Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 44 issue 1 (february 2024) : 47-52

Bioactivation of Legacy Phosphorus in Calcareous Soil and its Impact on Maize Yield

K. Aswitha1,*, P. Malarvizhi1,*, T. Chitdeshwari1, A. Lakshmanan2, M.K. Kalarani3
1Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
2School of Post Graduate Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Crop Management, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
Cite article:- Aswitha K., Malarvizhi P., Chitdeshwari T., Lakshmanan A., Kalarani M.K. (2024). Bioactivation of Legacy Phosphorus in Calcareous Soil and its Impact on Maize Yield . Agricultural Science Digest. 44(1): 47-52. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5644.
Background: Over the years, the excessive P fertilizer application to crop fields resulted in the build up of insoluble phosphorus pool in soil known as legacy phosphorus. This represents a vast and largely untapped resource in soil. The current study was conducted to evaluate the potential of some P activators (Phosphorus solubilising bacteria, phytase, humic acid, farmyard manure) on increasing the plant availability of legacy P in calcareous soil.

Methods: A field experiment was conducted with maize hybrid COH(M) 6. The P activators were combined and applied along with the different doses of P fertilizer (100%, 75% and 50% soil test dose of single super phosphate). 

Result: Farmyard Manure (FYM) application with Humic acid (HA) showed the increased Olsen P under 100% and 75% of P application. The phosphorus activation response of FYM+HA applied plots showed a higher value than other treatments. The maize yield and P uptake obtained with FYM and HA were statistically comparable at 100% and 75% soil test dose of P. The findings have illustrated that even the reduced amount of P fertilizer application can support the crop growth due to the release of legacy P if they are applied along with P- activators such as FYM and HA.
Phosphorus (P) is a non-substitutable nutrient for crop growth. It is an essential primary macronutrient indispensable in several physiological and biochemical processes. It is the major limiting nutrient in many agroecosystems; therefore, P deficiency is a constraint for global crop production and is estimated to impact >40% of agricultural soils (Zheng, 2010). The mobility of phosphorus (P) in the shallow subsurface is a matter of critical importance and considerable complexity. Often it is applied as chemical fertilizer to the field to improve crop production. A significant fraction of applied fertilizer P is usually fixed as an insoluble fraction due to various soil reactions.

Phosphorus accumulation is most commonly evident in arid soil conditions due to the low P use efficiency associated with the low rate of solubility and availability. This mainly includes the calcareous soils, characterized by the abundance of Ca2+ ions, alkaline pH and presence of calcite (CaCO3). All these factors promote the higher Ca- associated P precipitation, thereby reducing the P use efficiency and inducing P deficiency (Dhillon et al., 2017). The interaction of P with calcite surfaces results in the initial adsorption and subsequent precipitation of meta-stable dicalcium phosphate (DCP, CaHPO4) and its hydrolytic conversion into octa calcium phosphate [OCP, Ca8(HPO4)2(OH)2] and more stable hydroxyl apatite [HAp, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2] (Von Wandruszka, 2006). To overcome this soil P precipitation/adsorption process and to maintain the optimal P concentration in soil solution, P fertilizers are dumped in excessive amounts exceeding the crop needs. Under such long-term P fertilizer application, P exceeding the rate of crop removal accumulates  in large quantities of “legacy P” in calcareous soil (Menezes-blackburn et al., 2018).

So far, the soil legacy P can be considered a substantial secondary P resource, which could prolong the P crisis (Owen et al., 2015). It has been suggested that this accumulated P in calcareous soil would be sufficient to sustain crop yields for 100 years if it were made available (Zhu et al., 2018). The environmental behavior of  P is also a function of its speciation, which is directly linked to P solubility, reactivity and bio-availability. For example, Fe- P is sensitive to reducing conditions, whereas Al-P and Ca-P precipitates are more likely to be sensitive to pH changes (Yan et al., 2017). Therefore, legacy P availability in calcareous soils is greatly affected by a series of pH-dependent abiotic reactions that influence the ratio of soluble-to-insoluble P pools in the soil (DeLuca et al., 2015).

Unfortunately, most legacy P in the soil will not be available for plants to take up easily. Hence the soil has to be manipulated to increase the availability of this P to crops. The manipulation can be done by various P activation mechanisms, including dissolution/precipitation, sorption/desorption and mineralisation/immobilisation. The P activators (P as) can be divided into three types viz., 1. Bio- inoculants and Bio-Fertilizers (microorganisms and enzymes), 2. Organic matter (Organic acids, manure), 3. Zeolite and other materials (Teng et al., 2020). In this paper, the performance of P-activators such as farmyard manure, humic acid, phytase and phosphorus solubilising bacteria in increasing the legacy P availability in a P deficient calcareous soil was explored via a field experiment with maize.
Study area and sampling
 
The study area is located in the black soil region of Perianaickenpalayam in the Coimbatore district (11°N and 76°E). The soil has received the long-term regular application of P fertilizers and was expected to have high levels of legacy P. The soil samples collected at a depth of 0- 20 cm were air-dried, ground and passed through a 2mm sieve before further analysis and their initial characteristics were; pH - 8.20, Organic carbon- 5.5 g kg-1, Free CaCO3 -14%, Total P- 0.42%, Olsen P- 8.1 kg ha-1.
 
Field experiment
 
A field experiment was conducted with maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid CO(H)M 6 as a test crop in a randomised block design (RBD) with three replications. The treatment details are given in Table 1. The soil samples were collected on the critical stages of crop viz., Knee-high stage (30th day), Tasseling stage (60th day), Milky stage (90th day) and Harvest stage (105th stage) and subjected to laboratory analysis of Olsen P (Olsen et al., 1954). At the harvest stage of maize, grain and stover yield were recorded and P uptake was calculated.

Table 1: Treatment details.



In addition, to elucidate the effect of P activators on available P (AP), P activation response (PAR) (Teng et al., 2020) based on AP increase was calculated, where PAR is defined as:            
 
 PAR = (APT –AP0)/AP0
 
APT- Available P concentration in P activator treated soil.
AP0- Available P concentration in control.
 
Statistical analysis
 
Each treatment in this study was applied in a randomised design. Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) was employed for statistical analysis. The data recorded were analysed statistically by analysis of variance techniques appropriate for randomised block design (RBD) as suggested by Gomez and Gomez (1984). Means were compared and grouped by the least significant difference test (p<0.05).
Effect of P-activators on Olsen P
 
Soil phosphorus at different critical stages of the crop showed a significant difference among the treatments, as shown in Fig 1. The available phosphorus status of soil showed a decreasing trend along the crop growth stages due to the uptake of P by the crop. Among the different P-activator combinations, the farmyard manure and humic acid application showed the higher available phosphorus in all the stages. The treatment T3 (FYM+HA with 100% soil test dose of P) showed higher mean soil available P (18.54 kg ha-1), but it was statistically comparable with T6 (FYM+HA with 75% soil test dose of P). The treatment T3 and T6 recorded a 50.48% and 49.58% increase in soil available P over the control. Kaleeswari et al., (2007) reported that the decomposition of organic manure releases organic acid, which decreases adsorption and fixation. The organic acid is also involved in the complexing of Calcium, resulting in increased P release from the calcium phosphate fraction. The increased solubilisation of organic acids is due to the drop in soil pH, soil cations chelating and competition with phosphate for adsorption sites in the soil solution (Singh et al., 2022). The addition of humic acid to alkaline soil significantly increased the water-soluble phosphate and strongly retarded the formation of occluded phosphate by creating the competition between the humic acid and phosphorus for soil sorption sites (Yang et al., 2019).

Fig 1: Effect of P-activators on available phosphorus (kg ha-1).


 
Effect of P-activators on P-activation response
 
P-activation response (PAR) is an important indicator of soil P availability and the transformation of P-fractions. P- Activation Response of different P activators was calculated from the available P content of treated and control soil. The mean PAR of different treatments is given in Fig 2. The application of  farmyard manure and humic acid with a 100% soil test dose of P (T3) showed a higher PAR (1.04), which was statistically comparable with T6 ( FYM+HA with 75% soil test dose of P) (1.01).Yang et al. (2018) reported a higher PAR on the addition of organic acids in soil. The activating capability of Pi increased by the addition of organic acids in soil due to the acidification effect of the protons on the fixed P pools. The activation response varies for each P- activator based on its activation mechanism, soil properties, type and amount used. The higher P- activation response indicates that more P is available for plant growth. PAR represents the degree of difficulty with which the transformation between the different P fractions and available P occurs (Yang et al., 2019). Sun et al., (2018) reported a higher PAR in the fertilizer applied treatments. The Olsen P and P-activation responses are positively related to the P- balance. The PAC depends on the P geochemical fraction and the PAC was correlated with most Pi fractions. Among the different inorganic pools, the labile pool can easily be activated and transformed into a biologically available P pool (Wu et al., 2017).

Fig 2: Effect of P-activators on phosphorus activation response.


 
Effect of P-activators on maize yield and P uptake
 
The grain and stover yield of maize were recorded at the harvest stage and are given in Table 2. Their P uptake was calculated and depicted in Fig 3. The application of farmyard manure and humic acid with a 100% soil test dose of P (T3) showed a higher grain yield (6613 kg ha-1) with P uptake of  9.98 kg ha-1 and stover yield (9814 kg ha-1) with P uptake of 14.67 kg ha-1, which was statistically comparable with T6 (FYM+HA with 75% soil test dose of P). Similar results were observed by Sikka et al., (2018). The FYM application with a full and reduced dose of P fertilizer showed a similar yield, biomass production and P uptake. Under the conditions of reduced soil fertility, the combined application of P fertilizer and FYM are most effective because the supply of nutrients from both sources is additive. Shafi et al., (2020) reported a higher grain, straw yield of wheat and maximum harvest index of 43% in FYM, humic acid and fertilizer amended plots. The results revealed that the application of P with HA decreases the P-fixation and increases the water-soluble P availability to plants by making its soluble complexes and its uptake improves the storage of photosynthates in the plants. The addition of humic acid and FYM have direct as well as indirect effects on crop growth and yield, as they play an essential role in supplying and cycling nutrients in the soil and releasing the insoluble pool by its solubilising effect under the P-deficit conditions (Hussain et al., 2021; Kumawat et al., 2021). The FYM and humic acid, besides releasing their own nutrient, increases the nutrient use efficiency of applied inorganic fertilizers as well as solubilises the fixed pool of nutrients in the soil, thereby promoting the crop growth and yield (Venketesh et al., 2019). 

Table 2: Effect of P-activators on maize yield (kg ha-1).



Fig 3: Effect of P-activators on P uptake.

The study was undertaken to know the potential of different P- activators (FYM, HA, Phytase and PSB) on solubilising legacy P. The field experiment conducted with maize showed that the FYM and HA were the best P-activator combination for calcareous soil. The results of soil samples analysed for Olsen P suggested that the FYM and HA could perform better at 100% and 75% soil test dose of P fertilizer in all critical stages of the crop. The yield and uptake of maize crop at the harvest stage were also statistically comparable among T3 (FYM and HA with 100% soil test dose of P) and T6 (FYM and HA with 75% soil test dose of P). This shows that the P-activators have solubilised a portion of legacy P and increased its availability in soil for crop growth. The study concludes that FYM and humic acid with 75% soil test dose of P can be the efficient P management strategy for calcareous soils to reduce the P overload in soil and to promote the good soil health for sustainable agriculture.
I would like to thank my chairperson and members of my advisory committee for their valuable suggestions during my research work. Also I wish to thank the Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore,Tamil Nadu, India.
Nil
The authors declare that there is no competing interests.

  1. DeLuca, T.H., Glanville, H.C., Harris, M., Emmett, B.A., Pingree, M.R., de Sosa, L.L. and Jones, D.L. (2015). A novel biologically-based approach to evaluating soil phosphorus availability across complex landscapes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 88: 110-119.

  2. Dhillon, J., Torres, G., Driver, E., Figueiredo, B. and Raun, W.R. (2017). World phosphorus use efficiency in cereal crops. Agronomy Journal. 109(4): 1670-1677.

  3. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons.

  4. Hussain, S., Sharif, M. and Ahmad, W. (2021). Selection of efficient phosphorus solubilizing bacteria strains and mycorrhizea for enhanced cereal growth, root microbe status and N and P uptake in alkaline calcareous soil. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 67(3): 259-268.

  5. Izhar Shafi, M., Adnan, M., Fahad, S., Wahid, F., Khan, A., Yue, Z. and Datta, R. (2020). Application of single superphosphate with humic acid improves the growth, yield and phosphorus uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in calcareous soil. Agronomy. 10(9): 1224.

  6. Kaleeswari, R.K.S., Meena, M.R., Latha, P., Sarvanapandian, L.N. and Indriani, R. (2007). Impact of organics and P solubilizing microorganisms on phosphatic fertilizers under wetland ecosystem. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 3: 577-580.

  7. Kumawat, N., Tiwari, S.C., Bangar, K.S., Khandkar, U.R., Ashok, A.K. and Yadav, R.K. (2021). Influence of different sources of plant nutrients on soil fertility, nutrient uptake and productivity of soybean under Vertisols. Legume Research -An International Journal. 44(5): 556-561.

  8. Menezes-Blackburn, D., Giles, C., Darch, T., George, T.S.,  Blackwell, M., Stutter, M. and Haygarth, P. M. (2018). Opportunities for mobilizing recalcitrant phosphorus from agricultural soils: A review. Plant and Soil. 427(1): 5-16.

  9. Olsen, S.R. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate (No. 939). US  Department  of Agriculture.

  10. Owen, D., Williams, A.P., Griffith, G.W. and Withers, P.J.A. (2015). Use of commercial bio-inoculants to increase agricultural production through improved phosphrous acquisition. Applied Soil Ecology. 86: 41-54.

  11. Sikka, R., Singh, D., Deol, J.S. and Kumar, N. (2018). Effect of integrated nutrient and agronomic management on growth, productivity, nutrient uptake and soil residual fertility status of soybean. Agricultural Science Digest. 38(2): 103-107. doi: 10.18805/ag.LR-3994.

  12. Singh, J., Bhatt, R., Dhillon, B.S., Al-Huqail, A.A., Alfagham, A., Siddiqui, M.H. and Kumar, R. (2022). Integrated use of phosphorus, farmyard manure and biofertilizer improves the yield and phosphorus uptake of black gram in silt loam soil. Plos one. 17(4): e0266753.

  13. Sun, K., Qiu, M., Han, L., Jin, J., Wang, Z., Pan, Z. and Xing, B. (2018). Speciation of phosphorus in plant-and manure- derived biochars and its dissolution under various aqueous conditions. Science of the Total Environment. 634: 1300-1307.

  14. Teng, Z., Zhu, J., Shao, W., Zhang, K., Li, M. and Whelan, M.J. (2020). Increasing plant availability of legacy phosphorus in calcareous soils using some phosphorus activators. Journal of Environmental Management. 256: 109-952.

  15. Venkatesh, M.S., Hazra, K.K., Ghosh, P.K. and Mishra, J.P. (2019). Integrated phosphorus management in maize-chickpea rotation in moderately-alkaline Inceptisol in Kanpur, India: An agronomic and economic evaluation. Field Crops Research. 233: 21-32.

  16. Von Wandruszka, R. (2006). Phosphorus retention in calcareous soils and the effect of organic matter on its mobility. Geochemical Transactions. 7(1): 1-8.

  17. Wu, Q., Zhang, S., Zhu, P., Huang, S., Wang, B., Zhao, L. and Xu, M. (2017). Characterizing differences in the phosphorus activation coefficient of three typical cropland soils and the influencing factors under long-term fertilization. PLoS One. 12(5): e0176437.

  18. Yan, X., Wei, Z., Hong, Q., Lu, Z. and Wu, J. (2017). Phosphorus fractions and sorption characteristics in a subtropical paddy soil as influenced by fertilizer sources. Geoderma. 295: 80-85.

  19. Yang, X., Chen, X. and Yang, X. (2018). Effect of organic matter on phosphorus adsorption and desorption in a black soil from Northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research. 187: 85-91.

  20. Yang, X., Chen, X., Guo, E. and Yang, X. (2019). Path analysis of phosphorus activation capacity as induced by low molecular- weight organic acids in a black soil of Northeast China. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 19(2): 840-847.

  21. Zheng, S.J. (2010). Crop production on acidic soils: overcoming aluminium toxicity and phosphorus deficiency. Annals of Botany. 106(1): 183-184.

  22. Zhu, J., Li, M. and Whelan, M. (2018). Phosphorus activators contribute to legacy phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: A review. Science of the Total Environment. 612: 522-537.

Editorial Board

View all (0)