Yield attributing characters and yield
Significant results were observed for grain yield, stover yield, number of clusters plant
-1 and pods plant
-1, pod length and number of seeds pod
-1 among the various parameters with the application of organic and liquid manures (Table 1 and 2).
At Site-I, among manures the application of EFYM (11.8 and 17.0) showed significantly increased clusters plant
-1 whereas, in site-II VC (10.6 and 15.8) gave higher clusters number during trial-I and II, respectively. Spraying of Panchagavya recorded significantly higher number of clusters plant
-1 for site-I (11.4 and 16.4) and at site-II (10.4 and 15.4) during trial-I and II, respectively. The number of pods plant
-1 at site-I showed significantly higher number along with the application of EFYM (18.0 and 24.4) and at site-II with the application of VC (15.6 and 21.6) during trial-I and II, respectively. Panchagavya spray at site-I (17.5 and 23.8) and at site-II (15.3 and 21.3) recorded significantly greater number of pods during trial-I and II, respectively. The length of the pod at site-I was higher with the application of EFYM (4.66 and 4.73 cm) and at site-II the application of VC (4.35 and 4.58 cm) recorded higher length during trial-I and II respectively. Panchagavya spray showed higher pod length in both site-I (4.65 and 4.76 cm) and site-II (4.32 and 4.56 cm) during trial-I and II, respectively. Number of seeds pod
-1 at site-I was higher the application of EFYM (6.8 and 6.9) and at site-II application of VC (6.5 and 6.7) during trial-I and II respectively. Panchagavya spray showed higher seeds number in both site-I (6.8 and 6.8) and site-II (6.3 and 6.5) during trial-I and trial-II, respectively. Application of EFYM (2485 and 2569 kg ha
-1) at site-I and VC (2221 and 2460 kg ha
-1) at site-II recorded greater stover yield during trial-I and II, respectively. Among the foliar sprays, Panchagavya recorded higher stover yields for site-I (2422 and 2513 kg ha
-1) and site-II (2199 and 2394 ha
-1) during trial-I and II, respectively. The interaction effect for the higher yield attributes showed results of similar trend as that of the main and sub plot.
The manures application attributed for better vegetative growth and development in blackgram, as a result of balanced nutrition and better soil fertility status which together with the influence of foliar sprays might have created a better environment for the development of yield parameters in blackgram. Similar results have been reported by
Meena et al., (2021) and
Sangeetha et al., (2013). The enhanced yield parameters in the study might be attributed to spraying Panchagavya twice, which has various nutrients in balanced amount, along with the beneficial microorganisms, growth promoters and ability to boost flowering. These results are in line with
Kumawat et al., (2009) and Leo Daniel
Amalraj et al., (2013). The foliar spray of Panchagavya has improved the growth, physiological, yield attributes and yield especially when the foliar spray was given during the flowering stage
(Jha et al., 2015; Sutar et al., 2019 and
Ajaykumar et al., 2022).
Application of EFYM (760 and 799 kg ha-
1) and Panchagavya spray (744 and 778 kg ha
-1) showed significantly higher grain yield during both trial-I and II respectively in Experimental site-I. The Experimental site- II recorded significant grain yield with the application of vermicompost (715 and 760 kg ha
-1) and Panchagavya spray (699 and 742 kg ha
-1) during both the trial-I and II. Significantly higher yield among the main plots was recorded by EFYM followed by VC and EVC in site-I where FYM recorded the lowest yield. Application of VC was followed by EFYM and EVC showed higher yield where FYM recorded lowest in site-II. Panchagavya was followed by FFE in site-I and FEM in site-II respectively, showed superior yield where, FEE and Jeevamruth recorded the lowest yield being statistically at par for both the sites.
With the application of enriched FYM, the nutrient availability might have improved as a result of beneficial effects of biofertlizers and rock phosphate in site-I. Improvement in the soil properties, plant growth and root parameters might have led to yield enhancement which might be a result of better soil biological condition brought on by vermicompost application in site-II. These results were in accordance with
Suresh, 2005 and
Parthasarathi et al., (2008). The yield increase with Panchagavya foliar spray might have been due to the contribution from enhanced absorption of the nutrients and influence of plant growth regulators. This result is in line with
Choudhary et al., (2017). In the study, the initial supply of nutrition by manures incorporation followed by foliar spray of the liquid manures twice ensured the balanced nutrient supply throughout the growth period.
The test weight and harvest index showed non significant difference in both the locations during trial-I and II (Table 3).
Economics
The economics was given as net returns (₹ ha
-1) and Benefit cost ratio. The economics showed higher net returns with the application of EFYM at site-I (31377and 37063₹ ha
-1) and at site-II (24124 and 30768 ₹ ha
-1) during trial-I and II, respectively. Among the foliar sprays the net returns were greater with the Panchagavya spray at site-I (16971 and 21985 ₹ ha
-1) and at site-II (17743 and 23742 ₹ ha
-1) during trial-I and II, respectively. The BCR was maximum with the incorporation of EFYM at site-I (1.5 and 1.6) and at site-II (1.5 and 1.6) during trial-I and II, respectively. Higher BCR was obtained by spraying Panchagavya at site-I (1.3 and 1.4) and at site-II (1.3 and 1.4), during trial-I and II, respectively. Reduced quantity of manure applied along with higher yields might have led to the increased returns. These results are in line with
Masu et al., (2019) and
Somasundaram et al., (2020) (Table 4).