Population of weeds
The data on the effect of planting geometry and weed management on population of grassy weeds, broadleaved weeds, sedges and total weed population recorded at 20 and 60 DAS are presented in Table 1. Data on the population of weeds varied significantly at different planting geometry and weed management treatments at all the stages. The population of grassy and broadleaved weeds were recorded lowest (6.43, 9.75 and 7.03, 9.12 m
-2, at 20 DAS and 60 DAS, respectively) under 20 × 10 cm
2 planting geometry. Planting geometry 20 × 10 cm
2 was found to be statistically at par with 30 × 10 cm
2 and recorded the lowest population of sedges (2.37, 1.88) at 20 and 60 DAS respectively. Treatment pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha
-1 + one hand weeding at 30 DAS recorded the lowest grassy weed population (2.82, 7.32) at 20 and 60 DAS, while treatment pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha
-1 + imazethapyr @ 100 g a.i ha
-1 at 30 DAS was found to be statistically at par. At 20 and 60 DAS, the population of broadleaved weeds and sedges were significantly lowest (5.88, 7.70 and 2.05, 1.82) under treatment pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha
-1 + one hand weeding at 30 DAS. The highest population of grassy, broadleaved and sedge weeds were observed under wider planting geometry 40 × 10 cm
2 under weed check at all the stages of observation.
The data on the effect of planting geometry and weed management on total weed population recorded at 20 and 60 DAS revealed that there was significant difference between the treatments and the lowest weed population (10.09, 13.78 m
-2) were recorded under 20 × 10 cm
2 and it was found to be statistically at par with 30 × 10 cm
2. Low weed population could be due to high plant density which developed smothering effect on the growth of weeds. The highest weed population was observed under wider planting geometry 40 × 10 cm
2. Reduced weed population under narrow spacing might be due to quicker canopy closure of the crops which caused reduction in germination and growth of weed seeds. Increasing the crop density seems to be an alternative way to reduce the crop-weed competition in favour of the crop. Weed density increased significantly with increasing row spacing
(Daramola et al., 2019). Similarly, the weed management treatments had significant effect on total weed population at 20 and 60 DAS. Data showed that lowest weed population (6.85, 10.79) was observed under the treatment pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i. ha
-1 + one hand weeding at 30 DAS.
Kumar et al., (2006) reported that in the middle of various weed control treatments in blackgram, maximum reduction in weed population and dry matter accumulation of weeds was obtained with pendimethalin (750 g ha
-1) at 3 DAS and hand weeding at 30 DAS though hand weeding twice was also found equally effective. Usage of chemical weed control method accompanied with cultural method suppressed the weeds timely, which caused favourable weed free condition during the critical crop-weed competition period (
Raju, 2019).
Dry weight of weeds
Planting geometry and weed management treatments had significant effect on the dry weight of weeds at 20 and 60 DAS (Table 2). The dry weight of grassy weeds as well as broadleaved weeds and sedges were recorded lowest under 20 × 10 cm
2 planting geometry at 20 and 60 DAS (1.06, 2.63 g m
-2; 1.16, 3.62 g m
-2 and 1.06, 1.06 g m
-2), respectively and was found to be statistically at par with 30 × 10 cm
2. Similarly, at 20 and 60 DAS, the treatment pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha
-1 + one hand weeding at 30 DAS recorded the lowest dry weight of grassy weeds (0.82, 1.93), broadleaved weeds (0.94, 3.07) and sedges (0.81 and 0.81) which was superior to the other weed management treatments. Weeds dry weight was found to be highest under weedy check and at planting geometry of 40 × 10 cm
2.
The data on the effect of planting geometry and weed management on total weed dry weight recorded at 20 and 60 DAS revealed that there was significant difference between the treatments and the lowest weed dry weight (1.57, 4.50) were recorded under 20 × 10 cm
2 (Table 2). Low weed dry weight could be due to high plant population which developed smothering effect on the growth of weeds.
Daramola et al., (2019) reported that the weed biomass reduced significantly with a reduction in row spacing. Similarly, the weed management treatments had significant effect on total dry weight of weeds at 20 and 60 DAS. Treatment pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha
-1 + one hand weeding at 30 DAS recorded the lowest weed dry weight (1.09, 3.58) as compared to the other treatments at 20 and 60 DAS. The highest values on total weed dry weight were observed under weedy check at all the stages of observation.
Raju (2019) also stated that the integrated application of chemical and cultural method has been witnessed as more effective than their sole application in reducing the weed biomass.
Weed control efficiency
The data on weed control efficiency recorded at 20, 40 and 60 DAS revealed that there was significant difference between the treatments and presented in Table 3. It was revealed that the highest weed control efficiency (56.8%, 46.6%, 46.1%) at 20, 40 and 60 DAS, respectively were recorded at 20 × 10 cm
2 spacing and it was found to be statistically at par with 30 × 10 cm
2. The lowest values of weed control efficiency were recorded under wider planting geometry 40 × 10 cm
2 at all the stages of observation. At 20, 40 and 60 DAS, the weed control efficiency was significantly highest (90.76%, 73.59 % and 71.58%) under treatment pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha
-1 + one hand weeding at 30 DAS and it was at par with two hand weedings at 20 DAS and 40 DAS. The lowest values on weed control efficiency were under weedy check at all the stages of observation.
Tomar and Singh (2016) noted that all types of weed flora were effectively managed by application of pendimethalin followed by hand weeding and was found at par with two hand weedings.
Seed and stover yield and harvest index
From the observations recorded at harvest, it is revealed that planting geometry and weed management treatments significantly affected the seed and stover yield of blackgram (Table 4). The crop under planting geometry 30 × 10 cm
2 recorded the highest seed yield (663 kg ha
-1) and stover yield (2007.7 kg ha
-1) and it was observed to be statistically at par with 20 × 10 cm
2 with 654.60 kg ha
-1 seed yield and 1958.16 kg ha
-1stover yield. Higher grain yield in food legumes under narrow spacing could be due to increased number of plant population that compensated for the decrease of yield components (
Shamsi, 2010). Increase in stover yield of blackgram was observed by at closer spacing might be due to more plant population per unit area which contributed to more crop biomass and hence higher stover yield (Bhatt, 2020). Weed management treatments had significant effect on seed and stover yield. Highest seed yield (739 kg ha
-1) and stover yield (2068.2 kg ha
-1) were observed under treatment pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha
-1 + one hand weeding at 30 DAS and were found at par with two hand weedings at 20 DAS and 40 DAS. Application of pre-emergence herbicide supplemented with hand weeding produced maximum economic and biological yield which was on a par with hand weeding twice. Similar findings of superiority of hand weeding and integrated treatments were also noted by
Patel et al., (2017).
The data revealed that planting geometry and weed management treatments had significant effect on harvest index (Table 4). Spacings of 30 × 10 cm
2 and 20 × 10 cm
2 were at par with each other and recorded the highest harvest index as compared to 40 × 10 cm
2. Among weed management treatments, highest harvest index was observed under treatment pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha
-1 + one hand weeding at 30 DAS and found at par with the treatment two hand weeding’s at 20 DAS and 40 DAS.
Economics
The major consideration for the farmers while taking decision regarding the adoption of any cultivation practices is economics as ultimately it decides the acceptance or rejection of any recommended agri-techniques by farmers. The treatment combination of 20 × 10 cm
2 and two hand weeding’s at 20 DAS and 40 DAS recorded the highest cost of cultivation (Table 5). This was due to higher seed cost and labour cost in performing the operations under narrow spacing and hand weeding. The treatment combination of weedy check and 40 × 10 cm
2 planting geometry recorded the lowest cost of cultivation. The highest gross returns and net returns were recorded in treatment combination 30 × 10 cm
2 and pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha
-1 + one hand weeding at 30 DAS while the lowest gross returns and net returns were recorded under weedy check at 40 × 10 cm
2.
Velayudham (2007) also reported significantly higher net returns in weed management practice involving pre-emergence application of pendimethalin with cultural practices. The highest benefit-cost ratio was observed under treatment combination 30 × 10 cm
2 and pendimethalin @ 1 kg a.i ha
-1 + one hand weeding at 30 DAS. In blackgram, pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha
-1 fb hand weeding at 30 DAS resulted in higher gross monetary return, net monetary return and B: C ratio
(Kavad et al., 2016).