Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Production and Productivity of Oat (Avena sativa L.) Cultivars as Fodder Crop on Hilly Terraces of Nagaland under Rainfed Condition

T. Gohain1,*, Y. Lenmem1, Lanunola Tzudir1
1Department of Agronomy, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Campus-Medziphema, Nagaland-797106, India.
Background: Agricultural background of rural India, maintaining cattle is very important, but due to the lack of pasture land and fodder production, it is tough to maintain the cattle with the farmers. However, producing fodder crops throughout the year makes it possible to maintain cattle. During the rainy season, different grasses are available, but during the rabi season dry period, fodder becomes scares, so growing fodder oats will compensate during the lean period.

Methods: A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2019 and 2020 at the experimental research farm, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, Medziphema. The experiment consisted of six varieties of oat, namely, V1-OS-346, V2-OS-403, V3-WJ-8, V4-OS-6, V5-OS-7 and V6-OS-377, which were laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with four replications to find out the best suitable variety under rainfed condition of Nagaland.

Result: The study revealed that all the oat varieties grew well under Nagaland conditions. The variety OS-403 recorded the highest plant height (72.69 cm) and was at par with variety WJ-8 (72.43 cm). Among the varieties, green fodder yield and dry matter yield were significant. The variety OS-403 recorded the highest green fodder yield (148 q/ha), followed by WJ-8 (143.11 q/ha). Similar is the trend for dry matter yield. The variety OS-403 recorded the highest dry matter yield (27.97q/ha), at par with variety WJ-8 (27.22 q/ha). Crude protein content (%) and crude protein yield (q/ha) were non-significant among the different oat varieties.
Cereal crops are well known for having higher green biomass productivity. Among the different cereals, oats produce the greenest fodder per square foot per hour with the least amount of irrigation (Ahmad et al., 2013). Oats (Avena sativa L.) is a significant cereal crop grown in temperate and subtropical regions worldwide during winter. Cereal production comes in behind sorghum, wheat, maize, rice, barley, and maize (Hoffman, 2009), with 9.23% fat, 3.56% protein, 30.44% fiber, 0.82% calcium and 0.27% phosphorus all included in oats. In India, oats are a unique fodder crop planted in rabi because of their increased dry matter content, 7-10% protein content, disease tolerance, and suitability for silage production (Ahmad et al., 2014). Oats are grown for their grains, forage, fodder, straw for bedding, hay, haylage, silage and chaff.
       
India’s livestock sector experiences challenges such as low productivity, high cost of commercial feed, low green fodder production, insufficient availability of dry fodder, and low level of technology. In India, cultivated fodder is limited to 4.9% of the total cropped area (Kumar et al., 1992). The introduction of varieties that have the potential to produce higher seed yields can be used to attract farmers for seed production of forage crops, particularly oats. Increased nutritional demand for optimal animal performance has challenged producers to select superior oat varieties and combine good management practices to produce crops with high yields and favorable quality characteristics (Kim et al., 2006).
               
The northeastern region is mainly agricultural and agrarian in nature. Agriculture is the main livelihood in Nagaland, with livestock raising coming in second. According to reports, the state’s cattle population is far larger than the fodder needed and production is insufficient to meet population needs. In Nagaland, oat is a significant rabi fodder crop, but current production is not keeping up with demand. Consequently, bridging the gap between fodder production and demand is difficult (Ahmad et al., 2016). To close the supply-demand gap for green fodder, forage oat types with a higher yield, better quality and tolerance to abiotic stress are urgently needed (Ahmad et al., 2015), which would lead to an increase by 2-3 folds (Kumar, 2014 a, b; Kumar (2013); Kumar (2012). In light of this, the current study assessed the productivity and quality of various oat cultivars for use as fodder in the hilly terraces of Nagaland.
The field experiment was carried out in the experimental farm of the School of Agricultural Sciences (SAS) Nagaland University, Campus-Medziphema, during the rabi season of 2019 and 2020. The farm is situated at the foothill of Nagaland at 310 meters above the mean sea level with a geographical location of 25°45'43" North latitude and 95°53' 04" East longitude.
               
The average temperature during summer varies from 21-32°C, while during winter it varies from 8-20°C. The average rainfall varies from 2000-2500 mm starting from April, whereas in November-March, it is dry. The experimental plot’s soil was acidic, well-drained and sandy loam in texture. The experiment was carried out with the following oat varieties, V1-OS-346, V2-OS-403, V3-WJ-8, V4-OS-6, V5-OS-7, V6-OS-377, replicated four times. The cultivation practices were the same for all the treatments. Observation to be recorded on 6 cultivars viz., growth, and yield quality and soil parameters. The growth, yield and quality attributes are plant height (cm), green fodder yield (q/ha), dry matter yield (q/ha), crude protein yield (q/ha) and crude protein content (%) and statistical analysis. Determination of the nutrient status of the soil before sowing and after crop harvesting was observed and recorded from all 18 plots.
The results of various parameters were discussed in this chapter. The data noted for progressive growth of oat, yield, and quality parameters are presented in Table 1.
 

Table 1: Growth and yield of different oat cultivars under Nagaland conditions.


 
Growth parameter
 
Among the different varieties, the highest plant height was recorded in the variety WJ-8 with 71.86 cm at harvest, which is at par with OS-346 with 71.19 cm. And the lowest was recorded in the variety OS-346 with 56.74 cm. Differences in plant height among the varieties were expected due to the genetic makeup of the varieties and environmental influences. However, the plant heights among the cultivars were found to be non-significant. The effect of variety on plant height in the present study agreed with previous findings (Chohan et al., 2004; Hussain et al., 2005; Palsaniya et al., 2015). Similar patterns of growth in oat have also been reported by Kumar et al., (1992); Lupingan et al., (1999), Naeem et al., (2002) and Ahmad et al., (2008).
 
Yield parameter
 
The highest green fodder yield (GFY) was recorded in the variety OS-403 with 142.50q/ha, followed by the variety WJ-8 with 138.17q/ha and the lowest was recorded in the variety OS-346 with and 85.50q/ha. And for dry matter yield (DMY) the highest was also recorded in the variety OS-403 with 26.89 q/ha which is at par with WJ-8 (26.16 q/ha) and OS-6 (24.48 q/ha). Green as well as dry fodder yield of oat varieties were influenced significantly with their different genetic constituents. The improvement in the fodder yield could be attributed to improved growth parameters viz., plant height and tiller number (Hussain et al., 2016). These results were also in conformity with the earlier findings of Choudhary et al., 2016; Dar et al., 2014; and Palsaniya et al., 2015. These results were also in close conformity with the findings of Lu pingan et al., (1999); Naeem et al., (2002) and Singh and Singh (1992).
 
Quality parameter
 
Crude protein content (%) and crude protein yield (q/ha) were also recorded the highest in the variety WJ-8 with 9.96% crude protein content which was at par with OS-346 (9.26%) and OS-377 (9.07%) and 2.49 q/ha crude protein yield which was at par with the variety OS-403 (2.45). Whereas the lowest was recorded in the variety OS-7 with 7.43% crude protein content and the lowest crude protein yield was recorded in the variety OS-346 with 1.49 q/ha. The variation in fodder quality might be due to the different genetic constitutions of different varieties (Ahmad et al., 2015). Moreover, the results also agreed with the earlier findings of Choudhary et al., (2016); Dar et al., (2014) and Palsaniya et al., (2015).
 
Soil parameters
 
Soil parameters such as pH, OC and available N, P, K before and after sowing were analyzed and presented in Table 2. Results showed no significant differences in different soil parameters except available P. These results were statistically similar to the findings of Waheed et al., (2012) and Mohr et al., (2007).
 

Table 2: Soil pH, Org. C (%), available N, P and K (kg/ha).

Oats varieties are coming up with good green fodder yield in the hilly terraces of Nagaland. Among the six different oat varieties, OS-403 was found to perform better under rainfed condition than the other varieties, giving the highest green fodder yield, followed by variety WJ -8 and OS-6, respectively. The trend for dry matter production also followed a similar trend as green fodder yield. In crude protein yield, except for one variety OS-346 all other varieties recorded more than 2 q/ha. There is a scope for increasing green fodder yield under irrigation facilities.
The authors are sincerely grateful to Director, ICAR-IGFRI, Jhansi (UP), for providing financial support under AICRP voluntary trial for conducting the field investigation on oat. We also thank Dean, SAS, Nagaland University, Medziphema campus, for providing field facilities and necessary assistance throughout this study.
None.

  1. Ahmad, G., Ansar, M., Kaleem, S., Nabi. G. and Hussain, M. (2008). Performance of early maturing oat (Avena sativa) cultivars for yield and quality. J. Agric. Res. 46: 341-346.

  2. Ahmad, M., Zaffar, G., Mehraj, U., Jehangir, I.A. and Lone, A.A. (2015). Stability analysis for forge quality traits in oats (Avena sativa L.) over environments. International Journal of Science and Nature. 6: 590- 595.

  3. Ahmad, M., Zaffar, G., Dar, Z.A. and Habib, M. (2014). A review on oat (Avena sativa L.) as a dual-purpose crop. Scientific Research and Essays. 6: 590-595

  4. Ahmad, S., Singh, J.P., Khan, P.A. and Ali, A. (2016). Pastoraliam for strengthening rangeland resources of Jammu and Kashmir. Annals of Agri Bio Research. 21: 49-54. 

  5. Chohan, M., Naeem, S.M., Khan, M., Kainth, A.H. and Sarwar, M. (2004). Forage yield performance of different varieties of oat. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 6: 751-752.

  6. Choudhary, M. and G. Prabhu. (2016). Response of fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) varieties to irrigation and fertilizer gradient. Range Management and Agroforestry. 37: 201-206.

  7. Dar, N.A., Singh, K.N., Ahmad, L., Sofi, J.A., Bhat, M.E. and Kotru, R. (2014). Influence of dates of sowing, cultivars and different fertility levels on fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) under temperate conditions of Kashmir valley (India). Range Management and Agroforestry. 35: 51-55

  8. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1976). Statistical procedure for Agricultural Research.

  9. Hoffman, L.A. (2009). World production and uses of oats. Chapman and Hall, London. 5: 34-61.

  10. Hussain, A., Khan, S., Bashir, M. and Hassan, Z. (2005). Influence of environment on yield-related traits of exotic oats cultivars. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 21: 209-213.

  11. Hussain, M., Khan, A.S., Bakhsh, A., Imran, M. and Ansar, M. (2016). Variability in fodder production potential of exotic oats (Avena sativa) genotypes under irrigated conditions. Journal of Agriculture Research. 48: 65-71.

  12. Kim, J.D., Kim, S.G., Abuel, S.J., Kwon, C.H., Shin, C.N., Ko, K.H. and Park, B.G. (2006). Effect of location, season and variety on yield and quality of forage oat. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19(7): 970-977.

  13. Kumar, A., Rajpali, S.K. and Handa, D.P. (1992). Estimation of forage yield in oats (Avena sativa L.) by sampling methods. Crop. Research. (Hisar). 5: 370375.

  14. Kumar, R. (2012). Crop technology demonstration: An effective communication approach for dissemination of sustainable Green Gram production technology. Crop Improvement. 39: 1583-1584. 

  15. Kumar, R. (2013). Evaluation of Crop technology demonstration of the mustard crop in Transitional plain of Inland Drainage Zone of Rajasthan. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences. 9: 657-660.

  16. Kumar, R. (2014b). Crop Technology Demonstration: An Effective Communication Approach for Dissemination of Wheat Production Technology. Agricultural Science Digest-A Research Journal. 34(2): 131134. 

  17. Kumar, R. (2014a). Assessment of Technology Gap and Productivity Gain through Crop.

  18. Lu Pingan, G.S., Wang, W., Qingfeng, L. and Jianping, Y. (1999). An investigation of the high-yielding characteristics of oat Yumai No. 49. J. Henan Agric. Sci. 8: 8-9.

  19. Mohr, R., Grant, C., May, W., Stevenson, F. (2007). The influence of nitrogen, phosphorus and potash fertilizer application on oat yield and quality. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 87(4): 459-468.

  20. Naeem, M., Khan, M.A., Chohan, M.S.M., Khan, A.H. and Salah- ud-Din, S. (2002). Evaluation of different varieties of oats for green fodder yield potential. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 1: 640-641.

  21. Palsaniya, D.R., Kiran Kumar, T., Prabhu, G., Dixit, A.K., Rai, A.K. and Kumar, S. (2015). Weed dynamics in fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes. Range Management and Agroforestry. 36: 107-108.

  22. Singh, K.A. and Singh, L.N. (1992). Performance of oat varieties at mid hills of Sikkim. Indian J. Hill Farming. 5: 133-134.

  23. Waheed, A., Ahmad, W., Shehzad, M.A., Shahid, M. (2012). Nitrogen and phosphorus: impact on forage oat (Avena sativa L.) growth, yield and its quality attributes. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 49(4): 473-479.

Editorial Board

View all (0)