-KIO
3 treatments. This observation demonstrates the long-term stability of iodine in chitosan-based materials.
Residual iodine
The residual iodine, which was previously unavailable, has been extracted using Tetra Methyl Ammonium Hydroxide Solution. When potassium iodate alone was drenched to the soil at 60 and 90 days after incubation application (DAI), the residual iodine content increased from the 40
th to the 80+ DAI, but decreased from the 80
th to the 120
th DAI. The highest residual iodine content was observed in the Chitosan-KIO
3 complex at a rate of 10 kg ha
-1, combined with SD-KIO
3 at a concentration of 0.3%, at both 60th and 90
th DAI. This was followed by the Chitosan-KIO
3 complex at a rate of 5 kg ha
-1, combined with SD-KIO
3 at a concentration of 0.3%, at 60 and 90 DAI, throughout all stages of incubation (Table 4). The rate of decrease in residual iodine content during all stages of incubation was higher in treatments where KIO
3 was applied to the soil alone, as well as in treatments where SA-KIO
3 and SD-KIO
3 were combined. Compared to chitosan-based applications, both soil and foliar application of potassium iodate fertilizer showed instability, resulting in greater loss in SA-KIO
3 and SD-KIO
3 treatments and higher retention in chitosan-based treatments
(Sharif et al., 2018).