Performance of Rice genotypes under submergence condition
The performance of rice genotypes decreased in submerged environments, while most of the genotypes performed similarly under control circumstances. After 7 days and 14 days of submersion, there was a significant (P 0.01) difference in the survival rate among the genotypes of rice, ranging from 12.50% to 93.15%. Eighteen genotypes namely, Pankaj, Kerala Sundary, Kanoklata, Sonachur, Pravat, China IRRI, Bishnuprashad, Dehradun Basmati, Baskathi, Brahmabalak, Bahadur SUB1, Ranjit SUB1, Shyamashree, G.B. 2, Zeera, Jyotiprashad, Jaladhi 1-2 and Jaldubi along with Swarna SUB1, the tolerant check, showed survival rate of more than 75.0% and were therefore, categorised as moderately submergence tolerant type. The seedling development measured by the Relative Growth Index was considerably reduced under submergence and distinct genotype variations (P 0.01) were noted, ranging from 13.94% to 74.286% under submergence. Particularly, tolerant check Swarna SUB 1, including SUB 1 introgressed genotypes (Ranjit SUB1 and Bahadur SUB1) and certain landraces (Jaldubi and Jaladhi 1-2) showed a higher Relative Growth Index than Swarna.
In contrast, shoot elongation was found to increase substantially with submersion compared to the control plants, with genotype-specific values ranging from 33.86% to 96.00% (Table 4). In particular, the submergence tolerant Pankaj, which is statistically on par with the tolerant check genotype Swarna SUB1 compared to the susceptible Swarna, showed the least amount of shoot elongation. Mortality% was seen to fluctuate widely from 7.59% to 87.49% fourteen days following submersion at treated conditions. When compared to the susceptible check variety Swarna, genotype Bahadur SUB1, which statistically is on par with genotypes Ranjit SUB1 and Swarna SUB1, showed the lowest mortality %. Submergence significantly (P 0.01) decreased dry mass accumulation rate (DMAR) and a significant (P 0.01) varietal difference was noted. After 14 days of submersion, the range of DMAR was between 9.55 to 35.66 percent. After 14 days of submersion, the range of DM was between 9.55 to 35.66 per cent. In particular, the submergence-tolerant check variety (Swarna SUB 1) and some of the native landraces showed higher DMAR than Swarna, whereas the susceptible variety (Swarna) showed a dramatic fall in DM under submergence compared with the control.
According to
Voesenek and Bailey-Serres (2009) and
Colmer et al., (2014), two types of shoot growth moderation are suggested in genotypes that can tolerate submersion: slowed development with lower energy expenditure and elongation of the internode area of the shoot in response to rising water levels. Based on how each genotype performed differently when submerged, the genotypes were split into four groups. Pravat, China IRRI, Pankaj and Zeera, which were all members of the same group and experienced stunted development when submerged, are among those considered to be especially helpful for areas that are susceptible to flash floods. According to
Panda et al., (2008), certain genotypes of rice may store energy in such a situation and utilise it later during recovery by restricting the growth of their shoots when submerged. The second group of plants that elongate during the first half of the submergence period and then check their growth included Swarna SUB1, Ranjit SUB1, Bahadur SUB1, Shyamashree, G.B. 1, G.B. 2, Kerala Sundary, Maharaja, Sonachur, Baskathi, Bishnuprashad, Sahabhagi Dhan, Jyotiprashad and Dehradun Basmati.
Responses of rice genotypes under de-submerged condition
Numerous genotypes were restored in the de-submerged state along with the growth of fresh shoots and leaves. There were several seedlings retrieved in conditions of de-submergence, ranging in number from 6.33 to 23.33 (Table 5). In a de-submerged setting, plant height changed significantly (P 0.01) and significant varietal variations were found in a wide range of 9.77 cm to 33.90 cm (Table 4). The genotype Brahmabalak, which is statistically comparable to China IRRI, had the greatest plant height. The genotype G.B. 2 showed the greatest shoot length (P 0.01) and is statistically comparable to the genotypes Pravat, Brahmabalak, Kerala Sundary and China IRRI. The recovery percentage under de-submergence conditions ranged widely, from 40.78% to 95.89%. With a recovery rate of more than 92.0%, four genotypes-Bahadur SUB1, Jaladhi 1-2, China IRRI and the tolerant check-Swarna SUB1 variety-were classified as submergence tolerant.
Genetic variation of submergence tolerance attributing characters
The PCV, was discovered to be bigger than the GCV for all traits (Table 6) indicating significant role of environment into phenotypic expression. High heritability (77.87%-92.04%) and high GAM (31.62%-148.29%) were found for survival rate, shoot elongation, mortality rate, dry mass, number of recovered plants and recovery rate in submerged and de-submerged situations, respectively. Therefore, it would be beneficial to prioritise these characteristics throughout the selection process for crop enhancement projects.
SSR marker-based genotyping
Nine SSR markers were used in this study to assess the genotypic variance, including RM125, RM214, RM224, RM 8300, RM 12168, RM 6318, SUB1BC1, SUB1BC2 and SUB1BC3. One of the objectives of this investigation was to identify rice genotypes that are submergence-tolerant; the reliable and straight forward identification is made possible by the specific genetic marker. In order to ascertain whether there is any relatedness between genotypes with the submergence-tolerant checks Swarna SUB1, the submergence-specific markers SUB1BC1, SUB1BC2 and SUB1BC3 were utilised, while the diversity markers RM 214, RM224, RM125, RM6318, RM12168, RM8300 were used to assess genotype diversity. Major alleles are those that have the highest frequency. Maximum allele sizes in markers RM125, RM6318, RM224, RM12168, RM8300, RM214, SUB1BC2, SUBLBC3 and SUB1BC1 were 130bp, 175bp, 165bp, 140bp, 193bp, 120bp and 265bp, respectively. SUB1BC3 displayed the largest gene diversity while SUB1BC2 displayed the lowest gene diversity. According to
Travis et al., (2015), the PIC value reflects allele diversity and frequency across genotypes. The PIC values for the current investigation were 0.22 (SUB1BC2) to 0.70 (SUB1BC3) (Table 7).
According to
Iftekharuddaula et al., (2011), marker SUB1BC3 was a submergence-specific marker that was downstream of SUB1A. Maximum genotypes displayed genomic bands at 205 bp level, whereas the expected length was 217 bp. Swarna SUB1 displayed a band in that location and most genotypes displayed bands nearby, with the exception of susceptible genotypes Swarna and Ranjit. The genotypes Pravat, China IRRI, Dehradun Basmati, Brahmabalak and Kerala Sundary each showed a distinct allele in that region, it possesses certain distinctive characteristics of submergence tolerance (Fig 1). In case of SSR molecular marker SUB1A203, five unique DNA sequence data have been obtained for the genotypes Swarna, Kerala Sundary, Brahmabalak, Pravat and China IRRI and they were submitted to NCBI genomic depository obtaining the code OQ317918-OQ317922. The SUB1C1 primer’s banding pattern showed that the majority of genotypes displayed a band at 165 bp like that of Swarna SUB1. On the other hand, the genotypes Shyamashree, G.B. 1, Pravat, China IRRI and Sonachur clearly demonstrated their distinctiveness by presenting a distinct banding pattern at 245 bp (Fig 1).
Factor analysis based on morphological characters and molecular data
The factor analysis at morphological level showed that Swarna SUB1, the tolerant check and Swarna, the vulnerable type occupied quadrant 2 and 4 respectively (Fig 2). Such diversity in the scatter plot was also for the tolerant in the second quarter, the most divergent variety was represented by the genotypes Ranjit SUB1, Bahadur SUB1, Brahmabalak and Pankaj, as well as the submergence tolerant Swarna SUB1. The tolerant genotypes were mostly found in the quadrant 1 followed by quadrant 2 while morphologically susceptible genotype like Swarna, was placed in quadrant 4 (Fig 2).
The factor analysis based on SSR data also separated the genotypes into four quarters with clear separation of submergence tolerant Swarna SUB1 (Quadrant 1) and susceptible Swarna (Quadrant 3) (Fig 3). The genotypes Kerala Sundary, Pankaj, Jaladhi1-2, Zeera, Kanoklata and Sahabhagi Dhan along with submergence tolerant check variety Swarna SUB1 clearly separated from the other genotypes and belonged to the most molecularly tolerant variety present in first quadrant. In quadrant 4 fourteen days morphologically tolerant genotypes China IRRI, Jaldubi and Bahadur SUB1 share the same quadrant with the genotype Baskathi and Bishnuprashad. So, in the present analysis, it can be inferred that quadrant 1 was most tolerant followed by quadrant 4 and quadrant 2. Whereas, quadrant 3 contains susceptible genotypes.
The congruence between morphological and molecular factorial analysis can be used to define the tolerance pattern of genotypes more precisely. It can be summarized in the present finding that the local landraces like Kerala Sundary and Brahmabalak have the innate potentiality of possessing submergence tolerant gene which can be utilized directly in introgression of in the high yielding background. Some other genotypes like Jaladhi 1-2, Kanoklata and Zeera were also equally effective as submergence tolerant genotype and hence all the genotypes will help to broaden the genetic resources of desired submergence tolerance trait for utilization in breeding program. Moreover, the molecular markers identified for submergence tolerance will facilitate the screening process more simple and more precise.