Agro-wastes are a significant byproduct of agricultural activity. The advancement of value-added products including nanoparticles, pulp, biochar, organic fertiliser and biogas from agricultural crop leftovers may be a significant way to address the issue of the best way to dispose of agro-waste (
Bhuvaneshwari et al., 2019). Burning crop residue or agricultural waste was seen to be a severe health peril (
Nagendran, 2011). It is a significant contributor to local pollution in addition to subjecting the majority of those around to high levels of particulate matter (
Bhuvaneshwari et al., 2019). An alarming rise in air pollution, especially in 2015 and beyond, has been attributed to the widespread burning of agricultural waste in different parts of the world, which has brought the issue of agricultural waste management to the attention of various international agencies. Cereal crops are mostly grown in East Asian nations including China, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. China and India are the two countries with the highest global carbon emissions, respectively (
FAOSTAT, 2021). Prior research stated that in-situ agricultural crop residue combustion accounted for more than 33% of all biomass combustion in Asian countries
(Chen et al., 2019). After China, India has the second-largest agro-based economy in the world with year-round crop cultivation. According to the Indian Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), India generates 500 Mt of crop residue annually. The remaining 92 Mt of this 500 Mt of agricultural residue is still burned in various agricultural fields throughout India, while some of it has been utilised for fodder and other uses (
NPMCR, 2014). The world’s top rice-producing nations, including India, have an abundance of rice husk (RH), a biomass that is discarded throughout agricultural practises. While being burnet as a fuel, RH produces a large volume of rice husk ash (RHA) and has a very high thermal efficiency. Rarely employed in the commercial sector, RH creates a significant amount of RHA around 20% of RH when used as fuel. According to
Koteswara and Pranav (2011) and
Soltani et al., (2015) when rice husk is burned in ambient air with twenty million tonnes per year worldwide, the by-product is rice husk ash. The handling and transportation of rice husk are difficult due to its low density and poor commercial interest, which leads to disposal issues and significant environmental hazard (
Pode, 2016). Therefore, numerous efforts have been made to use RH/RHA for the manufacture of Nanosilica, which typically resides in the amorphous phase in RH/RHA. The numerous techniques for extracting silica from RH/RHA and their sustainable usage in diverse fields were compiled and addressed by
Fernandes et al., (2017) and
Shen (2017).
Environmentalists from all around the world have focused on the agriculture industry in recent years in an effort to create an effective strategy for minimising agro waste. Agro-waste can be used in a wide variety of ways for reuse and sustainable development. One such area that has tremendous potential for agro-waste prevention is nanotechnology.
Naddaf et al., (2020) and
Yuvakkumar et al., (2014) described the preparation of silica materials utilising a variety of extraction procedures, including solution precipitation, sol-gel processing, thermochemical redox reaction and vapour-phase reaction. Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), sodium silicate and silicon alkoxide are typically utilised as precursors to silica for manufacturing in large quantities. At high temperature (1300°C), silicon alkoxide is traditionally derived from raw silica sand via a multistep carbo thermal reaction pathway
(Arunmetha et al., 2015), while sodium silicate is extracted by heating quartz, an earth substance, to a high temperature of 1300°C and then treating it with sodium carbonate
(Mejia et al., 2016). Both of the aforementioned methods use a lot of energy and have environmental risks. Additionally, these technologies produce greenhouse gases like CO
2, making them unsuitable for silica production in large quantities
(Ma et al., 2012). Furthermore, the primary raw material may become scarce if natural resources like quartz are used to produce silica.
Laane (2018) reported that the synthesized amorphous silica nanoparticles with diameters in the range of 20 to 40 nm are most commonly used in foliar application in the field of agriculture. Therefore, in recent years, there has been an increase in interest among researchers in finding alternative sources of silica and ways to extract it.
Instead of sodium carbonate (Na
2CO
3), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is preferable for the alkali-SiO
2 extraction method for producing silica from RHA because Na
2CO
3 releases a tremendous amount of CO
2 during the extraction process, making the procedure unsustainable for the environment. As a result, a few tweaks were made to the current study’s process to make it more environmentally friendly. The prevailing technique involves mixing RHA directly with Na
2CO , which results in the production of sodium silicate and CO
2. Despite being straightforward and affordable, this practice pollutes the environment as its produces CO
2 (
Sun and Gong, 2001). Therefore, in the current investigation, RHA was first dissolved in the water before Na
2CO
3 was added. As an outcome, carbonic acid, which is safe for the environment, rather than CO
2 has been produced. This is because silica rich husk ash did not completely dissolve when distributed in water since it was difficult to break the covalent structure of silica; instead, meta-silicic acid (H
2SiO
3) was produced. When this meta-silicic acid was combined with sodium carbonate, sodium silicate (Na
2SiO
3) and carbonic acid (H
2CO
3) were produced. The byproduct carbonic acid is a mild acid upon stabilization poses no threat to the environment. As a result, this method may be appropriate for producing silica in large quantities. As a result, the objective of this study was to extract pure amorphous silica nanoparticles (SiO
2-NPs) from RHA using a reusable, environmentally benign process. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), fourier transformation infrared (FT-IR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) were used to characterise the retrieved silica.