Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Application of Pranic Agriculture to Improve Growth and Yield of Banana (Musa sp. var. Nanjangud Rasa Bale)-A Comparative Field Trial

K. Nagendra Prasad1, V. Vinu1, Srikanth N. Jois1,*
1World Pranic Healing Foundation India, Research Centre, Mysore-570 009, Karnataka, India.

Background: The projection of prana to soil, seeds and seedlings to enhance plant growth is referred to as Pranic Agriculture (PA).

Methods: A field study was carried out to study the influence of PA on Banana var. (Musa sps. var. Nanjangud rasabale) growth for a duration of one year. Banana suckers and agricultural land were divided into two groups namely pranic and control in half acre. The land and suckers were treated with PA and were referred to as the pranic group, while non-pranic were referred to as the control group. Growth parameters (shoot length, shoot diameter, number of leaves, leaf length and leaf diameter) were evaluated on the 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th and 12th months and statistically analyzed using repeated measure ANOVA. Fruit morphology and days to flowering were analyzed using a t-test.

Result: For pranic group, shoot diameter (F = 9.407, p = 0.001), leaf length (F = 7.082, p = 0.003) and leaf diameter (F = 11.459, p = .000), flowering days (t = 3.39, P=.002), fruit characteristics like fruit bunch weight (t = 8.81, p = .000), total number of fruits in bunch (t = 9.20, p = .000), fruits weight (t = 7.48, p = .000), fruit length (t = 7.94, p = .000) enhanced considerably and the results were all significant when compared to control. Further studies are needed to find out the mechanism for the improved growth in the pranic group. This study will help the farmers to get higher yields and more income by using pranic agriculture.

Banana, is one of the most important commercial tropical fruits traded in India. Globally, India is the world’s largest producer comprising 27%, with about 3,33,79000 MT productions (2020-21) from 923 thousand ha under cultivation (Takale et al., 2023). Bananas with year-round availability provide a permanent source of income to the small and marginal farmers in developing countries and rural populations, thus, playing an important role in poverty alleviation. The fruit can be eaten raw and is composed of mainly water and unripe fruit is a good source of resistant starch comprising of 30-50%, along with other nutrients. Resistant starch has found many clinical applications as probiotics, in regulating blood sugar levels and cholesterol, having a positive impact on the human colon. Bananas are a rich source of potassium, protein, carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals, which are the most essential parts of the diet of a human being (Paramasivam et al., 2021). Banana fruits are known to be a good source of antioxidants, polyphenols and carotenes. Banana fruit and plants are treated as symbols of prosperity, owing to their greater socio-economic significance and utility in Indian religious culture. All the parts of the banana plant (fruit, flowers, stem, leaves) have medicinal and nutritional importance and are commonly referred to as ‘kalpatharu’ in India (Ranjha et al., 2020).
Among different banana cultivars, Nanjangud rasabale (NR) is a native variety of banana that originated from a divine place known as ‘Nanjangud’ in Karnataka, India. It is considered as an exotic and elite variety in Karnataka and has been given Geographical Indication (GI) protection in 2005 by the Government of India for its distinguished aroma when ripened fully, fibrous texture and taste. NR is grown in and around Mysuru and Chamarajanagar districts of Karnataka and drives huge demand throughout the country. The flowers of this fruit have antidiabetic properties (Ramu et al., 2016), Unfortunately, this variety is highly susceptible to Panama disease and its popularity among the farmer is diminishing. Hence, the area under cultivation has been drastically reduced over the last three decades from 500 acre to just 5 ha and hence, this is now regarded as an endangered variety (Babu, 2019). Hence, an increase in NR productivity is important. Various methods have been implemented to increase NR productivity. Among them, micropropagation (Babu, 2019) and chemical-induced mutations (Kishor et al., 2017) have been attempted. However, these methods use chemicals, are costly, cannot be easily implemented by farmers and are not sustainable. Hence, alternative methods are needed which are traditional, environmentally friendly, cheap, easily adoptable by farmers and sustainable.
Traditional methods like Pranic Agriculture (PA) (Prasad et al., 2022), Agnihotra, meditation (Wright, 2021) and biofield therapy (Lee and Wu, 2019) are known to increase productivity. These methods are not substitute for farming but are complementary in nature. Pranic agriculture is a traditional agriculture practice in India and it uses the application of subtle energies or prana to modify plant growth, health and soil conditions (FAO, 2014). Prana is that vital energy which is essential to keep the body alive and in healthy conditions (Sui, 2015). Prana is also referred to as Ki or Bioplasmic energy. Every object including human beings, plants and trees is surrounded by an energy field. We can feel, interact with this energy and transfer energy to plants. Plants obtain prana from three major sources namely ground prana, sun prana and air prana (Sui, 2015). Using Kirlian photography, investigators have been able to take photographs of the bioenergy/prana of leaves (Pisotska et al., 2020).  Pranic agriculture can be applied to plants to produce faster growth, to increase seed germination and seedling vigor and to enhance yield (Prasad and Jois, 2021). Moreover, PA offers a wide range of economic benefits to farmers and under the current scenario of agrarian crisis, there is a need to adopt green and eco-friendly techniques to enhance productivity. The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence that PA treatment support farmers as a green and eco-friendly technique and helps in achieving sustainable development goals.
Plant propagation
Healthy sword suckers of Banana cv Nanjanagudu rasabale were collected from the farmer’s field at Devarasanahalli, Nanjanagudu taluk, Mysuru district. The suckers were washed and kept under shade for 2 days. It was divided into two groups, namely pranic and control.
Growing conditions
The experiment was conducted in March 2018 at an organic farm in Hosakote Masge village, Nanjangud, Mysore. The location of the organic farm was 12°07'28.3"N 76°64'22.9"E. The experiment was conducted on a half acre of agricultural land. Two experimental plots of 100 ft × 100 ft each were selected on the farm. It was named pranic and control plot and suckers were sown in their respective plots. Suckers were sown at a depth of 2 ft at a distance of 9 ft × 9 ft. The temperature was in the range of 28-35°C and with a relative humidity of 70-85%. Both plots were watered using drip irrigation. 
Pranic treatment
Before sowing, banana suckers and the land of the pranic group were treated with prana. Treatment was given to suckers and land simultaneously for 8 times at an interval of twice/week and each treatment lasted for about 15 minutes. Treatment involved techniques to improve the quality and quantity of prana. The healer first prays for the almighty God during the healing process to receive his blessings. The healer then sensitizes his hands and scans the suckers/soil. Any contaminated energies were perceived as heavy energies, which are felt in his hands as tingling sensations. These contaminated energies are then removed by flicking them into a saltwater bowl using green prana. Green prana has cleansing properties. The healer then energizes the suckers and soil by projecting fresh electric violet prana. Electric violet prana has regeneration properties (Sui, 2015).
Growth parameters
Suckers of pranic and control were sown at their respective plots. Timely required cultural practices like weeding and irrigation were given as crop maintenance. Organic liquid manure in the form of Jeevamrutha was given once a month, for twelve months (Sutar, 2019). Morphological observations like shoot length (cm), leaf length (cm) and leaf breadth (cm), were recorded once in two months using measuring tape. Shoot diameter (cm) was measured using digital vernier calipers and the number of leaves was counted manually. Flowering traits like days taken for first flowering and first harvest were recorded when flower and fruit emergence was noticed. Yield-related traits like fruit bunch weight (kg), no. of fruits per bunch, fruit diameter (cm), fruit weight (g) and fruit girth (cm) were recorded after harvest.
Statistical analysis
Growth and yield data were analyzed for 25 samples from each treatment (pranic and control) and presented as the mean value±standard error (SE). Analysis for growth was carried out by repeated measure ANOVA and yield by paired t-test using SPSS-21 and Microsoft Excel and the level of significance was expressed at 5% probability (p<.05) for all the parameters.
From the results, a significant difference in the growth of Nanjangud rasabale plants in control and pranic is noticed (Fig 1). Shoot length in pranic was increased when compared to the control but, the results were found to be insignificant (F=2.862, p=0.062) (Fig 2A). At twelve months of growth, the shoot diameter (cm) of the pranic group was 47.8±9.8 cm, while for the control it was 37.9±6.6 (Fig 2B) and the difference between both groups was found to be significant (F=9.407, p= 0.001). However, number of leaves (Fig 2C) results were insignificant (F=1.033, p= 0.390), while leaf length (F=7.082, p= 0.003) (Fig 2D) and leaf diameter (F=11.459, p= .000) (Fig 2E) of pranic group were found to be significantly higher when compared with control. A plant height of 79.1 cm is reported by Arun et al., (2012), at 6 months which is in agreement with our current findings (73.7±9.4). Also, the number of leaves (8.8) at 6 months and leaf width (30.8 cm), is parallel to our results. 

Fig 1: Growth of Nanjangud rasa bale.


Fig 2: Growth parameters of Nanjangud rasa bale.

Flowering was first noticed in the pranic group, 356±9.5 days, while in control it took 365.9±12.9 days and the results were significant (t = 3.39, P<0.001) (Table 1). Fruit harvest was earlier in pranic (125.7±8.9 days), while in control it took more days to fruit harvest (132.8±9.7) and the results were significant (t = 2.76, p<0.01). Fruit bunch weight in pranic was higher (6.3±0.5 kg), while in control it was only 4.9±0.6 kg and the results were significant (t=8.81, p=.000). Hence, pranic fruit bunch weight was higher by 29.9%, when compared with control (Fig 3).  A fruit bunch weight of 9.1 kg was reported by Kotur et al., (2014), which is higher than in our present findings. The number of hands per fruit bunch, fruit weight and fruit length were all higher in pranic when compared with the control. Fruit weight and fruit length of pranic were 22.4% and 23.5% higher than the control (t = 7.48, p = .000). However, even though the fruit diameter in pranic was more, the results were not significant (t = 0.731, p = 0.472). Kumar et al., (2011) have reported a fruit length of 13.1, a fruit weight of 97.30 g and fruit bunch weight of 6.37 kg which is in consistent with our findings (Table 1). 

Fig 3: Nanjangud rasa bale fruit bunch.


Table 1: Fruiting parameters of Nanjuangud rasa bale.

Various treatments including Pranic Agriculture (Prasad et al., 2022), Biofield (Lee and Wu, 2019) and chi energy (Bai et al., 2000) involve interaction with energy fields of the plants by trained healers. These energies when applied on plants, have been proven to enhance growth and improve yield. For instance, pea and wheat seeds when treated with chi energy, germinated faster, against the control (Bai et al., 2000). Bok choy and lettuce plants obtained  improved vegetative growth, an increase in chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in Biofield treated plants (Lee and Wu, 2019). Earlier studies have reported an increase in shoot length, shoot diameter, root length, number of leaves and increase in plant yield when pranic agriculture has been applied to plants (Prasad et al., 2022). 
In all cultures and medical traditions, healing has been achieved by projecting energy in the form of prana or Qi. Healers have been postulated to produce large magnetic fields from their hands during healing (Srinivasan, 2017). Magnetic field application has been proven to increase the growth and yield of many crops by altering enzyme activity and nutrient uptake among others, (Hafeez et al., 2023). Plant height and stem girth are good indices of plant vigor and contribute to an increase in productivity (Oke et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2022). Pranic-treated Nanjangud rasabale shoot diameter and shoot length was higher when compared to the control. Thus, higher plant vigor and yield is noticed in our current findings. 
Previously, we have reported that pranic-treated plants had longer root lengths. The longer the root length, the higher the nutrition absorption by the plants and thus great plant vigor and enhanced crop yield (Fageria and Moreira, 2011). Water when treated with pranic energy, the contact angle and surface tension is reduced which helps in better nutrient absorption by the plants (Ananthakeshava et al., 2021). Chi can alter the structure of mitochondria, enzyme activity and nucleotide polymerization, influence cell metabolism and affect gene expression (Bai et al., 2000). Probably, in the current work, when the pranic energy was applied on the banana suckers, the energy level in the suckers was increased and results in more energy supplied to the cells during cell division and elongation, growth and differentiation, resulting in enhanced growth of plants and increase in crop yield. By applying pranic energy in the ridge gourd, a polymorphism of 22% was obtained between the pranic and control groups. This indicates that there is substantial variability between the two groups (Poornima et al., 2020). The externally applied pranic energy might have acted as a stimulus to the plants and might have brought changes at DNA and at cellular levels. Nevertheless, the mechanism behind this needs to be studied.
The results show that pranic agriculture can have a significant impact on NB to increase the yield, shoot length, shoot diameter and number of leaves. The use of pranic agriculture to obtain these benefits does not require any specialized care or equipment or conditions. Any person who is interested can be trained. This would have a positive impact on the soil, air, water and human health. Further studies are needed to study the mechanism behind improved growth when treated with pranic agriculture. 
We would like to thank Master Choa Kok Sui, the founder of Modern Pranic Healing and for imparting the precise knowledge of pranic agriculture. All Acharyas of the World Pranic Healing Foundation, India for encouragement, support and funding the study.  Mr. Papanna N.S. for the application of pranic agriculture techniques and all those who contributed to the present study directly and indirectly. 

  1. Ananthakeshava, I., Srikanth, N.J., Prasad, K.N., Vinu, V. (2021). Reduction in surface tension of water due to pranic healing. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 14(26):  2175-2179. DOI:10.17485/IJST/v14i26.488

  2. Arun, W.A., Bohra, P., Umesha, K., Chandrashekar, S.C., Sathyanarayana,  B.N., Sreeramu, B.S. (2012). Successful rescue and field establishment of native banana varieties severely affected by rhizome rot. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development  in the Tropics and Subtropics. 113(2): 147-154.

  3. Babu, P. (2019). An efficient protocol for in vitro regeneration of banana var. Nanjangudu rasabale (Musa spp. AAB). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science. 8(6): 3392-3402.

  4. Bai, F., Sun, C., Liu, Z., Shen, J., Shen, Y., Ge, R., Bei, C., Zhang, J., Shi, X., Liu, Y., Liu, X. (2000). Seeds induced to germinate rapidly by mentally projected ‘qi energy’ are apparently genetically altered. American Journal of Chinese Medicine. 28(1): 3-8.

  5. Fageria, N.K. and Moreira, A. (2011). The role of mineral nutrition on root growth of crop plants. Advances in Agronomy. 110: 251-331.

  6. FAO, (2014). Territorial Development and Local Knowledge Systems. and accessed on 10/03/2023

  7. Hafeez, M.B., Zahra, N., Ahmad, N., Shi, Z., Raza, A., Wang, X., Li, J. (2023). Growth, physiological, biochemical and molecular changes in plants induced by magnetic fields: Plant Biology. 25(1): 8-23.

  8. Kishor, H., Prabhuling, G., Ambika, D.S., Abhijith, Y.C. (2017). Chemical induced mutations for development of resistance in banana cv. Nanjanagudu Rasabale. Crop Research. 52(6): 234-239.

  9. Kotur, S.C., Ramesh, P.R., Venugopalan, R. (2014). Evaluating direct feeding of de-navelled banana bunch with nutrients for enhancing fruit quality, yield and nutrient content. Journal  of Horticultural Sciences. 9(2): 166-171.

  10. Kumar, C.N., Sathyanarayana, B.N., Naresh, P., Lakshmipathy, M. (2011). Effect of certain pre harvest treatments in improving the yield and quality of banana cv. Nanjangudu Rasabale.  Plant Archives. 11(2): 677-681.

  11. Lee, C.T. and Wu, H.C. (2019). Effect of biofield treatment on growth and physiology of hydroponically-grown lettuce and bok choy plants. Agrivita, Journal of Agricultural Science.  41(3): 395-404. 

  12. Oke, A.M., Osilaechuu, A.P., Aremu, T.E., Ojediran, J.O. (2020). Effect of drip irrigation regime on plant height and stem girth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 445(1): 012016). IOP Publishing.  DOI: 10.1088/1755- 1315/445/1/012016.

  13. Paramasivam, S.K., Saravanan, A., Narayanan, S., Shiva, K.N., Ravi, I., Mayilvaganan, M., Uma, S. (2021). Exploring differences in the physicochemical, functional, structural and pasting properties of banana starches from dessert, cooking and plantain cultivars (Musa spp.). International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 191: 1056-1067.

  14. Pisotska, L., Yevdokymenko, N., Stetsula, N., Stakhiv, V. (2020). Kirlianography of bioelectric properties in plants. Human Health: Realities and Prospects. Monographic Series.  5(Ch. 13): 161-172.

  15. Poornima, R., Prasad, K.N., Yathindra, H., Jois, S.N. (2020). Influence of pranic agriculture on morphological traits, chlorophyll content, genetic polymorphism of ridge gourd (Luffa actungula L. Roxb) accessed by RAPD marker analysis.  Agrivita, Journal of Agricultural Science. 42(3): 521-532. DOI:

  16. Prasad, K.N. and Jois, S.N. (2021). Effect of pranic agriculture treatment on growth of cluster beans (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). Indian Journal of Agriculture Research.  55(3): 359-363. Doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5509

  17. Prasad, K.N., Srikanth, N.J., Papanna, N.S. (2022). Pranic Agriculture for Enhanced Crop Production. Introduction and Application  of Organic Fertilizers As Protectors of Our Environment, 340. Cambridge Scholarly Publishing, UK.

  18. Ramu, R.S., Shirahatti, P., Zameer, F.B.l, Dhanjaya, M.N., Nagendra, P. (2016). Assessment of in vivo antidiabetic properties of umbelliferone and lupeol constituents of banana (Musa sp. var. Nanjangud Rasa Bale) flower in hyperglycaemic rodent model. Plos one. 11(7): e0160048.

  19. Ranjha, M.M.A.N., Irfan, S., Nadeem, M., Mahmood, S. (2020). A comprehensive review on nutritional value, medicinal uses and processing of banana. Food Reviews International. 38(2): 199-225.

  20. Srinivasan, T.M. (2017). Biophotons and subtle energy carriers. International Journal of Yoga. 10(2): 57-58. doi: 10.4103/ ijoy.IJOY_18_17.

  21. Sui, C.K. (2015). The Ancient Science and Art of Pranic Healing, 3rd Edition, Institute of Inner studies publishing foundation India Private Ltd., India. 

  22. Sutar, R., Sujith, G.M., Devakumar, N. (2019). Growth and yield of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] as influenced by Jeevamrutha and Panchagavya application. Legume Research-An International Journal. 42(6): 824-828. Doi: 10.18805/LR-3932

  23. Takale, B.A., Lazarus, T.P., Vijayan, A., Sathayan, A.R., Joseph, B. (2023). Impact of climate change on banana production in Thiruvananthapuram District of Kerala, India. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics and Sociology. 41(3): 114-123.

  24. Wright, J. (Ed.). (2021). Subtle Agroecologies: Farming with the Hidden Half of Nature. CRC Press, New York, USA.

  25. Yang, Y., Dong, S., Miao, H., Liu, X., Dai, Z., Li, X., Zhang, S. (2022). Genome-wide association studies reveal candidate  genes related to stem diameter in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Genes. 13: 1095.

Editorial Board

View all (0)