Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 43 issue 4 (august 2023) : 521-523

New Group of Fungicides as the Potential Source of Management of Leaf Spot and Flower Blight of Marigold

Rakesh Roshan Satapathy1,*, Kartik Chandra Sahoo1
1Department of Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (deemed to be) University, Bhubaneswar-751 030, Odisha, India.
Cite article:- Satapathy Roshan Rakesh, Sahoo Chandra Kartik (2023). New Group of Fungicides as the Potential Source of Management of Leaf Spot and Flower Blight of Marigold . Agricultural Science Digest. 43(4): 521-523. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5614.
Background: Leaf spot and flower blight caused by Alternaria zinniae is serious disease of marigold causing yield loss of 50-60% in crop. Many previously used fungicides showed resistance against the pathogen. So the present investigation was carried out with an objective to study the efficacy of new fungicides available in the market using poison food technique. 

Methods: Eleven fungicides such as azoxystrobin, tebuconazole, azoxystrobin + tebuconazole, difenoconazole, azoxystrobin + difenoconazole, tebuconazole + sulphur, wettable sulphur, mancozeb, metalaxly, chlorothalonil, chlorothalonil + metalaxly were evaluated at the concentration of 0.1%, 0.15% ,0.1%, 0.1%, 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.25%, 0.3%,0.2%, 0.3% and 0.3% respectively.

Result: The present investigation revealed that Azoxystrobin + Tebuconazole recorded maximum mycelial growth inhibition of 96.85% followed by Tebuconazole + Sulphur 96.40% and Metalaxyl of 95.50%. The least inhibition of 18.92% was recorded by wettable sulphur.
Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.), a member of the Tagetes genus in the Asteraceae family and sometimes known as genda phool, is native to Mexico and America. In India, there are fifty kinds of annual and perennial herbaceous plants. In India, marigolds are grown on 8000-10000 hectares of land with a production of 70,000 metric tonnes (Negi et al., 1998). Marigold flower has a longer blooming duration and a long shelf life. The flower spreads quickly and they are also recognised for being a fast-growing and annual flowering plant. The plant’s height ranges from 6 inches to 3 feet. It is mostly utilised for ornamental and medicinal purposes in India. It’s used to treat rheumatism, colds and bronchitis, among other ailments.

Each portion of the plant is prized for its therapeutic properties; the leaves, for example, are commonly used as an antibacterial, to treat kidney problems and to treat piles. The flower has a more ayurvedic composition, making it effective for fever, scabies and liver problems, as well as eye problems. In Mexico, the plant’s shoots are often used to make teas. The bioactive component found in the flower has insecticidal and fungicidal properties. The leaves and flowers both have therapeutic properties due to their phenolic and antioxidant activities and they are equally essential in the pharmaceutical business (Tripathy and Gupta 1991; Khalil et al., 2007). Marigold essential oil is highly sought after in the perfume industry (Naik et al., 2003). Dhenkanala, Koraput, Sambalapur, Sundergah and Balasore are the primary marigold growing districts in Odisha. Except during the hot summer months, productivity is higher.

The most common source of yield loss is diseases caused by fungus, virus and bacteria, as well as nematodes, which cause significant damage and result in yield loss. Fungal diseases that affect marigold plants include flower blight, wilt and stem rot, Alternaria leaf spot and Fusarium wilt. Alternaria zinniae causes the most serious disease, blossom blight and leafspot.

For the treatment of the disease, we continue to use traditional fungicides. As a result, resistance to certain fungicides has developed in plant diseases. As a result, plant disease management is getting increasingly challenging. The use of fungicides is more effective than the use of botanical or biological components. Many new fungicides are now available on the market which shows a great efficacy against other diseases. But these fungicides are not tested against this pathogen. In light of these facts, the Department of Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Siksha o Anusandhan (deemed to be) University Bhubaneswar, Odisha, conducted research on the evaluation of novel fungicides against plant diseases (India).
The experiment was carried out in the Department of Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Year 2021. Using the poisoned food technique, all of the fungicides were bought from the market and tested at specific concentrations. The list of fungicides was mentioned in Table 1. The required chemical concentrations were prepared and mixed into sterilised, cooled potato dextrose agar medium.

Table 1: Different fungicides with their concentration.



Twenty millilitres of media were put into 90 mm sterilised petri dishes and each plate was inoculated with a 5 mm test fungus mycelia disc that was actively growing. For each treatment, three replications were kept. These plates were incubated for seven days at 25±1°C, after which the colony diameter was measured. Vincent’s formula was used to calculate the per cent inhibition over control (1947).
 
 
I = Per cent inhibition of mycelium.
C = Growth of mycelium in control.
T = Growth of mycelium in treatment.
It had been found from Table 2 and Fig 1 that Azoxystrobin + Tebuconazole showed the highest inhibition of mycelial growth (96.85%), followed by Tebuconazole + Sulphur (96.40%) and Metalaxly (95.50%). Wettable sulphur had the least inhibition of 18.92 per cent.

Table 2: In vitro bio-assay of fungicides.



Fig 1: In vitro bio-assay of fungicides.



Alternaria zinniae causes leaf spot and blossom blight in marigolds, resulting in yield losses of 50-60% in the crop. Many previously used fungicides have been shown to be resistant to the disease. As a result, the current study was carried out with the goal of determining the efficacy of new fungicides available on the market using the poison food technique. Eleven fungicides, including azoxystrobin, tebuconazole, azoxystrobin + tebuconazole, difenoconazole, azoxystrobin + difenoconazole, tebuconazole + sulphur, wettable sulphur, mancozeb, metalaxly, chlorothalonil, chlorothalonil + metalaxly, were tested at Azoxystrobin + Tebuconazole showed the greatest inhibition of mycelial growth (96.85%), followed by Tebuconazole + Sulphur (96.40%) and Metalaxly (95.50%). Wettable sulphur had the lowest inhibition rate of 18.92 per cent. The previous research work showed that mancozeb was the effective fungicide against the disease as Sunita et al (2010) reported that Mancozeb showed maximum growth inhibition of the pathogen. Mancozeb (0.2%) and Carbendazim (0.05%) spray can be used to control the disease at regular intervals (Aktar and Shamsi, 2015). Similarly, Yadav et al (2013) were tested different concentration of systemic fungicides in in vitro condition and revealed that Hexaconazole was found most effective with highest inhibition of radial growth (98.21%) followed by Propiconazole (97.32%) and Difenoconazole (91.23%).
The in vitro study on the effect of fungicides on the radial growth of Alternaria zinniae revealed that azxysotrobin + tebuconazole (0.1%) recorded maximum inhibition (96.85%) followed by tebuconazole + sulphur (96.40%) followed by metalxyl (95.5%). Wettable sulphur recorded least inhibition (18.92%). These fungicides may be trailed under field condition to know more about its efficacy against the pathogen so that it can be recommended in the farmer field condition.
The Institute of Agricultural Sciences’ Professor and Head of the Department of Plant Pathology is to be thanked for providing the facilities required to carry out the research study. I would like to convey my deep gratitude to my favourite professors Dr. N.K. Dhal and Dr. Bhagyashree Khamari for their insightful advice and kind friendship. I am also very appreciative of my good friends’ assistance and never-ending support throughout my course studies. Above all, I pay to God the highest praise for being my life’s source of knowledge, courage and strength.
None

  1. Aktar, M. and Shamsi, S. (2015). Blight of two species of marigold (Tagetes) caused by Aspergillus fumigatus Fresenius. Bangladesh J. Plant Pathol. 31(1 and 2): 1-6.

  2. Chandel, S., Teixeira da Silva, J.A. and Sharma, C. (2010). Management  of Alternaria leaf spot and Neem Formulations. Floriculture  and Ornamental Biotechnology, Global Science Book. 4(1): 79-83.

  3. Khalil, M.Y., Moustafa, A.A., Naguib, N.Y. (2007). Growth, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of some medicinal plants grown under organic farming condition. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 3: 451-457.

  4. Naik, S.A., Vidyasagar, D., Mishra, D.K. (2003). Value addition in floriculture. Floriculture Today. 8(2): 7-12.

  5. Negi, J.P., Mitra, L., Dabas, H.K. (1988). Indian Horticulture Database, National Horticulture Database. National Horticulture Board. 490 pp.

  6. Negi, J.P., Mitra, L., Dabas, H.K. (1988). Indian Horticulture Database, National Horticulture Database. National Horticulture Board. 490 pp.

  7. Sunita, V., Shukla, H.P., Narain, U. (2010). Management of Alternaria  blight of marigold. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 11(1): 172-173.

  8. Tripathy, A.K., Gupta, K.K. (1991). Plant phenolics of Tagetes erecta. Fitoterpia. 62(1): 91-92.

  9. Yadav, P.M., Rakholiya, K.B., Pawar, D.M. (2013). Evolution of different systemic fungicides against Alternaria from in vitro. Trends in Bioscience. 6(4): 382-383.

Editorial Board

View all (0)